PD60 Public Consultations And Their Influence On Health Decisions

2018 ◽  
Vol 34 (S1) ◽  
pp. 151-152
Author(s):  
Tacila Mega ◽  
Roberta Rabelo ◽  
Aline Silva ◽  
Artur Felipe de Brito
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Scientific Information ◽  
Health Technology ◽  
Public Consultation ◽  
National Committee ◽  
Decision Making Process ◽  
The Public ◽  
Health Technologies ◽  
Public Consultations ◽  
Economic Studies

Introduction:Public consultation is one of the phases provided by the law that rules the health technology incorporation process in Brazilian Public Health System (SUS). In the Brazilian model, anyone can participate as long as he/she identifies her/himself. During the decision-making process these suggestions are analyzed by the National Committee for Health Technology Incorporation (CONITEC) and, sometimes, they are responsible for changing a preliminary recommendation for a technology. This study aims to identify the health technologies for which CONITEC revised the initial negative recommendations due to the contributions received during the public consultation.Methods:A descriptive study using as input data the information on coverage decisions available on the CONITEC website.Results:Since CONITEC's creation until October 2017, CONITEC enacted 241 public consultations. Fifteen cases of change to the preliminary negative recommendation were found and among these eight (53 percent) had the economic studies or proposed technology price reconsidered by the companies. In the other seven decisions, the Board also regarded as important the reasons for changing the initial recommendation: new evidence on efficacy and safety as well as the analysis of different outcomes previously unconsidered in the preliminary assessment.Conclusions:During the public consultations, besides technical-scientific information, personal experiences and opinion reports on each health technology analyzed, CONITEC received new price offers and economic studies from the applicants. This new material has allowed, in some cases, these technologies to become competitive and to be included as alternatives to those already available, provided there is no clinical impairment. This study reinforces the importance of the public consultation and social participation in the process of health technologies incorporation in Brazil, considering its capacity to add new information to the decision-making process.

PP152 Options To Approach Health Litigation In Brazil: A Policy Brief

2018 ◽  
Vol 34 (S1) ◽  
pp. 126-127
Author(s):  
Carla Biella ◽  
Fabiana Raynal ◽  
Viviane Pereira ◽  
Laura Boeira ◽  
Marcel Carvalho ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Systematic Reviews ◽  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
Health Technology ◽  
Educational Outreach ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Decision Making Process ◽  
Policy Network ◽  
The Public ◽  
Health Technologies

Introduction:In Brazil, health is a constitutional right and the government is responsible for its guarantee. The Brazilian health system is characterized by universality, equality, and integrality, but citizens still strive to guarantee their rights through litigation. This work aimed to develop an evidence brief to support the decision-making process of judges with respect to health technologies, based on scientific evidence.Methods:Support tools from the Evidence-Informed Policy Network (EVIPNet) were used to develop the evidence brief. After defining and describing the problem, a comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, Health Systems Evidence, The Campbell Library, The Cochrane Library, Rx for Change, and PDQ-Evidence for systematic reviews published from 2010 to 2016. Nine systematic reviews were found. Review selection and quality appraisal were conducted independently by two reviewers. Three strategies for addressing the health litigation were defined. Evidence was summarized on benefits, harms, resource use, cost-effectiveness, uncertainties, and implementation. Implementation barriers and facilitators were also described.Results:Three strategies were found: (i) Rapid response services to support evidence-informed decision making in health technology decisions—educational activities and materials were described as an effective way to involve different stakeholders and inform decision making, even when financial reallocation is needed; (ii) Continuing education programs focused on developing health technology assessment knowledge among law workers—continued education and educational outreach may be effective in knowledge and ability acquisition and retention, changing professional practices. Eventual lack of interest from or availability of the professionals can be addressed by involving leaders and opinion makers, as well as offering multimedia educational materials and activities adapted for the public; and (iii) Restorative justice conferencing (RJC) focused on the litigation of health technologies—the use of RJC through face-to-face meetings or social councils involves citizens in the decision-making process, including resource management. There are multiple barriers to this option (e.g. a lack of understanding among the public, conflicts of interest, a lack of professionals capable of conducting RJCs, and the need for legal reformulation) because of its unprecedented use in the healthcare setting. Opinion leaders should be invited to facilitate communication and the decision-making process among citizens, government, and the law.Conclusions:This evidence brief will be debated among interested parties and presented to the health minister and state secretaries in order to implement the strategy options, once regional specificities are taken into account.

OP316 Patients’ Testimonials In The National Committee For Health Technology Incorporation In Brazilian Public Health System (Conitec) Meetings

2021 ◽  
Vol 37 (S1) ◽  
pp. 12-13
Author(s):  
Clarice Portugal ◽  
Adriana Prates ◽  
Luiza Losco ◽  
Fabiana Floriano ◽  
Odete da Silva ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Technology Assessment ◽  
Patient Participation ◽  
Technology Assessment ◽  
Selection Process ◽  
Health Technology ◽  
Public Consultation ◽  
National Committee ◽  
The Public ◽  
Construction Of Knowledge ◽  
Main Representative

IntroductionThe Department of Management and Incorporation of Technologies and Innovation in Health (DGITIS) acts as Conitec's Executive Secretariat. Among its attributions, it promotes the public/patient involvement in the health technology assessment (HTA) process. Recently, Conitec has been working on the inclusion of patient's testimonials about their illness experience in the plenary sessions, that is, the monthly meeting where technologies are assessed.MethodsTo support the action of including patient reporting in Conitec's HTA process, DGITIS developed research on HTA agencies websites worldwide. The main criteria was the inclusion of patients’ reports in their Committee meetings. DGITIS contacted some of these agencies and requested a listserv question to the International Network of Agencies for Health Technology Assessment (INAHTA) members. These findings supported the DGITIS for the inclusion of patient participation in Conitec's meetings, from the selection process to the actual participation.ResultsFor the Conitec's HTA process, the patients’ participation should occur in the prior session to the public consultation, guaranteeing the inclusion of their perspective since the recommendation process beginning. Hence, every demand for incorporation to be discussed at Conitec's meeting should be preceded by a public call for patients with the clinical condition. The DGITIS will also hold preparatory meetings, which will serve as moments for shared construction of knowledge and literacy.ConclusionsThe nomination process, so far, has been grounded as a consensus among the patients. Thus, Conitec acts as a mediator, connecting the involved stakeholders, in a way that they can autonomously organize themselves and indicate the main representative and an alternate one. With the inclusion of the patient's perspective in the Conitec's meeting, another form of patient participation was opened in the HTA process. Therefore, the consolidation of this participation space is feasible and contributes to enrich the Brazilian HTA process.

OP113 Iramuteq Analysis Of Trastuzumab's Public Consultation In Brazil

2018 ◽  
Vol 34 (S1) ◽  
pp. 42-43
Author(s):  
Viviane Carvalho ◽  
Everton Silva ◽  
Maria-Sharmila Sousa ◽  
Ricardo Sampaio ◽  
Jorge Barreto
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Pharmaceutical Industry ◽  
Health Professionals ◽  
Public Involvement ◽  
Public Consultation ◽  
National Committee ◽  
Efficient Tool ◽  
Health Technologies ◽  
Class 1 ◽  
Public Consultations

Introduction:In Brazil, the “Sistema Unico de Saúde” (SUS) is a public health system that has universal coverage, comprehensive care, and principles like community participation. The incorporation, update or exclusion of new health technologies is done by the National Committee for Technology Incorporation (CONITEC), which issues reports on the incorporation of technologies and submits them to public consultations, which is the main mechanism of public involvement and an opportunity to influence the decision to access and coverage to new health technologies. Our study aimed to investigate a typology of social representations on the contributions from 2012 to the CONITEC's public consultations to the incorporation of Trastuzumab for the treatment of initial breast cancer in Brazil.Methods:Our study deployed a mixed-methods approach to semi-quantitatively analyze the social representativeness and corpus composition of all the public consultation contributions for the recommendation of the Trastuzumab's incorporation for treatment of initial breast cancer within SUS, as well as the authors' qualitative analysis of the IRAMUTEQ software as a potential effective and efficient tool to semi-qualitatively analyze such public consultations. All contributions were included (127 contributions, from several Brazilian states) and organized into a single corpus, which was submitted to 5 types of analyzes (classical lexical analysis, analysis of group specificities, descending hierarchical classification; similitude analysis and word cloud).Results:The general corpus consisted of 114 texts, separated into 685 text segments (TS), with use of 79.12 percent of total TS (684). The analyzed content was categorized into four classes: Class 1 – Patient Representations/ Advocacy (186 ST-34.3 percent); Class 2: Pharmaceutical Industry/ Advocacy (181 ST-33.4 percent); Class 3: Health Professionals (81 ST-14.9 percent); and Class 4: Individual Contributions (94 -17.3 percent). Class 1 corpus consisted mostly of contributions made from a breast cancer patient association/ advocacy report, which focused mainly on lay expertise terminology. We observed a proximity in corpus between Classes 2 and 3, showing a potential approximation between the pharmaceutical industry and health professionals' contributions, to whom the main word occurrences related to health technologies. Class 4 corpus focused on improvement and individual need, as well as in corpus referring to SUS.Conclusions:From our findings, we observed: (i) a potential similarity in contributions of health professionals and pharmaceutical industry; (ii) how lay expertise might affect the contributions of patients individually and within advocacy and patient organizations; and (iii) the uses and limitations of IRAMUTEQ as potentially effective and efficient tool to semi-qualitatively analyze health technology assessment public consultation contributions.

Community views and perspectives on public engagement in health technology assessment decision making

2017 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
pp. 68 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sally Wortley ◽  
Allison Tong ◽  
Kirsten Howard
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Focus Groups ◽  
Health Technology Assessment ◽  
Public Participation ◽  
Healthcare System ◽  
Public Engagement ◽  
Technology Assessment ◽  
Health Technology ◽  
Decision Making Process ◽  
The Public

Objectives The aim of the present study was to describe community views and perspectives on public engagement processes in Australian health technology assessment (HTA) decision making. Methods Six focus groups were held in Sydney (NSW, Australia) as part of a broad program of work on public engagement and HTA. Eligible participants were aged ≥18 years and spoke English. Participants were asked about their views and perspectives of public engagement in the HTA decision-making process, with responses analysed using a public participation framework. Results Fifty-eight participants aged 19–71 years attended the focus groups. Responses from the public indicated that they wanted public engagement in HTA to include a diversity of individuals, be independent and transparent, involve individuals early in the process and ensure that public input is meaningful and useful to the process. This was consistent with the public participation framework. Perceived shortcomings of the current public engagement process were also identified, namely the lack of awareness of the HTA system in the general population and the need to acknowledge the role different groups of stakeholders or ‘publics’ can have in the process. Conclusions The public do see a role for themselves in the HTA decision-making process. This is distinct to the involvement of patients and carers. It is important that any future public engagement strategy in this field distinguishes between stakeholder groups and outline approaches that will involve members of the public in the decision-making process, especially if public expectations of involvement in healthcare decision-making continue to increase. What is known about this topic? The views and perspectives of patients and consumers are important in the HTA decision-making process. There is a move to involve the broader community, particularly as decisions become increasingly complex and resources more scarce. What does this paper add? It not been known to what extent, or at what points, the community would like to be engaged with the HTA decision-making process. The present study adds to the evidence base on this topic by identifying features of engagement that may be important in determining the extent of wider public involvement. It is clear that the community expects the system to be transparent, for patients to be involved early in specific processes and the wider community to be able to contribute to the broader vision of the healthcare system. What are the implications for practitioners? A formalised strategy is needed to include the public voice into health technology decisions. With the current level of reform in the healthcare sector and the focus on creating a sustainable healthcare system, there is a real opportunity to implement an approach that not only informs patients and the community of the challenges, but includes and incorporates their views into these decisions. This will assist in developing and adapting policy that is relevant and meets the needs of the population.

scholarly journals 3.L. Workshop: It’s time for timeliness in Health Technology Assessment

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (Supplement_4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Health Technology Assessment ◽  
Technology Assessment ◽  
Health Technology ◽  
Critical Issue ◽  
Decision Making Process ◽  
Long Term Effects ◽  
Health Technologies ◽  
Increasing Demand ◽  
Set Up

Abstract The timeliness of the release of results is one of the most critical issue regarding Health Technology Assessment (HTA) and its potential to support decision-making. This matter may reflect the deep conflict between HTA doers and users. HTA is a form of evidence-based research, expected to timely inform decision-making at several levels - from health policy (macro) to hospital and clinical management (meso and micro) - ensuring accuracy and assessment of both short- and long-term effects of a health technology. HTA purpose therefore is to respond to real world needs, while not overlook a correct methodology. Fast developing health technologies have rapidly spread over the past decades, hence increasing demand for timely assessment aimed at their prompt implementation and management, especially at meso and micro decisional levels. Furthermore, the need for quick answers is emphasized by the pressures placed on policy-makers when a health technology is publicly promoted or contested. Furthermore, an ill-timed assessment can lead to several consequences, among which possible inequalities in access to healthcare. In order to address the challenge of timeliness, organizations involved in HTA should set up models and tools to deliver timely information. The aim of this workshop is to point out the timeliness of HTA as crucial in the decision-making process as a mismanagement of HTA system could be an obstacle to an appropriate healthcare policy. Else more, the workshop would like to critically present examples where research was on time or too late to be included in the decision-making process and elaborate on possible models to successfully deal with timeliness of HTA deliverables in particular at hospital level. Key messages The timeframe of HTA should ensure the accuracy of information and of methodological and legal steps, without forgetting the timeliness of delivery. Models and instruments should be implemented in order to guarantee the timeliness of HTA reports.

scholarly journals Public engagement in health technology assessment in Brazil: the case of the Trastuzumab public consultation

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Viviane Karoline da Silva Carvalho ◽  
Maria Sharmila Alina de Sousa ◽  
Jorge Otávio Maia Barreto ◽  
Everton Nunes da Silva
Keyword(s):  
Health Technology Assessment ◽  
Public Engagement ◽  
Technology Assessment ◽  
Health Technology ◽  
Social Representation ◽  
Public Consultation ◽  
National Committee ◽  
Risk Category ◽  
The Public ◽  
Negative Score

Abstract Background Public engagement in health technology assessment (HTA) is increasing worldwide. There are several forms of public engagement and it is not always possible to determine which stakeholders participate in the HTA process and how they contribute. Our objective was to investigate which types of social representatives contributed to the public consultation on the incorporation of Trastuzumab for early-stage breast cancer treatment within the public health system in Brazil, held in 2012 by the National Committee for Health Technology Incorporation (CONITEC). Methods A mixed methods approach was used to analyze social representativeness and the composition of the corpus from the public consultation, which consisted of 127 contributions. Three types of analysis were performed using IRaMuTeQ software: classic lexical analysis, descending hierarchical classification and specificities analysis. The contributions were clustered according to the main categories of discourse observed, into four social representation categories: 1) patient representation/advocacy; 2) pharmaceutical industry/advocacy; 3) healthcare professionals; and 4) individual contributions. Results Category 1 contained words related to increased survival due to use of the drug and a low score for words pertaining to studies on Trastuzumab. The word “safety” obtained a positive score only in category 2, which was also the only category that exhibited a negative score for the word “risk”. Category 3 displayed the lowest scores for “diagnosis” and “safety”. The word “efficacy” had a negative score only in category 4. Conclusions Each category exhibited different results for words related to health systems and to key concepts linked to HTA. Our analysis enabled the identification of the most prominent contributions for each category. Despite the promising results obtained, further research is needed to validate this software for use in analyzing public contributions.

scholarly journals Social participation in the health technology incorporation process into Unified Health System

2019 ◽  
Vol 53 ◽  
pp. 109
Author(s):  
Aline Silveira Silva ◽  
Maria Sharmila Alina de Sousa ◽  
Emília Vitória da Silva ◽  
Dayani Galato
Keyword(s):  
Health System ◽  
Social Participation ◽  
Health Technology ◽  
Public Consultation ◽  
National Committee ◽  
Health Technologies ◽  
Unified Health System ◽  
Health Council ◽  
Public Hearings ◽  
Other Information

OBJECTIVE: To describe the current process of social participation in the incorporation of health technologies in Brazil, within the context of the Unified Health System (SUS). METHODS: A descriptive study was conducted based on the analysis of official records of the actions of the National Committee for Health Technology Incorporation into Unified Health System and its website, from the beginning of its activities in January 2012 until December 2017. RESULTS: The findings indicate that, in Brazil, there are legal instruments related to social participation in health, including the health technology assessment (HTA) field. However, its implementation is relatively recent and has been carried out gradually. In addition to the legal instruments (National Health Council representative, public consultation and public hearing forecast), other information and transparency strategies have been shown to be allied to social participation in the incorporation of health technologies. However, activities such as legally provided public hearings have not yet been carried out. CONCLUSIONS: Several actions to foster social participation were developed over the analyzed period, but they need to be evaluated in order to maintain or improve them. In addition, there is a need for more qualified social participation in the various existing spaces, including those prescribed by law.

OP114 The Public's Role In Understanding The Value Of Health Technologies

2018 ◽  
Vol 34 (S1) ◽  
pp. 43-44
Author(s):  
Tania Stafinski ◽  
Jackie Street ◽  
Devidas Menon
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Health Technology Assessment ◽  
Technology Assessment ◽  
Health Technology ◽  
Informed Decision ◽  
Informed Decision Making ◽  
The Public ◽  
Health Technologies ◽  
Decision Making Processes ◽  
Definition Of

Introduction:Increasingly, health technology assessment (HTA) organizations have instituted mechanisms for involving patients in assessment and review processes. The reasons are obvious—to understand the “patient experience” with a disease and to ensure that patient perspectives are considered during deliberations about the value of new treatments. More recently there have been efforts to engage the public in HTAs and HTA-informed decision-making processes. However, the goals of these efforts have not been well articulated. This may be attributable to the lack of a shared definition of “the public”. The objective of this study was to develop a common understanding of the term “the public” within the context of HTA.Methods:The following were conducted: a survey of HTA organizations; a systematic review; consultation with Health Technology Assessment international's Special Interest Group on Patient and Citizen Involvement; and a workshop comprising representatives from patient organizations, industry, and HTA bodies in Canada.Results:In many HTA processes, the terms “public” and “patients” are synonymous. Definitions found in scholarly articles vary and depend on the rationale for involving the public in a particular issue. Through consultations it became clear that, in the context of HTA, the definition depends on understanding what is missing from current deliberations around the value of new health technologies. There was consensus among workshop participants that: (i) “patients” and “the public” are not the same; (ii) the role of the public may be to ensure societal values are reflected in HTAs and HTA-informed decision-making processes (e.g. serving an audit function); and (iii) a legitimate definition of “the public” could be: “A non-aligned community member with no commercial or professional interest in the HTA process who is not a patient or member of a stakeholder group”.Conclusions:Consensus on the use of the terms “patient” and “public” will support rigorous, evidence-based public and patient engagement in HTA. The proposed definition indicates a way forward in this debate.

PP99 Hospital-Based Health Technology Assessment Units In Brazil: Present And Future

2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (S1) ◽  
pp. 56-57
Author(s):  
Mírian Cohen ◽  
Ana Flávia Lima ◽  
Sandro Miguel ◽  
Marina Aziz ◽  
Ricardo Bertoglio Cardoso ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Health Technology Assessment ◽  
Technology Assessment ◽  
New Technologies ◽  
Guideline Development ◽  
Health Technology ◽  
Teaching Hospitals ◽  
Decision Making Process ◽  
Online Questionnaire ◽  
Health Technologies

IntroductionSince 2007, 23 Núcleos de Avaliação de Tecnologias em Saúde or hospital-based health technology assessment (HB-HTA) units have been established in teaching hospitals across Brazil. These units aim to promote the development of health technology assessment in hospitals, assisting the decision-making process for implementing new technologies and evaluating and promoting the rational use of widespread technologies.MethodsAn online questionnaire was sent by e-mail to all HB-HTA units registered in the Brazilian Network for Evaluation of Health Technologies. Information was acquired to comprehensively assess the activity of the units.ResultsAll 23 HB-HTA units answered the questionnaire. Of these, 65 percent had a technology prioritization process. The technologies assessed included drug therapies (73%), equipment (64%), medical devices (64%), clinical protocols (46%), and emerging technologies (27%). The dimensions of health technology assessment (HTA) evaluated by these organizations were: efficacy (76%); effectiveness (67%); safety (67%); costs (52%); cost effectiveness or cost utility (52%); and budget impact (43%). The hospital departments that required more HTA studies were: cardiology (50%); infectious diseases (45%); hospital management (45%); oncology (40%); surgery (40%); and endocrinology (20%). HTA studies supported: incorporation of new technologies (81%); protocol or guideline development (57%); new indications for already approved technologies (38%); and withdrawal of obsolete technologies (29%). Half of the institutions also conducted educational or training activities. The main difficulties reported were a lack of trained professionals (78%), funding (70%), and material resources (48%).ConclusionsFor low- and middle-income countries, the process of implementing HB-HTA units remains a challenge. Even though human resources and funding are scarce, HB-HTA units continue to develop. Given their importance in the decision-making process, it is imperative that every effort is made to ensure their activities continue.

OP92 Addressing Challenges Of Implementing A Health Technology Assessment Framework In South Africa

2017 ◽  
Vol 33 (S1) ◽  
pp. 41-42
Author(s):  
Jani Mueller
Keyword(s):  
South Africa ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Health Technology Assessment ◽  
Technology Assessment ◽  
Health Technology ◽  
Healthcare Sector ◽  
Public And Private ◽  
The Public ◽  
Health Technologies

INTRODUCTION:South Africa is in the process of providing comprehensive health insurance to all its citizens, thus paving the pathway for Health Technology Assessment (HTA) to play a significant role in provision of safe and effective healthcare. The National Department of Health (DoH) has a published framework and Health Technology Act and strategies since the 1990s to improve health outcomes, and service and delivery of care. The purpose of this study is to explore challenges faced in the implementation of the framework and policies.METHODS:The study will be based on review and analysis of health technology policies and legislations introduced in South Africa since the 1990s. These documents are available from the DoH archive. The review from this grey literature was supplemented by information collected from a self-completion questionnaire, which was distributed to key stakeholders. Respondents were identified by direct contact with ministries of health and professional bodies, and included health professionals from the public and private healthcare sector, for example, practitioners, experts from hospitals, and industry representatives. The questionnaire addressed issues pertaining to decision making regarding health service delivery and the status of HTA in the country.RESULTS:The framework lays out the strategy to facilitate appropriate utilization of health technologies and includes among others, an HTA section. Fragmented use of HTA or parts thereof has been observed in the public and private health care sector. Furthermore, the respondents pointed out that decisions on health technology can be political, institutional or professionally driven whereas they all agreed that a formal and institutional implementation of HTA would improve healthcare service.CONCLUSIONS:The goal to achieve universal health care provides an excellent window of opportunity for formal use of HTA in policy- and decision-making. However, (i) the inadequate number of trained professionals and education and training opportunities (ii) lack of awareness and understanding of the principles of HTA and its impact on the improvement of health care are among the many challenges faced by the system. It has also been observed that national and regional champions can act as change agents and would have a snowball effect.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document