scholarly journals Programming in logic without logic programming

2016 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 269-295 ◽  
Author(s):  
ROBERT KOWALSKI ◽  
FARIBA SADRI
Keyword(s):  
Logic Programming ◽  
Logic Program ◽  
Operational Semantics ◽  
Canonical Model ◽  
State Transitions ◽  
Logic Programs ◽  
Initial State ◽  
State Sequence ◽  
Sequence Of Events ◽  
Current State

AbstractIn previous work, we proposed a logic-based framework in which computation is the execution of actions in an attempt to make reactive rules of the form if antecedent then consequent true in a canonical model of a logic program determined by an initial state, sequence of events, and the resulting sequence of subsequent states. In this model-theoretic semantics, reactive rules are the driving force, and logic programs play only a supporting role. In the canonical model, states, actions, and other events are represented with timestamps. But in the operational semantics (OS), for the sake of efficiency, timestamps are omitted and only the current state is maintained. State transitions are performed reactively by executing actions to make the consequents of rules true whenever the antecedents become true. This OS is sound, but incomplete. It cannot make reactive rules true by preventing their antecedents from becoming true, or by proactively making their consequents true before their antecedents become true. In this paper, we characterize the notion of reactive model, and prove that the OS can generate all and only such models. In order to focus on the main issues, we omit the logic programming component of the framework.

LOGIC PROGRAMMING AND DEFAULT LOGIC

1994 ◽  
Vol 03 (03) ◽  
pp. 367-373
Author(s):  
GRIGORIS ANTONIOU
Keyword(s):  
Logic Programming ◽  
Ad Hoc ◽  
Logic Program ◽  
Operational Semantics ◽  
Main Property ◽  
Default Logic ◽  
Logic Programs ◽  
Default Theory ◽  
Normal Logic ◽  
Direct Use

We present several ideas of increasing complexity how to translate default theories to normal logic programs that make direct use of the deductive capacity of logic programming. We show the limitations of simple, ad hoc approaches, and arrive at a more general construction; its main property is that the answer substitutions computed by the logic program via its standard operational semantics correspond exactly to the extensions of the default theory.

scholarly journals Logic + control: On program construction and verification

2017 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-29
Author(s):  
WŁODZIMIERZ DRABENT
Keyword(s):  
Logic Program ◽  
Practical Importance ◽  
Operational Semantics ◽  
Program Transformations ◽  
Logic Programs ◽  
Formal Reasoning ◽  
Prolog Program ◽  
Logic Control ◽  
Sat Solver ◽  
Program Construction

AbstractThis paper presents an example of formal reasoning about the semantics of a Prolog program of practical importance (the SAT solver of Howe and King). The program is treated as a definite clause logic program with added control. The logic program is constructed by means of stepwise refinement, hand in hand with its correctness and completeness proofs. The proofs are declarative – they do not refer to any operational semantics. Each step of the logic program construction follows a systematic approach to constructing programs which are provably correct and complete. We also prove that correctness and completeness of the logic program is preserved in the final Prolog program. Additionally, we prove termination, occur-check freedom and non-floundering.Our example shows how dealing with “logic” and with “control” can be separated. Most of the proofs can be done at the “logic” level, abstracting from any operational semantics.The example employs approximate specifications; they are crucial in simplifying reasoning about logic programs. It also shows that the paradigm of semantics-preserving program transformations may be not sufficient. We suggest considering transformations which preserve correctness and completeness with respect to an approximate specification.

scholarly journals Productive corecursion in logic programming

2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (5-6) ◽  
pp. 906-923 ◽  
Author(s):  
EKATERINA KOMENDANTSKAYA ◽  
YUE LI
Keyword(s):  
Data Structure ◽  
Logic Programming ◽  
State Of The Art ◽  
Logic Program ◽  
Stream Processing ◽  
The Internet ◽  
Logic Programs ◽  
Algorithmic Solution ◽  
Undecidable Property ◽  
Turing Complete

AbstractLogic Programming is a Turing complete language. As a consequence, designing algorithms that decide termination and non-termination of programs or decide inductive/coinductive soundness of formulae is a challenging task. For example, the existing state-of-the-art algorithms can only semi-decide coinductive soundness of queries in logic programming for regular formulae. Another, less famous, but equally fundamental and important undecidable property is productivity. If a derivation is infinite and coinductively sound, we may ask whether the computed answer it determines actually computes an infinite formula. If it does, the infinite computation is productive. This intuition was first expressed under the name of computations at infinity in the 80s. In modern days of the Internet and stream processing, its importance lies in connection to infinite data structure processing. Recently, an algorithm was presented that semi-decides a weaker property – of productivity of logic programs. A logic program is productive if it can give rise to productive derivations. In this paper, we strengthen these recent results. We propose a method that semi-decides productivity of individual derivations for regular formulae. Thus, we at last give an algorithmic counterpart to the notion of productivity of derivations in logic programming. This is the first algorithmic solution to the problem since it was raised more than 30 years ago. We also present an implementation of this algorithm.

scholarly journals Optimizing Answer Set Computation via Heuristic-Based Decomposition

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (04) ◽  
pp. 603-628 ◽  
Author(s):  
FRANCESCO CALIMERI ◽  
SIMONA PERRI ◽  
JESSICA ZANGARI
Keyword(s):  
Logic Programming ◽  
Logic Program ◽  
Answer Set Programming ◽  
Decomposition Techniques ◽  
Logic Programs ◽  
Experimental Activity ◽  
Performance Of Systems ◽  
Answer Sets ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Answer Set

AbstractAnswer Set Programming (ASP) is a purely declarative formalism developed in the field of logic programming and non-monotonic reasoning: computational problems are encoded by logic programs whose answer sets, corresponding to solutions, are computed by an ASP system. Different, semantically equivalent, programs can be defined for the same problem; however, performance of systems evaluating them might significantly vary. We propose an approach for automatically transforming an input logic program into an equivalent one that can be evaluated more efficiently. One can make use of existing tree-decomposition techniques for rewriting selected rules into a set of multiple ones; the idea is to guide and adaptively apply them on the basis of proper new heuristics, to obtain a smart rewriting algorithm to be integrated into an ASP system. The method is rather general: it can be adapted to any system and implement different preference policies. Furthermore, we define a set of new heuristics tailored at optimizing grounding, one of the main phases of the ASP computation; we use them in order to implement the approach into the ASP systemDLV, in particular into its grounding subsystemℐ-DLV, and carry out an extensive experimental activity for assessing the impact of the proposal.

ON A THEOREM PROVER FOR VARIATIONAL LOGIC PROGRAMS WITH FUNCTORS SETU AND SETS

2000 ◽  
Vol 08 (01) ◽  
pp. 73-92 ◽  
Author(s):  
HIROSHI SAKAI ◽  
AKIMICHI OKUMA
Keyword(s):  
Logic Programming ◽  
Soft Computing ◽  
Logic Program ◽  
Theorem Prover ◽  
Logic Programs

We are now touching a problem how we add soft computing aspects to logic programming and we have been discussing null attribute values on logic programs. Here, we introduce two functors setu and sets into logic programs for describing indefinite attribute values explicitly. Every logic program with setu or sets has variability and tolerance in itself, namely this program expresses a set of possible definite logic programs. We call this program a variational logic program. In this paper, we show the variational logic programs and a theorem prover for them.

scholarly journals On the Semantics of Logic Programs with Preferences

2007 ◽  
Vol 30 ◽  
pp. 501-523 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Greco ◽  
I. Trubitsyna ◽  
E. Zumpano
Keyword(s):  
Logic Programming ◽  
Complexity Analysis ◽  
Structural Information ◽  
Logic Program ◽  
Set Optimization ◽  
Logic Programs ◽  
Preference Relations ◽  
New Interpretation ◽  
Semantics Of Logic Programs ◽  
Stable Models

This work is a contribution to prioritized reasoning in logic programming in the presence of preference relations involving atoms. The technique, providing a new interpretation for prioritized logic programs, is inspired by the semantics of Prioritized Logic Programming and enriched with the use of structural information of preference of Answer Set Optimization Programming. Specifically, the analysis of the logic program is carried out together with the analysis of preferences in order to determine the choice order and the sets of comparable models. The new semantics is compared with other approaches known in the literature and complexity analysis is also performed, showing that, with respect to other similar approaches previously proposed, the complexity of computing preferred stable models does not increase.

DEFINITION AND ADAPTATION OF WEIGHTED FUZZY LOGIC PROGRAMS

2009 ◽  
Vol 17 (01) ◽  
pp. 85-135 ◽  
Author(s):  
ALEXANDROS CHORTARAS ◽  
GIORGOS STAMOU ◽  
ANDREAS STAFYLOPATIS
Keyword(s):  
Fuzzy Logic ◽  
Logic Programming ◽  
General Framework ◽  
Logic Program ◽  
Logic Programs ◽  
Truth Value ◽  
The Individual ◽  
Logic Rule

Fuzzy logic programming has been lately used as a general framework for representing and handling imprecise knowledge. In this paper, we define the syntax and the semantics of definite weighted fuzzy logic programs, which extend definite fuzzy logic programs by allowing the inclusion of different significance weights in the individual atoms that make up the antecedent of a fuzzy logic rule. The weights add expressiveness to a fuzzy logic program and allow the determination of the level up to which an atom in the antecedent of a rule may affect the truth value of its consequent. In describing the semantics of definite weighted fuzzy logic programs we introduce the notion of the generalized weighted fuzzy conjunction operator, which can be regarded as a weighted t-norm based aggregation. We determine the properties of generalized weighted fuzzy conjunction operators and provide several examples. A methodology for constructing generalized weighted fuzzy conjunction operators using generator functions of existing t-norms is also introduced. Finally, a method for setting up a parametric weighted fuzzy logic program and automatically adapting the weights of its rules using a numerical dataset is developed.

scholarly journals Semantics for Possibilistic Disjunctive Programs

2011 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 33-70 ◽  
Author(s):  
JUAN CARLOS NIEVES ◽  
MAURICIO OSORIO ◽  
ULISES CORTÉS
Keyword(s):  
Logic Programming ◽  
Knowledge Base ◽  
Logic Program ◽  
Programming Approach ◽  
Logic Programs ◽  
Possibilistic Logic ◽  
Point Operator ◽  
Disjunctive Logic Programs ◽  
Answer Sets ◽  
Disjunctive Programs

AbstractIn this paper, a possibilistic disjunctive logic programming approach for modeling uncertain, incomplete, and inconsistent information is defined. This approach introduces the use of possibilistic disjunctive clauses, which are able to capture incomplete information and states of a knowledge base at the same time. By considering a possibilistic logic program as a possibilistic logic theory, a construction of a possibilistic logic programming semantic based on answer sets and the proof theory of possibilistic logic is defined. It shows that this possibilistic semantics for disjunctive logic programs can be characterized by a fixed-point operator. It is also shown that the suggested possibilistic semantics can be computed by a resolution algorithm and the consideration of optimal refutations from a possibilistic logic theory. In order to manage inconsistent possibilistic logic programs, a preference criterion between inconsistent possibilistic models is defined. In addition, the approach of cuts for restoring consistency of an inconsistent possibilistic knowledge base is adopted. The approach is illustrated in a medical scenario.

The language of epistemic specifications (refined) including a prototype solver

2015 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 953-989 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick Kahl ◽  
Richard Watson ◽  
Evgenii Balai ◽  
Michael Gelfond ◽  
Yuanlin Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Logic Programming ◽  
Programming Language ◽  
Epistemic Logic ◽  
Formal Semantics ◽  
Logic Program ◽  
Logic Programs ◽  
Logic Programming Language ◽  
Conformant Planning

Abstract In this article, we present a new version of the language of Epistemic Specifications. The goal is to simplify and improve the intuitive and formal semantics of the language. We describe an algorithm for computing solutions of programs written in this new version of the language. The new semantics is illustrated by a number of examples, including an Epistemic Specifications-based framework for conformant planning. In addition, we introduce the notion of an epistemic logic program with sorts . This extends recent efforts to define a logic programming language that includes the means for explicitly specifying the domains of predicate parameters. An algorithm and its implementation as a solver for epistemic logic programs with sorts is also discussed.

scholarly journals An Asymptotic Analysis of Probabilistic Logic Programming, with Implications for Expressing Projective Families of Distributions

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-16
Author(s):  
FELIX Q. WEITKÄMPER
Keyword(s):  
Logic Programming ◽  
Size Dependence ◽  
Logic Program ◽  
Domain Size ◽  
Probabilistic Logic ◽  
Logic Programs ◽  
Probabilistic Logic Programming ◽  
Lifted Inference ◽  
Relational Domains ◽  
Distribution Semantics

Abstract Probabilistic logic programming is a major part of statistical relational artificial intelligence, where approaches from logic and probability are brought together to reason about and learn from relational domains in a setting of uncertainty. However, the behaviour of statistical relational representations across variable domain sizes is complex, and scaling inference and learning to large domains remains a significant challenge. In recent years, connections have emerged between domain size dependence, lifted inference and learning from sampled subpopulations. The asymptotic behaviour of statistical relational representations has come under scrutiny, and projectivity was investigated as the strongest form of domain size dependence, in which query marginals are completely independent of the domain size. In this contribution we show that every probabilistic logic program under the distribution semantics is asymptotically equivalent to an acyclic probabilistic logic program consisting only of determinate clauses over probabilistic facts. We conclude that every probabilistic logic program inducing a projective family of distributions is in fact everywhere equivalent to a program from this fragment, and we investigate the consequences for the projective families of distributions expressible by probabilistic logic programs.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document