scholarly journals Culturally adapted Family Intervention (CaFI): case examples from therapists’ perspectives

Author(s):  
Katherine Berry ◽  
Christine Day ◽  
Lee D. Mulligan ◽  
Tara Seed ◽  
Amy Degnan ◽  
...  

AbstractThis paper describes three case examples from a recent trial of family intervention specifically designed for people of African-Caribbean descent. These examples, told from the therapists’ perspectives, highlight key components of the intervention and issues that arose in working with this client group. Findings from the study suggest that it is possible to engage this client-group in family therapy similar to traditional evidenced-based family interventions, although as illustrated in the paper, it is important that therapists pay attention to themes that are likely to be particularly pertinent for this group, including experiences of discrimination and mistrust of services. The use of Family Support Members, consisting of members of the person's care team or volunteers recruited from the community, may also help support people to engage in therapy in the absence of biological relatives.

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (32) ◽  
pp. 1-316 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dawn Edge ◽  
Amy Degnan ◽  
Sarah Cotterill ◽  
Katherine Berry ◽  
John Baker ◽  
...  

BackgroundAfrican-Caribbean people in the UK experience the highest incidence of schizophrenia and the greatest inequity in mental health care. There is an urgent need to improve their access to evidence-based care and outcomes. Family intervention (FI) is a National Institute for Health and Care Excellence-approved psychosocial intervention. Although clinically effective and cost-effective for schizophrenia, it is rarely offered. Evidence for any research into FI is lacking for ethnic minority people generally and for African-Caribbean people specifically.Aims(1) To assess the feasibility of delivering a novel, culturally appropriate psychosocial intervention within a ‘high-risk’ population to improve engagement and access to evidence-based care. (2) To test the feasibility and acceptability of delivering FI via ‘proxy families’.DesignA mixed-methods, feasibility cohort study, incorporating focus groups and an expert consensus conference.SettingTwo mental health trusts in north-west England.ParticipantsWe recruited a convenience sample of 31 African-Caribbean service users. Twenty-six family units [service users, relatives/family support members (FSMs) or both] commenced therapy. Half of the service users (n = 13, 50%), who did not have access to their biological families, participated by working with FSMs.InterventionsAn extant FI model was culturally adapted with key stakeholders using a literature-derived framework [Culturally adapted Family Intervention (CaFI)]. Ten CaFI sessions were offered to each service user and associated family.Main outcome measuresRecruitment (number approached vs. number consented), attendance (number of sessions attended), attrition (number of dropouts at each time point), retention (proportion of participants who completed therapy sessions), and completeness of outcome measurement.ResultsOf 74 eligible service users, 31 (42%) consented to take part in the feasibility trial. The majority (n = 21, 67.7%) were recruited from community settings, seven (22.6%) were recruited from rehabilitation settings and three (9.7%) were recruited from acute wards. Twenty-four family units (92%) completed all 10 therapy sessions. The proportion who completed treatment was 77.42% (24/31). The mean number of sessions attended was 7.90 (standard deviation 3.96 sessions) out of 10. It proved feasible to collect a range of outcome data at baseline, post intervention and at the 3-month follow-up. The rating of sessions and the qualitative findings indicated that CaFI was acceptable to service users, families, FSMs and health-care professionals.LimitationsThe lack of a control group and the limited sample size mean that there is insufficient power to assess efficacy. The findings are not generalisable beyond this population.ConclusionsIt proved feasible to culturally adapt and test FI with a sample of African-Caribbean service users and their families. Our study yielded high rates of recruitment, attendance, retention and data completion. We delivered CaFI via FSMs in the absence of biological families. This novel aspect of the study has implications for other groups who do not have access to their biological families. We also demonstrated the feasibility of collecting a range of outcomes to inform future trials and confirmed CaFI’s acceptability to key stakeholders. These are important findings. If CaFI can be delivered to the group of service users with the most serious and persistent disparities in schizophrenia care, it has the potential to be modified for and delivered to other underserved groups.Future workA fully powered, multicentre trial, comparing CaFI with usual care, is planned.Trial registrationCurrent Controlled Trials ISRCTN94393315.FundingThis project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Services and Delivery Research programme and will be published in full inHealth Services and Delivery Research; Vol. 6, No. 32. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.


2018 ◽  
Vol 28 (Supp) ◽  
pp. 485-492 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dawn Edge ◽  
Paul Grey

Objective: To determine how to improve the cultural appropriateness and accept­ability of an extant evidence-based model of family intervention (FI), a form of ‘talking treatment,’ for use with African Caribbean service users diagnosed with schizophrenia and their families.Design: Community partnered participa­tory research (CPPR) using four focus groups comprising 31 key stakeholders.Setting: Community locations and National Health Service (NHS) mental health care settings in northwest England, UK.Participants: African Caribbean service us­ers (n=10), family members, caregivers and advocates (n=14) and health care profes­sionals (n=7).Results: According to participants, com­ponents of the extant model of FI were valid but required additional items (such as racism and discrimination and different models of mental health and illness) to im­prove cultural appropriateness. Additionally, emphasis was placed on developing a new ethos of delivery, which participants called ‘shared learning.’ This approach explicitly acknowledges that power imbalances are likely to be magnified where delivery of interventions involves White therapists and Black clients. In this context, therapists’ cultural competence was regarded as funda­mental for successful therapeutic engage­ment and outcomes.Conclusions: Despite being labelled ‘hard-to-reach’ by mainstream mental health services and under-represented in research, our experience suggests that, given the opportunity, members of the African Carib­bean community were highly motivated to engage in all aspects of research. Participat­ing in research related to schizophrenia, a highly stigmatized condition, suggests CPPR approaches might prove fruitful in developing interventions to address other health conditions that disproportionately affect members of this community.Ethn Dis. 2018;28(Suppl 2): 485-492; doi:10.18865/ed.28.S2.485.


2011 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 381-396 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hilary Weingarden ◽  
Luana Marques ◽  
Angela Fang ◽  
Nicole LeBlanc ◽  
Ulrike Buhlmann ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 151-160 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cátia C. A. Magalhães ◽  
Karol L. Kumpfer

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to compare the outcomes from the Portuguese Strengthening Families Programme (SFP) with those from other countries to see if they are equally effective despite the new context. SFP was selected for cultural adaptation because comparative effectiveness reviews find that SFP is the most effective parenting and family intervention (Foxcroft et al., 2003, 2012). Standardised cultural adaptations of SFP have resulted in successful outcomes in 35 countries. Design/methodology/approach – The outcomes for the SFP six to 11 years Portuguese families (n=41) were compared to the SFP six to 11 years international norms (n=1,600) using a quasi-experimental, non-equivalent control two group pre- and post-test design. A 2×2 ANOVA generated the outcome tables including p-values and Cohen’s d effect sizes. Standardised test scales were used and measured 21 parenting, family and child risk and protective factors. Findings – Statistically significant positive results (p < 0.05) were found for 16 or 76.2 per cent of the 21 outcomes measured for Portuguese families. The Portuguese effect sizes were similar to the SFP international norms for improvements in the five parenting scales (d=0.61 vs 0.65), five family scales (d=0.68 vs 0.70) and seven children’s scales (d=0.48 vs 0.48) despite these norms having larger effect sizes than the USA norms. Hence, the cultural adaptation did not diminish the outcomes and SFP Portuguese families can benefit substantially from SFP participation. Originality/value – A Portuguese culturally adapted version of SFP had never been developed or evaluated; hence, this paper reports original findings.


Author(s):  
Muhammad Omair Husain ◽  
Ameer B. Khoso ◽  
Laoise Renwick ◽  
Tayyeba Kiran ◽  
Sofiya Saeed ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 7-21 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ann-Marie Rosland ◽  
John D. Piette

Objectives: We identify recent models for programmes aiming to increase effective family support for chronic illness management and self-care among adult patients without significant physical or cognitive disabilities. We then summarize evidence regarding the efficacy for each model identified. Methods: Structured review of studies published in medical and psychology databases from 1990 to the present, reference review, general Web searches and conversations with family intervention experts. Review was limited to studies on conditions that require ongoing self-management, such as diabetes, chronic heart disease and rheumatologic disease. Results: Programmes with three separate foci were identified: (1) Programmes that guide family members in setting goals for supporting patient self-care behaviours have led to improved implementation of family support roles, but have mixed success improving patient outcomes. (2) Programmes that train family in supportive communication techniques, such as prompting patient coping techniques or use of autonomy supportive statements, have successfully improved patient symptom management and health behaviours. (3) Programmes that give families tools and infrastructure to assist in monitoring clinical symptoms and medications are being conducted, with no evidence to date on their impact on patient outcomes. Discussion: The next generation of programmes to improve family support for chronic disease management incorporate a variety of strategies. Future research can define optimal clinical situations for family support programmes, the most effective combinations of support strategies, and how best to integrate family support programmes into comprehensive models of chronic disease care.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document