Articulating the “New Paradigm” of Psychotherapy Research

1995 ◽  
Vol 40 (11) ◽  
pp. 1072-1073
Author(s):  
Michael J. Lambert ◽  
R. Scott Nebeker
Keyword(s):  
Psychotherapy Research ◽  
New Paradigm

Solar Filaments as Tracers of Subsurface Processes

2000 ◽  
Vol 179 ◽  
pp. 177-183
Author(s):  
D. M. Rust
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Fields ◽  
Magnetic Flux ◽  
Coronal Mass Ejections ◽  
Interplanetary Space ◽  
Intermediate Stage ◽  
Coronal Plasma ◽  
Magnetic Helicity ◽  
The Sun ◽  
New Paradigm ◽  
Solar Filaments

AbstractSolar filaments are discussed in terms of two contrasting paradigms. The standard paradigm is that filaments are formed by condensation of coronal plasma into magnetic fields that are twisted or dimpled as a consequence of motions of the fields’ sources in the photosphere. According to a new paradigm, filaments form in rising, twisted flux ropes and are a necessary intermediate stage in the transfer to interplanetary space of dynamo-generated magnetic flux. It is argued that the accumulation of magnetic helicity in filaments and their coronal surroundings leads to filament eruptions and coronal mass ejections. These ejections relieve the Sun of the flux generated by the dynamo and make way for the flux of the next cycle.

Does the Motor System Facilitate Spatial Imagery?

2017 ◽  
Vol 49 (3) ◽  
pp. 127-137 ◽  
Author(s):  
Markus Krüger ◽  
Horst Krist
Keyword(s):  
Motor System ◽  
Third Graders ◽  
External Support ◽  
New Paradigm ◽  
Perceptual Condition ◽  
Imagery Condition ◽  
Passive Rotation ◽  
Perception Condition ◽  
Motor Condition ◽  
Dynamic Imagery

Abstract. Recent studies have ascertained a link between the motor system and imagery in children. A motor effect on imagery is demonstrated by the influence of stimuli-related movement constraints (i. e., constraints defined by the musculoskeletal system) on mental rotation, or by interference effects due to participants’ own body movements or body postures. This link is usually seen as qualitatively different or stronger in children as opposed to adults. In the present research, we put this interpretation to further scrutiny using a new paradigm: In a motor condition we asked our participants (kindergartners and third-graders) to manually rotate a circular board with a covered picture on it. This condition was compared with a perceptual condition where the board was rotated by an experimenter. Additionally, in a pure imagery condition, children were instructed to merely imagine the rotation of the board. The children’s task was to mark the presumed end position of a salient detail of the respective picture. The children’s performance was clearly the worst in the pure imagery condition. However, contrary to what embodiment theories would suggest, there was no difference in participants’ performance between the active rotation (i. e., motor) and the passive rotation (i. e., perception) condition. Control experiments revealed that this was also the case when, in the perception condition, gaze shifting was controlled for and when the board was rotated mechanically rather than by the experimenter. Our findings indicate that young children depend heavily on external support when imagining physical events. Furthermore, they indicate that motor-assisted imagery is not generally superior to perceptually driven dynamic imagery.

Self-Prioritization Beyond Perception

2015 ◽  
Vol 62 (6) ◽  
pp. 415-425 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah Schäfer ◽  
Dirk Wentura ◽  
Christian Frings
Keyword(s):  
The Self ◽  
Stimulus Category ◽  
Abstract Concept ◽  
Conceptual Level ◽  
New Paradigm ◽  
Stimulus Features ◽  
Relevant Word ◽  
Word Shape

Abstract. Recently, Sui, He, and Humphreys (2012) introduced a new paradigm to measure perceptual self-prioritization processes. It seems that arbitrarily tagging shapes to self-relevant words (I, my, me, and so on) leads to speeded verification times when matching self-relevant word shape pairings (e.g., me – triangle) as compared to non-self-relevant word shape pairings (e.g., stranger – circle). In order to analyze the level at which self-prioritization takes place we analyzed whether the self-prioritization effect is due to a tagging of the self-relevant label and the particular associated shape or due to a tagging of the self with an abstract concept. In two experiments participants showed standard self-prioritization effects with varying stimulus features or different exemplars of a particular stimulus-category suggesting that self-prioritization also works at a conceptual level.

A rejoinder to "Psychotherapy research ethics: Continuing the debate on controlled clinical trials."

1987 ◽  
Vol 42 (12) ◽  
pp. 1132-1133
Author(s):  
Stanley D. Imber ◽  
Lawrence M. Glanz ◽  
Irene Elkin ◽  
Stuart M. Sotsky ◽  
Jenny L. Boyer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Research Ethics ◽  
Psychotherapy Research ◽  
Controlled Clinical Trials

Transforming psychological practice and society: Policies that reflect the new paradigm.

2003 ◽  
Vol 58 (4) ◽  
pp. 305-312 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carol J. Gill ◽  
Donald G. Kewman ◽  
Ruth W. Brannon
Keyword(s):  
New Paradigm ◽  
Psychological Practice

A New Paradigm in Intellectual Assessment?

1981 ◽  
Vol 26 (7) ◽  
pp. 507-509 ◽  
Author(s):  
Craig T. Ramey ◽  
David MacPhee
Keyword(s):  
New Paradigm ◽  
Intellectual Assessment

A New Paradigm for Understanding Suicide Terrorism

PsycCRITIQUES ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 50 (47) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark H. Waugh
Keyword(s):  
Suicide Terrorism ◽  
New Paradigm
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document