A negative order-repetition priming effect: Inhibition of order in unattended auditory sequences?

2003 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 199-218 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Hughes ◽  
Dylan M. Jones
Keyword(s):  
Repetition Priming ◽  
Priming Effect ◽  
Negative Order ◽  
Repetition Priming Effect

Masked immediate-repetition-priming effect on the early lexical process in the bilateral anterior temporal areas assessed by neuromagnetic responses

2010 ◽  
Vol 68 (2) ◽  
pp. 114-124 ◽  
Author(s):  
Norio Fujimaki ◽  
Tomoe Hayakawa ◽  
Aya Ihara ◽  
Ayumu Matani ◽  
Qiang Wei ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Repetition Priming ◽  
Priming Effect ◽  
Repetition Priming Effect

scholarly journals Refractory effects in picture naming as assessed in a semantic blocking paradigm

2005 ◽  
Vol 58 (4) ◽  
pp. 667-692 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eva Belke ◽  
Antje S. Meyer ◽  
Markus F. Damian
Keyword(s):  
Repetition Priming ◽  
Picture Naming ◽  
Priming Effect ◽  
Blocking Effect ◽  
Semantic System ◽  
The Gaze ◽  
Lexical Items ◽  
Naming Latencies ◽  
Repetition Priming Effect ◽  
Effect Experiment

In the cyclic semantic blocking paradigm participants repeatedly name sets of objects with semantically related names ( homogeneous sets) or unrelated names ( heterogeneous sets). The naming latencies are typically longer in related than in unrelated sets. In Experiment 1 we replicated this semantic blocking effect and demonstrated that the effect only arose after all objects of a set had been shown and named once. In Experiment 2, the objects of a set were presented simultaneously (instead of on successive trials). Evidence for semantic blocking was found in the naming latencies and in the gaze durations for the objects, which were longer in homogeneous than in heterogeneous sets. For the gaze-to-speech lag between the offset of gaze on an object and the onset of the articulation of its name, a repetition priming effect was obtained but no blocking effect. Experiment 3 showed that the blocking effect for speech onset latencies generalized to new, previously unnamed lexical items. We propose that the blocking effect is due to refractory behaviour in the semantic system.

Cross-language repetition priming effect of semantic access for trilinguals

2016 ◽  
Vol 48 (11) ◽  
pp. 1401 ◽  
Author(s):  
Li LI ◽  
Yang ZHANG ◽  
Xuan LI ◽  
Hongting GUO ◽  
Limei WU ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Repetition Priming ◽  
Priming Effect ◽  
Semantic Access ◽  
Cross Language ◽  
Repetition Priming Effect

Lack of repetition priming effect on visual event-related potentials in schizophrenia

1999 ◽  
Vol 46 (1) ◽  
pp. 137-140 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroo Matsuoka ◽  
Kazunori Matsumoto ◽  
Hisato Yamazaki ◽  
Hirotaka Sakai ◽  
Shinya Miwa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Repetition Priming ◽  
Priming Effect ◽  
Event Related Potentials ◽  
Related Potentials ◽  
Repetition Priming Effect

Repetition Priming Follows Spontaneous but not Prompted Recognition of Familiar Faces

1992 ◽  
Vol 44 (3) ◽  
pp. 423-454 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joana Brunas-Wagstaff ◽  
Andrew W. Young ◽  
Andrew W. Ellis
Keyword(s):  
Repetition Priming ◽  
Priming Effect ◽  
Semantic Information ◽  
Reaction Times ◽  
Training Phase ◽  
Test Reaction ◽  
Familiar Face ◽  
Spontaneous Recognition ◽  
Per Se ◽  
Repetition Priming Effect

Reaction times to make a familiarity decision to the faces of famous people were measured after recognition of the faces in a pre-training phase had occurred spontaneously or following prompting with a name or other cue. At test, reaction times to familiar faces that had been recognized spontaneously in the pre-training phase were significantly facilitated relative to an unprimed comparison condition. Reaction times to familiar faces recognized only after prompting in the pre-training phase were not significantly facilitated. This was demonstrated both when a name prompt was used (Experiments 1 and 3) and when subjects were cued with brief semantic information (Experiment 2). Repetition priming was not found to depend on prior spontaneous recognition per se. In Experiment 3, spontaneously recognizing a familiar face did not prime subsequent familiarity judgements when the same face had only been identified following prompting on a prior encounter. In Experiment 4, recognition memory for faces recognized after cueing was found to be over 90% accurate. This indicates that prompted recognition does not yield repetition priming, even though subjects can remember the faces. A fusion of “face recognition unit” and “episodic record” accounts of the repetition priming effect may be more useful than either theory alone in explaining these results.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document