Building and using large common sense knowledge bases

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenneth D. Forbus
Keyword(s):  
Common Sense ◽  
Knowledge Bases ◽  
Common Sense Knowledge

Ontologies

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Piek Vossen
Keyword(s):  
Artificial Intelligence ◽  
Information Systems ◽  
Common Sense ◽  
Information Science ◽  
Knowledge Bases ◽  
Philosophical Tradition ◽  
Small Scale ◽  
Language Understanding ◽  
Knowledge Structuring ◽  
Common Sense Knowledge

Ontology refers to the storage of information within a domain, to draw common sense inferences. The expressly linguistic nature of this sort of information would translate it into a lexicon. Traditions dealing with knowledge structuring within ontologies, can be positioned depending on their focus on words/concepts, for different purposes. These are, philosophical tradition, cognitive tradition, artificial intelligence tradition, lexical semantics, lexicography, and information science. Ontologically accumulated knowledge bases can be used to inform structural linguistic analysis, as well as partial understanding. However, most current NLP techniques hardly ever perform full language understanding. While NLP generally seems to be shifting towards inferencing systems that exploit common sense knowledge, small-scale information systems can be enhanced by (re)using more general strands of information. Prospects of convergence of different paradigms have also triggered of efforts to standardize ontological contents.

A Cross-Domain Recommender System Based on Common-Sense Knowledge Bases

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yi-Ting Tsai ◽  
Chih-Shiang Wuy ◽  
Hsiang-Ling Hsuy ◽  
Tenniel Liuy ◽  
Pei-Lin Cheny ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Recommender System ◽  
Common Sense ◽  
Knowledge Bases ◽  
Cross Domain ◽  
Common Sense Knowledge

scholarly journals The liberation of nature and knowledge: a case study on Hans Reichenbach’s naturalism

Synthese ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
László Kocsis ◽  
Adam Tamas Tuboly
Keyword(s):  
Common Sense ◽  
Interesting Case ◽  
Valuable Contribution ◽  
Rhetorical Strategy ◽  
Scientific Philosophy ◽  
Political Program ◽  
History Of ◽  
Contemporary Context ◽  
Common Sense Knowledge

AbstractOur main goal in this paper is to present and scrutinize Reichenbach’s own naturalism in our contemporary context, with special attention to competing versions of the concept. By exploring the idea of Reichenbach’s naturalism, we will argue that he defended a liberating, therapeutic form of naturalism, meaning that he took scientific philosophy (or philosophy of nature, Naturphilosophie) to be a possible cure for bad old habits and traditional ways of philosophy. For Reichenbach, naturalistic scientific philosophy was a well-established form of liberation. We do not intend to suggest that Reichenbach acted as an inventor of naturalism; nonetheless, invoking the term and the idea of ‘naturalism’ is more than a simple rhetorical strategy for rehabilitating Reichenbach as a forerunner of this field. We think that his ideas can make a valuable contribution to contemporary debates, and that he presents an interesting case among the other scientifically oriented proponents of his time. After presenting a short reconstruction of the meaning of naturalism—or, more appropriately, naturalisms—in order to be able to correctly situate Reichenbach within his own as well as a systematic context, we discuss Reichenbach’s naturalism against the background of his scientific philosophy, his views on the relation of common-sense knowledge to science, and his efforts at popularization. To delve deeper into this topic, we present a case study to show how Reichenbach argued that in both scientific and philosophical discussions (assuming their naturalistic continuity), it is necessary to move from the request and value of truth to probability. And, finally, we argue that the liberation of knowledge and nature was a socio-political program for Reichenbach, who talked about his own scientific philosophy as “a crusade.” By emphasizing this aspect of Reichenbach’s naturalism, we may be in a better position to situate him in the history of analytic philosophy in general, and in the yet-to-be-written narrative of the naturalistic movement in particular.

scholarly journals A Natural Logic System for Large Knowledge Bases

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Troels Andreasen ◽  
Henrik Bulskov ◽  
Jørgen Fischer Nilsson
Keyword(s):  
Common Sense ◽  
Scaling Up ◽  
Inference Engine ◽  
Knowledge Bases ◽  
General Purpose ◽  
Software System ◽  
Database Application ◽  
Natural Logic ◽  
Common Sense Reasoning ◽  
Database Operations

This paper describes principles and structure for a software system that implements a dialect of natural logic for knowledge bases. Natural logics are formal logics that resemble stylized natural language fragments, and whose reasoning rules reflect common-sense reasoning. Natural logics may be seen as forms of extended syllogistic logic. The paper proposes and describes realization of deductive querying functionalities using a previously specified natural logic dialect called Natura-Log. In focus here is the engineering of an inference engine employing as a key feature relational database operations. Thereby the inference steps are subjected to computation in bulk for scaling-up to large knowledge bases. Accordingly, the system eventually is to be realized as a general-purpose database application package with the database being turned logical knowledge base.

Noumenal Causality Reconsidered: Affection, Agency, and Meaning in Kant

1997 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 209-245 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenneth R. Westphal
Keyword(s):  
Common Sense ◽  
Natural Science ◽  
Necessary Conditions ◽  
Positive Answer ◽  
Pure Reason ◽  
Logical Possibility ◽  
Objective Reality ◽  
Metaphysical Question ◽  
Spatio Temporal ◽  
Common Sense Knowledge

The lead question of Kant's first Critique, indeed his whole Critical Philosophy is ‘How is Metaphysics as a Science Possible?’ Neo-Kantian and recent Anglophone interpretations of Kant's epistemology have concentrated on the ‘Transcendental Analytic’ of the first Critique, and have taken Kant's positive and legitimate sense of metaphysics to concern the necessary conditions of our knowledge of mathematics, natural science, and of course, our common sense knowledge of a spatio-temporal world of objects and events. However, in the ‘Canon of Pure Reason’ in the first Critique Kant indicates quite clearly that, although two of the leading sub-questions of metaphysics — ‘What should I so?’ and ‘What may I hope?’ — cannot be answered on theoretical grounds, they may be answered on practical grounds (A804-05=B832-33). Those practical grounds are elaborated and supplemented (mainly) in the latter two Critiques and the Religion. In each case, however, a definite and positive answer to a metaphysical question involves giving ‘objective reality’ to a concept, e.g., the concepts of freedom or immortality. ‘Objective reality’ involves possible reference to an object, where ‘possible reference’ involves more than merely describing a logical possibility.

Erratum: Common Sense Knowledge Based Personality Recognition from Text

2013 ◽  
pp. E1-E1
Author(s):  
Soujanya Poria ◽  
Alexander Gelbukh ◽  
Basant Agarwal ◽  
Erik Cambria ◽  
Newton Howard
Keyword(s):  
Common Sense ◽  
Knowledge Based ◽  
Personality Recognition ◽  
Common Sense Knowledge
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document