Human factors, organizational design, and productivity: Alternative management systems

1982 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ogden Brown
1983 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 69-69
Author(s):  
Ogden Brown

The Technical Group on Organizational Design and Management is interested in determining organizational characteristics of successful firms which have Human Factors Groups or Departments within their structure. Of particular interest is the organizational design employed by these companies and how the human factors function is incorporated into this framework. Also of interest is the degree of differentiation and the extent to which integrating functions have been or are now present in the organization. One way to learn about these considerations is to examine organizational programs, noting initial design, subsequent changes, management practices, and problems encountered in initiating human factors efforts. Another method by which we might learn about alternative management systems, organizational design, and problems encountered is to consult those who have the responsibility for managing human factors programs in large, high technology organizations which have incorporated the human factors function into their design.


1987 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
pp. 166-167 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew S. Imada

This symposium proposes macroergonomics as a vehicle for integrating human and organizational needs. The concept is defined and differentiated from more traditional studies in organizational behavior and human factors. Specific areas of focus include: conceptuation and differentiation of the unique contributions of macroergonomics; current practices and directions; integration of human and organizational data; and contemporary issues and concerns facing researchers and writers in the field.


1984 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 341-343
Author(s):  
Philip E. Knobel ◽  
Michael E. Wiklund

Engineer/constructor firms responsible for large process plant engineering, including the human-plant interface, have an emerging need for in-house human factors engineering (HFE) expertise. Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation has met his need through the creation of an HFE group. The group was founded as a small, informal, multidisciplinary organization. In an experimental manner, the group was provided the freedom to define its HFE markets within the firm and the process and power industry. Organizational design and management factors related to the functions and effectiveness of the group are discussed.


Author(s):  
Philip Grossweiler ◽  
David Costello ◽  
Kevin Graham

Regulations governing the safety of drilling and offshore production operations have changed since the Macondo spill. This paper suggests management level perspectives on the nexus of human factors and safety management systems including an overview of ideas from: Congressional Testimony; the Bipartisan Policy Center inputs to the Presidents Commission on the Spill; the National Academy of Engineering and National Research Council Deepwater Horizon Report, and workshops and initiatives by RPSEA (Research Partnership to Secure Energy for America), SPE, and ASME. The value of benchmarks from risk management practices from the aviation, nuclear power, and financial community are also discussed. The paper will also consider questions as to what management might consider reducing risk and treating risk management as not just a cost center, but as a way to integrate safety management systems into improving corporate performance for all stakeholders. Paper published with permission.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael A. Greig ◽  
Judy Village ◽  
Shane M. Dixon ◽  
Filippo A. Salustri ◽  
W. Patrick Neumann

This paper presents the development of a tool that allows an organization to assess its level of human factors (HF) and ergonomics integration and maturity within the organization. The Human Factors Integration Toolset (available at: TBD) has been developed and validated through a series of workshops with 45 participants from industry and academia and through industry partnered field-testing. HF maturity is assessed across five levels in 16 organizational functions based on any of 31 discrete elements contributing to HF. Summing element scores in a function determines a percent of ideal HF for the function. Industry stakeholders engaged in field-testing found the tool helped to establish the status of HF in the organization, plan projects to further develop HF capabilities, and initiate discussions on HF for performance and well-being. Improvement suggestions included adding an IT function, refining the language for non-HF specialists, including knowledge work, and creating a digital version to improve usability. Practitioner Summary A tool scoring HF capability in 16 organization functions has been developed collaboratively. Industry stakeholders expressed a need for the tool and provided validation of tool design decisions. Fieldtesting improved tool usability and showed that, beyond scoring HF capability, the tool created opportunities for discussions of HF-related improvement possibilities. Keywords: Macroergonomics, ergonomics strategy, organizational design and management, process management, operations management This paper was awarded a Liberty Mutual Award for 2020.


2007 ◽  
Vol 99 (6) ◽  
pp. 1629-1634 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard G. Smith ◽  
Fabian D. Menalled ◽  
G. P. Robertson

2019 ◽  
Vol 273 ◽  
pp. 01002
Author(s):  
Job Smeltink ◽  
Sybert Stroeve ◽  
Barry Kirwan

Controlling and improving safety in organisations is achieved using a Safety Management System (SMS). Notwithstanding the variety of components considered in SMS standards, including human factors and safety culture, safety management systems are sometimes observed by those at the ‘sharp end’ as being bureaucratic, distinct from actual operations, and being too focused on the prevention of deviations from procedures, rather than on the effective support of safety in the real operational context. The soft parts of advancing safety in organisations, such as the multitude of interrelations and the informal aspects in an organisation that influence safety, are only considered to a limited extent in traditional safety management systems. The research in Future Sky Safety Project 5 (FSS P5) focused on improving these human-related, informal organisational aspects. Since every organisation is unique, in the operations it conducts, its history, and its organisational culture, there cannot be a one-size-fits-all standard for advancing safety in organisations. Rather, this needs to be based on the organisation at hand, leading to tailored solutions. This has been applied to a safety culture assessment and enhancement approach applied for six key organisations at London Luton Airport, and the approach has become known as the Luton Safety Stack. The six organisations decided to share the detailed results of their individual safety culture assessments. They formed a group that holds quarterly meetings, which always include a workshop element. From this approach, the organisations were stimulated to develop harmonised procedures for all ground-handling operators at Luton, and for each operation, creating a simple one-page procedure with diagrams, to keep it simple and safe. The Luton Safety Stack shows that when organisations share a place, such as at an airport, they need the opportunity to meet to discuss both potential safety threats, and opportunities to advance safety, because even through organisations are interdependent, safety issues in one organisation often have implications for others.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document