The Influence of Lumbar Modifiers on Functional and Radiological Outcomes in the Brace Treatment of Lenke Type 1 Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alkan Bayrak ◽  
Altug Duramaz ◽  
Alican Koluman ◽  
Burak Belen ◽  
Vedat Öztürk
Keyword(s):  
Body Height ◽  
Functional Evaluation ◽  
Radiological Evaluation ◽  
Brace Treatment ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Scoliosis Research Society ◽  
Lenke Classification ◽  
Curve Magnitude ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Background Brace treatment prevents the progression of scoliosis and reduces surgical treatment rates. However, the efficacy of brace treatment varies depending on the patientʼs age, gender, curve magnitude and type, structure of the curve, and patient compliance at the beginning of treatment. Methods Between January 2009 and April 2015, 106 Lenke type 1 AIS consecutive patients (69 females, 37 males) who were treated with a brace were examined in three groups according to Lenke classification lumbar modifiers. The patients were evaluated at pre-bracing and 1 and 2 years after bracing. The Scoliosis Research Society 22 (SRS-22) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) were used for functional evaluation. Radiological evaluation revealed the Cobb angle, thoracic kyphosis angle, lumbar lordosis angle, trunk shift, shoulder asymmetry, and body height difference. Results Functional and radiological evaluation showed a statistically significant improvement in Lenke 1A, 1B, and 1C at 1 and 2 years after bracing compared to the pre-bracing (p = 0.000, p = 0.000, and p = 0.000, respectively). Lenke 1C had the best ODI score and followed by decreasing values of 1B and 1A respectively (p = 0.009). Lenke 1B had the best SRS-22 score and the mean scores of 1A and 1C were equal (p = 0.017). There was no significant difference between the groups in the parameters other than the trunk shift in radiological evaluation (p = 0.043). Conclusions Significant improvement was observed in all types of lumbar modifiers at the end of the 2nd year compared to pre-bracing. The best improvement in the ODI score was in the 1C modifier, whereas the best improvement in the SRS-22 score was in the 1B modifier. The type of lumbar modifier should be directly taken into consideration before starting brace treatment in Lenke type 1 AIS. Level of evidence Level III, retrospective study

scholarly journals Choosing the Distal Fusion Levels in Lenke Type 1 Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: How Do the Existing Classifications and Recommendations Guide Us?

2020 ◽  
pp. 219256822091071
Author(s):  
Bhavuk Garg ◽  
Nishank Mehta ◽  
Rudra Narayan Mukherjee
Keyword(s):  
Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis ◽  
Idiopathic Scoliosis ◽  
Treatment Outcomes ◽  
Outcome Measures ◽  
Deformity Correction ◽  
Sagittal Vertical Axis ◽  
Scoliosis Research Society ◽  
Lenke Classification ◽  
Selective Fusion ◽  
Significant Difference

Study Design: Retrospective cohort. Objective: ( a) To compare the recommendations of Lenke and Peking Union Medical College (PUMC) classifications in choosing distal fusion levels in Lenke 1 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) curves and ( b) to analyze whether the variability in distal fusion levels influences treatment outcomes. Methods: Hospital records of Lenke 1 AIS patients operated for single stage, posterior-only deformity correction were analyzed. Distal fusion levels recommended by Lenke and PUMC classifications were calculated and were compared with the actual distal fusion levels. The study population was divided based on whether the actual distal fusion levels were in agreement, shorter or longer than those recommended by Lenke classification. Subgroup analysis of Lenke 1C curves was done. The groups were compared with regard to the following outcome measures: Cobb angle correction, postoperative sagittal vertical axis, postoperative C7 offset, and Scoliosis Research Society–22r (SRS-22r) score at 24 months. Results: The distal fusion levels recommended by the 2 classifications were in agreement in 92 of 104 cases. In all the cases with disparity, Lenke classification recommended shorter fusions than the PUMC classification. No statistically significant difference was observed in the outcome measures—whether the actual distal fusion levels were in agreement, shorter, or longer than those recommended by the Lenke classification or whether or not the recommendations for selective fusion of any of these classifications were adhered to. Conclusion: Lenke classification can save fusion levels without compromising on treatment outcomes when compared with PUMC classification. Variability in choice of distal fusion levels is not clinically significant at 24-month follow-up.

scholarly journals Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis detection and referral trends: impact treatment options

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 75-84
Author(s):  
Alison Anthony ◽  
Reinhard Zeller ◽  
Cathy Evans ◽  
Jennifer A. Dermott
Keyword(s):  
Family History ◽  
Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis ◽  
Idiopathic Scoliosis ◽  
Cobb Angle ◽  
Geographic Location ◽  
Initial Assessment ◽  
Brace Treatment ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Curve Magnitude

Abstract Study design Retrospective cross-sectional study. Objective To analyze the patient demographic referred for scoliosis to the Hospital for Sick Children to determine the proportion of patients suitable for brace treatment, as per the Scoliosis Research Society guidelines. Summary of background data There is level 1 evidence that bracing in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) decreases the risk of curve progression and need for surgery, but optimal brace treatment requires early curve detection. Methods We performed a retrospective review of 618 consecutive patients who underwent initial assessment in our Spine Clinic between Jan. 1 and Dec. 31, 2014. We included children 10–18 years, with scoliosis greater than 10°, excluding those diagnosed with non-idiopathic curves. Primary outcomes were Cobb angle, menarchal status, and Risser score. We analyzed the effect of specific referral variables (family history, the person who first noticed the curve, and geographic location of residence) on presenting curve magnitude. Results During the study period, 335 children met the inclusion criteria, with an average age of 14.1 ± 1.8 years and a mean Cobb angle of 36.8 ± 14.5°. Brace treatment was indicated in 17% of patients; 18% had curves beyond optimal curve range for bracing (> 40°), and 55% were skeletally mature, therefore not brace candidates. The majority of curves (54%) were first detected by the patient or family member and averaged 7° more than curves first detected by a physician. A family history of scoliosis made no difference to curve magnitude, nor did geographic location of residence. Conclusion The majority of AIS patients present too late for effective management with bracing. Level of evidence III.

Evaluation of Reduction Accuracy of Suture-Button and Screw Fixation Techniques for Syndesmotic Injuries

2016 ◽  
Vol 37 (12) ◽  
pp. 1317-1325 ◽  
Author(s):  
Onur Kocadal ◽  
Mehmet Yucel ◽  
Murad Pepe ◽  
Ertugrul Aksahin ◽  
Cem Nuri Aktekin
Keyword(s):  
Screw Fixation ◽  
Ct Scans ◽  
Functional Evaluation ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Suture Button ◽  
Fixation Group ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Mean

Background: Among the most important predictors of functional results of treatment of syndesmotic injuries is the accurate restoration of the syndesmotic space. The purpose of this study was to investigate the reduction performance of screw fixation and suture-button techniques using images obtained from computed tomography (CT) scans. Methods: Patients at or below 65 years who were treated with screw or suture-button fixation for syndesmotic injuries accompanying ankle fractures between January 2012 and March 2015 were retrospectively reviewed in our regional trauma unit. A total of 52 patients were included in the present study. Fixation was performed with syndesmotic screws in 26 patients and suture-button fixation in 26 patients. The patients were divided into 2 groups according to the fixation methods. Postoperative CT scans were used for radiologic evaluation. Four parameters (anteroposterior reduction, rotational reduction, the cross-sectional syndesmotic area, and the distal tibiofibular volumes) were taken into consideration for the radiologic assessment. Functional evaluation of patients was done using the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot scale at the final follow-up. The mean follow-up period was 16.7 ± 11.0 months, and the mean age was 44.1 ± 13.2. Results: There was a statistically significant decrease in the degree of fibular rotation ( P = .03) and an increase in the upper syndesmotic area ( P = .006) compared with the contralateral limb in the screw fixation group. In the suture-button fixation group, there was a statistically significant increase in the lower syndesmotic area ( P = .02) and distal tibiofibular volumes ( P = .04) compared with the contralateral limbs. The mean AOFAS scores were 88.4 ± 9.2 and 86.1 ± 14.0 in the suture-button fixation and screw fixation group, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in the functional ankle joint scores between the groups. Conclusion: Although the functional outcomes were similar, the restoration of the fibular rotation in the treatment of syndesmotic injuries by screw fixation was troublesome and the volume of the distal tibiofibular space increased with the suture-button fixation technique. Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective comparative study.

scholarly journals STRYDE versus PRECICE magnetic internal lengthening nail for femur lengthening

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sherif Galal ◽  
Jonggu Shin ◽  
Peter Principe ◽  
Nathan Khabyeh-Hasbani ◽  
Rena Mehta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Weight Bearing ◽  
Functional Results ◽  
Research Society ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Limb Deformity ◽  
Scoliosis Research Society ◽  
Femoral Lengthening ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Therapeutic Study ◽  
Distraction Rate

Abstract Introduction Magnetic internal lengthening nails (MILNs) have been used for femoral lengthening to avoid complications associated with external fixation. The titanium version of the MILN (PRECICE®) has been in use since 2011 but had limitations (50–75 lb) in post-operative weight bearing. A new stainless-steel version of the MILN (STRYDE®) allows 150–250 lb of post-operative weight bearing. The aim is to compare the outcomes of using these two different MILNs for both unilateral and bilateral femoral lengthening. Methods A single-center, retrospective cohort study was conducted in which patients’ records were reviewed from the period from January 2017 to March 2020. A total of 66 femoral lengthening procedures were included in the study and were divided into two groups: STRYDE® group (30 femora) and PRECICE® group (36 femora). Outcomes assessed were the 6-months post-operative Limb Deformity-Scoliosis Research Society (LD-SRS) Score, adjacent joint range of motion (ROM), average distraction rate, bone healing index (BHI), and complications. Results No statistically significant difference was found between the two groups in regard to the (LD-SRS) score, hip ROM, or knee ROM. Statistically significant differences were found between the two groups in regard to BHI (average of 0.84 months/cm and 0.67 months/cm for STRYDE® and PRECICE®, respectively) and distraction rate (average of 0.6 mm/day and 0.9 mm/day for STRYDE® and PRECICE®, respectively). No mechanical nail complications were reported in the STRYDE® group compared to three events of nail failure in the PRECICE® group. One femur in the PRECICE® group needed BMAC injection for delayed healing compared to four femurs in the STRYDE® group. Conclusion The STRYDE® MILN yields comparable functional results to those of PRECICE® MILN and shows fewer mechanical nail complications. However, STRYDE® MILN requires a slower distraction rate and yields slower healing (larger BHI). Level of evidence Level III, Therapeutic study.

scholarly journals ADOLESCENT IDIOPATHIC SCOLIOSIS AND SIMILAR CONDITIONS: THREE-DIMENSIONAL CLASSIFICATION

2018 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 286-292
Author(s):  
Enguer Beraldo Garcia ◽  
Liliane Faria Garcia ◽  
Saulo Terror Giesbrecht ◽  
Luis Gustavo Vasconcelos ◽  
Enguer Beraldo Garcia Jr ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis ◽  
Idiopathic Scoliosis ◽  
Sagittal Plane ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Quantitative Factor ◽  
Lenke Classification ◽  
Dimensional Classification ◽  
Significant Difference

ABSTRACT Objective: To create a new comprehensive, three-dimensional, applicable classification for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis and similar conditions. Methods: The Three-Dimensional Classification was created with three components: the first, the quantitative factor, divides into three types according to the number of curves; the second, the locator factor defines the most structured point of the curve; and the third, the sagittal factor, evaluates the overall sagittal plane. To test the new classification, we studied the images of 99 patients comparing the intra- and interobserver agreement and reproducibility index of the Three-Dimensional Classification with that of Lenke. Results: It can be stated that, overall, the agreement between the three evaluators in relation to the Three-Dimensional Classification and that of Lenke in this series was considered very good. Conclusions: The case study showed a significant difference in the percentages between the two Classifications. In the evaluation of thoracic kyphosis, the Three-Dimensional Classification defined 26.6% of the cases as hyperkyphosis and 61.6% as normal, whereas the Lenke Classification defined 6.06% as hyperkyphosis and 84.18% as normal. However, in the global comparative analysis of the methods, the Three-Dimensional and Lenke systems presented statistically the same levels of agreement, since the values of the confidence intervals overlap. Level of Evidence II; Retrospective study.

scholarly journals Is Lenke Rule About Selective Thoracic Fusion Applicable for Younger Adult Idiopathic Scoliosis Under 40 Years of Age: Comparison With Adolescent Patients

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Honglei Yi ◽  
Hu Chen ◽  
Xinhui Wang ◽  
Wei Zhang ◽  
Hong Xia
Keyword(s):  
Idiopathic Scoliosis ◽  
Operating Time ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Research Society ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Scoliosis Research Society ◽  
Selective Thoracic Fusion ◽  
Release Technique ◽  
Curve Magnitude ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Background To evaluate the surgical outcome of younger adult idiopathic scoliosis patients (YAdIS) with selective thoracic fusion by comparing with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). Methods Seventy-two idiopathic scoliosis patients (36 adults and 36 adolescents) treated by posterior-only all-pedicle screw technique at the same institution were retrospective reviewed and matched by curve pattern and curve magnitude. Radiographic parameters were evaluated preoperatively, postoperatively and at final follow-up. Operating time, blood loss, transfusion and complications were noted. Clinical outcome was assessed by Scoliosis Research Society-22 questionnaire (SRS-22). Results The major thoracic curves in YAdIS group and AIS group were 56.3°±9.7°, 53.3°±10.1° and corrected to 17.2°±7.3°, 14.9°±7.5° respectively without significant difference of correction rate (69.3% vs. 72.0%). For the lumbar curve, Cobb angles in two groups were 35.6° ± 10.1° and 31.4 ± 9.2° preoperatively, and was spontaneously corrected to 18.5° ± 9.0° and 12.6° ± 8.2°. Correction rates were 48.0% and 59.8% (P＜0.05). Coronal vertebra alignments (CVA) in YAdIS group were 20.6 ± 9.7 mm before surgery and 16.8 ± 7.9 mm after surgery (P＞0.05), while CVA in the AIS group was 17.8 ± 10.5 mm preoperatively and decreased to 9.7 ± 8.3 mm postoperatively (P＜0.05). However, sagittal parameters showed significant improvements in thoracic kyphosis in both groups (P＜0.05). Complication rates were 13.9% vs. 5.6% without significant difference. Preoperative SRS score was worse in the YAdIS group than the AIS group. However, there were no significant differences between the final SRS score. Conclusions YAdIS patients gained similar correction of major thoracic curve as AIS patients, although the curve were stiffer.However,more extensive release technique needed to be done which was associated with longer operation time hospital stay. YAdIS had more complications,though this difference was not statistically significant. Patients with lower SRS score in YAdIS can also be treated very well with selective thoracic fusion surgery.

scholarly journals Functional evaluation of diabetic patients with foot ulcers

2018 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 136-139
Author(s):  
Thiago Santos Fernando ◽  
Vinicius Quadros Borges ◽  
Gabriel Ferreira Ferraz ◽  
Kelly Cristina Stéfani
Keyword(s):  
Comprehensive Evaluation ◽  
Diabetic Patients ◽  
Functional Evaluation ◽  
Foot And Ankle ◽  
Aofas Score ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Plantar Ulcers ◽  
The Mean ◽  
American Orthopaedic

Objective: The objective of this study was to perform a functional evaluation of diabetic patients with plantar ulcers using the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score. Methods: In this prospective cohort study, 50 diabetic patients treated in an outpatient clinic under conservative management were consecutively evaluated for active ulcers on the foot. The ulcer mean progression time, size and classification and the AOFAS score were evaluated. Results: Among the sample, 38 (76%) were men, the mean age was 64 years, and the mean body mass index was 28.27 kg/m2. The mean ulcer progression time was 9 months, and 40 (80%) patients were classified as Wagner grade 1. There was a significant difference in AOFAS scoresbetween ulcer grades. Conclusion: The AOFAS score can be used for functional evaluation in diabetic patients with ulcers. However, due to the peculiarities of this population, it is important to search for new and more comprehensive evaluation instruments. Level of Evidence II; Prognostic Studies; Prospective Study.

Functional Evaluation of RNLS, a Gene Harboring Risk Variants for Type 1 Diabetes in European and African Ancestry Subjects

Diabetes ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 67 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1702-P
Author(s):  
SUNA ONENGUT-GUMUSCU ◽  
NOAH VOGLER ◽  
MARIA FAIDAS ◽  
REBECCA R. PICKIN ◽  
ELAINE GERSZ ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Type 1 Diabetes ◽  
African Ancestry ◽  
Functional Evaluation ◽  
Risk Variants

Nonunion Rates in Hind- and Midfoot Arthrodesis in Current, Ex-, and Nonsmokers

2020 ◽  
pp. 107110072097126
Author(s):  
Jack Allport ◽  
Jayasree Ramaskandhan ◽  
Malik S. Siddique
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factor ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Relative Risk ◽  
Retrospective Cohort Study ◽  
Retrospective Cohort ◽  
Smoking Status ◽  
Time Frame ◽  
Modifiable Risk Factor ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Significant Difference

Background: Nonunion rates in hind or midfoot arthrodesis have been reported as high as 41%. The most notable and readily modifiable risk factor that has been identified is smoking. In 2018, 14.4% of the UK population were active smokers. We examined the effect of smoking status on union rates for a large cohort of patients undergoing hind- or midfoot arthrodesis. Methods: In total, 381 consecutive primary joint arthrodeses were identified from a single surgeon’s logbook (analysis performed on a per joint basis, with a triple fusion reported as 3 separate joints). Patients were divided based on self-reported smoking status. Primary outcome was clinical union. Delayed union, infection, and the need for ultrasound bone stimulation were secondary outcomes. Results: Smoking prevalence was 14.0%, and 32.2% were ex-smokers. Groups were comparable for sex, diabetes, and body mass index. Smokers were younger and had fewer comorbidities. Nonunion rates were higher in smokers (relative risk, 5.81; 95% CI, 2.54-13.29; P < .001) with no statistically significant difference between ex-smokers and nonsmokers. Smokers had higher rates of infection ( P = .05) and bone stimulator use ( P < .001). Among smokers, there was a trend toward slower union with heavier smoking ( P = .004). Conclusion: This large retrospective cohort study confirmed previous evidence that smoking has a considerable negative effect on union in arthrodesis. The 5.81 relative risk in a modifiable risk factor is extremely high. Arthrodesis surgery should be undertaken with extreme caution in smokers. Our study shows that after cessation of smoking, the risk returns to normal, but we were unable to quantify the time frame. Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Arthroscopic Repair of the Hip Abductor Musculotendinous Unit: The Effect of Microfracture on Clinical Outcomes

2021 ◽  
pp. 036354652199967
Author(s):  
Baris Kocaoglu ◽  
Ahmet Emre Paksoy ◽  
Simone Cerciello ◽  
Matthieu Ollivier ◽  
Romain Seil ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Surgical Repair ◽  
Gluteus Medius ◽  
Arthroscopic Repair ◽  
Harris Hip Score ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Outcome Score ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Hip Abductor ◽  
Tendon Tears

Background: Endoscopic surgical repair has become a common procedure for treating patients with hip abductor tendon tears. Considering that retear rates are high after the repair of gluteus medius and minimus tendons, exploring alternative strategies to enhance structural healing is important. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of adding microfracture to single-row repair (SR) on outcomes after the surgical repair of gluteus medius and minimus tendons and compare with SR and double-row repair (DR) without microfracture. We hypothesized that microfracture of the trochanteric footprint with SR would lead to superior clinical outcomes and lower clinically evident retear rates compared with SR and DR without the addition of microfracture. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A total of 50 patients who underwent primary arthroscopic repair of hip gluteus medius and minimus tendon tears were investigated. Patients were divided into 3 groups: DR, 16 patients; SR, 14 patients; and SR with microfracture (SRM), 20 patients. Patients were evaluated with a visual analog scale (VAS) for pain as well as the Hip Outcome Score–Activities of Daily Living (HOS-ADL), Hip Outcome Score–Sport Specific (HOS-SS), and modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) both preoperatively and at a minimum 2-year follow-up (mean, 30 months). Results: Among the SR, SRM, and DR groups, the greatest decrease in VAS scores and increase in mHHS, HOS-ADL, and HOS-SS scores were seen in the SRM group, and all the differences were significant ( P < .001 to P = .006). The abductor tendon retear rates were 31.3%, 35.7%, and 15.0% in the DR, SR, and SRM groups, respectively. Retear rates were lower in the SRM group compared with the SR and DR groups ( P = .042); however, there was no significant difference between the SR and DR groups ( P = .32) in terms of retear rates. Conclusion: Endoscopic SR with microfracture was a safe, practical, and effective technique and had the potential advantage of enhancing biological healing at the footprint. The addition of microfracturing the trochanteric footprint significantly lowered the retear rate and provided better functional outcomes than SR and DR without microfracture.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document