scholarly journals serving the political science community of europe

2001 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 2-2
Author(s):  
Joe Foweraker ◽  
Jim Newell
2012 ◽  
Vol 45 (03) ◽  
pp. 563-564
Author(s):  
Melissa Pewett

Join your colleagues in the political science community at APSA's 2012 Annual Meeting. With nearly 900 panels and roundtables, attendees can explore an array of research topics, including this year's theme “Representation and Renewal.” Along with access to timely scholarly research, attendees will benefit from a variety of social events and special programs to encourage networking and professional development. APSA invites you to take advantage of all the exciting features offered at the annual meeting.


1973 ◽  
Vol 6 (04) ◽  
pp. 400-403
Author(s):  
Stephen V. Stephens

It may be an unfortunate commentary on our achievements as “scientists”, but an American government textbook tends to be a rather topical document, and the ones that are good enough to justify the effort must be updated every several years, in order to maintain their competitive position. One of the best, I think, and surely one of the ones most highly recommended to me by other political scientists, was Marian Irish and James Prothro'sThe Politics of American Democracy(Prentice-Hall: 4th edn., 1968; 5th edn., 1971). I used the 1968 edition in classes several times, with such satisfaction that I ordered the new fifth edition in the summer of 1971, sight unseen. As the following comments indicate, I had reason to regret the decision. Since textbooks are rarely reviewed, and since Prentice-Hall reports that this edition will be current through 1975, I have reluctantly chosen this medium to bring some rather strange attributes of this book to the attention of the political science community.In common with many of the texts that have appeared in the last one or two years, the authors have gone to considerable effort to make their new edition more relevant to the great political disturbances we have just experienced and — to a lesser extent — are still experiencing: ghetto riots, the Vietnam peace movement, and women's liberation.


Author(s):  
Nigel Copsey

Within the political science community, scholars typically draw a sharp distinction between the “radical right” and “fascism.” This chapter challenges such a distinction, and encourages scholars to reprise fascism’s relationship to the radical right. It suggests that (neo)fascism’s past offers the best route to understanding the present-day radical right. Such a historical interpretation seeks to enhance our understanding of the central importance of the neofascist European New Right as the “missing link” between fascism and contemporary radical right-wing populism. Moreover, much of the scholarly literature theorizing the radical right also fails to take into account activist cultures and shared domains. Rather than breaking the historical link between the radical right and fascism, this chapter calls on those studying this field to reinstate this important link, thereby acknowledging the continuing presence of fascism in today’s radical right.


2018 ◽  
Vol 39 (5) ◽  
pp. 679-689 ◽  
Author(s):  
Enzo Lima ◽  
Melina Morschbacher ◽  
Paulo Peres

Where does the International Political Science Review (IPSR) stand in relation to the hierarchies of knowledge in the discipline? IPSR is the journal of the International Political Science Association and a well-established journal in the discipline of Political Science. The journal has been published since 1980 and in 2016 ranked 54 out of 163 journals in the field. Mapping IPSR’s profile can help us understand the changing thematic, epistemological and methodological preferences within the world of political science. This report maps the distribution of methodological techniques across 152 issues of IPSR, by analysing the abstracts of every article published between 1980 and 2015. In doing so, it aims to provide a clearer picture of the methodological approaches used by political scientists and endorsed by the political science community as acceptable scientific modes of knowledge making.


Author(s):  
Aleksandr R. Akramov ◽  

The article is a reference to the monograph by Y.N. Afanasyev’s “Dangerous Russia. The traditions of autocracy today”, which received devastating criticism from both the historical and the political science community. However, turning to the work 20 years after its release allows one to discard a number of limiting factors and look at the text in a new way, to understand what meanings the author of the monograph was trying to convey to his reader. The article concludes that the predominant emotional nature of the work of Y.N. Afanasyev is based on the historical and biographical context of the work. Such approach to the analysis of the work of Yu.N. Afanas’ev was not previously presented in the scientific literature, however, without taking into account the personality of the author himself, the reader can consider completely different meanings. The paper reveals a hidden meaning of the work related to the fact that Y.N. Afanasyev perceived the development of contemporary Russia as a looped movement in a circle. Such point of view is supported by the comments of Y.N. Afanasyev, as well as the structure of the monograph itself, which is the closest symbiosis of the history and politics of Russia.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document