Contract Enforcement for Claimants’ Satisfaction with Construction Dispute Resolution: Moderating Role of Shadow of the Future, Fairness Perception, and Trust

2021 ◽  
Vol 147 (2) ◽  
pp. 04020168
Author(s):  
Lihan Zhang ◽  
Yongcheng Fu ◽  
Wenxue Lu
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Contract Enforcement ◽  
Fairness Perception ◽  
The Future ◽  
Moderating Role

scholarly journals A JUDICIAL PERSPECTIVE ON ISLAMIC FINANCE LITIGATION IN MALAYSIA

1970 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tun Arifin Bin Zakaria
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Financial Services ◽  
Legal Framework ◽  
Islamic Finance ◽  
Finance Industry ◽  
International Recognition ◽  
The Future ◽  
Competitive Products ◽  
Civil Courts

In the last four decades, Malaysian jurists and Sharî’ah scholars have immensely contributed to the field of Islamic finance sufficient to attract international recognition and acceptance. This has turned Malaysia to a vibrant global hub for Islamic financial services. In furtherance of this enviable position, a new legal framework was recently introduced which is expected to reemphasize the pragmatic and resilient nature of the Islamic finance industry. This paper therefore provides a judicial perspective on the recent reforms in the legal framework of Islamic finance industry, examines the dynamics of Islamic finance litigation, and highlights the important role of the judiciary and other dispute resolution institutions in shaping the future of the industry. In Malaysia, the nature of the trading concepts, upon which the Islamic finance facilities are based, are the major sources of disputes since the Islamic finance industry operates within a conventional framework and related disputes are litigated in the civil courts. It is therefore argued that the biggest challenge for the courts in the exercise of its judicial function is the application of relevant laws to Islamic finance transactions. The paper concludes that strengthening the legal architecture of the industrywill necessarily lead to the development of competitive products that are not only Sharî’ah-compliant but alsoconventionally viable. This can be achieved through the channelling of Islamic finance disputes to an alternative forum for appropriate dispute resolution. ABSTRAKDalam empat dekad yang lalu, cendekiawan Malaysia dan pakar Syariah telah memberi sumbangan yang besar kepada bidang kewangan Islam yang cukup bagi menarik pengiktirafan dan penerimaan antarabangsa. Ini telah menjadikan Malaysia suatu hab global bertenaga untuk perkhidmatan kewangan Islam. Bagi meneruskan kedudukan yang dicemburui ini, satu rangka kerja undang-undang baru telah diperkenalkan baru-baru ini yang diharap lebih menekankan kepada lumrah pragmatik dan berdaya tahan industri kewangan Islam. Oleh itu, kertas kerja ini memberikan perspektif kehakiman terhadap pembaharuan mutakhir dalam rangka kerja undang undang industri kewangan Islam, mengkaji dinamik litigasi kewangan Islam, dan menjelaskan peranan penting badan kehakiman dan institusi-institusi penyelesaian pertikaian yang lain dalam membentuk masa depan industri ini. Di Malaysia, lumrah konsep perdagangan, yang mana menjadi dasar kemudahan kewangan Islam, adalah punca utama pertikaian sejak industri kewangan Islam beroperasi di dalam rangka kerja konvensional dan pertikaian berkaitan telah dilitigasikan di mahkamah sivil. Maka ia telah dibahaskan bahawa cabaran terbesar bagi mahkamah pada menjalankan fungsi kehakimannya adalah aplikasi undang-undang yang berkaitan dengan urus niaga kewangan Islam. Kertas kerja ini menyimpulkan bahawa pengukuhan rangka kerja undang-undang industri akan membawa kepada pembangunan produk yang berdaya saing yang bukan sahaja patuh Syariah tetapi juga berdaya maju dari sudut konvensionalnya. Ini boleh dicapai melalui penyaluran pertikaian kewangan Islam kepada forum alternatif untuk penyelesaian pertikaian yang sesuai.

scholarly journals KEDUDUKAN DAN TANGGUNG JAWAB NOTARIS SEBAGAI PIHAK DALAM PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA PERDATA DI INDONESIA TERKAIT AKTA YANG DIBUATNYA

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 246-261
Author(s):  
Anita Afriana
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Code Of Ethics ◽  
Descriptive Study ◽  
The Other ◽  
Third Party ◽  
The Third ◽  
Legal Power ◽  
State Official ◽  
The Future

ABSTRAK Peran notaris sangat krusial dewasa ini digunakan oleh para pihak yang ingin membuat beragam perjanjian, dengan alasan akta notaris yang bersifat otentik dianggap masyarakat lebih terjamin kekuataan hukumnya daripada akta dibawah tangan. Namun dalam praktik, acapkali ditemukan adanya suatu akta notaris digugat untuk dimintakan pembatalan di muka pengadilan yang disebabkan karena kesalahan dari para pihak yang tidak sepakat dan tidak jujur dalam memberikan keterangannya terhadap notaris, atau kesalahan dari notaris itu sendiri baik karena kelalaiannya maupun karena kesengajaan. Penulisan artikel ini bersifat deskriptif analitis, dengan tujuan untuk melihat kedudukan notaris di pengadilan terkait penyelesaian sengketa baik dalam kapasitasnya sebagai pejabat negara maupun dari kedudukan akta otentik yang dihasilkannya serta tanggung jawab dari notaris/PPAT yang dianggap telah melakukan kesalahan ketika memberikan jasanya yang lebih lanjut dianggap merugikan pihak ketiga. Hasil menunjukkan bahwa dalam hal timbul permasalahan dikemudian hari atas terbitnya akta otentik yang dibuat oleh notaris, tidak serta merta notaris dapat ditarik sebagai pihak yang bersalah yang mengakibatkan persengketaan tetapi harus dilihat sejauhmana pelanggaran yang telah dilakukan oleh notaris, apakah ada kesalahan/tidak, pelanggaran terhadap kode etik dan atau UUJN.   Dalam penyelesaian sengketa di pengadilan dalam sengketa perdata, notaris dapat saja berkedudukan sebagai pihak antara lain Tergugat jika dirasa telah melakukan perbuatan melawan hukum sehingga merugikan pihak lain, sebagai Turut Tergugat, atau saksi. Tanggung jawab notaris/PPAT tergantung dari kedudukannya dalam penyelesaian sengketa, namun pada intinya mempertanggungjawabkan perbuatannya baik secara perdata, pidana, maupun administratif.   Kata kunci: notaris; perdata; sengketa; tanggung jawab. ABSTRACT The role of a notary today is crucial for the parties who wish to make variety of agreements, due to authentic notarial deed is considered to be more secure for the society than the legal power of the deed under the hand. Nevertheless, in practice it is frequently discovered the presence of a notarial deed being sued to be requested  for cancellation  before the court due to the fault of the parties who disagree and dihonest in his statement to the notary, or the fault of the notary him/herself, either for negligence or willful misconduct. This article/is an analytical descriptive study, in order to see the position of the notary in the process of examination of dispute in court either as a person in his/her capacity as a state official or from the positions of the authentic deed made are often the source of disputes and and responsibility of the notary who is deemed to have made mistakes during undertaking further work that is considered detrimental to the third party. In terms of any problems that might arise in the future on the publication of an authentic deed made by the notary, the notary may not necessarily be drawn as the guilty party which  caused the disputes, yet to be seen how far the offense has been committed by a notary, whether there is an error/not, a violation of the code of ethics and or the Law Number 2 of 2014 on the Position of Notary (hereinafter referred to as UUJN). In the dispute resolution in court on civil disputes, notaries can hold the position as the other party such as  Defendant,  if deemed to have  committed an unlawful act to the detriment of others, as a co-defendant, or witness. The responsibility of a notary/PPAT depends on his/her position in dispute resolution, but in essence, they are responsible for their actions, whether civil, criminal or administrative. Keywords: notary; dispute; private; responsibility

scholarly journals Peran kepercayaan, manfaat dan religiusitas dalam meningkatkan niat menggunakan kembali dompet digital

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 181
Author(s):  
Adinda Ridhia A.N ◽  
Yudi Sutarso
Keyword(s):  
Statistical Analysis ◽  
Descriptive Analysis ◽  
Perceived Value ◽  
Continuance Intention ◽  
Perceived Benefit ◽  
The Future ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Positive Effect ◽  
Moderating Role

The purpose of this study is to examine the effect of trust and perceived value on continuance intention of payment gateway services with religiosity as moderation variable. This study involves 130 respondents collected through questionnaires in the area of Surabaya and Sidoarjo, East Java. Their responses were analyzed using descriptive analysis with SPSS 16.0 and statistical analysis with WarpPLS 6.0. The results indicate that trust and perceived benefit have positive effect on continuance intention. The moderating role of religiosity has an effect on the relationship between trust and continuance intention. It can be impliead that wallet payment companies should develop their strategies in the future, especially as an evaluation of the performance of their services in fintech competition. They should also provide important information to wallet payment so that they can build trust and perceived benefit that have an impact on continuance intetntion by moderating religiosity to increase the use of wallet payment services.

Testing the Strain Theory of Suicide – The Moderating Role of Social Support

Crisis ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (2) ◽  
pp. 82-88 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bob Lew ◽  
Ksenia Chistopolskaya ◽  
Yanzheng Liu ◽  
Mansor Abu Talib ◽  
Olga Mitina ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Social Support ◽  
Suicidal Behavior ◽  
Online Survey ◽  
Perceived Social Support ◽  
Strain Theory ◽  
Cross Sectional Survey ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Psychological Strains ◽  
Moderating Role

Abstract. Background: According to the strain theory of suicide, strains, resulting from conflicting and competing pressures in an individual's life, are hypothesized to precede suicide. But social support is an important factor that can mitigate strains and lessen their input in suicidal behavior. Aims: This study was designed to assess the moderating role of social support in the relation between strain and suicidality. Methods: A sample of 1,051 employees were recruited in Beijing, the capital of China, through an online survey. Moderation analysis was performed using SPSS PROCESS Macro. Social support was measured with the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support, and strains were assessed with the Psychological Strains Scale. Results: Psychological strains are a good predictor of suicidality, and social support, a basic need for each human being, moderates and decreases the effects of psychological strains on suicidality. Limitations: The cross-sectional survey limited the extent to which conclusions about causal relationships can be drawn. Furthermore, the results may not be generalized to the whole of China because of its diversity. Conclusion: Social support has a tendency to mitigate the effects of psychological strains on suicidality.

Challenges of Fear Conditioning Research in the Age of RDoC

2017 ◽  
Vol 225 (3) ◽  
pp. 189-199 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tina B. Lonsdorf ◽  
Jan Richter
Keyword(s):  
Fear Conditioning ◽  
Clinical Diagnosis ◽  
Research Domain Criteria ◽  
Major Focus ◽  
The Future ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Methodological Considerations ◽  
Research Domain

Abstract. As the criticism of the definition of the phenotype (i.e., clinical diagnosis) represents the major focus of the Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) initiative, it is somewhat surprising that discussions have not yet focused more on specific conceptual and procedural considerations of the suggested RDoC constructs, sub-constructs, and associated paradigms. We argue that we need more precise thinking as well as a conceptual and methodological discussion of RDoC domains and constructs, their interrelationships as well as their experimental operationalization and nomenclature. The present work is intended to start such a debate using fear conditioning as an example. Thereby, we aim to provide thought-provoking impulses on the role of fear conditioning in the age of RDoC as well as conceptual and methodological considerations and suggestions to guide RDoC-based fear conditioning research in the future.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document