Some controversies in the education of nurses in New Zealand, Great Britain and the United States, with reference to the impact of economic and social factors

1985 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 205-222
Author(s):  
Prue Hyman
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
New Zealand ◽  
Great Britain ◽  
Social Factors ◽  
The United States ◽  
The Impact

Repeat Migration in the Age of the “Unauthorized Permanent Resident”: A Quantitative Assessment of Migration Intentions Postdeportation

2018 ◽  
Vol 52 (4) ◽  
pp. 1186-1217 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel E. Martínez ◽  
Jeremy Slack ◽  
Ricardo D. Martínez-Schuldt
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Immigration Policy ◽  
Social Factors ◽  
Multivariate Analyses ◽  
The United States ◽  
Complex Nature ◽  
Mexican Migrants ◽  
Permanent Resident ◽  
Repeat Migration ◽  
The Impact

Drawing on postdeportation surveys ( N = 1,109) with Mexican migrants, we examine the impact of immigration enforcement programs and various social factors on repeat migration intentions. Our multivariate analyses suggest immigrants with strong personal ties to the United States have higher relative odds of intending to cross the border again, even when controlling modes of removal from the United States. Our findings highlight the inevitable failure of immigration policy and enforcement programs when placed against the powerful pull of family and home. These findings shed greater insight on the complex nature of unauthorized migration in an era of increased securitization and deportation.

scholarly journals COVID-19 and reproductive justice in Great Britain and the United States: ensuring access to abortion care during a global pandemic

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Chloe Romanis ◽  
Jordan A Parsons ◽  
Nathan Hodson
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Great Britain ◽  
Medical Abortion ◽  
The United States ◽  
Reproductive Justice ◽  
Abortion Care ◽  
Global Pandemic ◽  
The Us ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Legal Barriers

Abstract In this paper we consider the impact that the COVID-19 pandemic is having on access to abortion care in Great Britain (GB) (England, Wales, and Scotland) and the United States (US). The pandemic has exacerbated problems in access to abortion services because social distancing or lockdown measures, increasing caring responsibilities, and the need to self-isolate are making clinics much more difficult to access, and this is when clinics are able to stay open which many are not. In response we argue there is a need to facilitate telemedical early medical abortion in order to ensure access to essential healthcare for people in need of terminations. There are substantial legal barriers to the establishment of telemedical abortion services in parts of GB and parts of the US. We argue that during a pandemic any restriction on telemedicine for basic healthcare is an unjustifiable human rights violation and, in the US, is unconstitutional.

Jurisdiction Over Friendly Foreign Armed Forces

1942 ◽  
Vol 36 (4) ◽  
pp. 539-567 ◽  
Author(s):  
Archibald King
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
New Zealand ◽  
Great Britain ◽  
Northern Ireland ◽  
New Guinea ◽  
Armed Forces ◽  
The United States ◽  
Western Hemisphere ◽  
British Guiana ◽  
East Indies

There are at present armed forces of the United States in England, Northern Ireland, Egypt, Australia, New Zealand, New Guinea, China, India, Iceland, in British possessions in the Western Hemisphere from Newfoundland to British Guiana, and in other friendly countries. There are troops of Great Britain or her dominions in Egypt, Iraq, Iran, and a few of them in the United States. English forces were a few months ago in Greece, and ours in the Dutch East Indies and Burma. There are troops of various exiled governments in England. The armed forces of Germany are in Italy, Libya, Hungary, and Rumania; and those of Japan in French Indo-China and Thailand. In every case mentioned, the visiting forces are in the foreign country by invitation, or at least with the consent, of its sovereign or government.

The management of falls in older people: from research to practice

2000 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 397-406 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jed Rowe
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
New Zealand ◽  
Great Britain ◽  
Older People ◽  
Acute Care ◽  
The United States ◽  
Community Dwelling ◽  
Research To Practice ◽  
Financial Perspective ◽  
Serious Injury

Falls are common in late life. Evidence from New Zealand, the United States and Great Britain suggest that about a third of people aged over 65 will fall each year, a proportion that rises to about half for the community-dwelling population older than 85 years. Falls are the leading cause of death from injury in older people. Although many falls do not cause serious injury, nor precipitate referral to the health services for 30–50% of fallers, those that do have major consequences. From a purely financial perspective, acute care of those with falls is estimated to cost $10 billion per annum in the United States.

International Law and the Theory of War

2020 ◽  
pp. 171-200
Author(s):  
Gabriela A. Frei
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Great Britain ◽  
International Law ◽  
Private Property ◽  
The United States ◽  
Theory Of War ◽  
Economic Warfare ◽  
Maritime Strategy ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Theoretical Reflection

Chapter 7 explores the question of the immunity of private property from capture at sea, examining the views of its opponents and supporters. The immunity of private property at sea posed a serious challenge to sea powers—it was feared that this step would result in a further curtailment of belligerent rights. The chapter analyses the positions of the United States, Great Britain, and Germany in the first and second Hague peace conferences. The naval thinkers Alfred T. Mahan and Julian S. Corbett saw the proposal as an existential danger to waging economic warfare. Their reflection on the impact of international law on maritime strategy illustrated the limitation of the adoption of such a far-reaching proposal. The question also demanded a theoretical reflection on warfare and the chapter compares how international lawyers and strategists understood warfare and international law.

Twenty-five years of Norwegian sovereignty in Svalbard, 1925–50

Polar Record ◽  
1951 ◽  
Vol 6 (42) ◽  
pp. 179-184
Author(s):  
Anders K. Orvin
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
South Africa ◽  
New Zealand ◽  
Great Britain ◽  
The Netherlands ◽  
United States Of America ◽  
The United States ◽  
White Island

By a treaty signed in Paris on 9 February 1920, Norway was given the sovereignty of Svalbard, comprising all the islands situated between longs. 10° and 35° E. and lats. 74° and 81° N., thus including Spitsbergen, Bjørnøya (Bear Island), Hopen (Hope Island), Kong Karls Land, and Kvitøya (White Island). The treaty, which has since been recognized by a number of other states, was signed by the United States of America, Denmark, France, Italy, Japan, the Netherlands, Great Britain and Ireland, the Dominions of Canada and New Zealand, the Union of South Africa, India, and Sweden. The U.S.S.R. recognized Norway's sovereignty of Svalbard in 1924 but did not sign the treaty until 1935; Germany signed the treaty in 1925. On 14 August 1925, Norway formally took possession and the Norwegian flag was hoisted in Longyearbyen. Since then, twenty-five years have elapsed, and in honour of the occasion the anniversary was celebrated at Longyearbyen in 1950.

Family Change and Family Policies in Great Britain, Canada, New Zealand and the United States

1999 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 422
Author(s):  
John F. Peters ◽  
Sheila B. Kamerman ◽  
Alfred J. Kahn
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
New Zealand ◽  
Great Britain ◽  
The United States ◽  
Family Policies ◽  
Family Change

An Agreement Establishing the South Pacific Commission, Signed February 6, 1947, in Canberra, Australia.

1947 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 419-428 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
United Kingdom ◽  
New Zealand ◽  
Great Britain ◽  
Northern Ireland ◽  
The Netherlands ◽  
United States Of America ◽  
South Pacific ◽  
The United States ◽  
The United Kingdom

The Governments of Australia, the French Republic, the Kingdom of the Netherlands, New Zealand, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, and the United States of America, (hereinafter referred to as “the participating Governments”),

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document