Maximum likelihood estimator and confidence intervals for a simple errors in variables model

1981 ◽  
Vol 10 (10) ◽  
pp. 983-996 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. S. Konijn
Keyword(s):  
Maximum Likelihood ◽  
Maximum Likelihood Estimator ◽  
Confidence Intervals ◽  
Errors In Variables ◽  
Likelihood Estimator

scholarly journals A New Maximum Likelihood Estimator Formulated in Pole-Residue Modal Model

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (15) ◽  
pp. 3120
Author(s):  
Sandro Amador ◽  
Mahmoud El-Kafafy ◽  
Álvaro Cunha ◽  
Rune Brincker
Keyword(s):  
Maximum Likelihood ◽  
Least Squares ◽  
Maximum Likelihood Estimator ◽  
Confidence Intervals ◽  
Modal Parameters ◽  
Parameter Estimates ◽  
Modal Parameter ◽  
Likelihood Estimator ◽  
Pole Residue ◽  
Modal Model

Recently, a lot of efforts have been devoted to developing more precise Modal Parameter Estimation (MPE) techniques. This is explained by the necessity in civil, mechanical and aerospace engineering of obtaining accurate estimates for the modal parameters of the tested structures, as well as of determining reliable confidence intervals for these estimates. The Non-linear Least Squares (NLS) identification techniques based on Maximum Likelihood (ML) have been increasingly used in modal analysis to improve precision of estimates provided by the Least Squares (LS) based estimators when they are not accurate enough. Apart from providing more accurate estimates, the main advantage of the ML estimators, with regard to their LS counterparts, is that they allow for taking into account not only the measured Frequency Response Functions (FRFs) but also the noise information during the parametric identification process and, therefore, provide the modal parameters estimates together with their uncertainties bounds. In this paper, a new derivation of a Maximum Likelihood Estimator formulated in Pole-residue Modal Model (MLE-PMM) is presented. The proposed formulation is meant to be used in combination with the Least Squares Frequency Domain (LSCF) to improve the precision of the modal parameter estimates and compute their confidence intervals. Aiming at demonstrating the efficiency of the proposed approach, it is applied to two simulated examples in the final part of the paper.

scholarly journals Classical and Bayesian Inference of Conditional Stress-Strength Model under Kumaraswamy Distribution

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-13
Author(s):  
Fathy H. Riad ◽  
Mohammad Mehdi Saber ◽  
Mehrdad Taghipour ◽  
M. M. Abd El-Raouf
Keyword(s):  
Bayesian Inference ◽  
Maximum Likelihood ◽  
Maximum Likelihood Estimator ◽  
Asymptotic Distribution ◽  
Confidence Intervals ◽  
Bootstrap Method ◽  
Strength Model ◽  
Likelihood Estimator ◽  
Kumaraswamy Distribution ◽  
Strength Models

Stress-strength models have been frequently studied in recent years. An applicable extension of these models is conditional stress-strength models. The maximum likelihood estimator of conditional stress-strength models, asymptotic distribution of this estimator, and its confidence intervals are obtained for Kumaraswamy distribution. In addition, Bayesian estimation and bootstrap method are applied to the model.

scholarly journals Statistical Inference for the Inverted Scale Family under General Progressive Type-II Censoring

Symmetry ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (5) ◽  
pp. 731
Author(s):  
Jing Gao ◽  
Kehan Bai ◽  
Wenhao Gui
Keyword(s):  
Monte Carlo ◽  
Maximum Likelihood ◽  
Monte Carlo Simulations ◽  
Maximum Likelihood Estimator ◽  
Confidence Intervals ◽  
Interval Estimation ◽  
Bayesian Estimator ◽  
Small Samples ◽  
Likelihood Estimator ◽  
Scale Family

Two estimation problems are studied based on the general progressively censored samples, and the distributions from the inverted scale family (ISF) are considered as prospective life distributions. One is the exact interval estimation for the unknown parameter θ , which is achieved by constructing the pivotal quantity. Through Monte Carlo simulations, the average 90 % and 95 % confidence intervals are obtained, and the validity of the above interval estimation is illustrated with a numerical example. The other is the estimation of R = P ( Y < X ) in the case of ISF. The maximum likelihood estimator (MLE) as well as approximate maximum likelihood estimator (AMLE) is obtained, together with the corresponding R-symmetric asymptotic confidence intervals. With Bootstrap methods, we also propose two R-asymmetric confidence intervals, which have a good performance for small samples. Furthermore, assuming the scale parameters follow independent gamma priors, the Bayesian estimator as well as the HPD credible interval of R is thus acquired. Finally, we make an evaluation on the effectiveness of the proposed estimations through Monte Carlo simulations and provide an illustrative example of two real datasets.

The Comparison Between the Bayes Estimator and the Maximum Likelihood Estimator of the Reliability Function for Negative Exponential Distribution

2018 ◽  
pp. 439
Author(s):  
Hazim Mansour Gorgees ◽  
Bushra Abdualrasool Ali ◽  
Raghad Ibrahim Kathum
Keyword(s):  
Maximum Likelihood ◽  
Maximum Likelihood Estimator ◽  
Exponential Distribution ◽  
Reliability Function ◽  
Bayes Estimator ◽  
Likelihood Estimator ◽  
Monte Carlo Simulation Technique ◽  
Negative Exponential Distribution ◽  
Negative Exponential ◽  
Better Than

     In this paper, the maximum likelihood estimator and the Bayes estimator of the reliability function for negative exponential distribution has been derived, then a Monte –Carlo simulation technique was employed to compare the performance of such estimators. The integral mean square error (IMSE) was used as a criterion for this comparison. The simulation results displayed that the Bayes estimator performed better than the maximum likelihood estimator for different samples sizes.

scholarly journals Transforming variables to central normality

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jakob Raymaekers ◽  
Peter J. Rousseeuw
Keyword(s):  
Maximum Likelihood ◽  
Maximum Likelihood Estimator ◽  
Simulation Study ◽  
Real Data ◽  
Data Sets ◽  
Transformation Parameter ◽  
Likelihood Estimator ◽  
Extensive Simulation ◽  
Highly Sensitive

AbstractMany real data sets contain numerical features (variables) whose distribution is far from normal (Gaussian). Instead, their distribution is often skewed. In order to handle such data it is customary to preprocess the variables to make them more normal. The Box–Cox and Yeo–Johnson transformations are well-known tools for this. However, the standard maximum likelihood estimator of their transformation parameter is highly sensitive to outliers, and will often try to move outliers inward at the expense of the normality of the central part of the data. We propose a modification of these transformations as well as an estimator of the transformation parameter that is robust to outliers, so the transformed data can be approximately normal in the center and a few outliers may deviate from it. It compares favorably to existing techniques in an extensive simulation study and on real data.

Covariance matrix of the bias-corrected maximum likelihood estimator in generalized linear models

2013 ◽  
Vol 55 (3) ◽  
pp. 643-652
Author(s):  
Gauss M. Cordeiro ◽  
Denise A. Botter ◽  
Alexsandro B. Cavalcanti ◽  
Lúcia P. Barroso
Keyword(s):  
Maximum Likelihood ◽  
Maximum Likelihood Estimator ◽  
Covariance Matrix ◽  
Generalized Linear Models ◽  
Linear Models ◽  
Likelihood Estimator

Large deviations and Berry–Esseen inequalities for estimators in nonhomogeneous diffusion driven by fractional Brownian motion

2020 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 183-196
Author(s):  
Kouacou Tanoh ◽  
Modeste N’zi ◽  
Armel Fabrice Yodé
Keyword(s):  
Differential Equation ◽  
Brownian Motion ◽  
Maximum Likelihood ◽  
Large Deviations ◽  
Stochastic Differential Equation ◽  
Fractional Brownian Motion ◽  
Maximum Likelihood Estimator ◽  
Bayes Estimator ◽  
Likelihood Estimator

AbstractWe are interested in bounds on the large deviations probability and Berry–Esseen type inequalities for maximum likelihood estimator and Bayes estimator of the parameter appearing linearly in the drift of nonhomogeneous stochastic differential equation driven by fractional Brownian motion.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document