scholarly journals Bi-level Decision-making Modeling for an Autonomous Driver Agent: Application in the Car-following Driving Behavior

2019 ◽  
Vol 33 (13) ◽  
pp. 1157-1178 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anouer Bennajeh ◽  
Slim Bechikh ◽  
Lamjed Ben Said ◽  
Samir Aknine
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Driving Behavior ◽  
Car Following

scholarly journals Driving Behavior Modeling Based on Consistent Variable Selection in a PWARX Model

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (11) ◽  
pp. 4938
Author(s):  
Jude Chibuike Nwadiuto ◽  
Hiroyuki Okuda ◽  
Tatsuya Suzuki
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Variable Selection ◽  
Motion Control ◽  
Driving Behavior ◽  
Optimal Number ◽  
Behavior Modeling ◽  
Driver Model ◽  
Explanatory Variables ◽  
Car Following ◽  
Proposed Model

This paper proposes the hybrid system model identified by a PWARX (piecewise affine autoregressive exogenous) model for modeling human driving behavior. In the proposed model, the mode segmentation is carried out automatically and the optimal number of modes is decided by a novel methodology based on consistent variable selection. In addition, model flexibility is added within the ARX (autoregressive exogenous) partitions in the form of statistical variable selection. The proposed method is able to capture both the decision-making and motion-control facets of the driving behavior. The resulting model is an optimal basal model which is not affected by the choice of data, where the explanatory variables are allowed to vary within each ARX region, thus, allowing a higher-level understanding of the motion-control aspect of the driving behavior, as well as explaining the driver’s decision-making. The proposed model is applied to model the car-following driving task based on real-road driving data, as well as to ROS-CARLA-based car-following simulation and compared to Gipp’s driver model. Obtained results that show better performance both on prediction performance and mimicking actual real-road driving demonstrates and validates the usefulness of the model.

Autonomous Vehicles’ Car-Following Drivability Evaluation Based on Driving Behavior Spectrum Reference Model

2021 ◽  
pp. 036119812199485
Author(s):  
Xiao Qi ◽  
Ying Ni ◽  
Yiming Xu ◽  
Ye Tian ◽  
Junhua Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Autonomous Vehicles ◽  
Reference Model ◽  
Numerical Test ◽  
Safety Evaluation ◽  
Driving Behavior ◽  
Car Following ◽  
Driving Behaviors ◽  
Human Driver ◽  
Normal Human ◽  
Naturalistic Driving

A large portion of the accidents involving autonomous vehicles (AVs) are not caused by the functionality of AV, but rather because of human intervention, since AVs’ driving behavior was not properly understood by human drivers. Such misunderstanding leads to dangerous situations during interaction between AV and human-driven vehicle (HV). However, few researches considered HV-AV interaction safety in AV safety evaluation processes. One of the solutions is to let AV mimic a normal HV’s driving behavior so as to avoid misunderstanding to the most extent. Therefore, to evaluate the differences of driving behaviors between existing AV and HV is necessary. DRIVABILITY is defined in this study to characterize the similarity between AV’s driving behaviors and expected behaviors by human drivers. A driving behavior spectrum reference model built based on human drivers’ behaviors is proposed to evaluate AVs’ car-following drivability. The indicator of the desired reaction time (DRT) is proposed to characterize the car-following drivability. Relative entropy between the DRT distribution of AV and that of the entire human driver population are used to quantify the differences between driving behaviors. A human driver behavior spectrum was configured based on naturalistic driving data by human drivers collected in Shanghai, China. It is observed in the numerical test that amongst all three types of preset AVs in the well-received simulation package VTD, the brisk AV emulates a normal human driver to the most extent (ranking at 55th percentile), while the default AV and the comfortable AV rank at 35th and 8th percentile, respectively.

scholarly journals Quantified Analysis of the Decision Making in Driving Behavior

2008 ◽  
Vol 44 (3) ◽  
pp. 269-277 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shun TAGUCHI ◽  
Shinkichi INAGAKI ◽  
Tatsuya SUZUKI ◽  
Soichiro HAYAKAWA ◽  
Taishi TSUDA ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Driving Behavior ◽  
Quantified Analysis

scholarly journals Human-like Decision Making and Motion Control for Smooth and Natural Car Following

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-1
Author(s):  
Chongfeng Wei ◽  
Evangelos Paschalidis ◽  
Natasha Merat ◽  
Albert Solernou ◽  
Foroogh Hajiseyedjavadi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Motion Control ◽  
Car Following

Development of Operation Guidelines for Leader–Follower Autonomous Maintenance Vehicles at Work Zone Locations

2021 ◽  
pp. 036119812110566
Author(s):  
Qing Tang ◽  
Xianbiao Hu ◽  
Ruwen Qin
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Autonomous Vehicle ◽  
Field Testing ◽  
Work Zone ◽  
Lane Changing ◽  
The Public ◽  
Car Following ◽  
Technical Requirements ◽  
Car Following Model ◽  
Niche Area

The rapid advancement of connected and autonomous vehicle (CAV) technologies, although possibly years away from wide application to the general public travel, are receiving attention from many state Departments of Transportation (DOT) in the niche area of using autonomous maintenance technology (AMT) to reduce fatalities of DOT workers in work zone locations. Although promising results are shown in testing and deployments in several states, current autonomous truck mounted attenuator (ATMA) system operators are not provided with much practical driving guidance on how to drive these new vehicle systems in a way that is safe to both the public and themselves. To this end, this manuscript aims to model and develop a set of rules and instructions for ATMA system operators, particularly when it comes to critical locations where essential decision making is needed. Specifically, three technical requirements are investigated: car-following distance, critical lane-changing gap distance, and intersection clearance time. Newell’s simplified car-following model, and the classic lane-changing behavior model are modified, with roll-ahead distance taken into account, to model the driving behaviors of the ATMA vehicles at those critical decision-making locations. Data are collected from real-world field testing to calibrate and validate the developed models. The modeling outputs suggest important thresholds for ATMA system operators to follow. For example, on a freeway with a speed limit of 70 mph and ATMA operating speed of 10 mph, car-following distance should be no less than 75 ft for the lead truck and 100 ft for the follower truck, the critical lane-changing gap distance is 912 ft, and a minimum intersection clearance is 15 s, which are all much higher than the requirements for a general vehicle.

Influence of Autonomous Vehicles on Car-Following Behavior of Human Drivers

2019 ◽  
Vol 2673 (12) ◽  
pp. 367-379 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yalda Rahmati ◽  
Mohammadreza Khajeh Hosseini ◽  
Alireza Talebpour ◽  
Benjamin Swain ◽  
Christopher Nelson
Keyword(s):  
Autonomous Vehicles ◽  
Simulation Models ◽  
Driving Behavior ◽  
Data Driven ◽  
Microscopic Simulation ◽  
Car Following ◽  
The Road ◽  
Human Driver ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
On The Road

Despite numerous studies on general human–robot interactions, in the context of transportation, automated vehicle (AV)–human driver interaction is not a well-studied subject. These vehicles have fundamentally different decision-making logic compared with human drivers and the driving interactions between AVs and humans can potentially change traffic flow dynamics. Accordingly, through an experimental study, this paper investigates whether there is a difference between human–human and human–AV interactions on the road. This study focuses on car-following behavior and conducted several car-following experiments utilizing Texas A&M University’s automated Chevy Bolt. Utilizing NGSIM US-101 dataset, two scenarios for a platoon of three vehicles were considered. For both scenarios, the leader of the platoon follows a series of speed profiles extracted from the NGSIM dataset. The second vehicle in the platoon can be either another human-driven vehicle (scenario A) or an AV (scenario B). Data is collected from the third vehicle in the platoon to characterize the changes in driving behavior when following an AV. A data-driven and a model-based approach were used to identify possible changes in driving behavior from scenario A to scenario B. The findings suggested there is a statistically significant difference between human drivers’ behavior in these two scenarios and human drivers felt more comfortable following the AV. Simulation results also revealed the importance of capturing these changes in human behavior in microscopic simulation models of mixed driving environments.

scholarly journals Driver Characteristics Oriented Autonomous Longitudinal Driving System in Car-Following Situation

Sensors ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (21) ◽  
pp. 6376
Author(s):  
Haksu Kim ◽  
Kyunghan Min ◽  
Myoungho Sunwoo
Keyword(s):  
Driving Behavior ◽  
Cruise Control ◽  
Driver Assistance ◽  
Collision Warning ◽  
Driving System ◽  
Traffic Jam ◽  
Car Following ◽  
Preceding Vehicle ◽  
Planning Algorithm ◽  
Control Traffic

Advanced driver assistance system such as adaptive cruise control, traffic jam assistance, and collision warning has been developed to reduce the driving burden and increase driving comfort in the car-following situation. These systems provide automated longitudinal driving to ensure safety and driving performance to satisfy unspecified individuals. However, drivers can feel a sense of heterogeneity when autonomous longitudinal control is performed by a general speed planning algorithm. In order to solve heterogeneity, a speed planning algorithm that reflects individual driving behavior is required to guarantee harmony with the intention of the driver. In this paper, we proposed a personalized longitudinal driving system in a car-following situation, which mimics personal driving behavior. The system is structured by a multi-layer framework composed of a speed planner and driver parameter manager. The speed planner generates an optimal speed profile by parametric cost function and constraints that imply driver characteristics. Furthermore, driver parameters are determined by the driver parameter manager according to individual driving behavior based on real driving data. The proposed algorithm was validated through driving simulation. The results show that the proposed algorithm mimics the driving style of an actual driver while maintaining safety against collisions with the preceding vehicle.

An extended heterogeneous car-following model accounting for anticipation driving behavior and mixed maximum speeds

2018 ◽  
Vol 382 (7) ◽  
pp. 489-498 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fengxin Sun ◽  
Jufeng Wang ◽  
Rongjun Cheng ◽  
Hongxia Ge
Keyword(s):  
Driving Behavior ◽  
Car Following ◽  
Car Following Model
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document