At the Interface of Legislation and Wildlife Management: A Decade of Experience with Consensual Protected Area Management Planning in Cameroon

2009 ◽  
Vol 12 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 1-32 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Scholte
Oryx ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 50 (3) ◽  
pp. 495-505 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charlie J. Gardner ◽  
Firengea U. L. Gabriel ◽  
Freya A. V. St. John ◽  
Zoe G. Davies

AbstractProtected areas are usually conceived and managed as static entities, although this approach is increasingly viewed as unrealistic given climate change and ecosystem dynamics. The ways in which people use land and/or natural resources within and around protected areas can also shift and evolve temporally but this remains an under-acknowledged challenge for protected area managers. Here we investigate the factors driving a rapid rise in charcoal production within a new, multiple-use protected area in Madagascar, to inform appropriate management responses. We conducted a questionnaire survey of 208 charcoal producers to ascertain the mix of livelihood activities they practised in 2010/2011 and 5 years previously. Respondents had diversified their livelihood activities over time, and cultivation and pastoralism had decreased as primary sources of revenue. Reasons for the growing reliance on charcoal production include the reduced viability of alternative livelihoods (primarily farming), as a result of changing rainfall patterns and the loss of irrigation infrastructure, as well as a growing need for cash to support themselves and their families. Our results suggest that charcoal production is not a desirable activity but a safety net when times are difficult. Conservation efforts to ameliorate underlying factors driving livelihood change, such as dam restoration, could reduce the prevalence of charcoal production, but simultaneous action to cut demand is also required. We recommend that mechanisms to detect, understand and respond to social change are integrated systematically into protected area management planning, alongside traditional biodiversity monitoring.


2016 ◽  
Vol 60 ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erika Bockstael ◽  
Natália C.F. Bahia ◽  
Cristiana S. Seixas ◽  
Fikret Berkes

1970 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
pp. 69-81 ◽  
Author(s):  
Buddi Sagar Poudel

This paper distils Nepal's experience on protected area management planning, with particular reference to implementation of management plan. It also reviews the status of PA management plan and legal provisions related to management plan. Management plan is the road map to guide conservation efforts and sets out the desired future of protected area. Five-year management plan of protected areas have been prepared and implemented. Although park management plans were formulated for most of the parks and reserves, there remained wide gaps during its timely and effective implementation. The aim of this paper is to answer the question "what are the issues in management planning process and implementation". Building on the strength of the past and keeping the existing weaknesses in mind, the management effectiveness should be evaluated and improved.DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3126/init.v4i0.5538The Initiation Vol.4 2011 69-81


2018 ◽  
Vol 63 (1) ◽  
pp. 46-59 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lawrence Allen ◽  
Katie Krafte Holland ◽  
Hunter Holland ◽  
Salaton Tome’ ◽  
Moriaso Nabaala ◽  
...  

Marine Policy ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 34 (6) ◽  
pp. 1215-1225 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marion Glaser ◽  
Wasistini Baitoningsih ◽  
Sebastian C.A. Ferse ◽  
Muhammad Neil ◽  
Rio Deswandi

2015 ◽  
Vol 67 ◽  
pp. 475-489 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karla Sessin-Dilascio ◽  
Katrin Prager ◽  
Katherine N. Irvine ◽  
Paulo Antonio de Almeida Sinisgalli

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document