scholarly journals II. Historical remarks relative to the manufactures of iron and steel in Great Britain

1799 ◽  
Vol 2 (8) ◽  
pp. 346-353
Author(s):  
David Mushet
2014 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 384-387
Author(s):  
Oscar R. Hobson

Summary After carrying during the previous half-century a nationalization legislation, Great Britain by the recent Royal assent given to the Transport Act and the Iron and Steel Act, has brought on denationalization of these industries concerned. The Author comments briefly on this important question considering the Transport denationalization as a more difficult and hazardous measure than the Iron and Steel denationalization. In concluding, the Author hopes that both Transport and Steel Acts will at least be successful in securing the removal of their subjects from the party arena.


1945 ◽  
Vol 15 (1/2) ◽  
pp. 104
Author(s):  
J. Hurstfield ◽  
T. H. Burnham ◽  
G. O. Hoskins
Keyword(s):  

1951 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 389-402 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Thorner

A Striking disparity exists between India's ranking as a railway power and its ranking by any other modern economic category, such as coal mined, iron and steel produced, power generated, value added by all manufacturing, or national income received per capita. Throughout the twentieth century India has had one of the world's five largest railway systems, but by most other modern categories India's economy has been among the world's weakest and least developed. I propose to begin by recounting the way in which India's railway system was developed under British leadership in the century after 1850; then I intend to turn to some possible connections between the special types of railway organization that Britain sponsored in India and the relative lack of development of other sectors of India's economy, particularly modern industry.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document