scholarly journals Formation of a Complex between Nucleolin and Replication Protein a after Cell Stress Prevents Initiation of DNA Replication

2000 ◽  
Vol 149 (4) ◽  
pp. 799-810 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yaron Daniely ◽  
James A. Borowiec
Keyword(s):  
Dna Replication ◽  
Ribosome Biogenesis ◽  
Protein A ◽  
Simian Virus 40 ◽  
Replication Protein A ◽  
Cell Stress ◽  
Replication Protein ◽  
Binding Studies

We used a biochemical screen to identify nucleolin, a key factor in ribosome biogenesis, as a high-affinity binding partner for the heterotrimeric human replication protein A (hRPA). Binding studies in vitro demonstrated that the two proteins physically interact, with nucleolin using an unusual contact with the small hRPA subunit. Nucleolin significantly inhibited both simian virus 40 (SV-40) origin unwinding and SV-40 DNA replication in vitro, likely by nucleolin preventing hRPA from productive interaction with the SV-40 initiation complex. In vivo, use of epifluorescence and confocal microscopy showed that heat shock caused a dramatic redistribution of nucleolin from the nucleolus to the nucleoplasm. Nucleolin relocalization was concomitant with a tenfold increase in nucleolin–hRPA complex formation. The relocalized nucleolin significantly overlapped with the position of hRPA, but only poorly with sites of ongoing DNA synthesis. We suggest that the induced nucleolin–hRPA interaction signifies a novel mechanism that represses chromosomal replication after cell stress.

scholarly journals Replication Protein A (RPA) Phosphorylation Prevents RPA Association with Replication Centers

2004 ◽  
Vol 24 (5) ◽  
pp. 1930-1943 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vitaly M. Vassin ◽  
Marc S. Wold ◽  
James A. Borowiec
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Protein A ◽  
Simian Virus 40 ◽  
Replication Protein A ◽  
Replication Protein ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Chromosomal Dna

ABSTRACT Mammalian replication protein A (RPA) undergoes DNA damage-dependent phosphorylation at numerous sites on the N terminus of the RPA2 subunit. To understand the functional significance of RPA phosphorylation, we expressed RPA2 variants in which the phosphorylation sites were converted to aspartate (RPA2D) or alanine (RPA2A). Although RPA2D was incorporated into RPA heterotrimers and supported simian virus 40 DNA replication in vitro, the RPA2D mutant was selectively unable to associate with replication centers in vivo. In cells containing greatly reduced levels of endogenous RPA2, RPA2D again did not localize to replication sites, indicating that the defect in supporting chromosomal DNA replication is not due to competition with the wild-type protein. Use of phosphospecific antibodies demonstrated that endogenous hyperphosphorylated RPA behaves similarly to RPA2D. In contrast, under DNA damage or replication stress conditions, RPA2D, like RPA2A and wild-type RPA2, was competent to associate with DNA damage foci as determined by colocalization with γ-H2AX. We conclude that RPA2 phosphorylation prevents RPA association with replication centers in vivo and potentially serves as a marker for sites of DNA damage.

scholarly journals Novel Checkpoint Response to Genotoxic Stress Mediated by Nucleolin-Replication Protein A Complex Formation

2005 ◽  
Vol 25 (6) ◽  
pp. 2463-2474 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyung Kim ◽  
Diana D. Dimitrova ◽  
Kristine M. Carta ◽  
Anjana Saxena ◽  
Mariza Daras ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Replication ◽  
Complex Formation ◽  
Protein A ◽  
Resonance Energy ◽  
Genotoxic Stress ◽  
Replication Protein A ◽  
Replication Protein ◽  
Chromosomal Dna

ABSTRACT Human replication protein A (RPA), the primary single-stranded DNA-binding protein, was previously found to be inhibited after heat shock by complex formation with nucleolin. Here we show that nucleolin-RPA complex formation is stimulated after genotoxic stresses such as treatment with camptothecin or exposure to ionizing radiation. Complex formation in vitro and in vivo requires a 63-residue glycine-arginine-rich (GAR) domain located at the extreme C terminus of nucleolin, with this domain sufficient to inhibit DNA replication in vitro. Fluorescence resonance energy transfer studies demonstrate that the nucleolin-RPA interaction after stress occurs both in the nucleoplasm and in the nucleolus. Expression of the GAR domain or a nucleolin mutant (TM) with a constitutive interaction with RPA is sufficient to inhibit entry into S phase. Increasing cellular RPA levels by overexpression of the RPA2 subunit minimizes the inhibitory effects of nucleolin GAR or TM expression on chromosomal DNA replication. The arrest is independent of p53 activation by ATM or ATR and does not involve heightened expression of p21. Our data reveal a novel cellular mechanism that represses genomic replication in response to genotoxic stress by inhibition of an essential DNA replication factor.

scholarly journals An interaction between the DNA repair factor XPA and replication protein A appears essential for nucleotide excision repair.

1995 ◽  
Vol 15 (10) ◽  
pp. 5396-5402 ◽  
Author(s):  
L Li ◽  
X Lu ◽  
C A Peterson ◽  
R J Legerski
Keyword(s):  
Nucleotide Excision Repair ◽  
Excision Repair ◽  
Protein A ◽  
Simian Virus 40 ◽  
Replication Protein A ◽  
Simian Virus ◽  
Replication Protein ◽  
Nucleotide Excision

Replication protein A (RPA) is required for simian virus 40-directed DNA replication in vitro and for nucleotide excision repair (NER). Here we report that RPA and the human repair protein XPA specifically interact both in vitro and in vivo. Mapping of the RPA-interactive domains in XPA revealed that both of the largest subunits of RPA, RPA-70 and RPA-34, interact with XPA at distinct sites. A domain involved in mediating the interaction with RPA-70 was located between XPA residues 153 and 176. Deletion of highly conserved motifs within this region identified two mutants that were deficient in binding RPA in vitro and highly defective in NER both in vitro and in vivo. A second domain mediating the interaction with RPA-34 was identified within the first 58 residues in XPA. Deletion of this region, however, only moderately affects the complementing activity of XPA in vivo. Finally, the XPA-RPA complex is shown to have a greater affinity for damaged DNA than XPA alone. Taken together, these results indicate that the interaction between XPA and RPA is required for NER but that only the interaction with RPA-70 is essential.

scholarly journals The Schizosaccharomyces pombe rad11+ gene encodes the large subunit of replication protein A.

1997 ◽  
Vol 17 (5) ◽  
pp. 2381-2390 ◽  
Author(s):  
A E Parker ◽  
R K Clyne ◽  
A M Carr ◽  
T J Kelly
Keyword(s):  
Dna Repair ◽  
Dna Synthesis ◽  
Schizosaccharomyces Pombe ◽  
Excision Repair ◽  
Protein A ◽  
Simian Virus 40 ◽  
Replication Protein A ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Replication Protein

Replication protein A (RPA) is a heterotrimeric single-stranded DNA-binding protein present in all eukaryotes. In vitro studies have implicated RPA in simian virus 40 DNA synthesis and nucleotide excision repair, but little direct information is available about the in vivo roles of the protein. We report here the cloning of the largest subunit of RPA (rpa1+) from the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe. The rpa1+ gene is essential for viability and is expressed specifically at S phase of the cell cycle. Genetic analysis revealed that rpa1+ is the locus of the S. pombe radiation-sensitive mutation rad11. The rad11 allele exhibits pleiotropic effects consistent with an in vivo role for RPA in both DNA repair and DNA synthesis. The mutant is sensitive to both UV and ionizing radiation but is not defective in the DNA damage-dependent checkpoint, consistent with the hypothesis that RPA is part of the enzymatic machinery of DNA repair. When incubated in hydroxyurea, rad11 cells initially arrest with a 1C DNA content but then lose viability coincident with reentry into S phase, suggesting that DNA synthesis is aberrant under these conditions. A significant fraction of the mutant cells subsequently undergo inappropriate mitosis in the presence of hydroxyurea, indicating that RPA also plays a role in the checkpoint mechanism that monitors the completion of S phase. We propose that RPA is required to maintain the integrity of replication complexes when DNA replication is blocked. We further suggest that the rad11 mutation leads to the premature breakdown of such complexes, thereby preventing recovery from the hydroxyurea arrest and eliminating a signal recognized by the S-phase checkpoint mechanism.

scholarly journals Replication protein A binds RNA and promotes R-loop formation

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olga M. Mazina ◽  
Srinivas Somarowthu ◽  
Lyudmila Y. Kadyrova ◽  
Andrey G. Baranovskiy ◽  
Tahir H. Tahirov ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Replication ◽  
Protein A ◽  
Replication Protein A ◽  
Replication Protein ◽  
Loop Formation ◽  
Genome Maintenance ◽  
Ssdna Binding ◽  
Replication Restart ◽  
Ssdna Binding Protein

SUMMARYReplication protein A (RPA), a major eukaryotic ssDNA-binding protein, is essential for all metabolic processes that involve ssDNA including DNA replication, repair, and damage signaling. Surprisingly, we found here that RPA binds RNA in vitro with high affinity. Using native RIP method, we isolated RNA-RPA complexes from human cells. Furthermore, RPA promotes R-loop formation between RNA and homologous dsDNA. R-loops, the three-stranded nucleic acid structure consisting of an RNA-DNA hybrid and the displaced ssDNA strand, are common in human genome. R-loops may play an important role in transcription-coupled homologous recombination and DNA replication restart. We reconstituted the process of replication restart in vitro using RPA-generated R-loops and human DNA polymerases. These findings indicate that RPA may play a role in RNA metabolism and suggest a mechanism of genome maintenance that depends on RPA and RNA.

scholarly journals Analysis of a meiosis-specific URS1 site: sequence requirements and involvement of replication protein A.

1997 ◽  
Vol 17 (7) ◽  
pp. 3536-3546 ◽  
Author(s):  
V Gailus-Durner ◽  
C Chintamaneni ◽  
R Wilson ◽  
S J Brill ◽  
A K Vershon
Keyword(s):  
Protein A ◽  
Replication Protein A ◽  
Replication Protein ◽  
Sequence Specificity ◽  
Mobility Shift ◽  
Cell Extracts ◽  
Yeast Genes ◽  
Sequence Requirements

URS1 is a transcriptional repressor site found in the promoters of a wide variety of yeast genes that are induced under stress conditions. In the context of meiotic promoters, URS1 sites act as repressor sequences during mitosis and function as activator sites during meiosis. We have investigated the sequence requirements of the URS1 site of the meiosis-specific HOP1 gene (URS1H) and have found differences compared with a URS1 site from a nonmeiotic gene. We have also observed that the sequence specificity for meiotic activation at this site differs from that for mitotic repression. Base pairs flanking the conserved core sequence enhance meiotic induction but are not required for mitotic repression of HOP1. Electrophoretic mobility shift assays of mitotic and meiotic cell extracts show a complex pattern of DNA-protein complexes, suggesting that several different protein factors bind specifically to the site. We have determined that one of the complexes of URS1H is formed by replication protein A (RPA). Although RPA binds to the double-stranded URS1H site in vitro, it has much higher affinity for single-stranded than for double-stranded URS1H, and one-hybrid assays suggest that RPA does not bind to this site at detectable levels in vivo. In addition, conditional-lethal mutations in RPA were found to have no effect on URS1H-mediated repression. These results suggest that although RPA binds to URS1H in vitro, it does not appear to have a functional role in transcriptional repression through this site in vivo.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document