replication restart
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

125
(FIVE YEARS 38)

H-INDEX

30
(FIVE YEARS 4)

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rubén Torres ◽  
Juan C. Alonso

Reviving Bacillus subtilis spores require the recombinase RecA, the DNA damage checkpoint sensor DisA, and the DNA helicase RadA/Sms to prevent a DNA replication stress. When a replication fork stalls at a template lesion, RecA filaments onto the lesion-containing gap and the fork is remodeled (fork reversal). RecA bound to single-strand DNA (ssDNA) interacts with and recruits DisA and RadA/Sms on the branched DNA intermediates (stalled or reversed forks), but DisA and RadA/Sms limit RecA activities and DisA suppresses its c-di-AMP synthesis. We show that RecA, acting as an accessory protein, activates RadA/Sms to unwind the nascent lagging-strand of the branched intermediates rather than to branch migrate them. DisA limits the ssDNA-dependent ATPase activity of RadA/Sms C13A, and inhibits the helicase activity of RadA/Sms by a protein-protein interaction. Finally, RadA/Sms inhibits DisA-mediated c-di-AMP synthesis and indirectly inhibits cell proliferation, but RecA counters this negative effect. We propose that the interactions among DisA, RecA and RadA/Sms, which are mutually exclusive, contribute to generate the substrate for replication restart, regulate the c-di-AMP pool and limit fork restoration in order to maintain cell survival.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jillella Mallikarjun ◽  
J Gowrishankar

In Escherichia coli, three isoforms of the essential translation initiation factor IF2 (IF2-1, IF2-2, and IF2-3) are generated from separate in-frame initiation codons in infB. The isoforms have earlier been suggested to additionally participate in DNA damage repair and replication restart. It is also known that the proteins RecA and RecBCD are needed for repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) in E. coli. Here we show that strains lacking IF2-1 are profoundly sensitive to two-ended DSBs in DNA generated by radiomimetic agents phleomycin or bleomycin, or by endonuclease I-SceI. However, these strains remained tolerant to other DSB-generating genotoxic agents or perturbations to which recA and recBC mutants remained sensitive, such as to mitomycin C, type-2 DNA topoisomerase inhibitors, or DSB caused by palindrome cleavage behind a replication fork. Data from genome-wide copy number analyses following I-SceI cleavage at a single chromosomal locus suggested that, in a strain lacking IF2-1, the magnitude of break induced replication through replication restart mechanisms is largely preserved but the extent of DNA resection around the DSB site is reduced. We propose that in absence of IF2-1 it is the annealing of a RecA nucleoprotein filament to its homologous target that is weakened, which in turn leads to a specific failure in assembly of Ter-to-oriC directed replisomes needed for consummation of two-ended DSB repair.


2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (21) ◽  
pp. 11323
Author(s):  
Carolina Gándara ◽  
Rubén Torres ◽  
Begoña Carrasco ◽  
Silvia Ayora ◽  
Juan C. Alonso

DNA lesions that impede fork progression cause replisome stalling and threaten genome stability. Bacillus subtilis RecA, at a lesion-containing gap, interacts with and facilitates DisA pausing at these branched intermediates. Paused DisA suppresses its synthesis of the essential c-di-AMP messenger. The RuvAB-RecU resolvasome branch migrates and resolves formed Holliday junctions (HJ). We show that DisA prevents DNA degradation. DisA, which interacts with RuvB, binds branched structures, and reduces the RuvAB DNA-dependent ATPase activity. DisA pre-bound to HJ DNA limits RuvAB and RecU activities, but such inhibition does not occur if the RuvAB- or RecU-HJ DNA complexes are pre-formed. RuvAB or RecU pre-bound to HJ DNA strongly inhibits DisA-mediated synthesis of c-di-AMP, and indirectly blocks cell proliferation. We propose that DisA limits RuvAB-mediated fork remodeling and RecU-mediated HJ cleavage to provide time for damage removal and replication restart in order to preserve genome integrity.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Camilla Colding ◽  
Jacob Autzen ◽  
Boris Pfander ◽  
Michael Lisby

DNA replication stress is a source of genome instability and a replication checkpoint has evolved to enable fork stabilisation and completion of replication during stress. Mediator of the replication checkpoint 1 (Mrc1) is the primary mediator of this response in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mrc1 is partially sequestered in the intranuclear quality control compartment (INQ) upon methyl methanesulfonate (MMS)-induced replication stress. Here we show that Mrc1 re-localizes from the replication fork to INQ during replication stress. Sequestration of Mrc1 in INQ is facilitated by the Btn2 chaperone and the Cdc48 segregase is required to release Mrc1 from INQ during recovery from replication stress. Consistently, we show that Cdc48 colocalizes with Mrc1 in INQ and we find that Mrc1 is recognized by the Cdc48 cofactors Ufd1 and Otu1, which contribute to clearance of Mrc1 from INQ. Our findings suggest that INQ localization of Mrc1 and Cdc48 function to facilitate replication stress recovery by transiently sequestering the replication checkpoint mediator Mrc1 and explains our observation that Btn2 and Cdc48 are required for efficient replication restart following MMS-induced replication stress.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven J. Sandler ◽  
Maxime Leroux ◽  
Tricia A. Windgassen ◽  
James L. Keck

Author(s):  
Jing Zhang ◽  
Marina A. Bellani ◽  
Jing Huang ◽  
Ryan C. James ◽  
Durga Pokharel ◽  
...  

Replisomes follow a schedule in which replication of DNA in euchromatin is early in S phase while sequences in heterochromatin replicate late. Impediments to DNA replication, referred to as replication stress, can stall replication forks triggering activation of the ATR kinase and downstream pathways. While there is substantial literature on the local consequences of replisome stalling–double strand breaks, reversed forks, or genomic rearrangements–there is limited understanding of the determinants of replisome stalling vs. continued progression. Although many proteins are recruited to stalled replisomes, current models assume a single species of “stressed” replisome, independent of genomic location. Here we describe our approach to visualizing replication fork encounters with the potent block imposed by a DNA interstrand crosslink (ICL) and our discovery of an unexpected pathway of replication restart (traverse) past an intact ICL. Additionally, we found two biochemically distinct replisomes distinguished by activity in different stages of S phase and chromatin environment. Each contains different proteins that contribute to ICL traverse.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (7) ◽  
pp. e0255409
Author(s):  
Alexander T. Duckworth ◽  
Tricia A. Windgassen ◽  
James L. Keck

DNA replication complexes (replisomes) frequently encounter barriers that can eject them prematurely from the genome. To avoid the lethality of incomplete DNA replication that arises from these events, bacteria have evolved “DNA replication restart” mechanisms to reload replisomes onto abandoned replication forks. The Escherichia coli PriA DNA helicase orchestrates this process by recognizing and remodeling replication forks and recruiting additional proteins that help to drive replisome reloading. We have identified a conserved sequence motif within a linker region of PriA that docks into a groove on the exterior of the PriA helicase domain. Alterations to the motif reduce the apparent processivity and attenuate structure-specific helicase activity in PriA, implicating the motif as a potential autoregulatory element in replication fork processing. The study also suggests that multiple PriA molecules may function in tandem to enhance DNA unwinding processivity, highlighting an unexpected similarity between PriA and other DNA helicases.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shashank Hambarde ◽  
Chi-Lin Tsai ◽  
Raj K. Pandita ◽  
Albino Bacolla ◽  
Anirban Maitra ◽  
...  

eLife ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neha Puri ◽  
Amy J Fernandez ◽  
Valerie L O'Shea Murray ◽  
Sarah McMillan ◽  
James L Keck ◽  
...  

In many bacteria and in eukaryotes, replication fork establishment requires the controlled loading of hexameric, ring-shaped helicases around DNA by AAA+ ATPases. How loading factors use ATP to control helicase deposition is poorly understood. Here, we dissect how specific ATPase elements of E. coli DnaC, an archetypal loader for the bacterial DnaB helicase, play distinct roles in helicase loading and the activation of DNA unwinding. We identify a new element, the arginine-coupler, which regulates the switch-like behavior of DnaC to prevent futile ATPase cycling and maintains loader responsiveness to replication restart systems. Our data help explain how the ATPase cycle of a AAA+-family helicase loader is channeled into productive action on its target; comparative studies indicate elements analogous to the Arg-coupler are present in related, switch-like AAA+ proteins that control replicative helicase loading in eukaryotes, as well as polymerase clamp loading and certain classes of DNA transposases.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Logan Schuck ◽  
Jason A. Stewart

AbstractSister chromatid cohesion (SCC) is established during DNA replication by loading of the cohesin complex on newly replicated chromatids. Cohesin must then be maintained until mitosis to prevent segregation defects and aneuploidy. How SCC is established and maintained until mitosis remains incompletely understood and emerging evidence suggests that replication stress can lead to premature SCC loss. Here, we report that the single-stranded DNA-binding protein CTC1-STN1-TEN1 (CST) aids in SCC. CST primarily functions in telomere length regulation but also has known roles in replication restart and DNA repair. Following depletion of CST subunits, we observed an increase in the complete loss of SCC. Additionally, we determined that CST interacts with the cohesin complex. Unexpectedly, we did not find evidence of defective cohesion establishment or mitotic progression in the absence of CST. However, we did find that treatment with various replication inhibitors increased the association between CST and cohesin. Since replication stress was recently shown to induce SCC loss, we supposed that CST may be required to maintain SCC following fork stalling. In agreement with this idea, SCC loss was greatly increased in CST-depleted cells following exogenous replication stress. Based on our findings, we propose that CST aids in the maintenance of SCC at stalled replication forks to prevent premature cohesion loss.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document