scholarly journals Orchestration of the S-phase and DNA damage checkpoint pathways by replication forks from early origins

2008 ◽  
Vol 180 (6) ◽  
pp. 1073-1086 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julie M. Caldwell ◽  
Yinhuai Chen ◽  
Kaila L. Schollaert ◽  
James F. Theis ◽  
George F. Babcock ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Replication Fork ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Dna Damage Checkpoint ◽  
Replication Forks ◽  
Checkpoint Signaling ◽  
Checkpoint Pathway ◽  
Origin Licensing ◽  
Pause Site ◽  
S Phase Checkpoint

The S-phase checkpoint activated at replication forks coordinates DNA replication when forks stall because of DNA damage or low deoxyribonucleotide triphosphate pools. We explore the involvement of replication forks in coordinating the S-phase checkpoint using dun1Δ cells that have a defect in the number of stalled forks formed from early origins and are dependent on the DNA damage Chk1p pathway for survival when replication is stalled. We show that providing additional origins activated in early S phase and establishing a paused fork at a replication fork pause site restores S-phase checkpoint signaling to chk1Δ dun1Δ cells and relieves the reliance on the DNA damage checkpoint pathway. Origin licensing and activation are controlled by the cyclin–Cdk complexes. Thus, oncogene-mediated deregulation of cyclins in the early stages of cancer development could contribute to genomic instability through a deficiency in the forks required to establish the S-phase checkpoint.

scholarly journals A Role for Saccharomyces cerevisiae Chk1p in the Response to Replication Blocks

2004 ◽  
Vol 15 (9) ◽  
pp. 4051-4063 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kaila L. Schollaert ◽  
Julie M. Poisson ◽  
Jennifer S. Searle ◽  
Jennifer A. Schwanekamp ◽  
Craig R. Tomlinson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Transcriptional Response ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Yeast Cells ◽  
Dna Damage Checkpoint ◽  
Checkpoint Kinases ◽  
Checkpoint Pathway ◽  
Dna Replication And Repair ◽  
S Phase Checkpoint

Replication blocks and DNA damage incurred during S phase activate the S-phase and intra-S-phase checkpoint responses, respectively, regulated by the Atrp and Chk1p checkpoint kinases in metazoans. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, these checkpoints are regulated by the Atrp homologue Mec1p and the kinase Rad53p. A conserved role of these checkpoints is to block mitotic progression until DNA replication and repair are completed. In S. cerevisiae, these checkpoints include a transcriptional response regulated by the kinase Dun1p; however, dun1Δ cells are proficient for the S-phase-checkpoint-induced anaphase block. Yeast Chk1p kinase regulates the metaphase-to-anaphase transition in the DNA-damage checkpoint pathway via securin (Pds1p) phosphorylation. However, like Dun1p, yeast Chk1p is not required for the S-phase-checkpoint-induced anaphase block. Here we report that Chk1p has a role in the intra-S-phase checkpoint activated when yeast cells replicate their DNA in the presence of low concentrations of hydroxyurea (HU). Chk1p was modified and Pds1p was transiently phosphorylated in this response. Cells lacking Dun1p were dependent on Chk1p for survival in HU, and chk1Δ dun1Δ cells were defective in the recovery from replication interference caused by transient HU exposure. These studies establish a relationship between the S-phase and DNA-damage checkpoint pathways in S. cerevisiae and suggest that at least in some genetic backgrounds, the Chk1p/securin pathway is required for the recovery from stalled or collapsed replication forks.

scholarly journals Activation of the DNA Damage Checkpoint in Mutants Defective in DNA Replication Initiation

2008 ◽  
Vol 19 (10) ◽  
pp. 4374-4382 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ling Yin ◽  
Alexandra Monica Locovei ◽  
Gennaro D'Urso
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Replication Fork ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Replication Initiation ◽  
Dna Damage Checkpoint ◽  
Origin Firing ◽  
Dna Replication Initiation ◽  
Fork Stalling ◽  
S Phase Checkpoint

In the fission yeast, Schizosaccharomyces pombe, blocks to DNA replication elongation trigger the intra-S phase checkpoint that leads to the activation of the Cds1 kinase. Cds1 is required to both prevent premature entry into mitosis and to stabilize paused replication forks. Interestingly, although Cds1 is essential to maintain the viability of mutants defective in DNA replication elongation, mutants defective in DNA replication initiation require the Chk1 kinase. This suggests that defects in DNA replication initiation can lead to activation of the DNA damage checkpoint independent of the intra-S phase checkpoint. This might result from reduced origin firing that leads to an increase in replication fork stalling or replication fork collapse that activates the G2 DNA damage checkpoint. We refer to the Chk1-dependent, Cds1-independent phenotype as the rid phenotype (for replication initiation defective). Chk1 is active in rid mutants, and rid mutant viability is dependent on the DNA damage checkpoint, and surprisingly Mrc1, a protein required for activation of Cds1. Mutations in Mrc1 that prevent activation of Cds1 have no effect on its ability to support rid mutant viability, suggesting that Mrc1 has a checkpoint-independent role in maintaining the viability of mutants defective in DNA replication initiation.

scholarly journals Checkpoint regulation of replication forks: global or local?

2013 ◽  
Vol 41 (6) ◽  
pp. 1701-1705 ◽  
Author(s):  
Divya Ramalingam Iyer ◽  
Nicholas Rhind
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Replication Fork ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Cell Cycle Checkpoints ◽  
Dna Damage Checkpoint ◽  
Replication Forks ◽  
Origin Firing ◽  
Replication Fork Progression ◽  
Late Origin ◽  
Stalled Replication Forks

Cell-cycle checkpoints are generally global in nature: one unattached kinetochore prevents the segregation of all chromosomes; stalled replication forks inhibit late origin firing throughout the genome. A potential exception to this rule is the regulation of replication fork progression by the S-phase DNA damage checkpoint. In this case, it is possible that the checkpoint is global, and it slows all replication forks in the genome. However, it is also possible that the checkpoint acts locally at sites of DNA damage, and only slows those forks that encounter DNA damage. Whether the checkpoint regulates forks globally or locally has important mechanistic implications for how replication forks deal with damaged DNA during S-phase.

scholarly journals Surviving chromosome replication: the many roles of the S-phase checkpoint pathway

2011 ◽  
Vol 366 (1584) ◽  
pp. 3554-3561 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karim Labib ◽  
Giacomo De Piccoli
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Repair ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Reductase Activity ◽  
Critical Role ◽  
Chromosome Replication ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Replication Forks ◽  
Checkpoint Pathway ◽  
S Phase Checkpoint

Checkpoints were originally identified as signalling pathways that delay mitosis in response to DNA damage or defects in chromosome replication, allowing time for DNA repair to occur. The ATR (ataxia- and rad-related) and ATM (ataxia-mutated) protein kinases are recruited to defective replication forks or to sites of DNA damage, and are thought to initiate the DNA damage response in all eukaryotes. In addition to delaying cell cycle progression, however, the S-phase checkpoint pathway also controls chromosome replication and DNA repair pathways in a highly complex fashion, in order to preserve genome integrity. Much of our understanding of this regulation has come from studies of yeasts, in which the best-characterized targets are the stimulation of ribonucleotide reductase activity by multiple mechanisms, and the inhibition of new initiation events at later origins of DNA replication. In addition, however, the S-phase checkpoint also plays a more enigmatic and apparently critical role in preserving the functional integrity of defective replication forks, by mechanisms that are still understood poorly. This review considers some of the key experiments that have led to our current understanding of this highly complex pathway.

scholarly journals Mus81, Rhp51(Rad51), and Rqh1 Form an Epistatic Pathway Required for the S-Phase DNA Damage Checkpoint

2009 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 819-833 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas Willis ◽  
Nicholas Rhind
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Synthesis ◽  
Replication Fork ◽  
Alkylating Agent ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Negative Regulation ◽  
Dna Damage Checkpoint ◽  
Methyl Methane Sulfonate ◽  
Methane Sulfonate ◽  
Checkpoint Signaling

The S-phase DNA damage checkpoint slows the rate of DNA synthesis in response to damage during replication. In the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe, Cds1, the S-phase-specific checkpoint effector kinase, is required for checkpoint signaling and replication slowing; upon treatment with the alkylating agent methyl methane sulfonate, cds1Δ mutants display a complete checkpoint defect. We have identified proteins downstream of Cds1 required for checkpoint-dependant slowing, including the structure-specific endonuclease Mus81 and the helicase Rqh1, which are implicated in replication fork stability and the negative regulation of recombination. Removing Rhp51, the Rad51 recombinase homologue, suppresses the slowing defect of rqh1Δ mutants, but not that of mus81Δ mutant, defining an epistatic pathway in which mus81 is epistatic to rhp51 and rhp51 is epistatic to rqh1. We propose that restraining recombination is required for the slowing of replication in response to DNA damage.

scholarly journals The Role of MRN in the S-Phase DNA Damage Checkpoint Is Independent of Its Ctp1-dependent Roles in Double-Strand Break Repair and Checkpoint Signaling

2009 ◽  
Vol 20 (7) ◽  
pp. 2096-2107 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary E. Porter-Goff ◽  
Nicholas Rhind
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Homologous Recombination ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
Double Strand Break ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Double Strand Break Repair ◽  
Dna Damage Checkpoint ◽  
Checkpoint Signaling ◽  
Break Repair ◽  
S Phase Checkpoint

The Mre11-Rad50-Nbs1 (MRN) complex has many biological functions: processing of double-strand breaks in meiosis, homologous recombination, telomere maintenance, S-phase checkpoint, and genome stability during replication. In the S-phase DNA damage checkpoint, MRN acts both in activation of checkpoint signaling and downstream of the checkpoint kinases to slow DNA replication. Mechanistically, MRN, along with its cofactor Ctp1, is involved in 5′ resection to create single-stranded DNA that is required for both signaling and homologous recombination. However, it is unclear whether resection is essential for all of the cellular functions of MRN. To dissect the various roles of MRN, we performed a structure–function analysis of nuclease dead alleles and potential separation-of-function alleles analogous to those found in the human disease ataxia telangiectasia-like disorder, which is caused by mutations in Mre11. We find that several alleles of rad32 (the fission yeast homologue of mre11), along with ctp1Δ, are defective in double-strand break repair and most other functions of the complex, but they maintain an intact S phase DNA damage checkpoint. Thus, the MRN S-phase checkpoint role is separate from its Ctp1- and resection-dependent role in double-strand break repair. This observation leads us to conclude that other functions of MRN, possibly its role in replication fork metabolism, are required for S-phase DNA damage checkpoint function.

scholarly journals The yeast S phase checkpoint enables replicating chromosomes to bi-orient and restrain spindle extension during S phase distress

2005 ◽  
Vol 168 (7) ◽  
pp. 999-1012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeff Bachant ◽  
Shannon R. Jessen ◽  
Sarah E. Kavanaugh ◽  
Candida S. Fielding
Keyword(s):  
Dna Replication ◽  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Replication Fork ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Origin Of Replication ◽  
Independent Manner ◽  
Checkpoint Signaling ◽  
Hydroxyurea Treatment ◽  
Chromatid Cohesion ◽  
S Phase Checkpoint

The budding yeast S phase checkpoint responds to hydroxyurea-induced nucleotide depletion by preventing replication fork collapse and the segregation of unreplicated chromosomes. Although the block to chromosome segregation has been thought to occur by inhibiting anaphase, we show checkpoint-defective rad53 mutants undergo cycles of spindle extension and collapse after hydroxyurea treatment that are distinct from anaphase cells. Furthermore, chromatid cohesion, whose dissolution triggers anaphase, is dispensable for S phase checkpoint arrest. Kinetochore–spindle attachments are required to prevent spindle extension during replication blocks, and chromosomes with two centromeres or an origin of replication juxtaposed to a centromere rescue the rad53 checkpoint defect. These observations suggest that checkpoint signaling is required to generate an inward force involved in maintaining preanaphase spindle integrity during DNA replication distress. We propose that by promoting replication fork integrity under these conditions Rad53 ensures centromere duplication. Replicating chromosomes can then bi-orient in a cohesin-independent manner to restrain untimely spindle extension.

Replication forks pause at yeast centromeres

1992 ◽  
Vol 12 (9) ◽  
pp. 4056-4066
Author(s):  
S A Greenfeder ◽  
C S Newlon
Keyword(s):  
Gel Electrophoresis ◽  
Replication Fork ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Core Structure ◽  
Replication Forks ◽  
Agarose Gel Electrophoresis ◽  
Unusual Structure ◽  
Dna Complex ◽  
Derivatives Of ◽  
Pause Site

The 120 bp of yeast centromeric DNA is tightly complexed with protein to form a nuclease-resistant core structure 200 to 240 bp in size. We have used two-dimensional agarose gel electrophoresis to analyze the replication of the chromosomal copies of yeast CEN1, CEN3, and CEN4 and determine the fate of replication forks that encounter the protein-DNA complex at the centromere. We have shown that replication fork pause sites are coincident with each of these centromeres and therefore probably with all yeast centromeres. We have analyzed the replication of plasmids containing mutant derivatives of CEN3 to determine whether the replication fork pause site is a result of an unusual structure adopted by centromere DNA or a result of the protein-DNA complex formed at the centromere. The mutant centromere derivatives varied in function as well as the ability to form the nuclease-resistant core structure. The data obtained from analysis of these derivatives indicate that the ability to cause replication forks to pause correlates with the ability to form the nuclease-resistant core structure and not with the presence or absence of a particular DNA sequence. Our findings further suggest that the centromere protein-DNA complex is present during S phase when replication forks encounter the centromere and therefore may be present throughout the cell cycle.

scholarly journals Saccharomyces cerevisiae Rrm3p DNA Helicase Promotes Genome Integrity by Preventing Replication Fork Stalling: Viability of rrm3 Cells Requires the Intra-S-Phase Checkpoint and Fork Restart Activities

2004 ◽  
Vol 24 (8) ◽  
pp. 3198-3212 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jorge Z. Torres ◽  
Sandra L. Schnakenberg ◽  
Virginia A. Zakian
Keyword(s):  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Replication Fork ◽  
Opportunity To Learn ◽  
Normal Growth ◽  
Dna Helicase ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Exogenous Dna ◽  
Fork Stalling ◽  
S Phase Checkpoint

ABSTRACT Rrm3p is a 5′-to-3′ DNA helicase that helps replication forks traverse protein-DNA complexes. Its absence leads to increased fork stalling and breakage at over 1,000 specific sites located throughout the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome. To understand the mechanisms that respond to and repair rrm3-dependent lesions, we carried out a candidate gene deletion analysis to identify genes whose mutation conferred slow growth or lethality on rrm3 cells. Based on synthetic phenotypes, the intra-S-phase checkpoint, the SRS2 inhibitor of recombination, the SGS1/TOP3 replication fork restart pathway, and the MRE11/RAD50/XRS2 (MRX) complex were critical for viability of rrm3 cells. DNA damage checkpoint and homologous recombination genes were important for normal growth of rrm3 cells. However, the MUS81/MMS4 replication fork restart pathway did not affect growth of rrm3 cells. These data suggest a model in which the stalled and broken forks generated in rrm3 cells activate a checkpoint response that provides time for fork repair and restart. Stalled forks are converted by a Rad51p-mediated process to intermediates that are resolved by Sgs1p/Top3p. The rrm3 system provides a unique opportunity to learn the fate of forks whose progress is impaired by natural impediments rather than by exogenous DNA damage.

scholarly journals Set1-dependent H3K4 methylation becomes critical for DNA replication fork progression in response to changes in S phase dynamics in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christophe de La Roche Saint-André ◽  
Vincent Géli
Keyword(s):  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Replication Fork ◽  
Genetic Material ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Replication Forks ◽  
H3k4 Methylation ◽  
Origin Firing ◽  
Phase Dynamics

AbstractDNA replication is a highly regulated process that occurs in the context of chromatin structure and is sensitive to several histone post-translational modifications. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the histone methylase Set1 is responsible for the transcription-dependent deposition of H3K4 methylation (H3K4me) throughout the genome. Here we show that a combination of a hypomorphic replication mutation (orc5-1) with the absence of Set1 (set1Δ) compromises the progression through S phase, and this is associated with a large increase in DNA damage. The ensuing DNA damage checkpoint activation, in addition to that of the spindle assembly checkpoint, restricts the growth of orc5-1 set1Δ. Interestingly, orc5-1 set1Δ is sensitive to the lack of RNase H activity while a reduction of histone levels is able to counterbalance the loss of Set1. We propose that the recently described Set1-dependent mitigation of transcription-replication conflicts becomes critical for growth when the replication forks accelerate due to decreased origin firing in the orc5-1 background. Furthermore, we show that an increase of reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels, likely a consequence of the elevated DNA damage, is partly responsible for the lethality in orc5-1 set1Δ.Author summaryDNA replication, that ensures the duplication of the genetic material, starts at discrete sites, termed origins, before proceeding at replication forks whose progression is carefully controlled in order to avoid conflicts with the transcription of genes. In eukaryotes, DNA replication occurs in the context of chromatin, a structure in which DNA is wrapped around proteins, called histones, that are subjected to various chemical modifications. Among them, the methylation of the lysine 4 of histone H3 (H3K4) is carried out by Set1 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, specifically at transcribed genes. We report that, when the replication fork accelerates in response to a reduction of active origins, the absence of Set1 leads to accumulation of DNA damage. Because H3K4 methylation was recently shown to slow down replication at transcribed genes, we propose that the Set1-dependent becomes crucial to limit the occurrence of conflicts between replication and transcription caused by replication fork acceleration. In agreement with this model, stabilization of transcription-dependent structures or reduction histone levels, to limit replication fork velocity, respectively exacerbates or moderates the effect of Set1 loss. Last, but not least, we show that the oxidative stress associated to DNA damage is partly responsible for cell lethality.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document