scholarly journals Managers' Practices of Tobacco and Marijuana Smoking Policies in Hispanic-Occupied Multiunit Housing

Health Equity ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 304-311
Author(s):  
Angelica Delgado Rendon ◽  
Tess Boley Cruz ◽  
Lourdes Baezconde-Garbanati ◽  
Claradina Soto ◽  
Jennifer B. Unger
2020 ◽  
Vol 18 ◽  
pp. 101088 ◽  
Author(s):  
Georg E. Matt ◽  
Penelope J.E. Quintana ◽  
Eunha Hoh ◽  
Joy M. Zakarian ◽  
Nathan G. Dodder ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 132 (6) ◽  
pp. 637-645 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen M. Wilson ◽  
Michelle R. Torok ◽  
Robert C. McMillen ◽  
Jonathan D. Klein ◽  
Douglas E. Levy ◽  
...  

Objectives: Residents of multiunit housing can be exposed to tobacco smoke even if they do not permit smoking in their homes. Although even low levels of tobacco smoke exposure can cause health problems for children and adults, some landlords are reluctant to ban smoking for fear of decreased occupancy rates or tenant satisfaction. The objective of this study was to assess the impact of tobacco smoke-free policies and tobacco-smoke incursions on housing satisfaction in multiunit housing residences with children. Methods: In 2013, 3696 randomly sampled US adult multiunit housing dwellers were invited to participate in a survey, and 3253 (88%) participated. Of these, 3128 responded to the question about having a child in the home, and 835 (27%) reported having a child in the home. We collected data on demographic characteristics, tobacco-smoke incursions, knowledge and attitudes about smoking policies, and housing satisfaction for this sample of 835 residents. Results: Of the 827 residents who responded to the question, 755 (91.3%) agreed that tenants have a right to live in a tobacco smoke-free building. Although 672 of 835 (80.5%) residents were not cigarette smokers, most lived where smoking was permitted in the units (n = 463, 56.9%) or on the property (n = 571, 70.5%). Of 580 non-cigarette smoking residents who lived where no one had smoked cigarettes in the home for the past 3 months, 144 (25.2%) reported a recent tobacco-smoke incursion. Of these 144 residents, 143 (99%) were bothered. Few (36/143, 25.2%) complained to the landlord. Reasons for not complaining were reluctance to upset neighbors or concern about retaliation. Tobacco-smoke incursions and housing/landlord satisfaction were inversely related ( P < .05). Conclusion: Multiunit housing residents living with children in the United States strongly support smoke-free multiunit housing.


2013 ◽  
Vol 38 (6) ◽  
pp. 1074-1080 ◽  
Author(s):  
Douglas L. Ballor ◽  
Heidi Henson ◽  
Kathleen MacGuire

2017 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Brooke L. Bennett ◽  
Melodi Deiner ◽  
Pallav Pokhrel

PEDIATRICS ◽  
1993 ◽  
Vol 91 (2) ◽  
pp. 460-463
Author(s):  
David E. Nelson ◽  
Jeffrey J. Sacks ◽  
David G. Addiss

The authors analyzed data from a national survey of 2003 directors of licensed child day-care centers to determine employee smoking policies, measure compliance with state and local employee smoking regulations for child day-care centers and state clean indoor air laws, and to estimate the extent of exposure to environmental tobacco smoke in these settings. Forty states regulated employee smoking in child day-care centers, but only three states required day-care centers to be smoke-free indoors. More than 99% of licensed child day-care centers had employee smoking policies that complied with the appropriate state or local smoking regulations. Nearly 55% of centers were smoke-free indoors and outdoors, and 26% were smoke-free indoors only. The best predictors of more stringent employee smoking policies were location in the West or South, smaller size, independent ownership, or having written smoking policies. Despite the presence of strong smoking policies at the majority of licensed child day-care centers, more than 752000 children in the United States are at risk for environmental tobacco smoke exposure in these settings. Health care professionals and parents should insist that child day-care centers be smoke-free indoors and, preferably, smoke-free indoors and outdoors.


2015 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rachna D. Chandora ◽  
Carrie F. Whitney ◽  
Scott R. Weaver ◽  
Michael P. Eriksen
Keyword(s):  

1999 ◽  
Vol 75 (3) ◽  
pp. 225-240 ◽  
Author(s):  
PETER BARDSLEY ◽  
NILSS OLEKALNS

1986 ◽  
Vol 76 (4) ◽  
pp. 390 ◽  
Author(s):  
Larry R. Ford

1979 ◽  
Vol 8 (5) ◽  
pp. 557-561 ◽  
Author(s):  
Norma R. Kelly ◽  
Felissa L. Cohen

2021 ◽  
pp. e1-e12
Author(s):  
David J. K. Balfour ◽  
Neal L. Benowitz ◽  
Suzanne M. Colby ◽  
Dorothy K. Hatsukami ◽  
Harry A. Lando ◽  
...  

The topic of e-cigarettes is controversial. Opponents focus on e-cigarettes’ risks for young people, while supporters emphasize the potential for e-cigarettes to assist smokers in quitting smoking. Most US health organizations, media coverage, and policymakers have focused primarily on risks to youths. Because of their messaging, much of the public—including most smokers—now consider e-cigarette use as dangerous as or more dangerous than smoking. By contrast, the National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine concluded that e-cigarette use is likely far less hazardous than smoking. Policies intended to reduce adolescent vaping may also reduce adult smokers’ use of e-cigarettes in quit attempts. Because evidence indicates that e-cigarette use can increase the odds of quitting smoking, many scientists, including this essay’s authors, encourage the health community, media, and policymakers to more carefully weigh vaping’s potential to reduce adult smoking-attributable mortality. We review the health risks of e-cigarette use, the likelihood that vaping increases smoking cessation, concerns about youth vaping, and the need to balance valid concerns about risks to youths with the potential benefits of increasing adult smoking cessation. (Am J Public Health. Published online ahead of print August 19, 2021: e1–e12. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2021.306416 )


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document