scholarly journals Regulation of Membrane Localization of Sanpodo by lethal giant larvae and neuralized in Asymmetrically Dividing Cells of Drosophila Sensory Organs

2005 ◽  
Vol 16 (8) ◽  
pp. 3480-3487 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fabrice Roegiers ◽  
Lily Yeh Jan ◽  
Yuh Nung Jan
Keyword(s):  
Cell Division ◽  
Notch Signaling ◽  
Cell Fate ◽  
Asymmetric Cell Division ◽  
Transmembrane Protein ◽  
Negative Regulator ◽  
Membrane Localization ◽  
Lethal Giant Larvae ◽  
Dividing Cells ◽  
Fate Decision

In Drosophila, asymmetric division occurs during proliferation of neural precursors of the central and peripheral nervous system (PNS), where a membrane-associated protein, Numb, is asymmetrically localized during cell division and is segregated to one of the two daughter cells (the pIIb cell) after mitosis. numb has been shown genetically to function as an antagonist of Notch signaling and also as a negative regulator of the membrane localization of Sanpodo, a four-pass transmembrane protein required for Notch signaling during asymmetric cell division in the CNS. Previously, we identified lethal giant larvae (lgl) as a gene required for numb-mediated inhibition of Notch in the adult PNS. In this study we show that Sanpodo is expressed in asymmetrically dividing precursor cells of the PNS and that Sanpodo internalization in the pIIb cell is dependent cytoskeletally associated Lgl. Lgl specifically regulates internalization of Sanpodo, likely through endocytosis, but is not required for the endocytosis Delta, which is a required step in the Notch-mediated cell fate decision during asymmetric cell division. Conversely, the E3 ubiquitin ligase neuralized is required for both Delta endocytosis and the internalization of Sanpodo. This study identifies a hitherto unreported role for Lgl as a regulator of Sanpodo during asymmetric cell division in the adult PNS.

scholarly journals Polarized endosome dynamics engage cytosolic Par-3 and dynein during asymmetric division

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiang Zhao ◽  
Kai Tong ◽  
Xingye Chen ◽  
Bin Yang ◽  
Qi Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Notch Signaling ◽  
Cell Fate ◽  
Radial Glia ◽  
Asymmetric Cell Division ◽  
Time Lapse ◽  
Cell Fate Decisions ◽  
Dynein Motor ◽  
Fate Decision ◽  
Underlying Mechanisms

AbstractAsymmetric cell division (ACD), which produces two daughters with different fates, is fundamental for generating cellular diversity. In the developing embryos of both invertebrates and vertebrates, asymmetrically dividing progenitors generate daughter cells with differential activity of Notch signaling1–7, a key regulator of cell fate decisions8,9. The cell polarity regulator Par-3 is critical for establishing this Notch asymmetry1,4,6, but the underlying mechanisms are not understood. Here, employing in vivo time-lapse imaging in the developing zebrafish forebrain during the mitotic cycle of radial glia, the principal vertebrate neural stem cells10,11, we show that during ACD, endosomes containing the Notch ligand Delta D (Dld) undergo convergent movement toward the cleavage plane, followed by preferential segregation into the posterior (and subsequently basal) Notchhi daughter. This asymmetric segregation requires the activity of Par-3 and the dynein motor complex. Employing label-retention expansion microscopy, we further detect Par-3 in the cytosol in association with the dynein light intermediate chain 1 (DLIC1) on Dld endosomes, suggesting a direct involvement of Par-3 in dynein-mediated polarized transport of Notch signaling endosomes. Our data reveal an unanticipated mechanism by which Par-3 regulates cell fate decision by directly polarizing Notch signaling components during ACD.

scholarly journals The endoplasmic reticulum is partitioned asymmetrically during mitosis before cell fate selection in proneuronal cells in the early Drosophila embryo

2017 ◽  
Vol 28 (11) ◽  
pp. 1530-1538 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anthony S. Eritano ◽  
Arturo Altamirano ◽  
Sarah Beyeler ◽  
Norma Gaytan ◽  
Mark Velasquez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endoplasmic Reticulum ◽  
Cell Division ◽  
Cell Fate ◽  
Asymmetric Cell Division ◽  
Asymmetric Division ◽  
Drosophila Embryo ◽  
Early Drosophila Embryo ◽  
Dividing Cells ◽  
Fate Determinants ◽  
Selection Of

Asymmetric cell division is the primary mechanism to generate cellular diversity, and it relies on the correct partitioning of cell fate determinants. However, the mechanism by which these determinants are delivered and positioned is poorly understood, and the upstream signal to initiate asymmetric cell division is unknown. Here we report that the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) is asymmetrically partitioned during mitosis in epithelial cells just before delamination and selection of a proneural cell fate in the early Drosophila embryo. At the start of gastrulation, the ER divides asymmetrically into a population of asynchronously dividing cells at the anterior end of the embryo. We found that this asymmetric division of the ER depends on the highly conserved ER membrane protein Jagunal (Jagn). RNA inhibition of jagn just before the start of gastrulation disrupts this asymmetric division of the ER. In addition, jagn-deficient embryos display defects in apical-basal spindle orientation in delaminated embryonic neuroblasts. Our results describe a model in which an organelle is partitioned asymmetrically in an otherwise symmetrically dividing cell population just upstream of cell fate determination and updates previous models of spindle-based selection of cell fate during mitosis.

Centromere assembly and non-random sister chromatid segregation in stem cells

2020 ◽  
Vol 64 (2) ◽  
pp. 223-232 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ben L. Carty ◽  
Elaine M. Dunleavy
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cells ◽  
Cell Division ◽  
Cell Fate ◽  
Sister Chromatid ◽  
Asymmetric Cell Division ◽  
Protein A ◽  
Germline Stem Cells ◽  
Sister Chromatids ◽  
Centromere Protein A ◽  
Oocyte Meiosis

Abstract Asymmetric cell division (ACD) produces daughter cells with separate distinct cell fates and is critical for the development and regulation of multicellular organisms. Epigenetic mechanisms are key players in cell fate determination. Centromeres, epigenetically specified loci defined by the presence of the histone H3-variant, centromere protein A (CENP-A), are essential for chromosome segregation at cell division. ACDs in stem cells and in oocyte meiosis have been proposed to be reliant on centromere integrity for the regulation of the non-random segregation of chromosomes. It has recently been shown that CENP-A is asymmetrically distributed between the centromeres of sister chromatids in male and female Drosophila germline stem cells (GSCs), with more CENP-A on sister chromatids to be segregated to the GSC. This imbalance in centromere strength correlates with the temporal and asymmetric assembly of the mitotic spindle and potentially orientates the cell to allow for biased sister chromatid retention in stem cells. In this essay, we discuss the recent evidence for asymmetric sister centromeres in stem cells. Thereafter, we discuss mechanistic avenues to establish this sister centromere asymmetry and how it ultimately might influence cell fate.

scholarly journals Cell fate clusters in ICM organoids arise from cell fate heredity and division: a modelling approach

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tim Liebisch ◽  
Armin Drusko ◽  
Biena Mathew ◽  
Ernst H. K. Stelzer ◽  
Sabine C. Fischer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Proliferation ◽  
Cell Division ◽  
Cell Fate ◽  
Inner Cell Mass ◽  
Cell Mass ◽  
Cell Lineage ◽  
Cell Fate Decision ◽  
Cell Fate Decisions ◽  
Chemical Signalling ◽  
Fate Decision

AbstractDuring the mammalian preimplantation phase, cells undergo two subsequent cell fate decisions. During the first decision, the trophectoderm and the inner cell mass are formed. Subsequently, the inner cell mass segregates into the epiblast and the primitive endoderm. Inner cell mass organoids represent an experimental model system, mimicking the second cell fate decision. It has been shown that cells of the same fate tend to cluster stronger than expected for random cell fate decisions. Three major processes are hypothesised to contribute to the cell fate arrangements: (1) chemical signalling; (2) cell sorting; and (3) cell proliferation. In order to quantify the influence of cell proliferation on the observed cell lineage type clustering, we developed an agent-based model accounting for mechanical cell–cell interaction, i.e. adhesion and repulsion, cell division, stochastic cell fate decision and cell fate heredity. The model supports the hypothesis that initial cell fate acquisition is a stochastically driven process, taking place in the early development of inner cell mass organoids. Further, we show that the observed neighbourhood structures can emerge solely due to cell fate heredity during cell division.

Asymmetric organelle inheritance predicts human blood stem cell fate

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dirk Loeffler ◽  
Florin Schneiter ◽  
Weijia Wang ◽  
Arne Wehling ◽  
Tobias Kull ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cells ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Cell Division ◽  
Cell Fate ◽  
Human Blood ◽  
Asymmetric Cell Division ◽  
Cell Fates ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Stem Cell Fate ◽  
Blood Stem Cells

Understanding human hematopoietic stem cell fate control is important for their improved therapeutic manipulation. Asymmetric cell division, the asymmetric inheritance of factors during division instructing future daughter cell fates, was recently described in mouse blood stem cells. In human blood stem cells, the possible existence of asymmetric cell division remained unclear due to technical challenges in its direct observation. Here, we use long-term quantitative single-cell imaging to show that lysosomes and active mitochondria are asymmetrically inherited in human blood stem cells and that their inheritance is a coordinated, non-random process. Furthermore, multiple additional organelles, including autophagosomes, mitophagosomes, autolysosomes and recycling endosomes show preferential asymmetric co-segregation with lysosomes. Importantly, asymmetric lysosomal inheritance predicts future asymmetric daughter cell cycle length, differentiation and stem cell marker expression, while asymmetric inheritance of active mitochondria correlates with daughter metabolic activity. Hence, human hematopoietic stem cell fates are regulated by asymmetric cell division, with both mechanistic evolutionary conservation and differences to the mouse system.

scholarly journals Cell shape and intercellular adhesion regulate mitotic spindle orientation

2019 ◽  
Vol 30 (19) ◽  
pp. 2458-2468 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jingchen Li ◽  
Longcan Cheng ◽  
Hongyuan Jiang
Keyword(s):  
Cell Division ◽  
Epithelial Cells ◽  
Cell Fate ◽  
Cell Shape ◽  
Intercellular Adhesion ◽  
Shape Anisotropy ◽  
Spindle Orientation ◽  
Mitotic Spindles ◽  
Strong Adhesion ◽  
Fate Decision

Cell division orientation plays an essential role in tissue morphogenesis and cell fate decision. Recent studies showed that either cell shape or adhesion geometry can regulate the orientation of mitotic spindles and thereby the cell division orientation. However, how they together regulate the spindle orientation remains largely unclear. In this work, we use a general computational model to investigate the competitive mechanism of determining the spindle orientation between cell shape and intercellular adhesion in epithelial cells. We find the spindle orientation is dominated by the intercellular adhesion when the cell shape anisotropy is small, but dominated by the cell shape when the shape anisotropy is large. A strong adhesion and moderate adhesive size can ensure the planar division of epithelial cells with large apico-basal elongation. We also find the spindle orientation could be perpendicular to the adhesive region when only one side of the cell is adhered to an E-cadherin–coated matrix. But after the cell is compressed, the spindle orientation is governed by the cell shape and the spindle will be parallel to the adhesive region when the cell shape anisotropy is large. Finally, we demonstrate the competition between cell shape and tricellular junctions can also effectively regulate the spindle orientation.

Strontium regulates stem cell fate during osteogenic differentiation through asymmetric cell division

2021 ◽  
Vol 119 ◽  
pp. 432-443
Author(s):  
Yanqun Li ◽  
Jianhui Yue ◽  
Yuan Liu ◽  
Jun Wu ◽  
Min Guan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Cell Division ◽  
Osteogenic Differentiation ◽  
Cell Fate ◽  
Asymmetric Cell Division ◽  
Stem Cell Fate

scholarly journals Cytokine receptor-Eb1 interaction couples cell polarity and fate during asymmetric cell division

eLife ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cuie Chen ◽  
Ryan Cummings ◽  
Aghapi Mordovanakis ◽  
Alan J Hunt ◽  
Michael Mayer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cells ◽  
Cell Division ◽  
Cell Fate ◽  
Cell Polarity ◽  
Adult Stem Cells ◽  
Asymmetric Cell Division ◽  
Cytokine Receptor ◽  
Spindle Orientation ◽  
Germline Stem Cells ◽  
Self Renewal

Asymmetric stem cell division is a critical mechanism for balancing self-renewal and differentiation. Adult stem cells often orient their mitotic spindle to place one daughter inside the niche and the other outside of it to achieve asymmetric division. It remains unknown whether and how the niche may direct division orientation. Here we discover a novel and evolutionary conserved mechanism that couples cell polarity to cell fate. We show that the cytokine receptor homolog Dome, acting downstream of the niche-derived ligand Upd, directly binds to the microtubule-binding protein Eb1 to regulate spindle orientation in Drosophila male germline stem cells (GSCs). Dome’s role in spindle orientation is entirely separable from its known function in self-renewal mediated by the JAK-STAT pathway. We propose that integration of two functions (cell polarity and fate) in a single receptor is a key mechanism to ensure an asymmetric outcome following cell division.

scholarly journals Emerging mechanisms of asymmetric stem cell division

2018 ◽  
Vol 217 (11) ◽  
pp. 3785-3795 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zsolt G. Venkei ◽  
Yukiko M. Yamashita
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cells ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Cell Division ◽  
Asymmetric Cell Division ◽  
Binary Outcomes ◽  
Cellular Mechanisms ◽  
Asymmetric Cell Divisions ◽  
Cell Divisions ◽  
Dividing Cells ◽  
Stem Cell Division

The asymmetric cell division of stem cells, which produces one stem cell and one differentiating cell, has emerged as a mechanism to balance stem cell self-renewal and differentiation. Elaborate cellular mechanisms that orchestrate the processes required for asymmetric cell divisions are often shared between stem cells and other asymmetrically dividing cells. During asymmetric cell division, cells must establish asymmetry/polarity, which is guided by varying degrees of intrinsic versus extrinsic cues, and use intracellular machineries to divide in a desired orientation in the context of the asymmetry/polarity. Recent studies have expanded our knowledge on the mechanisms of asymmetric cell divisions, revealing the previously unappreciated complexity in setting up the cellular and/or environmental asymmetry, ensuring binary outcomes of the fate determination. In this review, we summarize recent progress in understanding the mechanisms and regulations of asymmetric stem cell division.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document