35 Enhanced Service Through An Integrated New Model of Care in A Buckinghamshire Care Home

2020 ◽  
Vol 49 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. i9-i10
Author(s):  
U Okoli ◽  
S Chimhau ◽  
B Nagyova ◽  
A Sahni ◽  
S Amin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Best Practice ◽  
Adverse Drug Events ◽  
Hospital Admissions ◽  
Care Home ◽  
Cost Savings ◽  
Care Homes ◽  
Multiple Chronic Conditions ◽  
Model Of Care ◽  
Nice Guideline ◽  
Care Plans

Abstract Introduction Care home residents often have multiple, chronic conditions and are receiving complex treatment regimes. Polypharmacy and medication errors are common. The frequency and quality of medication reviews is variable with limited general practice (GP) capacity to carry out comprehensive reviews. The initiative used a care home pharmacist, technician, geriatrician and GPs to tackle these issues on an individual and care home level. The objective being to ensure the safe and effective use of medicines for all care home residents. NICE guideline [NG56] recommends reducing pharmacological treatment burden for adults with multimorbidity at risk of adverse drug events such as unplanned hospital admissions. A study by Dilles et al1 found adverse drug reactions in 60% of residents. Methods A new interdisciplinary model of care was delivered in a 120 bedded Buckinghamshire care home. Clinical Commissioning Group pharmacist, general practitioners and pharmacy technician reviewed medication for all residents. The most complex individuals were reviewed by the geriatrician and if needed by other multidisciplinary team members specialist. Results Overall 115 medications were stopped for 109 residents, with 31 interventions to reduce falls risk and 19 interventions on medication at high risk2 of causing admission. Total cost savings on medicines optimisation, medicines waste and non-elective admission prevented was £35,211. Residents’ care plans were updated to reflect best practice standards. Conclusions Future direction of this project focuses on system wide improvements to promote interdisciplinary healthcare professionals work in care homes. The success of this integrated model of care has enabled recurrent funding of pharmacist by the local county council and an additional 42 geriatrician sessions into Buckinghamshire care homes. References 1. Dilles T, Vander Stichele R, Van Bortel L, Elseviers M. Journal of American Medical Directors Association 2013; 14: 371–6. 2. Pirmohamed M, et al. Br Med J 2004; 329: 15–9 61.

scholarly journals 44 Wirral's Teletriage Service

2020 ◽  
Vol 49 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. i11-i13
Author(s):  
E Whittle ◽  
E James ◽  
A Smith ◽  
M Highton ◽  
S Shaikh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Assessment ◽  
Hospital Admissions ◽  
Care Pathway ◽  
Care Home ◽  
Community Services ◽  
Ambulance Service ◽  
Care Homes ◽  
Care Plans ◽  
Phone Calls ◽  
Number Of Patients

Abstract Introduction The Wirral Teletriage Service provides non-urgent clinical support to Wirral Care Homes in order to help avoid unnecessary hospital admissions for their residents. It also aims to provide quicker access to clinical assessment than via NHS 111 and to provide this care in the patient’s residence wherever possible. Methods Care homes call the Teletriage service when they have concerns about the health of one of their residents. The Teletriage nurse undertakes a clinical assessment of the resident remotely via Skype. Care Homes have been provided with a secure NHS email address to facilitate secure sharing of data. They have also been provided with iPads and training for their staff. After being assessed by Teletriage, residents are signposted to the most appropriate care pathway for their needs. Results 76 Care Homes have signed up to the service. On average, the Teletriage Service receives 300-400 calls a month. In an 18 month period, the number of calls to NHS 111 have reduced by 76%. Out of all the calls to Teletriage, 22% of patients were managed by the Teletriage team with no onward referral, 57% were managed via community services e.g GPs, Community Geriatricians, and 10% were referred to the ambulance service. Emergency Health Care Plans (EHCPs), Preferred Priorities of Care and EOL (End of Life) wishes are taken into account. Conclusions The Teletriage project has reduced the number of phone calls to NHS 111 and the ambulance service, and subsequently has reduced the number of patients conveyed to hospital by 12%. The Teletriage nurses work very closely with various community services as well as GPs, NWAS and Community Geriatricians. The ongoing training and education provided to the Care Home Staff means that overall there has been good engagement with the project from the majority of the Wirral Care Homes.

scholarly journals Improving the oral health of older people in care homes (TOPIC): a protocol for a feasibility study

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Georgios Tsakos ◽  
Paul R. Brocklehurst ◽  
Sinead Watson ◽  
Anna Verey ◽  
Nia Goulden ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Promotion ◽  
Oral Health ◽  
Complex Intervention ◽  
Assessment Tool ◽  
Care Home ◽  
Care Homes ◽  
Routine Practice ◽  
Oral Health Promotion ◽  
Nice Guideline ◽  
Care Home Staff

Abstract Background Evidence for interventions promoting oral health amongst care home residents is weak. The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guideline NG48 aims to maintain and improve the oral health of care home residents. A co-design process that worked with residents and care home staff to understand how the NG48 guideline could be best implemented in practice has been undertaken to refine a complex intervention. The aim of this study is to assess the feasibility of the intervention to inform a future larger scale definitive trial. Methods This is a protocol for a pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial with a 12-month follow-up that will be undertaken in 12 care homes across two sites (six in London, six in Northern Ireland). Care homes randomised to the intervention arm (n = 6) will receive the complex intervention based on the NG48 guideline, whilst care homes randomised to the control arm (n = 6) will continue with routine practice. The intervention will include a training package for care home staff to promote knowledge and skills in oral health promotion, the use of the Oral Health Assessment Tool on residents by trained care home staff, and a ‘support worker assisted’ daily tooth-brushing regime with toothpaste containing 1500 ppm fluoride. An average of ten residents, aged 65 years or over who have at least one natural tooth, will be recruited in each care home resulting in a recruited sample of 120 participants. Assessments will be undertaken at baseline, 6 months and 12 months, and will include a dental examination and questionnaires on general health and oral health administered by a research assistant. A parallel process evaluation involving semi-structured interviews will be undertaken to explore how the intervention could be embedded in standard practice. Rates of recruitment and retention, and intervention fidelity will also be recorded. A cost-consequence model will determine the relevance of different outcome measures in the decision-making context. Discussion The study will provide valuable information for trialists, policymakers, clinicians and care home staff on the feasibility and associated costs of oral health promotion in UK care homes. Trial registration ISRCTN10276613. Registered on 17th April 2020. http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN10276613.

scholarly journals COVID-19 risk factors amongst 14,786 care home residents: An observational longitudinal analysis including daily community positive test rates of COVID-19, hospital stays, and vaccination status in Wales (UK) between 1st September 2020 and 1st May 2021.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joe Hollinghurst ◽  
Robyn Hollinghurst ◽  
Laura North ◽  
Amy Mizen ◽  
Ashley Akbari ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Logistic Regression ◽  
Hospital Admissions ◽  
Care Home ◽  
Vaccination Status ◽  
Care Homes ◽  
Positive Test ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Specialist Care ◽  
Individual Level

Objectives: Determine individual level risk factors for care home residents testing positive for SARS-CoV-2. Study Design: Longitudinal observational cohort study using individual-level linked data. Setting: Care home residents in Wales (United Kingdom) between 1st September 2020 and 1st May 2021. Participants: 14,786 older care home residents (aged 65+). Our dataset consisted of 2,613,341 individual-level daily observations within 697 care homes. Methods: We estimated odds ratios (ORs [95% confidence interval]) using multilevel logistic regression models. Our outcome of interest was a positive SARS-CoV-2 polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test. We included time dependent covariates for the estimated community positive test rate of COVID-19, hospital admissions, and vaccination status. Additional covariates were included for age, positive PCR tests prior to the study, sex, frailty (using the hospital frailty risk score), and specialist care home services. Results: The multivariable logistic regression model indicated an increase in age (OR 1.01 [1.00,1.01] per year of age), community positive test rate (OR 1.13 [1.12,1.13] per percent increase in positive test rate), hospital inpatients (OR 7.40 [6.54,8.36]), and residents in care homes with non-specialist dementia care (OR 1.42 [1.01,1.99]) had an increased odds of a positive test. Having a positive test prior to the observation period (OR 0.58 [0.49,0.68]) and either one or two doses of a vaccine (0.21 [0.17,0.25] and 0.05 [0.02,0.09] respectively) were associated with a decreased odds of a positive test. Conclusions: Our findings suggest care providers need to stay vigilant despite the vaccination rollout, and extra precautions should be taken when caring for the most vulnerable. Furthermore, minimising potential COVID-19 infection for care home residents admitted to hospital should be prioritised.

scholarly journals Malnutrition in the UK: where does it begin?

2010 ◽  
Vol 69 (4) ◽  
pp. 465-469 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. A. Russell ◽  
M. Elia
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Hospital Admissions ◽  
Care Home ◽  
Healthcare Services ◽  
Care Homes ◽  
Sheltered Housing ◽  
Nutrition Screening ◽  
Good Opportunity ◽  
Outpatient Departments ◽  
The Uk

More than 3 million individuals are estimated to be at risk of malnutrition in the UK, of whom about 93% live in the community. BAPEN's Nutrition Screening Week surveys using criteria based on the ‘Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool’ (‘MUST’) revealed that 28% of individuals on admission to hospital and 30–40% of those admitted to care homes in the previous 6 months were malnourished (medium+high risk using ‘MUST’). About three quarters of hospital admissions and about a third of care home admissions came from their own homes with a malnutrition prevalence of 24% in each case. Outpatient studies using ‘MUST’ showed that 16–20% patients were malnourished and these were associated with more hospital admissions and longer length of stay. In sheltered housing, 10–14% of the tenants were found to be malnourished, with an overall estimated absolute prevalence of malnutrition which exceeded that in hospitals. In all cases, the majority of subjects were at high risk of malnutrition. These studies have helped establish the magnitude of the malnutrition problem in the UK and identified the need for integrated strategies between and within care settings. While hospitals provide a good opportunity to identify malnourished patients among more than 10 million patients admitted there annually and the five- to six-fold greater number attending outpatient departments, commissioners and providers of healthcare services should be aware that much of the malnutrition present in the UK originates in the community before admission to hospitals or care homes or attendance at outpatient clinics.

PP34  Collecting experience-based expertise when planning prehospital care research: a stakeholder event about evaluating paramedics working in care homes

2020 ◽  
Vol 37 (10) ◽  
pp. e16.2-e16
Author(s):  
Bridie Evans ◽  
Mark Kingston ◽  
Alison Porter ◽  
Leigh Keen ◽  
Lesley Griffiths ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Admissions ◽  
Prehospital Care ◽  
Care Home ◽  
Healthcare Services ◽  
Family Satisfaction ◽  
Care Homes ◽  
Research Development ◽  
Multiple Perspectives ◽  
Care Research ◽  
Wide Range

BackgroundDue to medical advances, the population of care homes is becoming increasingly frail, often with co-morbidities. Recent innovations have seen paramedics take on non-emergency roles within or supporting care homes. This workforce innovation requires urgent evaluation, taking account of the multiple perspectives at stake. Research is more relevant, feasible and accountable if those who commission, deliver and use healthcare services are able to input their professional and personal insights.MethodWe conducted a stakeholder event as part of research development work for paramedics working in care homes (PERCH: Preliminary Exploration of paramedic Roles in Care Homes). We invited representatives from care homes, including Enabling Research in Care Homes (ENRICH) network members, ambulance services, primary and secondary care, patient/resident and public members, and the research community. To inform discussion, we presented examples of paramedics working in care homes. We then facilitated small-group discussions about how to evaluate such innovations and recorded views on sticky notes and flipcharts.Results23 people attended the event. Clarity of roles and communication processes were considered important to implement the pilot project. Attendees agreed that research outcome measures should include changes in avoidable hospital admissions, emergency department attendances and 999 calls plus staff, patient and family satisfaction. They identified some potential benefits to ambulance services and general practice, such as time saved for other patients, but believed these could be difficult to measure.DiscussionGaining the insights of a wide range of stakeholders prior to research being designed is an important, but under-utilised approach in research development. People who deliver and receive community-based care have insight derived from personal and professional experience which complements research expertise. Research in care home settings is challenging, and insights from stakeholders were significant in the development of a research proposal about the role of paramedics in care homes (PERCH study). We submitted this to the Health and Care Research Wales Research for Public and Patient Benefit funding scheme in 2019.

scholarly journals Reducing urinary tract infections in care homes by improving hydration

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. e000563 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katie Lean ◽  
Rasanat Fatima Nawaz ◽  
Sundus Jawad ◽  
Charles Vincent
Keyword(s):  
Urinary Tract ◽  
Urinary Tract Infections ◽  
Hospital Admissions ◽  
Low Cost ◽  
Care Home ◽  
Kidney Injury ◽  
Care Staff ◽  
Care Homes ◽  
Raising Awareness ◽  
Tract Infections

Dehydration may increase the risk of urinary tract infections (UTIs), which can lead to confusion, falls, acute kidney injury and hospital admission. We aimed to reduce the number of UTIs in care home residents which require admission to hospital. The principal intervention was the introduction of seven structured drink rounds every day accompanied by staff training and raising awareness. UTIs requiring antibiotics reduced by 58% and UTIs requiring hospital admissions reduced by 36%, when averaged across the four care homes. Care home residents benefited from greater fluid intake, which in turn may have reduced infection. Structured drink rounds were a low-cost intervention for preventing UTIs and implemented easily by care staff.

scholarly journals Reducing time in acute hospitals: A stepped-wedge randomised control trial of a specialist palliative care intervention in residential care homes

2020 ◽  
Vol 34 (5) ◽  
pp. 571-579 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liz Forbat ◽  
Wai-Man Liu ◽  
Jane Koerner ◽  
Lawrence Lam ◽  
Juliane Samara ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Care Home ◽  
Care Homes ◽  
Randomised Control Trial ◽  
Specialist Palliative Care ◽  
Stepped Wedge ◽  
Model Of Care ◽  
Care Needs ◽  
Palliative Care Needs

Background: Care home residents are frequently transferred to hospital, rather than provided with appropriate and timely specialist care in the care home. Aim: To determine whether a model of care providing specialist palliative care in care homes, called Specialist Palliative Care Needs Rounds, could reduce length of stay in hospital. Design: Stepped-wedge randomised control trial. The primary outcome was length of stay in acute care (over 24-h duration), with secondary outcomes being the number and cost of hospitalisations. Care homes were randomly assigned to cross over from control to intervention using a random number generator; masking was not possible due to the nature of the intervention. Analyses were by intention to treat. The trial was registered with ANZCTR: ACTRN12617000080325. Data were collected between 1 February 2017 and 30 June 2018. Setting/participants: 1700 residents in 12 Australian care homes for older people. Results: Specialist Palliative Care Needs Rounds led to reduced length of stay in hospital (unadjusted difference: 0.5 days; adjusted difference: 0.22 days with 95% confidence interval: −0.44, −0.01 and p = 0.038). The intervention also provided a clinically significant reduction in the number of hospitalisations by 23%, from 5.6 to 4.3 per facility-month. A conservative estimate of annual net cost-saving from reduced admissions was A$1,759,011 (US$1.3 m; UK£0.98 m). Conclusion: The model of care significantly reduces hospitalisations through provision of outreach by specialist palliative care clinicians. The data offer substantial evidence for Specialist Palliative Care Needs Rounds to reduce hospitalisations in older people approaching end of life, living in care homes.

scholarly journals Hearing and vision care provided to older people residing in care homes: a cross-sectional survey of care home staff

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wendy Andrusjak ◽  
Ana Barbosa ◽  
Gail Mountain
Keyword(s):  
Older People ◽  
Best Practice ◽  
Vision Loss ◽  
Care Home ◽  
Care Homes ◽  
Eye Care ◽  
Cross Sectional Survey ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Care Home Staff ◽  
Vision Care

Abstract Background: Hearing and vision loss in older people has been proven to affect physical and mental health and increase the speed of cognitive decline. Studies have demonstrated that certain practices and improved staff knowledge increase the effective care of residents’ ears and eyes, yet it is not known which practices are being implemented in care homes. This study aimed to identify the gaps in staff knowledge regarding hearing and vision difficulties in older residents, and which practices known to improve ear and eye care in older care home residents are not commonly implemented in care homes in England.Methods: This study used a cross-sectional survey design. Survey questions were informed by the existing literature and were focused on practices, staff knowledge, and other aspects that have shown to affect residents’ hearing and vision care. A convenience sample of care home staff were recruited from care homes across England between November 2018 and February 2019 via email and in paper format. Descriptive statistics and Chi-Square analysis were applied to identify the factors influencing the care being provided to care home residents. Results: A total of 400 care home staff responded from 74 care homes. The results revealed that less than half of staff respondents reported to use screening tools to identify hearing (46%) and vision impairments (43.8%); that care homes rarely have limited access to other assistive devices for hearing (16%) and vision loss (23.8%), and that audiology services do not regularly assess care home residents (46.8%). A majority of staff who responded were not confident in ear and eye care. Responses were found to be influenced by the respondents’ job role, length of time working in care homes and also the care home type and care home size. Findings confirmed a lack of standardised practice and the importance of shared communication for promulgation of best practice.Conclusion: This study has identified that some practices known to facilitate ear and eye care are not commonly applied in a sample of English care homes. It has also shown that care home staff knowledge of ear and eye care is inconsistent. The information derived from this survey can be used to inform guidelines for best practice and inform needs for future research.

Experience of use of advance care planning in care homes

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maggie Stobbart-Rowlands ◽  
Mandy Thorn
Keyword(s):  
Advance Care Planning ◽  
Best Practice ◽  
Care Home ◽  
Training Programme ◽  
Best Interests ◽  
Care Homes ◽  
Care Planning ◽  
Home Setting ◽  
People With Dementia ◽  
Advance Care

This chapter describes the care home setting, aspects that have an impact on use of Advance care planning (ACP) in care homes, examples of challenges and best practice, use of ACP in the GSF Care Homes Training Programme, ACP with people with dementia, and culture change. Many people in care homes are in the last year/s of life, and ACP discussions are especially important for them to ensure that the care they receive is in line with what they want. Care homes lead the way in their extensive use of ACP discussions. ACP is more routinely used by care home staff than is often recognized, and can be easier to introduce in care homes than in other settings. Key challenges include poor means of communication due to dementia/cognitive impairment or physical deterioration, and how staff address the expectations of families, and ensure any interventions are in the best interests of the person.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document