Predictors of mortality and heart transplantation in patients with Chagas’ cardiomyopathy and ventricular tachycardia treated with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators

EP Europace ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (7) ◽  
pp. 1070-1078 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wagner L Gali ◽  
Alvaro V Sarabanda ◽  
José M Baggio ◽  
Eduardo F Silva ◽  
Gustavo G Gomes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Secondary Prevention ◽  
Heart Transplantation ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Risk Of Death

Aims Data on long-term follow-up of patients with Chagas’ heart disease (ChHD) receiving a secondary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) are limited and its benefit is controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term outcomes of ChHD patients who received a secondary prevention ICD. Methods and results We assessed the outcomes of consecutive ChHD patients referred to our Institution from 2006 to 2014 for a secondary prevention ICD [89 patients; 58 men; mean age 56 ± 11 years; left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), 42 ± 12%]. The primary outcome included a composite of death from any cause or heart transplantation. After a mean follow-up of 59 ± 27 months, the primary outcome occurred in 23 patients (5.3% per year). Multivariate analysis showed that LVEF < 35% [hazard ratio (HR) 4.64; P < 0.01] and age ≥ 65 years (HR 3.19; P < 0.01) were independent predictors of the primary outcome. Using these two risk factors, a risk score was developed, and lower- (no risk factors), intermediate- (one risk factor), and higher-risk (two risk factors) groups were recognized with an annual rate of primary outcome of 1.4%, 7.4%, and 20.4%, respectively. A high burden of appropriate ICD therapies (16% per year) and electrical storms were documented, however, ICD interventions did not impact on the primary outcome. Conclusion Among ChHD patients receiving a secondary prevention ICD, older age (≥65 years) and left ventricular dysfunction (LVEF < 35%) portend a poor outcome and were associated with increased risk of death or heart transplantation. Most patients received appropriate ICD therapies, however, ICD interventions did not impact on the primary outcome.

INFLUENCE OF RISK FACTORS FOR CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES, HISTORY OF CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES, AND STRUCTURAL AND FUNCTIONAL STATE OF THE HEART ON 3-YEAR SURVIVAL IN PERSONS 95 YEARS AND OLDER

2021 ◽  
pp. 727-733
Author(s):  
К.А. Ерусланова ◽  
А.В. Лузина ◽  
Ю.С. Онучина ◽  
В.С. Остапенко ◽  
Н.В. Шарашкина ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Cardiovascular Diseases ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Risk Of Death ◽  
History Of ◽  
The Right

В последние годы появляется все больше работ, посвященных снижению воздействия классических факторов риска, негативно сказывающихся на выживаемости с возрастом. Целью исследования была оценка влияния сердечно-сосудистых заболеваний, их факторов риска и структурно-функциональных характеристик сердца на трехлетнюю выживаемость лиц 95 лет и старше. В исследовании участвовали 69 пациентов 95 лет и старше (98±1,9 года), из них 61 (88,4 %) женщина и 8 (11,6 %) мужчин. Через 3 года были получены данные о статусе жизни участников: 25 (36,2 %) были живы и 44 (63,8 %) умерли. По результатам проведенного однофакторного регрессионного анализа было определено, что факторы риска и анамнез сердечно-сосудистых заболеваний не ассоциированы с трехлетней выживаемостью. Однако в трехлетнем периоде риск смерти увеличивался в 3 раза при снижении ДАД <75 мм рт. ст., в 7,8 раза - при снижении ФВ ЛЖ <62 % и в 4,9 раза - при увеличении конечного диастолического размера правого желудочка >2,9 см. In recent years, more and more works have appeared that with age, classic risk factors that negatively affect the prognosis (cardiovascular diseases) lose their influence on life expectancy. The study aimed to assess the influence of cardiovascular diseases and their risk factors and structural and functional characteristics of the heart on three-year survival in people 95 years and older. The study involved 69 patients 95 years and older (98±1,9 years), 61 (88,4 %) were women. After 36 months, data were obtained on the participants’ status of life: 25 (36,2 %) were alive, and 44 (63,8 %) died. Based on the regression analysis results, it was determined that risk factors and history of cardiovascular diseases were not associated with 3-year survival. With a 3-year follow-up, the risk of death increases three times with a decrease in diastolic blood pressure less than 75 mm/Hg, 7,8 times with a decrease in left ventricular ejection fraction below 62 %, and 4,9 times with an increase in the end-diastolic size of the right ventricle by more than 2,9 cm.

Pre-anthracycline left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) assessment and long-term cardiovascular (CV) outcomes in adolescent and young adult (AYA) lymphoma survivors.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e24060-e24060
Author(s):  
Alma Farooque ◽  
Cibele Carroll ◽  
Amye Juliet Tevaarwerk ◽  
Priyanka Avinash Pophali
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Adolescent And Young Adult ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Late Cardiotoxicity ◽  
Pre Treatment ◽  
Lymphoma Survivors

e24060 Background: Anthracyclines are known to cause long-term cardiotoxicity. There are no specific guidelines for CV screening and follow-up of AYA patients treated with anthracyclines. Pediatric guidelines focus on long-term imaging surveillance, while for adults, LVEF assessment prior to anthracyclines is recommended. Multiple studies have demonstrated LVEF assessment rarely impacts treatment decisions, especially in the absence of CV symptoms/risk factors, adds to unnecessary costs and delays treatment initiation. Our study aimed to determine the pre-treatment LVEF assessment practices in AYA lymphoma patients treated with anthracyclines and its association with long-term cardiotoxicity. Methods: AYA survivors diagnosed with lymphoma > 5 years ago and treated with anthracyclines at age 15-39 years were identified in a retrospective single institution registry. To ensure adequate follow-up, at least 2 follow-up visits during 2015-19 were required. Data abstracted on eligible subjects included documentation of pre-treatment LVEF evaluation, clinical rationale and treatment regimen. CV risk factors and events were collected pre-treatment and during follow-up. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize data. Results: 64/115 (56%) of AYA lymphoma patients underwent pre-treatment LVEF assessment. Rationale for/against LVEF assessment was rarely documented: low CV risk was recorded as rationale for no LVEF assessment in 2 subjects. Among AYAs who underwent pre-treatment LVEF assessment, no significant abnormalities were detected and no changes in subsequent treatment plans were found. During median follow-up of 6.7 (inter-quartile range 5.4-9.5) years, 6/115 (5%) experienced CV events. Only 2 (1.7%) survivors experienced potential anthracycline-related CV events: 1 moderate cardiomyopathy at 9 years, 1 peri-partum cardiomyopathy and atrial fibrillation due to post-radiation SVC occlusion at 15 years post-treatment. Both these AYAs (aged 38 and 31 years at time of CV events) also had other CV risk factors- family history, smoking, obesity, and hyperlipidemia. Four (3.5%) survivors’ experienced CV events (1 sinus tachyarrhythmia, 1 junctional rhythm, 2 acute/asymptomatic drop in LVEF) unrelated to anthracyclines with clear alternative etiology e.g. sepsis/symptom burden. There was no correlation between having pre-treatment LVEF assessment and occurrence of CV events. 13/115 (11.3%) developed new CV risk factors: 4 hypertension, 6 hyperlipidemia, 3 diabetes. Conclusions: Pre-treatment LVEF assessment is done inconsistently in AYA lymphoma patients but does not impact initial treatment or predict late cardiotoxicity. CV events in long-term AYA lymphoma survivors are rare but evaluation of CV risk factors, early detection and management may be more important than focusing on LVEF assessment.

scholarly journals Ceruloplasmin, NT-proBNP, and Clinical Data as Risk Factors of Death or Heart Transplantation in a 1-Year Follow-Up of Heart Failure Patients

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 137
Author(s):  
Ewa Romuk ◽  
Wojciech Jacheć ◽  
Ewa Zbrojkiewicz ◽  
Alina Mroczek ◽  
Jacek Niedziela ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Heart Failure ◽  
Heart Transplantation ◽  
Prognostic Value ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Cox Regression Analysis

We investigated whether the additional determination of ceruloplasmin (Cp) levels could improve the prognostic value of N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) in heart failure (HF) patients in a 1-year follow-up. Cp and NT-proBNP levels and clinical and laboratory parameters were assessed simultaneously at baseline in 741 HF patients considered as possible heart transplant recipients. The primary endpoint (EP) was a composite of all-cause death (non-transplant patients) or heart transplantation during one year of follow-up. Using a cut-off value of 35.9 mg/dL for Cp and 3155 pg/mL for NT-proBNP (top interquartile range), a univariate Cox regression analysis showed that Cp (hazard ratio (HR) = 2.086; 95% confidence interval (95% CI, 1.462–2.975)), NT-proBNP (HR = 3.221; 95% CI (2.277–4.556)), and the top quartile of both Cp and NT-proBNP (HR = 4.253; 95% CI (2.795–6.471)) were all risk factors of the primary EP. The prognostic value of these biomarkers was demonstrated in a multivariate Cox regression model using the top Cp and NT-proBNP concentration quartiles combined (HR = 2.120; 95% CI (1.233–3.646)). Lower left ventricular ejection fraction, VO2max, lack of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker therapy, and nonimplantation of an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator were also independent risk factors of a poor outcome. The combined evaluation of Cp and NT-proBNP had advantages over separate NT-proBNP and Cp assessment in selecting a group with a high 1-year risk. Thus multi-biomarker assessment can improve risk stratification in HF patients.

scholarly journals Long-Term Cardiac Safety Analysis of NCCTG N9831 (Alliance) Adjuvant Trastuzumab Trial

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (6) ◽  
pp. 581-587 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pooja P. Advani ◽  
Karla V. Ballman ◽  
Travis J. Dockter ◽  
Gerardo Colon-Otero ◽  
Edith A. Perez
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Risk Factors ◽  
Cumulative Incidence ◽  
Cardiac Toxicity ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Her2 Positive ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction

Purpose Significant improvement in survival outcomes has been established with the addition of trastuzumab to adjuvant chemotherapy for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) –positive early breast cancer treatment. However, trastuzumab may increase the risk of cardiac toxicity, and long-term evaluation of its incidence and risk factors are warranted. Methods NCCTG (Alliance) N9831 trial compared adjuvant doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (AC) followed by either weekly paclitaxel (arm A); paclitaxel then trastuzumab (arm B); or paclitaxel plus trastuzumab followed by trastuzumab alone (arm C) in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer. Cumulative incidence of cardiac events (CE) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) were evaluated in 1,944 women who proceeded to post-AC therapy. Risk factors for trastuzumab-induced cardiac toxicity were identified by Cox regression models. Results The 6-year cumulative incidence of CE was 0.6% in arm A, 2.8% in arm B, and 3.4% in arm C. At a median follow-up of 9.2 years, only two additional CHF diagnoses (of 1,046 patients) occurred beyond our previously reported follow-up time of 3.75 years. LVEF recovered in the majority of the patients who developed CHF. There were two cardiac deaths in arm A and one each in arms B and C. Age of 60 years or older, registration LVEF less than 65%, and use of antihypertensive medications were associated with an increased risk of CE in arms B and C. Conclusion The cumulative incidence of CE at 6 years was slightly higher with the addition of trastuzumab; however, the late development of CE is infrequent. Trastuzumab (in the context of anthracycline- and taxane-based therapy) continues to have a favorable benefit-risk ratio.

scholarly journals Impact of right ventricular dysfunction after MitraClip treatment as a bridge to heart transplantation: insights from the MitraBridge registry

2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
A Munafo ◽  
A Scotti ◽  
R Estevez-Loureiro ◽  
D Arzamendi ◽  
N.P Fam ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Transplantation ◽  
Right Ventricular ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Ventricular Dysfunction ◽  
Right Ventricular Dysfunction ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Volume Index ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
End Point

Abstract Background MitraClip treatment has been recently proposed as a “bridge strategy” solution for advanced heart failure (HF) patients with significant functional mitral regurgitation (MR), who are potential candidates or are waiting for cardiac replacement therapy (LVAD or heart transplantation, HTx). In this clinical scenario, left-ventricular-related right ventricular dysfunction (RVD) represents an important prognostic factor. Purpose Our study aimed to investigate the possible prognostic implication of RVD in advanced HF patients treated with MitraClip as a bridge to HTx strategy. Methods RVD was assessed using the relationship between tricuspid annular peak systolic excursion (TAPSE) and pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP). All patients from the MitraBridge registry for whom these two echocardiographic parameters were available, were included in the study. A cut-off value of TAPSE/PASP ratio &lt;0.36 was used to defined RVD, as previously reported. The primary outcome was a composite end-point of all-cause death or rehospitalization for HF at 2-year. For patients who underwent LVAD implantation or HTx, follow-up data were censored at the time of those events. Results A total of 80 patients were included in the study. The median TAPSE/PASP ratio was 0.35 (25th-75th: 0.27–0.46), with 43 (54%) patients having a TAPSE/PASP ratio &lt;0.36 (RVD group). The latter had a prevalent MR ischemic etiology (49% vs 38%), with a more frequent history of percutaneous coronary intervention (46.5% vs 22%, p=0.02). Except for TAPSE (15.7±3.6 mm vs 19.2±3.7 mm, p=0.001) and PASP (61±14 mmHg vs 39.5±9.5 mmHg, p&lt;0.001), the other echocardiographic characteristics were similar between the two study groups (overall mean left ventricular ejection fraction 26.9±8%, median left ventricular end-diastolic volume index 120.7, 25th-75th: 102.2–146.5 mL/m2). After a median follow-up time of 508 (25th-75th: 160–899) days, elective HTx occurred in 12 patients (7 from the RVD group), while LVAD implantation was performed in 13 patients (7 from the RVD group). The primary outcome occurred in 30 patients (38%) with a 2-year Kaplan-Meier estimate of freedom from the composite end-point of 41%. At univariate (HR 1.3 95% CI 0.6–2.8, p=0.451) and multivariate (HR 1.6 CI 0.7–3.8, p=0.249) Cox-regression analysis, TAPSE/PASP ratio &lt;0.36 was not identified as an independent predictor of primary outcome. Indeed, at follow-up echocardiographic control (median time 252, 25th-75th: 122–365 days), a significant improvement in TAPSE/PASP ratio was observed in the RVD group (baseline median TAPSE/PASP ratio 0.27, 25th-75th: 0.22–0.32 vs follow-up median TAPSE/PASP ratio 0.37, 25th-75th: 0.28–0.47, p&lt;0.001). Conclusion In advanced HF patients with functional MR, MitraClip treatment could prevent or ameliorate left-ventricular-related RVD, allowing safe access to HTx or LVAD. FUNDunding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None.

P1868Risk of arrhythmias after myocardial infarction in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction according to mode of revascularization: a CARISMA substudy

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
A Thomsen ◽  
S Pedersen ◽  
P K Jacobsen ◽  
H V Huikuri ◽  
P E Bloch Thomsen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction ◽  
Systolic Dysfunction ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Loop Recorder ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
New Onset

Abstract Introduction The CARISMA trial was the first study to use continuous monitoring for documentation of long-term arrhythmias in post-infarction patients with left ventricular dysfunction. During the study duration (2000–2005), primary PCI (pPCI) as treatment of acute myocardial infarction was introduced approximately midway (2002) on the enrolling centres. Purpose The aim of this study was to describe the influence of mode of revascularization after myocardial infarction (AMI) on long-term risk of risk of new onset atrial fibrillation, ventricular tachyarrhythmias and brady arrhythmias. Methods The study is a sub-study on the CARISMA study population that consisted of patients with AMI and left ventricular ejection fraction ≤40%, which received an implantable loop recorder and was followed for 2 years. After exclusion of 15 patients who refused device implantation and 26 with pre-existing arrhythmias, 268 of the 312 patients were included. Choice of revascularization was made by the treating team independently of the trial and was retrospectively divided into primary percutaneous intervention (pPCI), subacute PCI (24 hours to 2 weeks after AMI), primary thrombolysis or no revascularization. Endpoints were new-onset of arrhythmias and major cardiovascular events (MACE). The Kaplan-Meier (figure 1) and Mantel-Byar methods were used for time to first event risk analysis. Results A total of 77 patients received no revascularization, whereas 49 received thrombolysis only and 142 received PCI. At two-years follow up patients treated with any PCI had a significant lower risk (0.40, n=63) of any arrhythmia compared to patients treated with trombolysis (0.60, n=30) or no revascularization (0.68, n=16) (p<0.001, unadjusted) (figure 1). Risk of MACE was significant higher in patients with any arrhythmia (0.25, n=76) compared to no arrhythmia (0.11, n=93) at two years follow-up (p=0.004, unadjusted). Figure 1 Conclusion(s) The long-term risk of new onset arrhythmias after AMI was significantly lower in patients treated with any PCI compared to patients not revascularized or treated with thrombolysis. Risk of MACE was significantly higher in patients with new onset arrhythmias compared to patients with no arrhythmias.

scholarly journals Differences in the prognoses of patients referred to an advanced heart failure center from hospitals with different bed volumes

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Koichi Narita ◽  
Eisuke Amiya ◽  
Masaru Hatano ◽  
Junichi Ishida ◽  
Hisataka Maki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Advanced Heart Failure ◽  
Ventricular Assist Devices ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Left Ventricular Assist Devices ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction

AbstractFew reports have discussed appropriate strategies for patient referrals to advanced heart failure (HF) centers with available left ventricular assist devices (LVADs). We examined the association between the characteristics and prognoses of referred patients with advanced HF and the bed volume of the referring hospitals. This retrospective analysis evaluated 186 patients with advanced HF referred to our center for consultation about the indication of LVAD between January 1, 2015, and August 31, 2018. We divided the patients into two groups according to the bed volume of their referring hospital (high bed volume hospitals (HBHs): ≥ 500 beds in the hospital; low bed volume hospitals (LBHs): < 500 beds). We compared the primary outcome measure, a composite of LVAD implantation and all-cause death, between the patients referred from HBHs and patients referred from LBHs. The 186 patients with advanced HF referred to our hospital, who were referred from 130 hospitals (87 from LBHs and 99 from HBHs), had a mean age of 43.0 ± 12.6 years and a median left ventricular ejection fraction of 22% [15–33%]. The median follow-up duration of the patients was 583 days (119–965 days), and the primary outcome occurred during follow-up in 42 patients (43%) in the HBH group and 20 patients (23%) in the LBH group. Patients referred from HBHs tended to require catecholamine infusion on transfer more often than those referred from LBLs (36.5% (HBH), 20.2% (LBL), P = 0.021). Kaplan–Meier analysis indicates that the occurrence of the primary outcome was significantly higher in the HBH patients than in the LBH patients (log-rank P = 0.0022). Multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis revealed that catecholamine support on transfer and long disease duration were statistically significant predictors of the primary outcome. Patients from HBHs had a greater risk of the primary outcome. However, the multivariate analysis did not indicate an association between referral from an HBH and the primary outcome. In contrast, catecholamine support on transfer, long duration of disease, and low blood pressure were independent predictors of the primary outcome. Therefore, these should be considered when determining the timing of a referral to an advanced HF center, irrespective of the bed volume of the referring hospital.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document