21.K. Workshop: Closing the data gap on child health – approaches, characteristics and methodological challenges

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (Supplement_5) ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  

Abstract As stated in the 2010 and 2020 Marmot review, inequalities, especially during childhood, have lifelong impacts. Social hardships during childhood reduce the chances for children to develop and flourish and show to have a negative impact on livelong health outcomes. To monitor progress in reducing inequalities in child health and to inform policy makers and other stakeholders to develop healthy public policies, data on social determinants, health outcomes, health behaviour, the conditions in which children grow up, and the utilisation of health care are needed. But these data have been scarce for routine population health monitoring. Routine data sources like mortality statistics or hospital discharge data have shown to be not very well suited to monitor child health since they are only outcome focussed and cover only extreme events. In this workshop we aim to showcase different national approaches that aim to overcome this data gap. We want to discuss their set-up including the strength and weaknesses in terms of organisation, management, data quality, information richness, and dissemination and we want to learn about the experiences workshop participants made in their countries. First, we will learn about two approaches that combine questionnaire and examination elements. England has long-standing experiences in monitoring child health and includes children in their general population-based health examination survey, so that children's health can be seen in the context of other household members, in particular parent's socio-economic status, health status, and health-related behaviours. The German approach focusses specifically on child health and includes a module for longitudinal monitoring. Second, we will learn about experiences from Finland who make use of routinely collected data from health check-ups performed at child health clinics and school health care. While the first two approaches use representative population samples, the Finish approach make use of a whole population sample including those who utilise public health services. The third part of this workshop will focus on a specific methodological discussion regarding the identification of children with chronic diseases and the comparison of several measurement approaches. We will devote twenty minutes for the presentation of the three different data collection approaches in order to gain a good overview on their set-up and their characteristics and 15 minutes for the methodological presentation regarding the measurement of chronic diseases in children. 15 minutes are reserved for further discussion with the workshop participants and the exchange of experiences in child health monitoring worldwide. Key messages Register- and survey-based approaches for child health monitoring exist that provide data for routine population health monitoring and inform policy-making. Methodological issues, e.g. in terms of standards or measurement approaches exist and need further research and discussion.

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (Supplement_4) ◽  
Author(s):  

Abstract Population health monitoring and reporting provides regular and up to date information on health outcomes, health behaviour, and parameters related to health care. If relevant and possible, information is stratified by sex, age and socio-economic indicators. Finally, the outputs of routine population health monitoring and reporting aim to inform policy makers and other stakeholders to develop healthy public policies and implement health promoting actions. However, does the processed data and information really help us to develop a strong and effective narrative on how to improve population health? Alternatively, this information might perpetuate a focus on health care and individualistic solutions for health and inhibits us to frame a narrative focussed on the social, political, and commercial determinants of health. If we (1) aim to follow a Health in All Policies approach, (2) agree that changes in population health can best be reached if health determinants are tackled upstream, and (3) acknowledge that health is mainly determined outside the health sector, we probably miss parts of the picture with our current routine population health monitoring and reporting activities. In this workshop, we aim to explore data and information sources that have the potential to expand our general monitoring and reporting focus. The first presentation will focus on the living environment and provides an overview on geospatial information like land use, road and rail networks, amenities, and air pollution, available online at EU level. The second presentation puts the focus on health promoting processes within Finnish municipalities. The tool, that follows a Health in All Policies approach, has emerged to a resource that collects and presents this information routinely. The third presentation will discuss methods for involving the community in making decisions about measuring what is important for their own health and wellbeing. It will also discuss taking their ideas forward and identifying validated tools that can be used to measure what the community want. The last presentation highlights the relevance of policy analysis, for example in the area of food and nutrition, and underlines how this analytical approach can be used to communicate actions needed upstream. Experts from public health authorities and universities are invited to discuss during this skills building seminar how the focus on the wider health determinants and upstream prevention can be strengthened in routine population health monitoring and reporting. The presentations are followed by an interactive part of 30 minutes to discuss the applicability of the presented approaches and further possibilities to broaden the scope of population health monitoring and reporting. Key messages The data and information usually used for population health monitoring and reporting lacks information necessary to promote a Health in All Policies perspective and to push upstream prevention. To frame narratives that underline the importance of the social, political and commercial determinants of health, we need to expand our data and information sources and include policy analysis.


2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dana R. Thomson ◽  
Cheryl Amoroso ◽  
Sidney Atwood ◽  
Matthew H. Bonds ◽  
Felix Cyamatare Rwabukwisi ◽  
...  

ABSTRACTIntroductionAlthough Rwanda’s health system underwent major reforms and improvements after the 1994 Genocide, the health system and population health in the southeast lagged behind other areas. In 2005 Partners In Health and the Rwandan Ministry of Health began a health system strengthening intervention in this region.MethodsCombining results from the 2005 and 2010 Demographic and Health Surveys with those from a supplemental 2010 survey, we compared changes in health system output indicators and population health outcomes between 2005 and 2010 as reported by 21,338 women living in the intervention area and similar rural areas, controlling for potential confounding by economic and demographic variables.ResultsOverall health system coverage improved similarly in both regions between 2005 and 2010, with an indicator of composite coverage of child health interventions increasing from 57.9% to 75.0% in the intervention area and from 58.7% to 73.8% in other rural areas. Despite experiencing poorer health outcomes in 2005, the intervention area caught up to or exceeded other rural areas on 23 of 25 indicators. Most notably, under-five mortality declined by an annual rate of 12.8% in the intervention area, from 229.8 to 83.2 deaths per 1000 live births, and by 8.9% in other rural areas, from 157.7 to 75.8 deaths per 1000 live births. Improvements were most dramatic among the poorest households.ConclusionWe observed dramatic improvements in population health outcomes including under-five mortality between 2005 and 2010 in rural Rwanda generally, and in the intervention area specifically.SUMMARY BOXWhat is already known about this topic?Much of the evidence that health system strengthening in rural Africa has improved health outcomes comes from studies of targeted regional interventions such as performance based financing or community health worker programs, rather than integrated interventions that encompass multiple components including infrastructure and supply chain investments, health management information system, workforce training and incentives at all levels, community health workers, and free services for poor patients.In addition to these experimental or quasi-experimental studies, a series of case studies have documented individual nations, pathways to achieving millennium development goal 4 target, the reduction of under-five mortality by two thirds between 1990 and 2015.These reports suggest that improvements in coverage of reproductive, maternal and child health indicators explain some, but not all, of the decline in child mortality and that these successes occurred in the context of national gains in health, nutrition and food security, sanitation, poverty reduction, and access to clean water.What are the new findings?Coverage of most maternal and child health care interventions improved at a similar pace in our rural intervention area and other rural areas.Despite experiencing poorer health outcomes in 2005, our rural intervention area caught up to or exceeded other rural areas on 23 of 25 population health indicators by 2010.Infant and under-5 mortality declined in our rural intervention area even more precipitously than in other rural areas of Rwanda between 2005 and 2010.How might this influence practice?The process of strengthening national health systems often involves trade-offs between a focus on first testing individual programs that distributed widely, as is often practiced by pilot programs with multilateral institutions, or implementing multiple simultaneous programs locally. Our results show that integrated health system strengthening interventions can be locally adapted to enable the rapid expansion of health care coverage as well as dramatic improvements in population health outcomes.Integrated multi-level interventions can also help narrow the health care coverage and outcome gap between richer and poorer members of a society.National governments can leverage nongovernmental partners to achieve the health related sustainable development goals through joint implementation of national health policy.


2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. e000674 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dana R Thomson ◽  
Cheryl Amoroso ◽  
Sidney Atwood ◽  
Matthew H Bonds ◽  
Felix Cyamatare Rwabukwisi ◽  
...  

IntroductionAlthough Rwanda’s health system underwent major reforms and improvements after the 1994 Genocide, the health system and population health in the southeast lagged behind other areas. In 2005, Partners In Health and the Rwandan Ministry of Health began a health system strengthening intervention in this region. We evaluate potential impacts of the intervention on maternal and child health indicators.MethodsCombining results from the 2005 and 2010 Demographic and Health Surveys with those from a supplemental 2010 survey, we compared changes in health system output indicators and population health outcomes between 2005 and 2010 as reported by women living in the intervention area with those reported by the pooled population of women from all other rural areas of the country, controlling for potential confounding by economic and demographic variables.ResultsOverall health system coverage improved similarly in the comparison groups between 2005 and 2010, with an indicator of composite coverage of child health interventions increasing from 57.9% to 75.0% in the intervention area and from 58.7% to 73.8% in the other rural areas. Under-five mortality declined by an annual rate of 12.8% in the intervention area, from 229.8 to 83.2 deaths per 1000 live births, and by 8.9% in other rural areas, from 157.7 to 75.8 deaths per 1000 live births. Improvements were most marked among the poorest households.ConclusionWe observed dramatic improvements in population health outcomes including under-five mortality between 2005 and 2010 in rural Rwanda generally and in the intervention area specifically.


1975 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 153-171 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Jordan ◽  
M. Ruben ◽  
J. Hernandez ◽  
A. Bebelagua ◽  
J.M. Tanner ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document