scholarly journals Influence of positive peritoneal cytology on prognostic factors and survival in early-stage endometrial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2016 ◽  
Vol 46 (8) ◽  
pp. 711-717 ◽  
Author(s):  
Banghyun Lee ◽  
Dong Hoon Suh ◽  
Kidong Kim ◽  
Jae Hong No ◽  
Yong Beom Kim
2004 ◽  
Vol 22 (14_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5032-5032
Author(s):  
P. M. Tebeu ◽  
Y. Popowski ◽  
H. M. Verkooijen ◽  
C. Bouchardy ◽  
F. Ludicke ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 22 (14_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5032-5032
Author(s):  
P. M. Tebeu ◽  
Y. Popowski ◽  
H. M. Verkooijen ◽  
C. Bouchardy ◽  
F. Ludicke ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 59 (3) ◽  
pp. 125-128
Author(s):  
Yoko NISHIMURA ◽  
Motoki MATSUURA ◽  
Masato TAMATE ◽  
Noriko TERADA ◽  
Seiro SATOHISA ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 26 (6) ◽  
pp. 1081-1091 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yun Qin ◽  
Zhizhi Yu ◽  
Jiaxin Yang ◽  
Dongyan Cao ◽  
Mei Yu ◽  
...  

ObjectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of oral progestin treatment for early-stage endometrial cancer.MethodsWe conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the proportions from observational studies. Original studies were selected if patients with early-stage endometrial cancer, especially those of reproductive age, were treated with oral progestin. We conducted searches on studies listed in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane that were published through June 2014, and relevant articles were also searched. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa quality assessment scale. Funnel plots and metaregression analyses were used to assess bias.ResultsThe final sample included 25 articles involving 445 patients. Based on a random-effects model, patients achieved a disease regression rate of 82.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 75.3%–88.7%), a relapse rate of 25.0% (95% CI, 15.8%–35.2%), a pregnancy rate of 28.8% (95% CI, 22.5%–35.5%), and a live birth rate of 19.6% (95% CI, 12.8%–27.4%). Body weight gain, liver dysfunction, and abnormal blood coagulation test results were the most common treatment-related adverse effects. Only 2 disease-related deaths were reported during the follow-up duration.ConclusionsBased on the present systematic review and meta-analysis, oral progestin treatment is feasible and safe for patients of reproductive age.


2004 ◽  
Vol 91 (4) ◽  
pp. 720-724 ◽  
Author(s):  
P-M Tebeu ◽  
Y Popowski ◽  
H M Verkooijen ◽  
C Bouchardy ◽  
F Ludicke ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yi Du ◽  
Yu Xu ◽  
Zhaojuan Qin ◽  
Liang Sun ◽  
Yali Chen ◽  
...  

BackgroundHysteroscopy is becoming a common method for the diagnosis of uterine disorders in developed countries. However, hysteroscopy might worsen the prognosis of endometrial cancer because it could cause cancer dissemination into the peritoneal cavity through the fallopian tubes. Objective: The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to explore the oncological safety of hysteroscopy for early-stage endometrial cancer.Search StrategyEligible studies were obtained from PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library up to September 22, 2020.Selection CriteriaStudies which compared the oncological safety of hysteroscopy with other methods were included.Data Collection and AnalysisA total of 3980 patients were included in this study, of whom1357 patients had undergone hysteroscopy and2623 had not.Main ResultsThere was no significant association between hysteroscopy and worse prognosis in early-stage endometrial cancer [disease-free survival: log risk ratio(logRR) -0.22; 95% confidence interval (CI), -0.54 to 0.1; p=0.97; overall survival: logRR 0.03; 95% CI, -0.05 to 0.11; p=0.02; disease-specific survival: logRR 0.03; 95% CI, -0.03 to 0.10; p=0.00].ConclusionThis study suggests that hysteroscopy is a safe diagnostic and treatment method, and has no significant effect on the prognosis of early-stage endometrial cancer.Systematic Review RegistrationPROSPERO registration number: CRD42020193696.


2013 ◽  
Vol 128 (1) ◽  
pp. 77-82 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gunjal Garg ◽  
Feng Gao ◽  
Jason D. Wright ◽  
Andrea R. Hagemann ◽  
David G. Mutch ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document