scholarly journals Tim/Timeless, a member of the replication fork protection complex, operates with the Warsaw breakage syndrome DNA helicase DDX11 in the same fork recovery pathway

2015 ◽  
Vol 44 (2) ◽  
pp. 705-717 ◽  
Author(s):  
Federica Calì ◽  
Sanjay Kumar Bharti ◽  
Roberta Di Perna ◽  
Robert M. Brosh ◽  
Francesca M. Pisani
PLoS Genetics ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. e1003213 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura C. Roseaulin ◽  
Chiaki Noguchi ◽  
Esteban Martinez ◽  
Melissa A. Ziegler ◽  
Takashi Toda ◽  
...  

PLoS Genetics ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 14 (10) ◽  
pp. e1007622 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giuseppe Cortone ◽  
Ge Zheng ◽  
Pasquale Pensieri ◽  
Viviana Chiappetta ◽  
Rosarita Tatè ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 24 (8) ◽  
pp. 3198-3212 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jorge Z. Torres ◽  
Sandra L. Schnakenberg ◽  
Virginia A. Zakian

ABSTRACT Rrm3p is a 5′-to-3′ DNA helicase that helps replication forks traverse protein-DNA complexes. Its absence leads to increased fork stalling and breakage at over 1,000 specific sites located throughout the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome. To understand the mechanisms that respond to and repair rrm3-dependent lesions, we carried out a candidate gene deletion analysis to identify genes whose mutation conferred slow growth or lethality on rrm3 cells. Based on synthetic phenotypes, the intra-S-phase checkpoint, the SRS2 inhibitor of recombination, the SGS1/TOP3 replication fork restart pathway, and the MRE11/RAD50/XRS2 (MRX) complex were critical for viability of rrm3 cells. DNA damage checkpoint and homologous recombination genes were important for normal growth of rrm3 cells. However, the MUS81/MMS4 replication fork restart pathway did not affect growth of rrm3 cells. These data suggest a model in which the stalled and broken forks generated in rrm3 cells activate a checkpoint response that provides time for fork repair and restart. Stalled forks are converted by a Rad51p-mediated process to intermediates that are resolved by Sgs1p/Top3p. The rrm3 system provides a unique opportunity to learn the fate of forks whose progress is impaired by natural impediments rather than by exogenous DNA damage.


2009 ◽  
Vol 29 (17) ◽  
pp. 4742-4756 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander Lorenz ◽  
Fekret Osman ◽  
Victoria Folkyte ◽  
Sevil Sofueva ◽  
Matthew C. Whitby

ABSTRACT Controlling the loading of Rad51 onto DNA is important for governing when and how homologous recombination is used. Here we use a combination of genetic assays and indirect immunofluorescence to show that the F-box DNA helicase (Fbh1) functions in direct opposition to the Rad52 orthologue Rad22 to curb Rad51 loading onto DNA in fission yeast. Surprisingly, this activity is unnecessary for limiting spontaneous direct-repeat recombination. Instead it appears to play an important role in preventing recombination when replication forks are blocked and/or broken. When overexpressed, Fbh1 specifically reduces replication fork block-induced recombination, as well as the number of Rad51 nuclear foci that are induced by replicative stress. These abilities are dependent on its DNA helicase/translocase activity, suggesting that Fbh1 exerts its control on recombination by acting as a Rad51 disruptase. In accord with this, overexpression of Fbh1 also suppresses the high levels of recombinant formation and Rad51 accumulation at a site-specific replication fork barrier in a strain lacking the Rad51 disruptase Srs2. Similarly overexpression of Srs2 suppresses replication fork block-induced gene conversion events in an fbh1Δ mutant, although an inability to suppress deletion events suggests that Fbh1 has a distinct functionality, which is not readily substituted by Srs2.


2016 ◽  
Vol 113 (26) ◽  
pp. E3639-E3648 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deepak Bastia ◽  
Pankaj Srivastava ◽  
Shamsu Zaman ◽  
Malay Choudhury ◽  
Bidyut K. Mohanty ◽  
...  

Several important physiological transactions, including control of replicative life span (RLS), prevention of collision between replication and transcription, and cellular differentiation, require programmed replication fork arrest (PFA). However, a general mechanism of PFA has remained elusive. We previously showed that the Tof1–Csm3 fork protection complex is essential for PFA by antagonizing the Rrm3 helicase that displaces nonhistone protein barriers that impede fork progression. Here we show that mutations of Dbf4-dependent kinase (DDK) of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, but not other DNA replication factors, greatly reduced PFA at replication fork barriers in the spacer regions of the ribosomal DNA array. A key target of DDK is the mini chromosome maintenance (Mcm) 2–7 complex, which is known to require phosphorylation by DDK to form an active CMG [Cdc45 (cell division cycle gene 45), Mcm2–7, GINS (Go, Ichi, Ni, and San)] helicase. In vivo experiments showed that mutational inactivation of DDK caused release of Tof1 from the chromatin fractions. In vitro binding experiments confirmed that CMG and/or Mcm2–7 had to be phosphorylated for binding to phospho-Tof1–Csm3 but not to its dephosphorylated form. Suppressor mutations that bypass the requirement for Mcm2–7 phosphorylation by DDK restored PFA in the absence of the kinase. Retention of Tof1 in the chromatin fraction and PFA in vivo was promoted by the suppressor mcm5-bob1, which bypassed DDK requirement, indicating that under this condition a kinase other than DDK catalyzed the phosphorylation of Tof1. We propose that phosphorylation regulates the recruitment and retention of Tof1–Csm3 by the replisome and that this complex antagonizes the Rrm3 helicase, thereby promoting PFA, by preserving the integrity of the Fob1–Ter complex.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erin E. Henninger ◽  
Pascale Jolivet ◽  
Emilie Fallet ◽  
Mohcen Benmounah ◽  
Zhou Xu ◽  
...  

AbstractPassage of the replication fork through telomeric repeats necessitates additional DNA processing by DNA repair factors, to regenerate the terminal 3’-overhang structure at leading telomeres. These factors are prevented from promoting telomeric recombination or fusion by an uncharacterized mechanism. Here we show that Rad5, a DNA helicase and ubiquitin ligase involved in the DNA damage tolerance pathway, participates in this mechanism. Rad5 is enriched at telomeres during telomere replication. Accelerated senescence seen in the absence of telomerase and Rad5, can be compensated for by a pathway involving the Rad51 recombinase and counteracted by the helicase Srs2. However, this pathway is only active at short telomeres. Instead, the ubiquitous activity of Rad5 during telomere replication is necessary for the proper reconstitution of the telomeric 3’-overhang, indicating that Rad5 is required to coordinate telomere maturation during telomere replication.


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Justin L. Sparks ◽  
Alan O. Gao ◽  
Markus Räschle ◽  
Nicolai B. Larsen ◽  
Matthias Mann ◽  
...  

SummaryCovalent and non-covalent nucleoprotein complexes impede replication fork progression and thereby threaten genome integrity. UsingXenopus laevisegg extracts, we previously showed that when a replication fork encounters a covalent DNA-protein cross-link (DPC) on the leading strand template, the DPC is degraded to a short peptide, allowing its bypass by translesion synthesis polymerases. Strikingly, we show here that when DPC proteolysis is blocked, the replicative DNA helicase (CMG), which travels on the leading strand template, still bypasses the intact DPC. The DNA helicase RTEL1 facilitates bypass, apparently by translocating along the lagging strand template and generating single-stranded DNA downstream of the DPC. Remarkably, RTEL1 is required for efficient DPC proteolysis, suggesting that CMG bypass of a DPC normally precedes its proteolysis. RTEL1 also promotes fork progression past non-covalent protein-DNA complexes. Our data suggest a unified model for the replisome’s response to nucleoprotein barriers.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document