scholarly journals Prospective Prediction of Clinical Drug Response in High Grade Gliomas Using an Ex Vivo 3D Cell Culture Assay

Author(s):  
Stephen Shuford ◽  
Lindsay Lipinski ◽  
Ajay Abad ◽  
Ashley M Smith ◽  
Melissa Rayner ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Clinical outcomes in high-grade glioma (HGG) have remained relatively unchanged over the last three decades with only modest increases in overall survival. Despite the validation of biomarkers to classify treatment response, most newly diagnosed (ND) patients receive the same treatment regimen. This study aimed to determine whether a prospective functional assay that provides a direct, live tumor cell-based drug response prediction specific for each patient could accurately predict clinical drug response prior to treatment. Methods A modified 3D cell culture assay was validated to establish baseline parameters including drug concentrations, timing, and reproducibility. Live tumor tissue from HGG patients were tested in the assay to establish response parameters. Clinical correlation was determined between prospective ex vivo response and clinical response in ND HGG patients enrolled in 3D-PREDICT (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03561207). Clinical case studies were examined for relapsed HGG patients enrolled on 3D-PREDICT, prospectively assayed for ex vivo drug response, and monitored for follow-up. Results Absent biomarker stratification, the test accurately predicted clinical response/non-response to temozolomide in 17/20 (85%, p = 0.007) ND patients within 7 days of their surgery, prior to treatment initiation. Test-predicted responders had a median overall survival post-surgery of 11.6 months compared to 5.9 months for test-predicted non-responders (p = 0.0376). Case studies provided examples of the clinical utility of the assay predictions and their impact upon treatment decisions resulting in positive clinical outcomes. Conclusion This study both validates the developed assay analytically and clinically and provides case studies of its implementation in clinical practice.

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. ii119-ii120
Author(s):  
Lindsay Lipinski ◽  
Ajay Abad ◽  
Laszlo Mechtler ◽  
Andrew Fabiano ◽  
Ashley Smith ◽  
...  

Abstract Recurrent high-grade glioma is a challenging disease process, without consensus on effective second-line therapy options. Individualized, patient-specific, biologically-based data is desirable in driving therapeutic decision-making. Patients with recurrent high-grade glioma and planned surgical re-resection at our institution were prospectively enrolled into the 3D-PREDICT study. Tissue was collected at the time of surgery for ex vivo 3D cell culture assays comprising a panel of agents commonly used for high-grade glioma, including chemotherapies and targeted therapies used in other solid cancers. In all cases, therapeutic agent selection was guided by the neuro-oncologist’s clinical judgement, factoring the patient’s age, performance status, comorbidities, toxicities/side effect profile of potential agents, and drug accessibility, plus ex-vivo drug response RESULTS: We present 3 cases in which the selection of agents was influenced by the tissue-derived 3D cell culture results; treatment led to clinical response observed in terms of progression free survival, quality of life, and pharmacologic tolerability. In Case 1, a patient with recurrent anaplastic astrocytoma was treated with a BRAF inhibitor for 12 months with excellent tolerability and no radiographic progression. Case 2 demonstrates the use of combination bevacizumab and irinotecan after disease progression subsequent to standard treatment. This patient had local radiographic control for 7 months, tolerating the regimen well. In Case 3, an individual with recurrent glioblastoma was treated with combination carboplatin and etoposide based on assay response prediction to both agents; treatment has been tolerated well with radiographic stability at 6 months while maintaining good performance status. This case series represents our institutional experience of utilizing patient-specific, ex-vivo tissue-derived cell drug response profiling to guide choice of therapy for recurrent high-grade glioma patients. Using individualized, tumor-specific drug sensitivity data to guide these decisions is representative of the ongoing paradigm shift into the realm of individualized medicine to improve outcomes in cancer patients.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Istvan Grexa ◽  
Akos Diosdi ◽  
Maria Harmati ◽  
Andras Kriston ◽  
Nikita Moshkov ◽  
...  

AbstractRecent statistics report that more than 3.7 million new cases of cancer occur in Europe yearly, and the disease accounts for approximately 20% of all deaths. High-throughput screening of cancer cell cultures has dominated the search for novel, effective anticancer therapies in the past decades. Recently, functional assays with patient-derived ex vivo 3D cell culture have gained importance for drug discovery and precision medicine. We recently evaluated the major advancements and needs for the 3D cell culture screening, and concluded that strictly standardized and robust sample preparation is the most desired development. Here we propose an artificial intelligence-guided low-cost 3D cell culture delivery system. It consists of a light microscope, a micromanipulator, a syringe pump, and a controller computer. The system performs morphology-based feature analysis on spheroids and can select uniform sized or shaped spheroids to transfer them between various sample holders. It can select the samples from standard sample holders, including Petri dishes and microwell plates, and then transfer them to a variety of holders up to 384 well plates. The device performs reliable semi- and fully automated spheroid transfer. This results in highly controlled experimental conditions and eliminates non-trivial side effects of sample variability that is a key aspect towards next-generation precision medicine.


Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 1028-1028
Author(s):  
Stefania Paolini ◽  
Emanuela Ottaviani ◽  
Sarah Parisi ◽  
Federica Salmi ◽  
Barbara Lama ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 1028 Poster Board I-50 Background: Outcome of elderly acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients is dismal. Targeted-therapies might improve current results by overcoming drug-resistance and reducing toxicity. In particular, the farnesyl-transferase inhibitor Tipifarnib (Zarnestra®), and the proteasome inhibitor Bortezomib (Velcade®), appeared synergistic in AML cells ex vivo, and their association was shown to be safe in vivo in a phase I trial by our group. Aim We conduced a phase II study aiming to assess efficacy and toxicity of Tipifarnib-Bortezomib association in AML patients >18 years, unfit for conventional therapy, or >60 years, in relapse. Furthermore, we aimed to identify biological features potentially predictive of clinical response. In particular, we focused on the RASGRP1/APTX ratio, which was previously found to be effective in predicting treatment response in patients treated with Tipifarnib alone. Methods: Bortezomib (1.0 mg/m2) was administered as weekly infusion for three consecutive weeks (days 1, 8, 15). Tipifarnib was administered at dose of 300-600 mg BID for 21 consecutive days. Response was assessed at the end of each cycle (28 days). Patients' withdrawn was planned in case of progression or stable disease after six cycles. Real-time quantitative-PCR (q-PCR) was used for RASGRP1/APTX quantification. Results: Eighty patients were enrolled (47 male). Median age was 71 years (43-89) and WBC at diagnosis was 4.2 × 109/L (0.5- 42.1). Thirty-two out of 80 patients had a secondary-AML, 14 had a high risk cytogenetic and 42 were previously untreated. Seventy-five patients actually initiated the treatment, 62 completed at least the first cycle while 13 early dropped out for non-leukemia related adverse event. Nine patients achieved complete remission (CR), 1 patients obtained a partial response (PR) and in 2 cases an hematological improvement (HI) was documented for an overall response rate (ORR) of 19%. Eighteen had progressive disease (PD) and the remaining showed stable disease (SD). Median time to response was 112 days, corresponding to 4 cycles (range 2-14). Marrow response (CR+PR) was significantly associated with overall survival (OS) (p<0.0001). RASGRP1/APTX was evaluated before treatment initiation on bone marrow (BM) and/or peripheral blood (PB). The median RASGRP/APTX value on BM was 15.3 (15-19.8) in responder patients and 2.2 (0.5-25.9) in non responders, respectively (p=0.00006). Its median value on PB was 31.6 (19.3-35.5) in responders and 6.4 (0.5-27.1) in non responders, respectively (p=0.00001). Interestingly, no marrow responses were recorded in patients with marrow RASGRP1/APTX ratio <8, while the response rate was 43% in patients with RASGRP1/APTX >8 (p<0.0001). Finally, RASGRP1/APTX levels significantly correlated with OS (p=0.001) with a median OS of 490 days and 162 days in patients with RASGRP1/APTX >8 and <8 respectively. Conversely, there was no correlation between cytogenetics, secondary AML, previous treatment and response or overall survival. Toxicity was overall mild, the most common adverse event being febrile neutropenia. Permanent treatment interruption due to Tipifarnib-Bortezomib related adverse events occurred in 13/75 (17%) of patients. With a median follow-up of 122 days (range 9-737), 57/75 (76%) patients are dead and 18/75 (24%) are alive, six of which in CR. Conclusion: We conclude that the clinical efficacy of the combination Tipifarnib-Bortezomib was similar to what reported for Tipifarnib alone. However, noteworthy, we could confirm that the RASGPR1/APTX BM or PB level is an effective predictor of response. Though higher RASGRP1/APTX is relatively rare (∼10% of cases), Tipifarnib (±Bortezomib) may represent an important option in a subset of high risk/frail AML patients. Acknowledgments: Supported by BolognAIL, AIRC, European LeukemiaNET, COFIN, FIRB 2006, Fondazione del Monte di Bologna e Ravenna. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 15-16
Author(s):  
Andrej Lissat ◽  
Despina Maniotis ◽  
Michael Nosswitz ◽  
Julia Alten ◽  
Silvia Jenni ◽  
...  

Despite progress with immunotherapy and targeted agents, treatment of refractory disease remains challenging, in particular for patients with T-ALL. Identification of genomic lesions defining actionable targets had limited impact on patient care so far. The complexity of biological systems highlights the need to develop complementary functional approaches. We and others have established platforms with a library of 120 drugs based on current treatment and (pre-)clinical development, to detect ex-vivo drug response phenotypes on leukemia samples at single cell resolution by high content image analysis. We demonstrated that drug response profiling (DRP) identifies dependencies not predicted by genetic alterations adding a functional information layer for clinicians. Here we report first correlations with clinical outcome using DRP in a non-interventional setting. From 2016 to 2019 we performed DRP in the framework of European ALL first- and second- line protocols upon request by treating centers. Here we analyze retrospectively treatment decisions and outcome for 23 T- and 50 BCP-ALL patients. To evaluate drug responses, we compared dose response curves of individual patients to data recorded for all patients. Sensitivity and resistance were defined based on the IC50 outlier analysis using cut-offs depending on distribution (normal gaussian vs. skewed). From 73 patients tested, clinical outcome data has been available for 36 BCP- and 15 T-ALL patients. NGS data provided by the INFORM registry has been available in 8 BCP- and 2 T-ALL patients. In first line BCP-ALL patients, ex-vivo Dexamethasone response predicted clinical response to prephase prednisone (d8) and minimal residual disease (MRD) reduction measured by flow cytometry at d15 of first line AIEOP BFM 2009 induction (Fig. 1). For refractory and relapsed ALL we observed an association of DRP and response to targeted agents in 14 out of 16 patients (87.5 %; Table 1). Data for the r/r BCP-ALL cohort is limited because most patients underwent CD19 and / or CD22-directed immunotherapy. Sensitivity and resistance to Calicheamicin correlated with clinical response to Inotuzumab, suggesting functional testing to be evaluated in future studies. In contrast, lack of correlation of ex-vivo sensitivity to MEK-inhibitors with presence of RAS-pathway alterations caution the exclusive use of molecular information to predict response to these agents. Most therapeutic decisions based on DRP information were made for patients with r/r T-ALL. Bortezomib ex-vivo sensitivity correlated with clinical responses in 5 T-ALL patients (Fig. 2). Both patients predicted to respond to Bortezomib and treated on Bortezomib + Venetoclax experienced good MRD response providing a bridge to stem cell transplantation (SCT). However, these patients relapsed after SCT emphasizing the need for additional consolidative therapeutic elements for heavily pretreated patients. In line with previous reports, we confirmed a T-ALL with high sensitivity to Dasatinib (IC50 1.9 nM; Fig. 3). Dasatinib monotherapy induced a molecular remission. A 2nd T-ALL showing an ex- vivo Dasatinib IC50 at 80 nM was refractory to treatment with Dasatinib + Daunoxome-FLAG. A 3rd ABL1-fusion positive T-ALL, ex-vivo resistant to Imatinib and Dasatinib, had only short- term response to Imatinib + chemotherapy. Finally, treating a T-ALL patient based on high sensitivity to the XPO1 inhibitor Selinexor as 4th line monotherapy led to significant decrease of PB blasts from d1 25 G/L to 0.7 G/L at d13 of treatment (Fig. 4). The patient experienced improved quality of life, minimizing need of hospitalization with stable disease for 3 months on maintenance with Selinexor. Given the promising preclinical data with this class of agents and current lack of established biomarkers, we propose that DRP should be evaluated for this class of agents. In conclusion, we established first associations between DRP and clinical response for various agents providing a rationale for the evaluation of DRP in prospective clinical trials. Integration of molecular and functional information may improve the selection of more specific treatment options for patients with resistant disease. The international BFM Study Group and ITCC Consortium are planning an international multiarm early clinical trial for treatment of r/r ALL patients that will include DRP for evaluation in order to improve selection of targeted therapy. Disclosures Cario: Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Other: travel support; Novartis: Consultancy, Other: travel support. Hrusak:Amgen: Other: MRD investigations funded by Amgen, Research Funding. Kulozik:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; bluebird bio, Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria. von Stackelberg:Morphosys: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Personal fees, advisory committees and speakers bureau, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Personal fees, advisory committees and speakers bureau, Speakers Bureau; Jazz: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Personal fees, advisory committees and speakers bureau, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Personal fees, advisory committees and speakers bureau, Speakers Bureau; Shire: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Personal fees, advisory committees and speakers bureau, Speakers Bureau. Jacoby:Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Lonza: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Bourquin:Servier: Other: Travel Support.


2005 ◽  
pp. 155-172
Author(s):  
Robert L. Ochs ◽  
Dennis Burholt ◽  
Paul Kornblith

2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (Supplement_6) ◽  
pp. vi272-vi272
Author(s):  
Ashley Smith ◽  
Lillia Holmes ◽  
Stephen Shuford ◽  
Charles Kanos ◽  
Stephen Gardner ◽  
...  

Abstract Standard treatment for newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM) is surgical resection followed by radiation with concurrent temozolomide (TMZ). For those who do not respond there are few clinical options, survival is low, and there no biomarkers to direct the decision of second-line treatment. We have developed a 3D cell culture assay to predict response to TMZ and 11 other potential therapies for GBM. Our assay uses GBM tissue obtained at surgical resection and the test’s 7-day turnaround maximizes clinical actionability of results. We performed a small, prospective study examining the ability of the assay to predict response to TMZ. Ten newly diagnosed GBM patients were enrolled over 12 months. Two patients were removed due to refusal of treatment, and three failed the assay (3/8, 62.5% success). The remaining five patients received radiation and concurrent TMZ following surgical resection. Using progression-free survival (PFS) measured from the completion of radiation therapy and setting 4 months as the cutoff for response, we were able to determine the ability of our assay to predict TMZ response. The assay correctly predicted all five patients (100%). The average PFS for the two predicted responders was 8 months compared to the three predicted non-responders at 3 months, p = 0.0634. In this limited dataset, MGMT methylation did not appear to play a role as two of three predicted non-responders were methylated along with one of two predicted responders. Average overall survival of the predicted TMZ responders was 13 months compared to 6 months for the predicted non-responders, p = 0.0634. This early data indicates the potential for this assay to inform clinicians of the best course of action for their patients. Further enrollment of patients into the 3D-PREDICT clinical trial will provide a larger dataset for better validation of the predictive value of this new assay.


2010 ◽  
Vol 38 (4) ◽  
pp. 1072-1075 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel J. Maltman ◽  
Stefan A. Przyborski

Drug discovery programmes require accurate in vitro systems for drug screening and testing. Traditional cell culture makes use of 2D (two-dimensional) surfaces for ex vivo cell growth. In such environments, cells are forced to adopt unnatural characteristics, including aberrant flattened morphologies. Therefore there is a strong demand for new cell culture platforms which allow cells to grow and respond to their environment in a more realistic manner. The development of 3D (three-dimensional) alternative substrates for in vitro cell growth has received much attention, and it is widely acknowledged that 3D cell growth is likely to more accurately reflect the in vivo tissue environments from which cultured cells are derived. 3D cell growth techniques promise numerous advantages over 2D culture, including enhanced proliferation and differentiation of stem cells. The present review focuses on the development of scaffold technologies for 3D cell culture.


2018 ◽  
Vol 47 (1) ◽  
pp. 549-567 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pei-Hsun Wu ◽  
Daniele M. Gilkes ◽  
Denis Wirtz

Three-dimensional (3D) cell culture systems have gained increasing interest not only for 3D migration studies but also for their use in drug screening, tissue engineering, and ex vivo modeling of metastatic behavior in the field of cancer biology and morphogenesis in the field of developmental biology. The goal of studying cells in a 3D context is to attempt to more faithfully recapitulate the physiological microenvironment of tissues, including mechanical and structural parameters that we envision will reveal more predictive data for development programs and disease states. In this review, we discuss the pros and cons of several well-characterized 3D cell culture systems for performing 3D migration studies. We discuss the intracellular and extracellular signaling mechanisms that govern cell migration. We also describe the mathematical models and relevant assumptions that can be used to describe 3D cell movement.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document