Chk1 Inhibitor Induced DNA Damage Increases BFL1 and Decreases BIM but Does Not Protect Human Cancer Cell Lines From Chk1 Inhibitor-induced Apoptosis

V158411 is a potent, selective Chk1 inhibitor currently in pre-clinical development. We utilised RNAseq to evaluate the gene responses to V158411 treatment. BCL2A1 was highly upregulated in U2OS cells in response to V158411 treatment with BCL2A1 mRNA increased >400-fold in U2OS but not HT29 cells. Inhibitors of Chk1, Wee1 and topoisomerases but not other DNA damaging agents or inhibitors of ATR, ATM or DNA-PKcs increased BFL1 and decreased BIM protein. Increased BFL1 appeared limited to a subset of approximately 35% of U2OS cells. Out of 24 cell lines studied, U2OS cells were unique in being the only cell line with low basal BFL1 levels to be increased in response to DNA damage. Induction of BFL1 in U2OS cells appeared dependent on PI3K/AKT/mTOR/MEK pathway signalling but independent of NF-κB transcription factors. Inhibitors of MEK, mTOR and PI3K effectively blocked the increase in BFL1 following V15841 treatment. Increased BFL1 expression did not block apoptosis in U2OS cells in response to V158411 treatment and cells with high basal expression of BFL1 readily underwent caspase-dependent apoptosis following Chk1 inhibitor therapy. BFL1 induction in response to Chk1 inhibition appeared to be a rare event that was dependent on MEK/PI3K/AKT/mTOR signalling.

A combination of PARP and CHK1 inhibitors efficiently antagonizes MYCN-driven tumors

MYCN drives aggressive behavior and refractoriness to chemotherapy, in several tumors. Since MYCN inactivation in clinical settings is not achievable, alternative vulnerabilities of MYCN-driven tumors need to be explored to identify more effective and less toxic therapies. We previously demonstrated that PARP inhibitors enhance MYCN-induced replication stress and promote mitotic catastrophe, counteracted by CHK1. Here, we showed that PARP and CHK1 inhibitors synergized to induce death in neuroblastoma cells and in primary cultures of SHH-dependent medulloblastoma, their combination being more effective in MYCN amplified and MYCN overexpressing cells compared to MYCN non-amplified cells. Although the MYCN amplified IMR-32 cell line carrying the p.Val2716Ala ATM mutation showed the highest sensitivity to the drug combination, this was not related to ATM status, as indicated by CRISPR/Cas9-based correction of the mutation. Suboptimal doses of the CHK1 inhibitor MK-8776 plus the PARP inhibitor olaparib led to a MYCN-dependent accumulation of DNA damage and cell death in vitro and significantly reduced the growth of four in vivo models of MYCN-driven tumors, without major toxicities. Our data highlight the combination of PARP and CHK1 inhibitors as a new potential chemo-free strategy to treat MYCN-driven tumors, which might be promptly translated into clinical trials.

Checkpoint Kinase 1 (Chk1) inhibition fails to activate the Stimulator of Interferon Genes (STING) innate immune signalling in a human coculture cancer system

Utilising Checkpoint Kinase 1 (Chk1) inhibitors to increase cytoplasmic DNA may be a potential strategy to increase the sensitivity of tumours to immune checkpoint modulators. The appearance of DNA in the cytoplasm can drive Cyclic GMP-AMP Synthase-2′,3′-Cyclic Guanosine Monophosphate–Adenosine Monophosphate-Stimulator of Interferon Genes (cGAS-cGAMP-STING) inflammatory, anti-tumour T-cell activity via a type I interferon (IFN) and nuclear factor-κB response. In the THP1-Dual reporter cell line, the STING agonist cGAMP activated both reporters, and increased phosphorylation of the innate immune pathway signallers Tank Binding Kinase 1 (TBK1) and Interferon Regulatory Factor (IRF) 3. Inhibition of Chk1 increased TBK1 but not IRF3 phosphorylation and did not induce IRF or NF-κB reporter activation. cGAMP induced a Type I IFN response in THP1 cells whereas inhibition of Chk1 did not. HT29 or HCC1937 cell treatment with a Chk1 inhibitor increased cytoplasmic dsDNA in treated HCC1937 but not HT29 cells and increased IRF reporter activation in cocultured THP1-Dual cells. HT29 cells pre-treated with gemcitabine or camptothecin had elevated cytoplasmic dsDNA and IRF reporter activation in cocultured THP1-Dual cells. Camptothecin or gemcitabine plus a Chk1 inhibitor increased cytoplasmic dsDNA but Chk1 inhibition suppressed IRF reporter activation in cocultured THP1 cells. In THP1-Dual cells treated with cGAMP, Chk1 inhibition suppressed the activation of the IRF reporter compared to cGAMP alone. These results suggest that, in some cellular models, there is little evidence to support the combination of Chk1 inhibitors with immune checkpoint modulators and, in some combination regimes, may even prove deleterious.

Regulation of CHK1 inhibitor resistance by a c-Rel and USP1 dependent pathway

We previously discovered that deletion of c-Rel in the Eμ-Myc mouse model of lymphoma results in earlier onset of disease, a finding that contrasted with the expected function of this NF-κB subunit in B-cell malignancies. Here we report that c-rel -/- Eμ-Myc cells have an unexpected and major defect in the CHK1 pathway, with almost undetectable levels of CHK1 and CLSPN protein leading to therapeutic resistance to the highly specific CHK1 inhibitor (CHK1i) CCT244747. Similar downregulation of CHK1 levels was also seen in CCT244747 resistant U2OS osteosarcoma cells. Further investigation revealed that downregulation of the deubiquitinase USP1 is responsible, at least in part, for these effects. Importantly, we demonstrate that c-rel -/- Eμ-Myc lymphoma cells survive though upregulation of compensatory PI3K/AKT pathway activity. Moreover, targeting this pathway with Pictilisib (GDC-0941) effectively killed c-rel -/- Eμ-Myc in vivo, while having no effect on wild type Eμ-Myc cells. This data reveals an NF-κB regulated pathway controlling CHK1 activity in cancer cells and identifies a potential mechanism for both acquiring and overcoming CHK1i resistance in cancer patients.

Inhibition of checkpoint kinase 1 potentiates anticancer activity of gemcitabine in bladder cancer cells

Checkpoint kinases (CHKs) are involved in the DNA damage response in many cancer cells. CHK inhibitors have been used in clinical trials in combination with chemotherapeutics; however, their effect against bladder cancer remains unclear. Here, we investigated the efficacy of combining gemcitabine with MK-8776, a novel CHK1 inhibitor, in four bladder cancer cell lines. The effects of gemcitabine and MK-8776 on cell viability, clonogenicity, cell cycle, and apoptosis were examined alongside in vivo efficacy using murine xenograft tumor models. Combined treatment inhibited the viability and colony formation of bladder cancer cells compared to either single treatment. Although gemcitabine (10 nM) alone increased the cell number in S-phase, it increased the cell number in sub-G1 phase when combined with MK-8776 (0.5 µM). Combined treatment enhanced cleaved poly[ADP-ribose]-polymerase expression alongside the number of annexin-V-positive cells, indicating the induction of apoptosis. In vivo, administration of gemcitabine and MK-8776 was well tolerated and suppressed tumor growth. Mechanistically, the combined treatment elevated γH2A.X and suppressed Rad51 expression. Our study demonstrates that MK-8776 and gemcitabine combined induces apoptosis and suppresses proliferation in bladder cancer cells by inhibiting CHKs and DNA repair. Therefore, CHK1 inhibition combined with gemcitabine may be a potential treatment for bladder cancer.