Gender Discrimination in Romania through the Case Law of the ECtHR

Author(s):  
Elena Brodeală

This chapter explores some of the barriers to the application of non-discrimination law in Romania through the few gender discrimination cases from the country that have reached the ECtHR. Unlike the other contributions in this volume, this chapter does not focus on the national legislation on non-discrimination implementing EU law or on the national case law on sex discrimination. This is due to the poor availability of sources, but also due to the fact that the ECtHR cases offer a more comprehensive view of the domestic (mis)application of the non-discrimination principle, since they were adjudicated under Article 14 ECHR, which has much broader scope than EU anti-discrimination law as transposed in the national legislation.

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 55-86
Author(s):  
Luis Arroyo Jiménez ◽  
Gabriel Doménech Pascual

This article describes the Europeanisation of Spanish administrative law as a result of the influence of the EU law general principle of legitimate expectations. It examines, firstly, whether the formal incorporation of the principle of legitimate expectations into national legislation and case law has modified the substance of the latter, and if so, secondly, whether this has led to a weaker or a more robust protection of the legal status quo. To carry out that examination, the article considers the influence of the principle of legitimate expectations in two different areas: in individual administrative decision-making, and in legislative and administrative rulemaking. Our conclusion is that the Europeanisation of Spanish administrative law through the principle of legitimate expectations has been variable and ambiguous.


2016 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
pp. 82-96
Author(s):  
Carla Machado

This article aims to address the interpretation that has been made by Portuguese courts in relation to the concept of “communication of the work to the public” enshrined in Article 3 (1) of Directive 2001/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2001, duly transposed into the Portuguese legal order by Law No. 50/2006 of 24 August, which culminated in the drafting of the case law unifying judgment No. 15/2013. By verifying its content and analysing the case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union (hereinafter CJEU), concerning the interpretation of that concept, we conclude that the said case law unifying judgment does not comply with EU law. Therefore, we will list, on the one hand, the inherent consequences regarding the upkeep of the interpretation that has been held by the Portuguese judicial authorities and, on the other, we will suggest solutions for the resolution of similar cases by appealing to the principle of conforming interpretation.


2016 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 61-78
Author(s):  
Kacper Kanka

Abstract This article contains general characteristics of both the standstill clause, in particular its objectives and functions regarding tax law, as well as a description of the mechanism of its application. At the end, the article contains proposals for both the direct subject of this work and the impact of the case law of the ECJ on the interpretation and application of the EU law and national legislation which implements this law. As stated in the article, proper application of the standstill clause should be preceded by a thorough analysis of the EU law, national provisions and case law of the ECJ. In the article, in order to ensure the transparency of the process, a test has been proposed the results of which should indicate whether the national provisions constitute the so-called permitted derogation. Current rules relating to Polish tax on civil law transactions are partially incompatible with EU rules - they do not constitute a permitted derogation and should not be used.


2015 ◽  
Vol 3 (72) ◽  
pp. 50
Author(s):  
Aleksejs Šaforostovs

The aim of this Article is to evaluate determination of value of smuggled goods according to existing Latvian and EU legislation and regulations. The problem analyzed in this study- existing determination metodology of smuggled goods value, which does not comply with EU legislation and case law, and European Commission opinion as well. Article`s novity has been shown by research carried out through analysis of the smuggled goods value, paying special attention to Latvian legislation in comparison with EU law, the case-law. As particular novelty of research should be emphasized Author`s proposals for improvements in national legislation and terminology, defining specific activities. Summarizing up conclusions of the article it can be said that the value of smuggled goods should be fixed according to market price or assimilated price at the time of the offense, but it is not acceptable to include customs tax, VAT and excise tax into the value of goods. These taxes can be applied to determine the compensation for losses if it will be proved that goods had been intended for use in commercial purposes.


Author(s):  
Oleksandra Bilyk

The article deals with the case law of the European Court of Human Rights in the context of the individuals’ possibility to dissolveone’s marriage in general and other issues related to divorce.Starting with the case of Johnston and Others v. Ireland (1986) ECHR made it clear that a right to divorce cannot be derived fromArticle 12 of the Convention (Right to marry). The Court stated that drafters of the Convention had no intention to include in Article12 any guarantee of a right to have the ties of marriage dissolved by divorce. On the other hand, in case of F. v. Switzerland (1987)ECHR stated that if national legislation allows divorce, which is not a requirement of the Convention, Article 12 secures for divorcedpersons the right to remarry without unreasonable restrictions.In more recent cases the Court dealt with issues concerning the lengthy divorce proceedings that impaired applicants’ right tomarry again. In this aspect the Court would not exclude that a failure to conduct divorce proceedings within a reasonable time could incertain circumstances raise an issue under Article 12 of the Convention. However, in such cases the Court emphasizes more on the issueof the violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention in light of the failure of the domestic authorities to conduct the divorce proceedingsefficiently.Another side of divorce proceedings was reviewed in case of Babiarz v. Poland (2017) where the applicant complained that byrefusing to grant him a divorce the authorities had prevented him from marrying the woman with whom he had been living and had achild. The situation arose due to the provisions of Polish law that a divorce could not be granted if it had been requested by the partywhose fault it was that the marriage had broken down, if the other party refused to consent. In the Court’s view, if the provisions of theConvention cannot be interpreted as guaranteeing a possibility, under domestic law, of obtaining divorce, they cannot, a fortiori, beinterpreted as guaranteeing a favourable outcome in divorce proceedings instituted under the provision of that law allowing for adivorce.


2020 ◽  
pp. 209-254
Author(s):  
Steve Wilson ◽  
Helen Rutherford ◽  
Tony Storey ◽  
Natalie Wortley ◽  
Birju Kotecha

The UK is a former member state of the European Union (EU). The EU is administered by several supranational institutions including: the European Council, the Council of the European Union, the European Commission, the European Parliament, and the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU). The main sources of EU law are primary legislation, i.e. the treaties; secondary legislation, including regulations and directives; and the case law of the CJEU. Where EU law and national law conflict, EU law is supreme. EU law may have direct effect, i.e. be enforceable by individuals before national courts, or indirect effect, where national courts are obliged to interpret national legislation and case law, so far as possible to conform with a relevant directive. State liability for breaches of EU law means that member states are obliged to compensate individuals for consequent loss or damage. The Withdrawal Act 2018 includes the key provisions for EU law in the UK post-Brexit.


Author(s):  
Steve Wilson ◽  
Helen Rutherford ◽  
Tony Storey ◽  
Natalie Wortley

The UK is currently a Member State of the European Union (EU). The EU is administered by several supranational institutions including: the European Council; the Council of the European Union; the European Commission; the European Parliament; and the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU). The main sources of EU law are primary legislation, ie the treaties, secondary legislation, including regulations and directives, and the case law of the CJEU. Where EU law and national law conflict, EU law is supreme. EU law may have direct effect, i.e. be enforceable by individuals before national courts or indirect effect, where national courts are obliged to interpret national legislation and case law, so far as possible to conform with a relevant directive. State liability for breaches of EU law means that Member States are obliged to compensate individuals for consequent loss or damage.


Author(s):  
Дэнис Биндер ◽  
Denis Binder

The publication is translation of paper by Denis Binder (professor of law, Chapman University), published in California Law Review in 1971. The article highlights the important legal issues related to gender discrimination in the workplace. The author analyzes the principle of bona fide professional qualification, its content, interpretation in law enforcement practice as the only legitimate exceptions established by the Civil Rights Act of 1964’s the prohibition of sex discrimination. The author analyzes a broad approach to the interpretation of the principle of bona fide occupational qualifications based on any common characteristics in general are related to gender and a narrow approach of assessing individuals based on individual qualities, not on the basis of common characteristics of the sex. The author substantiates the necessity of narrow interpretation of the principle of bona fide occupational qualifications. Also in the article was analyzed the reasoning by the courts the position of the employer when this employer conceders an additional factors such as presence of children or marital status and using of the developed approaches to disputes of the airlines with the stewardesses. In addition to the prohibition of marriage there also was the age limit for stewardesses, when many airlines were automatically dismissed them upon reaching 32—35 years without taking into account individual characteristics of women, while the age of retirement of male stewards was 65 years. According to the author the collective agreements can be very effective in resolving existing problems for stewardess restrictions, which, however, does not eliminate practices of discrimination completely. The author has argued the necessity of the case law development in order to force the airline to refuse sex discrimination at all stages of employment.


2011 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 265-291
Author(s):  
Manuel A. Vasquez ◽  
Anna L. Peterson

In this article, we explore the debates surrounding the proposed canonization of Archbishop Oscar Romero, an outspoken defender of human rights and the poor during the civil war in El Salvador, who was assassinated in March 1980 by paramilitary death squads while saying Mass. More specifically, we examine the tension between, on the one hand, local and popular understandings of Romero’s life and legacy and, on the other hand, transnational and institutional interpretations. We argue that the reluctance of the Vatican to advance Romero’s canonization process has to do with the need to domesticate and “privatize” his image. This depoliticization of Romero’s work and teachings is a part of a larger agenda of neo-Romanization, an attempt by the Holy See to redeploy a post-colonial and transnational Catholic regime in the face of the crisis of modernity and the advent of postmodern relativism. This redeployment is based on the control of local religious expressions, particularly those that advocate for a more participatory church, which have proliferated with contemporary globalization


Law and World ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 83-95

The research includes the full and the detailed overview of assessing activities of minor importance in Georgian Criminal Law. The Article 7 of the Criminal Code of Georgia states the following: a crime shall not be an action that, although formally containing the signs of a crime, has not produced, for minor importance, the prejudice that would require criminal liability of its perpetrator, or has not created the risk of such harm. The research includes the main criteria of defining activities as activities of minor importance. The detailed review of Georgian case law is also introduced, as well as, legislation, judicial literature and experience of the other European countries.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document