The Magnitude of Offset Analgesia as a Measure of Endogenous Pain Modulation in Healthy Participants and Patients With Chronic Pain

2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (2) ◽  
pp. 189-204 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tibor M. Szikszay ◽  
Waclaw M. Adamczyk ◽  
Kerstin Luedtke
2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 99-106 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristian K. Petersen ◽  
Megan E. McPhee ◽  
Morten S. Hoegh ◽  
Thomas Graven-Nielsen

Pain ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 161 (12) ◽  
pp. 2852-2859 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julie Shulman ◽  
David Zurakowski ◽  
Julie Keysor ◽  
Kelsey Jervis ◽  
Navil F. Sethna

2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 462-471 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marc O. Martel ◽  
Kristian Petersen ◽  
Marise Cornelius ◽  
Lars Arendt-Nielsen ◽  
Robert Edwards

Cephalalgia ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 21 (7) ◽  
pp. 765-769 ◽  
Author(s):  
TS Jensen

Within the last 2 decades there has been an explosion in new information on mechanisms underlying pain. Unfortunately this information has not resulted in a similar improvement of our handling of patients with chronic pain including chronic musculoskeletal pain. Neuronal hyperexcitability, which apparently is a key phenomenon in many (if not all) types of chronic pain results in changes in the nervous system from the level of the peripheral nociceptor to the highest cortical centers in the brain. The neuronal plastic changes in chronic pain conditions makes the nociceptive system amenable for treatment with several traditional as well as untraditional types of interventions. Two treatment areas that seem worth exploring within chronic pain including headache concerns preventive measures and endogenous pain modulation.


2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 695-701 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Dahl Nissen ◽  
Carsten Dahl Mørch ◽  
Lars Arendt-Nielsen ◽  
Asbjørn Mohr Drewes ◽  
Anne Estrup Olesen

Abstract Background and aims Offset analgesia (OA) is a pain modulating mechanism described as a disproportionately large decrease in pain intensity evoked by a minor decrease in stimulus intensity. Precise mechanisms of OA are still not elucidated and studies are needed to evaluate factors modulating OA. The aim of this study was to investigate OA before and during tonic cold pain (thought to induce descending inhibition), in a group of healthy volunteers. Methods A randomized, crossover study was performed in 17 healthy participants (8 males and 9 females). The OA paradigm lasted 35 s and was induced by the traditional method using thermal stimulation applied to the forearm. A constant control heat stimulus (CTL) paradigm was used as control to assess adaptation. Pain intensity was assessed continuously. For induction of tonic cold pain, the participants immersed their hand into 2°C water for 2 min. After 1 min and 25 s, the heat stimulation (OA or CTL paradigm) was repeated to assess the modulatory effect of the cold pressor test. Results It was possible to induce OA both before and during the cold pressor test. Tonic cold pain modulated the peak pain reported during both the OA (p=0.015) and CTL paradigms (p=0.001) reflecting endogenous pain modulation. However, the magnitude of OA was not modulated by tonic cold pain (p>0.05). Conclusions The offset analgesia magnitude was not modulated by simultaneously tonic cold pain, thought to reflect another endogenous pain modulation mechanism. Implications Neither offset analgesia magnitude nor adaptation were modulated by cold pressor induced endogenous analgesia. This could be explained by the fact, that offset analgesia was already at maximum in healthy participants. Hence, offset analgesia may not be a suitable assessment tool to investigate modulation induced by experimental methods or pharmacology in healthy participants.


Neuroscience ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 286 ◽  
pp. 37-44 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Miranda ◽  
S.M.S. Lamana ◽  
E.V. Dias ◽  
M. Athie ◽  
C.A. Parada ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document