Autologous platelet-rich plasma injection in tennis elbow and plantar fasciitis

2016 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 405-408 ◽  
Author(s):  
S.K.Venkatesh Gupta ◽  
Divya Bandari
Keyword(s):  
Plantar Fasciitis ◽  
Tennis Elbow ◽  
Platelet Rich Plasma ◽  
Plasma Injection ◽  
Autologous Platelet Rich Plasma ◽  
Autologous Platelet

Functional outcome of autologous platelet rich plasma injection in plantar fasciitis and tennis elbow

2022 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 76-81
Author(s):  
Rameshwar Sharan Gupta ◽  
Manish Khanna
Keyword(s):  
Repeated Measures ◽  
Plantar Fasciitis ◽  
Tennis Elbow ◽  
Platelet Rich Plasma ◽  
Biological Response ◽  
Osteoblastic Differentiation ◽  
Plasma Injection ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Autologous Platelet Rich Plasma ◽  
Autologous Platelet

Recent developments in cellular and molecular biology have emerged as a potent tool in the management of orthopaedic illnesses and injuries. Upon binding to the target cell receptor, the growth factor from platelets triggers the activation of an intracellular signal transduction system, which results in a biological response that is essential for chemotaxis, cell proliferation, and osteoblastic differentiation. The aim of this study is to determine the efficacy and safety of autologous platelet-rich plasma injection in tennis elbow and plantar fasciitis. We conducted a prospective study with patients who were suffering from plantar fasciitis (n=37) or tennis elbow (n=23) and were given with autologous platelet-rich plasma injection. A short term follow up of all these cases were done at regular intervals for 1, 4, 8, and 12 weeks. The clinical outcomes were analyzed with severity of pain and movements of the pathological part. The functional outcomes were analyzed with VAS and AOFAS scoring for plantar fasciitis and VAS and Mayo’s elbow scoring for tennis elbow. All these patients were statistically analyzed by repeated measures ANOVA test. Our investigation found a statistically significant difference between pre-procedural and post-procedural scores in both the subjective (VAS) and functional (AOFAS and Mayo elbow score) grading systems used in this study. Patients who received an autologous platelet-rich plasma injection experienced a statistically significant (p <0.05) improvement in their ability to combat both of the musculoskeletal illnesses studied. Autologous platelet-rich plasma acts as a promising efficacious biological therapeutic agent for use in musculoskeletal disorders such as plantar fasciitis and tennis elbow without major complications upon its usage.

scholarly journals Efficacy of intralesional corticosteroid versus autologous platelet rich plasma injection in the management of chronic plantar fasciitis

2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (5) ◽  
pp. 790
Author(s):  
Divya Anil Kumar ◽  
Harsha Kumar Koramutla
Keyword(s):  
Plantar Fasciitis ◽  
Platelet Rich Plasma ◽  
Vas Score ◽  
Plasma Injection ◽  
Intralesional Corticosteroid ◽  
Group A ◽  
Autologous Platelet Rich Plasma ◽  
Group B ◽  
Autologous Platelet

<p class="abstract"><strong>Background:</strong> Plantar fasciitis is a common pathological condition affecting the hind foot, and a common cause of heel pain. The present study was taken up to assess the efficacy of intralesional corticosteroid compared to autologous platelet rich plasma injection in the management of chronic plantar fasciitis.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Methods:</strong> Patients were randomized into two groups (Group A and Group B) of 30 each. Group-A received Corticosteroid injection while Group-B received PRP injection. Patients were assessed functionally using American Orthopaedic Foot and ankle score (AOFAS), Visual analogue scale (VAS) scores before treatment and on follow-up visit at 6 weeks, 3rd month, and 6th month. Ultrasound of heel for plantar fascia thickness was measured before treatment and follow up visit at 6th month.<strong></strong></p><p class="abstract"><strong>Results:</strong> A significant decrease in VAS score was observed in the corticosteroid group compared to PRP group at 6 weeks while the VAS score continued to decrease in the PRP group at 3 months and 6 months with an increase in the corticosteroid group at 3 months and 6 months. A significant increase in AOFAS was observed in the Corticosteroid group compared to PRP group at 6 weeks which increased in the PRP group at 3 months and 6 months. However it decreased in the corticosteroid group at 3 months and 6 months. Ultrasonographic evaluation showed improvement in fascial thickness in both the groups, but was better in the PRP group.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Conclusions:</strong> To conclude our study shows that corticosteroid is more effective for short term relief and PRP is more effective for long term relief.</p>

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document