Reciprocal Change in Sagittal Profiles After Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Surgery With Segmental Pedicle Screw Construct

Spine ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 44 (24) ◽  
pp. 1705-1714 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takayoshi Shimizu ◽  
Meghan Cerpa ◽  
Ronald A. Lehman ◽  
John Alex Sielatycki ◽  
Suthipas Pongmanee ◽  
...  
2016 ◽  
Vol 7 (04) ◽  
pp. 550-553 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sohail Rafi ◽  
Naseem Munshi ◽  
Asad Abbas ◽  
Rabia Hassan Shaikh ◽  
Imtiaz Hashmi

ABSTRACT Introduction: Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis is the most common type of scoliosis. A Cobb angle of 50° will progress beyond the age of spinal maturity. Surgery over bracing is advised at a Cobb angle above or equal to 50°. The aim of surgery is to bring the Cobb angle down below 50° to prevent reprogression as well as improve the quality of life. The objective of the study is to analyze the efficacy and significance in lifestyle improvement of pedicle screw-only fixation system versus the more common hybrid instrumentation system used for the surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Materials and Methods: A prospective cohort study was conducted involving two groups of patients were included in the study. One group was operated with pedicle screw-only method while the other with hybrid instrumentation system. The pre- and post-operative Cobb’s angles were taken across a follow-up of 4 years. An SRS-30 questionnaire was given in a yearly follow-up to assess the lifestyle improvement of the patient. Results: Pedicle screw-only method was significantly more effective in reducing Cobb’s angle (P = 0.0487). It was showed less loss of correction (P = 0.009) pedicle screw-only surgery was also better at reducing thoracic curves (P = 0.001). There seemed a better recovery time with pedicle screw surgery (P = 0.003). Conclusion: Pedicle screws are more effective and durable than hybrid systems at when treating adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.


Spine ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 38 (14) ◽  
pp. 1199-1208 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alvin H. Crawford ◽  
Marios G. Lykissas ◽  
Xu Gao ◽  
Emily Eismann ◽  
Jennifer Anadio

2007 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
pp. 523-528 ◽  
Author(s):  
Omer Karatoprak ◽  
Koray Unay ◽  
Mehmet Tezer ◽  
Cagatay Ozturk ◽  
Mehmet Aydogan ◽  
...  

Spine ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 39 (4) ◽  
pp. 286-290 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ozgur Dede ◽  
William Timothy Ward ◽  
Patrick Bosch ◽  
Austin J. Bowles ◽  
James W. Roach

2017 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. 998-1007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chris Yin Wei Chan ◽  
Mun Keong Kwan

<p>To review existing publications on the safety of pedicle screw insertions in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). Despite having increased risk for neurological and visceral injuries, the use of pedicle screws have led to increased correction rates in scoliosis surgery. A review was performed on topics pertinent to pedicle screw insertion in AIS, which included pedicle morphometry in AIS, structures at risk during pedicle screw insertion, and accuracy and safety of various pedicle screw insertion techniques. The importance of computer navigation and future research regarding pedicle screw placement in AIS were also briefly reviewed. Many authors have reported abnormal pedicle anatomy in AIS. Injury to the neural structures was highest over the apical region, whereas aortic injury was the highest at T5 and T10. In the proximal thoracic spine, the esophagus could be injured even with screws as short as 25 mm. Overall pedicle perforation rates for perforations &gt;0 and &gt;2 mm (assessed by computed tomography) ranged from 6.4% to 65.0% and 3.7% to 29.9%, respectively. The critical pedicle perforation (&gt;2 mm excluding lateral thoracic) and anterior perforation (&gt;0 mm) rates was reported to range from 1.5% to 14.5% and 0.0% to 16.1%, respectively. Pedicle perforation rates were lower with the use of computer navigation. The incidence of neurological adverse events after scoliosis surgery was 0.06%–1.9%. Aortic injury has only been observed in case reports. According to the available literature, pedicle screw insertion in AIS is considered safe with low rates of clinical adverse events. Moreover, the use of navigation technology has been shown to reduce pedicle perforation rates.</p>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document