scholarly journals Change in standardized uptake values in delayed 18F-FDG positron emission tomography images in hepatocellular carcinoma

Medicine ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 97 (42) ◽  
pp. e12817
Author(s):  
Kevser Oksuzoglu ◽  
Tunc Ones ◽  
Salih Ozguven ◽  
Sabahat Inanir ◽  
Halil Turgut Turoglu ◽  
...  
2014 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 551-556
Author(s):  
E. Simoneau ◽  
M. Hassanain ◽  
A. Madkhali ◽  
A. Salman ◽  
C.G. Nudo ◽  
...  

(1) Introduction: We set out to evaluate the prognostic value of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron-emission tomography (pet) in patients with advanced (non-transplant-eligible) hepatocellular carcinoma (hcc) and to evaluate the correlation between standardized uptake values (suvs) and survival outcomes. (2) Methods: We identified patients with hcc who, from 2005 to 2013, underwent pet imaging before any treatment. This retrospective study from our hcc database obtained complete follow-up data for the 63 identified patients. (3)Results: Of the 63 patients, 10 underwent surgical resection, and 59 underwent locoregional therapy. In this cohort, 28 patients were pet-positive (defined as any lesion with a suv ≥ 4.0) before any therapy was given, and 35 patients were pet negative (all lesions with a suv < 4.0). On survival analysis, median survival was greater for the pet-negative than for the pet-positive patients: 29 months (range: 16.3–41.1 months) versus 12 months (range: 4.0–22.1 months) respectively, p = 0.0241. The pet-positive patients more often had large tumours (≥5 cm), poor differentiation, and extrahepatic disease, reflecting more aggressive tumours. On multivariate analysis, only pet positivity was associated with poor survival (p = 0.049). (4) Conclusions: Compared with pet-positive patients, pet-negative patients with hcc experienced longer survival. Imaging by pet can be of value in early prognostication for patients with hcc, especially patients receiving locoregional therapy for whom pathologic tumour differentiation is rarely available. This potential role for pet requires further validation in a prospective study.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 9 (8) ◽  
pp. e105679 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuri Cho ◽  
Dong Hyeon Lee ◽  
Yun Bin Lee ◽  
Minjong Lee ◽  
Jeong-ju Yoo ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document