scholarly journals Longitudinal symptom and clinical outcome analysis of hospitalized COVID-19 patients

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arturas Ziemys
Keyword(s):  
Patient Care ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Respiratory System ◽  
Remission Rate ◽  
Outcome Analysis ◽  
Hospital Operations ◽  
Symptom Intensity ◽  
Symptom Remission ◽  
Remission Rates ◽  
Prognostic Utility

COVID-19 pandemics increased patient hospitalization impacting the hospital operations and patient care beyond COVID-19 patients. Although longitudinal symptom analysis may provide prognostic utility about clinical outcomes and critical hospitalization events of COVID-19 patients, such analysis is still missing. Here, we have analyzed over 10,000 hospitalized COVID-19 patients in the Houston Methodist Hospital at the Texas Medical Center from the beginning of pandemics till April of 2020. Our study used statistical and regression analysis over symptoms grouped into symptom groups based on their anatomical locations. Symptom intensity analysis indicated that symptoms peaked at the time of admission and subsided within the first week of hospitalization for most of the patients. Patients surviving the infection (n=9,263), had faster remission rates, usually within the first days of hospitalization compared to sustained symptom for the deceased patient group (n=1,042). The latter had also a longer hospitalization stay and more comorbidities including diabetes, cardiovascular, and kidney disease. Inflammation-associated systemic symptoms (Systemic) such as fever and chills, and lower respiratory system specific symptoms (Lower Respiratory System) such as shortness of breath and pneumonia, were the most informative for the analysis of longitudinal symptom dynamics. Our results suggest that the symptom remission rate could possess prognostic utility in evaluating patient hospitalization stay and clinical outcomes early in hospitalization. We believe knowledge and information about symptom remission rates can be used to improve hospital operations and patient care by using common and relatively easy to process source of information.

Debates in Dysphagia Management: How Do You Use Evidence-Based Practice in Your Dysphagia Patient Care?

2011 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 121-123
Author(s):  
Jeri A. Logemann
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Patient Care ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Clinical Judgment ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Evidence Based Practice ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Clinical Method ◽  
Do So

Evidence-based practice requires astute clinicians to blend our best clinical judgment with the best available external evidence and the patient's own values and expectations. Sometimes, we value one more than another during clinical decision-making, though it is never wise to do so, and sometimes other factors that we are unaware of produce unanticipated clinical outcomes. Sometimes, we feel very strongly about one clinical method or another, and hopefully that belief is founded in evidence. Some beliefs, however, are not founded in evidence. The sound use of evidence is the best way to navigate the debates within our field of practice.

scholarly journals Outcomes of endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery for Cushing's disease

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zarina Brady ◽  
Aoife Garrahy ◽  
Claire Carthy ◽  
Michael W. O’Reilly ◽  
Christopher J. Thompson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Insipidus ◽  
Cushing’S Disease ◽  
Transsphenoidal Surgery ◽  
Remission Rate ◽  
Cushing's Disease ◽  
Endoscopic Transsphenoidal Surgery ◽  
Endocrine Society ◽  
Csf Leakage ◽  
Remission Rates

Abstract Background Transsphenoidal surgery (TSS) to resect an adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH)-secreting pituitary adenoma is the first-line treatment for Cushing’s disease (CD), with increasing usage of endoscopic transsphenoidal (ETSS) technique. The aim of this study was to assess remission rates and postoperative complications following ETSS for CD. Methods A retrospective analysis of a prospective single-surgeon database of consecutive patients with CD who underwent ETSS between January 2012–February 2020. Post-operative remission was defined, according to Endocrine Society Guidelines, as a morning serum cortisol < 138 nmol/L within 7 days of surgery, with improvement in clinical features of hypercortisolism. A strict cut-off of < 50 nmol/L at day 3 post-op was also applied, to allow early identification of remission. Results A single surgeon (MJ) performed 43 ETSS in 39 patients. Pre-operative MRI localised an adenoma in 22 (56%) patients; 18 microadenoma and 4 macroadenoma (2 with cavernous sinus invasion). IPSS was carried out in 33 (85%) patients. The remission rates for initial surgery were 87% using standard criteria, 58% using the strict criteria (day 3 cortisol < 50 nmol/L). Three patients had an early repeat ETSS for persistent disease (day 3 cortisol 306-555 nmol/L). When the outcome of repeat early ETSS was included, the remission rate was 92% (36/39) overall. Remission rate was 94% (33/35) when patients with macroadenomas were excluded. There were no cases of CSF leakage, meningitis, vascular injury or visual deterioration. Transient and permanent diabetes insipidus occurred in 33 and 23% following first ETSS, respectively. There was one case of recurrence of CD during the follow-up period of 24 (4–79) months. Conclusion Endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery produces satisfactory remission rates for the primary treatment of CD, with higher remission rates for microadenomas. A longer follow-up period is required to assess recurrence rates. Patients should be counselled regarding risk of postoperative diabetes insipidus.

scholarly journals Remission Rate of Graves' Disease and the Trend of Changes in Serum TSH Receptor Antibodies in Prolonged Antithyroid Drug Treatment

2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (Suppl) ◽  
Author(s):  
Danilo Villagelin ◽  
Roberto Bernardo Santos ◽  
João Hamilton Romaldini
Keyword(s):  
Drug Treatment ◽  
Remission Rate ◽  
Antithyroid Drug ◽  
Antithyroid Drugs ◽  
Graves Disease ◽  
Remission Rates ◽  
Thyrotropin Receptor Antibodies ◽  
Antithyroid Drug Treatment ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Receptor Antibodies

Context: Graves’ disease is an autoimmune disease caused by thyrotropin receptor antibodies (TRAb). These antibodies can be measured and used for the diagnosis, prediction of remission, and risk of Graves’ orbitopathy development. There are three treatments for Graves’ disease that have remained unchanged for the last 75 years: Antithyroid drugs, radioiodine, and surgery. Antithyroid drugs are the first treatment option worldwide and are usually used for 12 - 18 months. Recent reports suggest the use of antithyroid drugs for more than 18 months with better outcomes. This review focuses on two aspects of treatment with antithyroid drugs: The impact of using antithyroid drugs for more than 12 - 18 months on remission rates and the trend of TRAb during prolonged antithyroid drug treatment. Evidence Acquisition: A review was performed in Medline on the published work regarding the duration of ATD treatment and remission of Graves' disease and also ATD treatment and TRAb status during the 1990 - 2019 period. Results: Remission rates are variable (30% - 80%), and many clinical and genetic factors serve as predictors. The long-term use of antithyroid drugs appears to increase remission rates. TRAb values usually decline during ATD treatment, but the trend could occur in two ways: Becoming negative or showing a fluctuating pattern. However, approximately 10% of the patients will remain TRAb-positive after five years of treatment with antithyroid drugs. Conclusions: Antithyroid drugs can be used for long periods with an increase in remission rates, and a gradual decrease in TRAb levels, with the disappearance of TRAb in 90% of the patients after 60 months.

MO294COMPARISON OF TIP AND CELLULAR VARIANT OF PRIMARY FOCAL SEGMENTAL GLOMERULOSCLEROSIS

2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nikola Zagorec ◽  
Ivica Horvatić ◽  
Dino Kasumović ◽  
Petar Šenjug ◽  
Matija Horaček ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nephrotic Syndrome ◽  
Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis ◽  
Clinical Features ◽  
Remission Rate ◽  
Prognostic Significance ◽  
European Population ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Outcome Analysis ◽  
Laboratory Findings ◽  
Segmental Glomerulosclerosis

Abstract Background and Aims After membranous nephropathy, focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) is the most common cause of nephrotic syndrome in European population. According to Columbia classification, there are five histological variants of FSGS defined on light microscopy (tip, cellular, perihilar, collapsing and not otherwise specified - NOS) and this classification has a prognostic significance. The aim is to compare features and outcomes of tip and cellular variant of primary FSGS. Method All patients with FSGS were identified by a retrospective review of the Registry of kidney biopsies at the Department of Nephrology and Dialysis, Dubrava University Hospital, Zagreb, from 2003 until 2020. Each kidney specimen was analyzed by light, immunofluorescent and electron microscopy and Columbia classification was applied by experienced nephropathologist. Patients with primary FSGS met following criteria: full nephrotic syndrome and diffuse podocyte foot process effacement in absence of secondary causes of FSGS. Laboratory findings were obtained for every patient at the time of biopsy and following outpatient visits. Complete remission was defined as proteinuria &lt; 0.3 g/day with normal kidney function and partial remission as proteinuria 0.3 - 3.5 g/day. Variables are expressed as median ± IQR (interquartile range) and frequencies. Statistical comparison between groups of patients with tip and cellular variant of primary FSGS and disease outcome analysis were done. Results Out of 200 patients with FSGS, 59 (29.5 %) had primary form of disease. Tip variant was the most common form of primary FSGS (22 patients, 37 %) followed by NOS (20, 34 %), cellular (13, 22 %), perihilar (2, 3.5 %) and collapsing (2, 3.5 %) variant. Demographic and clinical features with initial laboratory findings are shown in Table 1. There were no significant differences between two groups in all analyzed variables in Figure 1. All patients were treated by anti-RAAS agents and steroids. Median follow-up was 55 months (range 1 – 196 months), and followup data were unavailable for three patients. Figure 2 shows treatment regimens in both patient grouos with treatment outcomes. Remission rate was significantly higher in tip variant (90 % vs. 41 %, p = 0.002). There was no difference in relapse rate between the two groups (p = 0.717). Conclusion There were no significant differences in clinical features and laboratory findings at the time of clinical presentation between tip and cellular variant of primary FSGS. Patients with tip variant had significantly higher remission rate than patients with cellular variant.

Randomized trial of three cisplatin dose schedules in squamous-cell carcinoma of the cervix: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study.

1985 ◽  
Vol 3 (8) ◽  
pp. 1079-1085 ◽  
Author(s):  
P Bonomi ◽  
J A Blessing ◽  
F B Stehman ◽  
P J DiSaia ◽  
L Walton ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Complete Remission ◽  
Remission Rate ◽  
Gynecologic Oncology ◽  
Prospective Trial ◽  
Response Duration ◽  
Response Rates ◽  
Gynecologic Oncology Group ◽  
Oncology Group ◽  
Free Interval ◽  
Remission Rates

The Gynecologic Oncology Group has conducted a randomized prospective trial comparing cisplatin 50 mg/m2 every 21 days (regimen 1), 100 mg/m2 every 21 days (regimen 2), and cisplatin 20 mg/m2 for five consecutive days repeated every 21 days (regimen 3). Four hundred ninety-seven evaluable patients have been accrued on this study. The response rates were 20.7%, 31.4%, and 25.0%, for regimens 1, 2, and 3, respectively; the complete remission rates were 10.0%, 12.7%, and 8.6% for regimens 1, 2, and 3, respectively. The median duration of response ranged from 3.9 to 4.8 months, the median progression-free interval from 3.7 to 4.6 months, and the median survival time from 6.1 to 7.1 months. The difference in response rates for regimens 1 and 2 is statistically significant (P = .015) but less than the magnitude originally considered clinically significant. The differences in complete remission rates, response duration, progression-free interval, and survival times are not statistically significant. The following types of toxicity were observed: serum creatinine level greater than 2 mg/dL and/or BUN level greater than 40 mg/dL was 7%, 14%, and 17% on regimens 1, 2, and 3, respectively; leukocyte count less than 4,000/microL was 27%, 44%, and 41% on regimens 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Nausea and vomiting occurred in 74 patients (83%). The regimen consisting of a 100-mg/m2 single dose has produced a statistically significant higher response rate than the 50 mg/m2 regimen while producing no appreciable differences in complete remission rate, response duration, progression-free interval, or survival. In addition, the higher dose regimen was associated with greater myelosuppression and nephrotoxicity.

scholarly journals Impact of baseline anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide-2 antibody concentration on efficacy outcomes following treatment with subcutaneous abatacept or adalimumab: 2-year results from the AMPLE trial

2015 ◽  
Vol 75 (4) ◽  
pp. 709-714 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeremy Sokolove ◽  
Michael Schiff ◽  
Roy Fleischmann ◽  
Michael E Weinblatt ◽  
Sean E Connolly ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Antibody Concentration ◽  
Treatment Groups ◽  
Cyclic Citrullinated Peptide ◽  
Remission Rates ◽  
Registration Number ◽  
Baseline Characteristics ◽  
Citrullinated Peptide

ObjectivesTo examine whether baseline anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide-2 (CCP2) antibody status and concentration correlated with clinical outcomes in patients treated with abatacept or adalimumab on background methotrexate (MTX) in the 2-year AMPLE (Abatacept versus adaliMumab comParison in bioLogic-naïvE rheumatoid arthritis subjects with background MTX) study.MethodsIn this exploratory analysis, anti-CCP2 antibody concentration was measured at baseline, and antibody-positive patients were divided into equal quartiles, Q1–Q4, representing increasing antibody concentrations. Clinical outcomes analysed by baseline anti-CCP2 status and quartile included change from baseline in disease activity and disability and remission rates.ResultsBaseline characteristics were generally comparable across quartiles and treatment groups. In both treatment groups, anti-CCP2 antibody-negative patients responded less well than antibody-positive patients. At year 2, improvements in disease activity and disability and remission rates were similar across Q1–Q3, but were numerically higher in Q4 in the abatacept group; in contrast, treatment effects were similar across all quartiles in the adalimumab group.ConclusionsIn AMPLE, baseline anti-CCP2 positivity was associated with a better response for abatacept and adalimumab. Patients with the highest baseline anti-CCP2 antibody concentrations had better clinical response with abatacept than patients with lower concentrations, an association that was not observed with adalimumab.Trial registration numberNCT00929864.

scholarly journals Ten-year analysis of saccular aneurysms in the Barrow Ruptured Aneurysm Trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 132 (3) ◽  
pp. 771-776 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert F. Spetzler ◽  
Cameron G. McDougall ◽  
Joseph M. Zabramski ◽  
Felipe C. Albuquerque ◽  
Nancy K. Hills ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Artery Aneurysm ◽  
Ruptured Aneurysm ◽  
Outcome Analysis ◽  
Final Report ◽  
Clinical Trial Registration ◽  
Poor Outcome ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Saccular Aneurysms

OBJECTIVEThe authors present the 10-year results of the Barrow Ruptured Aneurysm Trial (BRAT) for saccular aneurysms. The 1-, 3-, and 6-year results of the trial have been previously reported, as have the 6-year results with respect to saccular aneurysms. This final report comparing the safety and efficacy of clipping versus coiling is limited to an analysis of those patients presenting with subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) from a ruptured saccular aneurysm.METHODSIn the study, 362 patients had saccular aneurysms and were randomized equally to the clipping and the coiling cohorts (181 each). The primary outcome analysis was based on the assigned treatment group; poor outcome was defined as a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score > 2 and was independently adjudicated. The extent of aneurysm obliteration was adjudicated by a nontreating neuroradiologist.RESULTSThere was no statistically significant difference in poor outcome (mRS score > 2) or deaths between these 2 treatment arms during the 10 years of follow-up. Of 178 clip-assigned patients with saccular aneurysms, 1 (< 1%) was crossed over to coiling, and 64 (36%) of the 178 coil-assigned patients were crossed over to clipping. After the initial hospitalization, 2 of 241 (0.8%) clipped saccular aneurysms and 23 of 115 (20%) coiled saccular aneurysms required retreatment (p < 0.001). At the 10-year follow-up, 93% (50/54) of the clipped aneurysms were completely obliterated, compared with only 22% (5/23) of the coiled aneurysms (p < 0.001). Two patients had documented rebleeding, both died, and both were in the assigned and treated coiled cohort (2/83); no patient in the clipped cohort (0/175) died (p = 0.04). In 1 of these 2 patients, the hemorrhage was not from the target aneurysm but from an incidental basilar artery aneurysm, which was coiled at the same time.CONCLUSIONSThere was no significant difference in clinical outcomes between the 2 assigned treatment groups as measured by mRS outcomes or deaths. Clinical outcomes in the patients with posterior circulation aneurysms were better in the coiling group at 1 year, but after 1 year this difference was no longer statistically significant. Rates of complete aneurysm obliteration and rates of retreatment favored patients who actually underwent clipping compared with those who underwent coiling.Clinical trial registration no.: NCT01593267 (clinicaltrials.gov)

scholarly journals Prognostic Utility of Soluble Suppression of Tumorigenicity 2 level as a Predictor of Clinical Outcomes in Incident Hemodialysis Patients

2018 ◽  
Vol 15 (7) ◽  
pp. 730-737 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suk Min Seo ◽  
Sun Hwa Kim ◽  
Yaeni Kim ◽  
Hye Eun Yoon ◽  
Seok Joon Shin
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Hemodialysis Patients ◽  
Prognostic Utility

scholarly journals Unorthodox Parenteral β-Lactam and β-Lactamase Inhibitor Combinations: Flouting Antimicrobial Stewardship and Compromising Patient Care

2020 ◽  
Vol 64 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Snehal Palwe ◽  
Balaji Veeraraghavan ◽  
Hariharan Periasamy ◽  
Kshama Khobragade ◽  
Arun S. Kharat
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Drug Development ◽  
Patient Care ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Fixed Dose ◽  
Resistance Development ◽  
Safety And Efficacy ◽  
India And China ◽  
Lactamase Inhibitor

ABSTRACT In India and China, indigenous drug manufacturers market arbitrarily combined parenteral β-lactam and β-lactamase inhibitors (BL-BLIs). In these fixed-dose combinations, sulbactam or tazobactam is indiscriminately combined with parenteral cephalosporins, with BLI doses kept in ratios similar to those for the approved BL-BLIs. Such combinations have been introduced into clinical practice without mandatory drug development studies involving pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic, safety, and efficacy assessments being undertaken. Such unorthodox combinations compromise clinical outcomes and also potentially contribute to resistance development.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document