scholarly journals Heavy quarkonium at finite temperature and chemical potential

2020 ◽  
Vol 102 (11) ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefano Carignano ◽  
Joan Soto
Keyword(s):  
Finite Temperature ◽  
Chemical Potential ◽  
Heavy Quarkonium

scholarly journals Effects of the hyperscaling violation and dynamical exponents on the imaginary potential and entropic force of heavy quarkonium via holography

2021 ◽  
Vol 81 (8) ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Kioumarsipour ◽  
J. Sadeghi
Keyword(s):  
Finite Temperature ◽  
Chemical Potential ◽  
Heavy Quarkonia ◽  
Heavy Quarkonium ◽  
Entropic Force ◽  
Dynamical Exponent ◽  
Strongly Coupled ◽  
Imaginary Potential ◽  
Dynamical Exponents ◽  
Hyperscaling Violation

AbstractThe imaginary potential and entropic force are two important different mechanisms to characterize the dissociation of heavy quarkonia. In this paper, we calculate these two quantities in strongly coupled theories with anisotropic Lifshitz scaling and hyperscaling violation exponent using holographic methods. We study how the results are affected by the hyperscaling violation parameter $$ \theta $$ θ and the dynamical exponent z at finite temperature and chemical potential. Also, we investigate the effect of the chemical potential on these quantities. As a result, we find that both mechanisms show the same results: the thermal width and the dissociation length decrease as the dynamical exponent and chemical potential increase or as the hyperscaling violating parameter decreases.

scholarly journals Finite Temperature QCD Sum Rules: A Review

2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-24 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alejandro Ayala ◽  
C. A. Dominguez ◽  
M. Loewe
Keyword(s):  
Finite Temperature ◽  
Chemical Potential ◽  
Sum Rules ◽  
Light Quark ◽  
Axial Vector ◽  
Heavy Ion ◽  
Qcd Sum Rules ◽  
Rho Meson ◽  
Ion Collisions ◽  
Rule Method

The method of QCD sum rules at finite temperature is reviewed, with emphasis on recent results. These include predictions for the survival of charmonium and bottonium states, at and beyond the critical temperature for deconfinement, as later confirmed by lattice QCD simulations. Also included are determinations in the light-quark vector and axial-vector channels, allowing analysing the Weinberg sum rules and predicting the dimuon spectrum in heavy-ion collisions in the region of the rho-meson. Also, in this sector, the determination of the temperature behaviour of the up-down quark mass, together with the pion decay constant, will be described. Finally, an extension of the QCD sum rule method to incorporate finite baryon chemical potential is reviewed.

scholarly journals Thermal operator and cutting rules at finite temperature and chemical potential

2006 ◽  
Vol 74 (8) ◽  
Author(s):  
F. T. Brandt ◽  
Ashok Das ◽  
Olivier Espinosa ◽  
J. Frenkel ◽  
Silvana Perez
Keyword(s):  
Finite Temperature ◽  
Chemical Potential

Studies on proper time regularization and the QCD chiral phase transition

2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (01) ◽  
pp. 1950003
Author(s):  
Yu-Qiang Cui ◽  
Zhong-Liang Pan
Keyword(s):  
Phase Transition ◽  
Small Parameter ◽  
Effective Mass ◽  
Finite Temperature ◽  
Chemical Potential ◽  
Proper Time ◽  
Chiral Phase ◽  
Chiral Phase Transition ◽  
Njl Model ◽  
The Difference

We investigate the finite-temperature and zero quark chemical potential QCD chiral phase transition of strongly interacting matter within the two-flavor Nambu–Jona-Lasinio (NJL) model as well as the proper time regularization. We use two different regularization processes, as discussed in Refs. 36 and 37, separately, to discuss how the effective mass M varies with the temperature T. Based on the calculation, we find that the M of both regularization schemes decreases when T increases. However, for three different parameter sets, quite different behaviors will show up. The results obtained by the method in Ref. 36 are very close to each other, but those in Ref. 37 are getting farther and farther from each other. This means that although the method in Ref. 37 seems physically more reasonable, it loses the advantage in Ref. 36 of a small parameter dependence. In addition, we also, find that two regularization schemes provide similar results when T [Formula: see text] 100 MeV, while when T is larger than 100 MeV, the difference becomes obvious: the M calculated by the method in Ref. 36 decreases more rapidly than that in Ref. 37.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document