scholarly journals Gamma-ray burst lensing parallax: Closing the primordial black hole dark matter mass window

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sunghoon Jung ◽  
TaeHun Kim
2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (02n03) ◽  
pp. 2040046 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu. N. Eroshenko

The accumulation of dark matter particles near the primordial black holes starts at the radiation-dominated cosmological stage and produces the central density spikes. The spikes can be the bright gamma-ray sources due to dark matter annihilation. We present the self-consistent derivation of the equation of motion of particle in the metrics of primordial black hole immersed into cosmological background. By numerical solution of this equation we find the central dark matter density profile. The density growth is suppressed in the central part of the profile compared with previous calculations.


Author(s):  
Ryotaro Ishikawa ◽  
Sergei V Ketov

Abstract We study the parameter space of the effective (with two scalars) models of cosmological inflation and primordial black hole (PBH) formation in the modified (R+ R 2) supergravity. Our models describe double inflation, whose first stage is driven by Starobinsky’s scalaron coming from the R 2 gravity, and whose second stage is driven by another scalar belonging to the supergravity multiplet. The ultra-slow-roll regime between the two stages leads a large peak (enhancement) in the power spectrum of scalar perturbations, which results in efficient PBH formation. Both inflation and PBH formation are generic in our models, while those PBH can account for a significant part or the whole of dark matter. Some of the earlier proposed models in the same class are in tension (over 3σ) with the observed value of the scalar tilt ns , so that we study more general models with more parameters, and investigate the dependence of the cosmological tilts (ns,r) and the scalar power spectrum enhancement upon the parameters. The PBH masses and their density fraction (as part of dark matter) are also calculated. A good agreement (between 2σ and 3σ) with the observed value of ns requires fine tuning of the parameters, and it is only realized in the so-called δ-models. Our models offer the (super)gravitational origin of inflation, PBH and dark matter together, and may be confirmed or falsified by future precision measurements of the cosmic microwave background radiation and PBH-induced gravitational waves.


2021 ◽  
Vol 81 (11) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gert Hütsi ◽  
Tomi Koivisto ◽  
Martti Raidal ◽  
Ville Vaskonen ◽  
Hardi Veermäe

AbstractWe show that the physical conditions which induce the Thakurta metric, recently studied by Bœhm et al. in the context of time-dependent black hole masses, correspond to a single accreting compact object in the entire Universe filled with isotropic non-interacting dust. In such a case, accretion physics is not local but tied to the properties of the whole Universe. We show that radiation, primordial black holes or particle dark matter cannot produce the specific energy flux required for supporting the mass growth of the compact objects described by the Thakurta metric. In particular, this solution does not apply to black hole binaries. We conclude that compact dark matter candidates and their mass growth cannot be described by the Thakurta metric, and thus existing constraints on the primordial black hole abundance from the LIGO-Virgo and the CMB measurements remain valid.


Galaxies ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 90 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesca Calore ◽  
Moritz Hütten ◽  
Martin Stref

Searches for “dark” subhaloes in gamma-ray point-like source catalogues are among promising strategies for indirect dark matter detection. Such a search is nevertheless affected by uncertainties related, on the one hand, to the modelling of the dark matter subhalo distribution in Milky-Way-like galaxies, and, on the other hand, to the sensitivity of gamma-ray instruments to the dark matter subhalo signals. In the present work, we assess the detectability of dark matter subhaloes in Fermi-LAT catalogues, taking into accounts uncertainties associated with the modelling of the galactic subhalo population. We use four different halo models bracketing a large set of uncertainties. For each model, adopting an accurate detection threshold of the LAT to dark matter subhalo signals and comparing model predictions with the number of unassociated point-sources in Fermi-LAT catalogues, we derive upper limits on the annihilation cross section as a function of dark matter mass. Our results show that, even in the best-case scenario (i.e., DMonly subhalo model), which does not include tidal disruption from baryons, the limits on the dark matter parameter space are less stringent than current gamma-ray limits from dwarf spheroidal galaxies. Comparing the results obtained with the different subhalo models, we find that baryonic effects on the subhalo population are significant and lead to dark matter constraints that are less stringent by a factor of ∼2 to ∼5. This uncertainty comes from the unknown resilience of dark matter subhaloes to tidal disruption.


1995 ◽  
Vol 10 (38) ◽  
pp. 2897-2913
Author(s):  
DAVID B. CLINE

We provide a brief review of the current situation concerning gamma ray bursts, with emphasis on the role that particle physics may play in the interesting phenomena. The current understanding of GRB origins allows for a large range of physical processes from primordial black hole evaporation to neutron star and black hole collisions. There does not seem to be a simple standard luminosity function and the burst times range from ms to 1000 s of seconds five orders of magnitude. It is likely that some type of fireball model is needed to explain the GRBs. No counterparts of GRB have been detected. We indicate some ways in which progress can be made in either the study of the fine time structure (~μs) or the detection of very high energy photons (>100 GeV to >100 TeV). We also indicate how a small but unique class of the GRB could come from primordial black hole evaporation.


2011 ◽  
Vol 107 (23) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kim Griest ◽  
Matthew J. Lehner ◽  
Agnieszka M. Cieplak ◽  
Bhuvnesh Jain

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document