Modelling of rotary converter in electrical railway traction power-systems for stability analysis

Author(s):  
Carsten Heising ◽  
Jie Fang ◽  
Roman Bartelt ◽  
Volker Staudt ◽  
Andreas Steimel
2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 1-29 ◽  
Author(s):  
Subhash Lakshminarayana ◽  
Teo Zhan Teng ◽  
Rui Tan ◽  
David K. Y. Yau

2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 715-726
Author(s):  
Xiaofeng Jiang ◽  
Haitao Hu ◽  
Xiaowei Yang ◽  
Zhengyou He ◽  
Qingquan Qian ◽  
...  

Energies ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (8) ◽  
pp. 2328
Author(s):  
Mohammed Alzubaidi ◽  
Kazi N. Hasan ◽  
Lasantha Meegahapola ◽  
Mir Toufikur Rahman

This paper presents a comparative analysis of six sampling techniques to identify an efficient and accurate sampling technique to be applied to probabilistic voltage stability assessment in large-scale power systems. In this study, six different sampling techniques are investigated and compared to each other in terms of their accuracy and efficiency, including Monte Carlo (MC), three versions of Quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), i.e., Sobol, Halton, and Latin Hypercube, Markov Chain MC (MCMC), and importance sampling (IS) technique, to evaluate their suitability for application with probabilistic voltage stability analysis in large-scale uncertain power systems. The coefficient of determination (R2) and root mean square error (RMSE) are calculated to measure the accuracy and the efficiency of the sampling techniques compared to each other. All the six sampling techniques provide more than 99% accuracy by producing a large number of wind speed random samples (8760 samples). In terms of efficiency, on the other hand, the three versions of QMC are the most efficient sampling techniques, providing more than 96% accuracy with only a small number of generated samples (150 samples) compared to other techniques.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document