On Lewis on Egoism De Se and De Dicto

2002 ◽  
Vol 102 (3) ◽  
pp. 295-299
Author(s):  
Y.S. Lo
Keyword(s):  
De Se ◽  
De Dicto

scholarly journals On the roads to de se

2011 ◽  
Vol 21 ◽  
pp. 393 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emar Maier
Keyword(s):  
De Re ◽  
Dynamic Framework ◽  
The Third ◽  
Center Stage ◽  
De Se ◽  
De Dicto ◽  
Special Case

It is rather uncontroversial that there are different ways to report de se attitudes, but there is still disagreement about the number and the nature of the different mechanisms at work. Following Anand (2006), I distinguish three types of de se reporting: one a special case of de re, another expressed by shifted indexicals, and a third expressed by dedicated de se pronouns. For the first two I propose reductions to de re and de dicto reporting, respectively, couched in a dynamic framework where presupposition resolution takes center stage. For the third, I part ways with all current proposals in offering what is essentially a de re analysis of dedicated de se pronouns. I motivate this radical departure with examples of de se pronouns binding de re reflexives, as recently brought into the spotlights by Charlow (2010) and Sharvit (2010).

De dicto and de se

1984 ◽  
Vol 45 (2) ◽  
pp. 231-237 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter J. Markie
Keyword(s):  
De Se ◽  
De Dicto

scholarly journals Attitudes De Dicto and De Se

1999 ◽  
Vol 31 (92) ◽  
pp. 67-92
Author(s):  
B.H. Slater
Keyword(s):  
De Se ◽  
De Dicto

Attitudes De Dicto and De Se

Fitting Attitudes De Dicto and De Se

Noûs ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 44 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jason Turner
Keyword(s):  
Fitting Attitudes ◽  
De Se ◽  
De Dicto

scholarly journals On the roads to de se

2015 ◽  
pp. 393
Author(s):  
Emar Maier
Keyword(s):  
De Re ◽  
Dynamic Framework ◽  
The Third ◽  
Center Stage ◽  
De Se ◽  
De Dicto ◽  
Special Case

It is rather uncontroversial that there are different ways to report de se attitudes, but there is still disagreement about the number and the nature of the different mechanisms at work. Following Anand (2006), I distinguish three types of de se reporting: one a special case of de re, another expressed by shifted indexicals, and a third expressed by dedicated de se pronouns. For the first two I propose reductions to de re and de dicto reporting, respectively, couched in a dynamic framework where presupposition resolution takes center stage. For the third, I part ways with all current proposals in offering what is essentially a de re analysis of dedicated de se pronouns. I motivate this radical departure with examples of de se pronouns binding de re reflexives, as recently brought into the spotlights by Charlow (2010) and Sharvit (2010).

Attitudes De Dicto and De Se

1979 ◽  
Vol 88 (4) ◽  
pp. 513 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Lewis
Keyword(s):  
De Se ◽  
De Dicto
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document