Effects of seismic surveys on New Zealand fur seals during daylight hours: Do fur seals respond to obstacles rather than airgun noise?

2015 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 643-663
Author(s):  
Chris Lalas ◽  
Helen McConnell
2014 ◽  
Vol 36 (2) ◽  
pp. 154 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter D. Shaughnessy ◽  
Catherine M. Kemper ◽  
David Stemmer ◽  
Jane McKenzie

Two fur seal species breed on the southern coast of Australia: the Australian fur seal (Arctocephalus pusillus doriferus) and the New Zealand fur seal (A. forsteri). Two other species are vagrants: the subantarctic fur seal (A. tropicalis) and the Antarctic fur seal (A. gazella). We document records of vagrant fur seals in South Australia from 1982 to 2012 based primarily on records from the South Australian Museum. There were 86 subantarctic fur seals: 49 specimens and 37 sightings. Most (77%) were recorded from July to October and 83% of all records were juveniles. All but two specimens were collected between July and November. Sightings were prevalent during the same period, but there were also nine sightings during summer (December–February), several of healthy-looking adults. Notable concentrations were near Victor Harbor, on Kangaroo Island and Eyre Peninsula. Likely sources of subantarctic fur seals seen in South Australia are Macquarie and Amsterdam Islands in the South Indian Ocean, ~2700 km south-east and 5200 km west of SA, respectively. There were two sightings of Antarctic fur seals, both of adults, on Kangaroo Island at New Zealand fur seal breeding colonies. Records of this species for continental Australia and nearby islands are infrequent.


1998 ◽  
Vol 76 (2) ◽  
pp. 350-360 ◽  
Author(s):  
R H Mattlin ◽  
N J Gales ◽  
D P Costa

The dive behaviour of 18 female New Zealand fur seals (Arctocephalus forsteri) from Taumaka, Open Bay Islands, New Zealand (43°52'S, 168°53'E), was recorded during early (summer; December-February), mid (autumn; March-May), and late (winter; June-August) lactation. Mean dive depth, dive duration, and bottom time for dives >=6 m in depth increased from summer through winter. Variation in individual seal dive behaviour within a season accounted for approximately 11, 9, and 11% of the observed difference between seasons in dive depth, dive duration, and bottom time, respectively. Seasonal dive data (mean ± 1 SD) were as follows: summer: dive depth 30 ± 37 m, dive duration 1.4 ± 1.1 min, and bottom time 0.5 ± 0.6 min; autumn: dive depth 54 ± 47 m, dive duration 2.4 ± 1.3 min, and bottom time 1.0 ± 0.8 min; winter: dive depth 74 ± 64 m, dive duration 2.9 ± 1.5 min, and bottom time 1.2 ± 1.1 min. Maximum recorded dive depth was 274 m for a 5.67-min dive in autumn. Maximum duration was 11.17 min for a dive to 237+ m in winter. New Zealand fur seals are the deepest diving fur seal species reported thus far. The estimated theoretical aerobic dive limit was exceeded on 18.4% of dives (range of individual values 0.2-57.8%). Females (n = 12) were ashore about 1.8 days at a time during February through November, and this increased to about 4.3 days during December and January. Average time spent away from the rookery ranged from 3 to 15 days.


1998 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 101-104 ◽  
Author(s):  
Corey J. A. Bradshaw ◽  
Chris Lalas ◽  
Shaun Mcconkey
Keyword(s):  
Sea Lion ◽  

2002 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 85 ◽  
Author(s):  
LJ Boren ◽  
NJ Gemmell ◽  
KJ Barton

Marine mammals are significant tourist attractions around New Zealand, however, the impact of eco-tourism on these species is poorly documented. Effective management to mitigate any negative effects requires an understanding of target species? reactions to tourist activities. We have studied the effects of tourist activities on New Zealand fur seals (Arctocephalus forsteri) using a novel combination of observations and controlled approaches. Three study areas were selected reflecting a range of visitor density, type of tourism, and the anticipated sensitivity of fur seals to disturbance. Behaviour was observed using instantaneous scan sampling and attributes of tourist approaches were tested experimentally by controlled approaches. Approaches were made on land, by kayak, and motorboat. Fur seal responses and the distance at which the seal responded were recorded. Our results indicate that A. forsteri behaviour was being modified by tourist activities. Habituation was occurring at study areas with high levels of tourist activity. Approachers following current minimum approach distances still caused some animals to modify their behaviour and new minimum approach distances are recommended based on controlled approaches to seals at all study areas. Our work demonstrated that controlled approaches can be a useful tool to develop effective management guidelines to lessen impacts from eco-tourism activities.


2011 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 276-294 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alastair M. M. Baylis ◽  
Brad Page ◽  
Jane McKenzie ◽  
Simon D. Goldsworthy

1994 ◽  
Vol 72 (2) ◽  
pp. 293-299 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gina M. Lento ◽  
Robert H. Mattlin ◽  
Geoffrey K. Chambers ◽  
C. Scott Baker

Nucleotides spanning 361 base pairs of the 5′ portion of the mitochondrial cytochrome b gene were sequenced from 16 New Zealand fur seals, Arctocephalus forsteri, representing seven rookeries in three different regions: the east and west coasts of New Zealand, and Western Australia. Five different mitochondrial haplotypes were observed in these novel sequence data for this species. The geographical distribution of the cytochrome b haplotypes was shown to be heterogeneous by three statistical tests. The major finding of this study is the difference between haplotypes found in fur seals from Western Australian rookeries and haplotypes found in fur seals from New Zealand rookeries. The nucleotide sequence difference found in pairwise comparisons among the surveyed individuals is in the range 0.3–0.8%. One individual showed an unexpectedly large sequence divergence (range 3.3–4.2%) from all other fur seals in this study. We compare alternative hypotheses that this individual is a descendant of an ancient maternal lineage which survived a population bottleneck, that New Zealand fur seals exhibit a rather large amount of genetic variability at this locus, or that this particular individual is a hybrid. Western Australian rookeries were extirpated as a result of sealing during the early 1800s. The geographic distribution of mitochondrial cytochrome b haplotypes suggests that the extirpated Australian rookeries were not recolonized by migrants from New Zealand. No genetic division between fur seal populations sampled from the east and west coasts of New Zealand is revealed using this region of the mitochondrial genome as a genetic marker, but we suggest that it should be possible to create a more discriminating test by examining a more variable DNA target such as the mitochondrial control region.


2002 ◽  
Vol 148 (2) ◽  
pp. 111-131 ◽  
Author(s):  
Corey J.A Bradshaw ◽  
Lloyd S Davis ◽  
Martin Purvis ◽  
Qingqing Zhou ◽  
George L Benwell

1990 ◽  
Vol 17 (6) ◽  
pp. 563 ◽  
Author(s):  
N Brothers ◽  
D Pemberton

Surveys were carried out between 1987 and 1989 on Maatsuyker I. and nearby Needle Rocks off southern Tasmania to establish the status and identification of the seals present. New Zealand fur seals, Arctocephalus forsteri, were found on Maatsuyker I. There were at least 15 pups born on the island in 1987/88. Australian fur seals, Arctocephalus pusillus doriferus, use the islands as a haulout site but do not breed here. The distribution of New Zealand fur seals can now be amended to include Tasmanian waters. Records discussed here also alter aspects of the status of Australian fur seals because the Maatsuyker group is not a breeding site for this species and breeding colonies are therefore restricted to Bass Strait waters.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document