scholarly journals Generating subdirect products

2019 ◽  
Vol 100 (2) ◽  
pp. 404-424 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Mayr ◽  
Nik Ruškuc
Keyword(s):  
2020 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 971-1017
Author(s):  
Claudio Llosa Isenrich

Author(s):  
P. R. Jones

AbstractSeveral morphisms of this lattice V(CR) are found, leading to decompostions of it, and various sublattices, into subdirect products of interval sublattices. For example the map V → V ∪ G (where G is the variety of groups) is shown to be a retraction of V(CR); from modularity of the lattice V(BG) of varieties of bands of groups it follows that the map V → (V ∪ V V G) is an isomorphism of V(BG).


2001 ◽  
Vol 26 (9) ◽  
pp. 539-545
Author(s):  
P. Mukhopadhyay

Bandelt and Petrich (1982) proved that an inversive semiringSis a subdirect product of a distributive lattice and a ring if and only ifSsatisfies certain conditions. The aim of this paper is to obtain a generalized version of this result. The main purpose of this paper however, is to investigate, what new necessary and sufficient conditions need we impose on an inversive semiring, so that, in its aforesaid representation as a subdirect product, the “ring” involved can be gradually enriched to a “field.” Finally, we provide a construction of fullE-inversive semirings, which are subdirect products of a semilattice and a ring.


1996 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 1389-1407 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Oyonarte ◽  
B. Torrecillas

1982 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 155-171 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hans-J. Bandelt ◽  
Mario Petrich

Rings and distributive lattices can both be considered as semirings with commutative regular addition. Within this framework we can consider subdirect products of rings and distributive lattices. We may also require that the semirings with these restrictions are regarded as algebras with two binary operations and the unary operation of additive inversion (within the additive subgroup of the semiring). We can also consider distributive lattices with the two binary operations and the identity mapping as the unary operation. This makes it possible to speak of the join of ring varieties and distributive lattices. We restrict the ring varieties in order that their join with distributive lattices consist only of subdirect products. In certain cases these subdirect products can be obtained via a general construction of semirings by means of rings and distributive lattices.


2013 ◽  
Vol 135 (4) ◽  
pp. 891-933 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin R. Bridson ◽  
James Howie ◽  
Charles F. Miller ◽  
Hamish Short

2007 ◽  
Vol 57 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ján Jakubík

AbstractThe notion of internal subdirect decomposition can be defined in each variety of algebras. In the present note we prove the validity of a cancellation rule concerning such decompositions for lattice ordered groups and for GMV-algebras. For the case of groups, this cancellation rule fails to be valid.


2010 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-19 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dessislava H. Kochloukova

2011 ◽  
Vol 343 (1) ◽  
pp. 160-172 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dessislava H. Kochloukova ◽  
Hamish Short

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document