Hybrid Cooling for Thermal-Electric Power Generation

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
John S. Maulbetsch
Keyword(s):  
Cooling System ◽  
Meteorological Data ◽  
Combined Cycle ◽  
Plant Performance ◽  
Design Parameters ◽  
Water Requirements ◽  
Cooling Systems ◽  
Capital Costs ◽  
Hybrid Cooling ◽  
Dry Cooling

Water use by power plant cooling systems has become a critical siting issue for new plants and the object of increasing pressure for modification or retrofit at existing plants. Wet cooling typically costs less and results in more efficient plant performance. Dry cooling, while costing more and imposing heat rate and capacity penalties on the plant, conserves significant amounts of water and eliminates any concerns regarding thermal discharge to or intake losses on local water bodies. Hybrid cooling systems have the potential of combining the advantages of both systems by reducing, although not eliminating, water requirements while incurring performance penalties that are less than those from all-dry systems. The costs, while greater than those for wet cooling, can be less than those for dry. This paper addresses parallel wet/dry systems combining direct dry cooling using a forced-draft air-cooled condenser (ACC) with closed-cycle wet cooling using a surface (shell-and-tube) steam condenser and a mechanical-draft, counterflow wet cooling tower as applied to coal-fired steam plants, gas-fired combined-cycle plants and nuclear plants. A brief summary of criteria used to identify situations where hybrid systems should be considered is given. A methodology for specifying and selecting a hybrid system is described along with the information and data requirements for sizing and estimating the capital costs and water requirements a specified plant at a specified site. The methodology incorporates critical plant and operating parameters into the analysis, such as plant monthly load profile, plant equipment design parameters for equipment related to the cooling system, e.g. steam turbine, condenser, wet or dry cooling system, wastewater treatment system. Site characteristics include a water budget or constraints, e.g. acre feet of water available for cooling on an annual basis as well as any monthly or seasonal “draw rate” constraints and meteorological data. The effect of economic parameters including cost of capital, power, water and chemicals for wastewater treating are reviewed. Finally some examples of selected systems at sites of varying meteorological characteristics are presented.

Economic Design of Hybrid Wet-Dry Cooling Systems

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. W. Card
Keyword(s):  
Power Plants ◽  
Cooling System ◽  
Combined Cycle ◽  
Weather Data ◽  
Net Generation ◽  
Steam Turbines ◽  
Cooling Systems ◽  
Hybrid Cooling ◽  
Seasonal Basis ◽  
Dry Cooling

A hybrid wet-dry cooling system can be designed for a large combined-cycle power plant. A well-designed hybrid cooling system will provide reasonable net generation year-round, while using substantially less water than a conventional wet cooling tower. The optimum design for the hybrid system depends upon climate at the site, the price of power, and the price of water. These factors vary on a seasonal basis. Two hypothetical power plants are modeled, using state-of-the-art steam turbines and hybrid cooling systems. The plants are designed for water-constrained sites incorporating typical weather data, power prices, and water prices. The principles for economic designs of hybrid cooling systems are demonstrated.

scholarly journals Studying the Reduction of Water Use in Integrated Solar Combined-Cycle Plants

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (7) ◽  
pp. 2085 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fontina Petrakopoulou ◽  
Marina Olmeda-Delgado
Keyword(s):  
Water Consumption ◽  
Power Plants ◽  
High Efficiency ◽  
Cooling System ◽  
Combined Cycle ◽  
Special Focus ◽  
Cooling Systems ◽  
Cooling Fluid ◽  
Hybrid Cooling ◽  
Dry Cooling

With vast amounts of water consumed for electricity generation and water scarcity predicted to rise in the near future, the necessity to evaluate water consumption in power plants arises. Cooling systems are the main source of water consumption in thermoelectric power plants, since water is a cooling fluid with relatively low cost and high efficiency. This study evaluates the performance of two types of power plants: a natural gas combined-cycle and an integrated solar combined-cycle. Special focus is made on the cooling system used in the plants and its characteristics, such as water consumption, related costs, and fuel requirements. Wet, dry, and hybrid cooling systems are studied for each of the power plants. While water is used as the cooling fluid to condense the steam in wet cooling, dry cooling uses air circulated by a fan. Hybrid cooling presents an alternative that combines both methods. We find that hybrid cooling has the highest investment costs as it bears the sum of the costs of both wet and dry cooling systems. However, this system produces considerable fuel savings when compared to dry cooling, and a 50% reduction in water consumption when compared to wet cooling. As expected, the wet cooling system has the highest exergetic efficiency, of 1 and 5 percentage points above that of dry cooling in the conventional combined-cycle and integrated solar combined-cycle, respectively, thus representing the lowest investment cost and highest water consumption among the three alternatives. Hybrid and dry cooling systems may be considered viable alternatives under increasing water costs, requiring better enforcement of the measures for sustainable water consumption in the energy sector.

Performance Enhancement of Solar Air Conditioners Using Hybrid Heat Rejection System

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abdul Ahad Iqbal ◽  
Ali Al-Alili
Keyword(s):  
Air Conditioning ◽  
Cooling System ◽  
Vapor Compression ◽  
Summer Period ◽  
Cooling Systems ◽  
Hybrid Cooling ◽  
Vapor Compression Cooling ◽  
Air Conditioning Systems ◽  
Sorption Systems ◽  
Dry Cooling

Abstract The performance of air conditioning systems is highly dependent on the environmental conditions of the high pressure side, where heat is rejected to the environment. Air conditioning systems utilize dry cooling systems which often don’t provide adequate cooling during peak cooling periods, or wet cooling systems which consume a lot of water. In this study, a novel hybrid cooling system that can provide both wet and dry cooling was modelled in TRNSYS, and used to provide cooling to closed sorption air conditioning systems. The performance of these systems with the hybrid cooling system was compared to the performance of a standard vapor compression cooling system being cooled by a dry cooling system. The COPsol of the vapor compression cooling system exhibited a decrease of almost 26% during the summer period, whereas the COPsol of the sorption systems increased by around 30%. Similarly, the cooling capacity of the vapor compression cooling system dropped by almost 5%, and for the sorption systems, it increased by around 20% during the summer period.

Towards a Technoeconomic Framework for Estimating Cost-Performance Tradeoffs for Power Plants Incorporating Transformative Dry-Cooling Technologies

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Geoffrey Short ◽  
Addison K. Stark ◽  
Daniel Matuszak ◽  
James F. Klausner
Keyword(s):  
Heat Transfer ◽  
Power Plant ◽  
Fresh Water ◽  
Power Plants ◽  
Cooling System ◽  
Combined Cycle ◽  
Cooling Systems ◽  
Natural Gas Combined Cycle ◽  
Evaporative Cooling System ◽  
Dry Cooling

Fresh water withdrawal for thermoelectric power generation in the U.S. is approximately 139 billion gallons per day (BGD), or 41% of total fresh water draw, making it the largest single use of fresh water in the U.S. Of the fresh water withdrawn for the power generation sector, 4.3 BGD is dissipated to the atmosphere by cooling towers and spray ponds. Dry-cooled power plants are attractive and sometimes necessary because they avoid significant withdrawal and consumption of freshwater resources that could otherwise be used for other purposes. This could become even more important when considering the potential effects of climate change (1). Additional benefits of dry-cooling include power plant site flexibility, reduced risk of water scarcity, and faster permitting (reducing project development time and cost). However, dry-cooling systems are known to be more costly and larger than their wet-cooling counterparts. Additionally, without the benefit of additional latent heat transfer through evaporation, the Rankine cycle condensing (cold) temperature for dry-cooling is typically higher than that for wet-cooling, affecting the efficiency of power production and the resultant levelized cost of electricity (LCOE). The Advanced Research Projects Agency - Energy (ARPA-E) has developed a technoeconomic analysis (TEA) model for the development of indirect dry-cooling systems employing steam condensation within a natural gas combined cycle power plant. The TEA model has been used to inform the Advanced Research in Dry-Cooling (ARID) Program on the performance metrics needed to achieve an economical dry-cooling technology. In order to assess the relationship between air-cooled heat exchanger (ACHX) performance, including air side heat transfer coefficient and pressure drop, and power plant economics, ARPA-E has employed a modified version of the National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL) model of a 550 MW natural gas combined cycle (NGCC) plant employing an evaporative cooling system. The evaporative cooling system, including associated balance of system costs, was replaced with a thermodynamic model for an ACHX with the desired improved heat transfer performance and supplemental cooling and storage systems. Monte Carlo simulation determined an optimal ACHX geometry and associated ACHX cost. Allowing for an increase in LCOE of 5%, the maximum allowable additional cost of the supplemental cooling system was determined as a function of the degree of cooling of the working fluid required. This paper describes the methodologies employed in the TEA, details the results, and includes related models as supplemental material, while providing insight on how the open source tool might be used for thermal management innovation.

Cost/Performance Comparisons of Water Conserving Power Plant Cooling Systems

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
John S. Maulbetsch
Keyword(s):  
Combined Cycle ◽  
Operating Costs ◽  
Large Reduction ◽  
Cooling Systems ◽  
Cost Performance ◽  
Direct System ◽  
Hybrid Cooling ◽  
Combined Cycle Plant ◽  
Power Plant Cooling ◽  
Dry Cooling

This paper documents the results of a study of alternative cooling systems for electric power generating plants to understand the tradeoffs between wet, dry and hybrid cooling technologies. Results are presented through case studies of a 500 MW coal plant, a 600 MW nuclear plant and a 500 MW gas-fired combined-cycle plant, each at five different sites. Alternative cooling systems are configured and optimized for each site. For optimized designs under nearly all conditions, wet cooling systems are not only the least expensive but result in the highest plant output and efficiency. For both all-dry and hybrid systems, the system using indirect dry cooling has higher capital and operating costs than one using the direct system. The use of either dry or hybrid cooling can result in a large reduction in the amount of water used by a plant. The savings cost approximately $7 to $10 million per year for plants of the specified size, depending on the plant and site implying a breakeven water cost of $3 to $6 per thousand gallons.

Perimeter Cooling Unit and Localized Row-Based Cooling Unit Transient Air Flow Effects Modeling and Characterization in Data Centers

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tianyi Gao ◽  
James Geer ◽  
Bahgat G. Sammakia ◽  
Russell Tipton ◽  
Mark Seymour
Keyword(s):  
Thermal Management ◽  
Data Center ◽  
Data Centers ◽  
Cooling System ◽  
Air Flow ◽  
Cooling Systems ◽  
Dynamic Thermal Management ◽  
Hybrid Cooling ◽  
Cooling Unit ◽  
Cooling Air

Cooling power constitutes a large portion of the total electrical power consumption in data centers. Approximately 25%∼40% of the electricity used within a production data center is consumed by the cooling system. Improving the cooling energy efficiency has attracted a great deal of research attention. Many strategies have been proposed for cutting the data center energy costs. One of the effective strategies for increasing the cooling efficiency is using dynamic thermal management. Another effective strategy is placing cooling devices (heat exchangers) closer to the source of heat. This is the basic design principle of many hybrid cooling systems and liquid cooling systems for data centers. Dynamic thermal management of data centers is a huge challenge, due to the fact that data centers are operated under complex dynamic conditions, even during normal operating conditions. In addition, hybrid cooling systems for data centers introduce additional localized cooling devices, such as in row cooling units and overhead coolers, which significantly increase the complexity of dynamic thermal management. Therefore, it is of paramount importance to characterize the dynamic responses of data centers under variations from different cooling units, such as cooling air flow rate variations. In this study, a detailed computational analysis of an in row cooler based hybrid cooled data center is conducted using a commercially available computational fluid dynamics (CFD) code. A representative CFD model for a raised floor data center with cold aisle-hot aisle arrangement fashion is developed. The hybrid cooling system is designed using perimeter CRAH units and localized in row cooling units. The CRAH unit supplies centralized cooling air to the under floor plenum, and the cooling air enters the cold aisle through perforated tiles. The in row cooling unit is located on the raised floor between the server racks. It supplies the cooling air directly to the cold aisle, and intakes hot air from the back of the racks (hot aisle). Therefore, two different cooling air sources are supplied to the cold aisle, but the ways they are delivered to the cold aisle are different. Several modeling cases are designed to study the transient effects of variations in the flow rates of the two cooling air sources. The server power and the cooling air flow variation combination scenarios are also modeled and studied. The detailed impacts of each modeling case on the rack inlet air temperature and cold aisle air flow distribution are studied. The results presented in this work provide an understanding of the effects of air flow variations on the thermal performance of data centers. The results and corresponding analysis is used for improving the running efficiency of this type of raised floor hybrid data centers using CRAH and IRC units.

Inlet Air Cooling Applied to Combined Cycle Power Plants: Influence of Site Climate and Thermal Storage Systems

2008 ◽  
Vol 130 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicola Palestra ◽  
Giovanna Barigozzi ◽  
Antonio Perdichizzi
Keyword(s):  
Power Output ◽  
Parametric Analysis ◽  
Power Plants ◽  
Cooling System ◽  
Thermal Storage ◽  
Combined Cycle ◽  
Operating Conditions ◽  
Air Cooling ◽  
Ambient Conditions ◽  
Cooling Systems

The paper presents the results of an investigation on inlet air cooling systems based on cool thermal storage, applied to combined cycle power plants. Such systems provide a significant increase of electric energy production in the peak hours; the charge of the cool thermal storage is performed instead during the night time. The inlet air cooling system also allows the plant to reduce power output dependence on ambient conditions. A 127MW combined cycle power plant operating in the Italian scenario is the object of this investigation. Two different technologies for cool thermal storage have been considered: ice harvester and stratified chilled water. To evaluate the performance of the combined cycle under different operating conditions, inlet cooling systems have been simulated with an in-house developed computational code. An economical analysis has been then performed. Different plant location sites have been considered, with the purpose to weigh up the influence of climatic conditions. Finally, a parametric analysis has been carried out in order to investigate how a variation of the thermal storage size affects the combined cycle performances and the investment profitability. It was found that both cool thermal storage technologies considered perform similarly in terms of gross extra production of energy. Despite this, the ice harvester shows higher parasitic load due to chillers consumptions. Warmer climates of the plant site resulted in a greater increase in the amount of operational hours than power output augmentation; investment profitability is different as well. Results of parametric analysis showed how important the size of inlet cooling storage may be for economical results.

Performance Analysis With Future Predictions of Different Solar Cooling Systems in Guayaquil, Ecuador

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlos Naranjo-Mendoza ◽  
Jesús López-Villada ◽  
Gabriel Gaona ◽  
Jerko Labus
Keyword(s):  
Flow Rate ◽  
Cooling System ◽  
Meteorological Data ◽  
Cooling Systems ◽  
Great Opportunity ◽  
Constant Flow Rate ◽  
Solar Cooling ◽  
Average Annual Temperature ◽  
System Configurations

This paper presents a comparative analysis of three different solar cooling system configurations developed for a case study building in Guayaquil, Ecuador. Guayaquil is a city located at the Ecuadorian coast with an average annual temperature of 25°C. The city’s need for air conditioning throughout the year and the relatively intense solar radiation provide a great opportunity for implementation of solar cooling systems. The first cooling system includes a 175 kWc single-effect absorption chiller powered by evacuated tubes solar thermal collectors. This system was compared with two 140 kWc compression chiller systems (air-cooled (AC) and water-cooled (WC)) powered by grid-connected photovoltaics. Both constant flow rate (CFR) and variable flow rate (VFR) of chilled water were analyzed. The three systems have to satisfy a cooling demand of the top floor in one governmental building (app. 1296 m2) which was selected as case study. Additionally, two 140 kWc conventional compression chiller systems (AC and WC) were included in the comparison as reference systems. Cooling demand of the building was simulated in EnergyPlus and coupled with the appropriate system configurations developed in TRNSYS. The weather file (TMY) was developed based on real meteorological data collected in the last decade. The present analysis was extended with the prediction scenarios for the years 2020, 2050 and 2080 using climate change adapted weather files.

Advanced Bottoming Cycle Optimisation for Large Alstom CCPP

2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Vollmer ◽  
Camille Pedretti ◽  
Alexander Ni ◽  
Manfred Wirsum
Keyword(s):  
Power Plant ◽  
Gas Turbines ◽  
Process Model ◽  
Combined Cycle ◽  
Plant Performance ◽  
Design Parameters ◽  
Economic Plant ◽  
Plant Design ◽  
Investment Cost ◽  
Definition Of

This paper presents the fundamentals of an evolutionary, thermo-economic plant design methodology, which enables an improved and customer-focused optimization of the bottoming cycle of a large Combined Cycle Power Plant. The new methodology focuses on the conceptual design of the CCPP applicable to the product development and the pre-acquisition phase. After the definition of the overall plant configuration such as the number of gas turbines used, the type of main cooling system and the related fix investment cost, the CCPP is optimized towards any criteria available in the process model (e.g. lowest COE, maximum NPV/IRR, highest net efficiency). In view of the fact that the optimization is performed on a global plant level with a simultaneous hot- and cold- end optimization, the results clearly show the dependency of the HRSG steam parameters and the related steam turbine configuration on the definition of the cold end (Air Cooled Condenser instead of Direct Cooling). Furthermore, competing methods for feedwater preheating (HRSG recirculation, condensate preheating or pegging steam), different HRSG heat exchanger arrangements as well as applicable portfolio components are automatically evaluated and finally selected. The developed process model is based on a fixed superstructure and copes with the full complexity of today’s bottoming cycle configurations as well with any constraints and design rules existing in practice. It includes a variety of component modules that are prescribed with their performance characteristics, design limitations and individual cost. More than 100 parameters are used to directly calculate the overall plant performance and related investment cost. Further definitions on payment schedule, construction time, operation regime and consumable cost results in a full economic life cycle calculation of the CCPP. For the overall optimization the process model is coupled to an evolutionary optimizer, whereas around 60 design parameters are used within predefined bounds. Within a single optimization run more than 100’000 bottoming cycle configurations are calculated in order to find the targeted optimum and thanks to today’s massive parallel computing resources, the solution can be found over night. Due to the direct formulation of the process model, the best cycle configuration is a result provided by the optimizer and can be based on a single-, dual or triple pressure system using non-reheat, reheat or double reheat configuration. This methodology enables to analyze also existing limitations and characteristics of the key components in the process model and assists to initiate new developments in order to constantly increase the value for power plant customers.

Maximizing Plant Power Output Using Dry Cooling System

2004 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ram Chandran
Keyword(s):  
Power Output ◽  
Cooling System ◽  
Combined Cycle ◽  
Ambient Temperatures ◽  
Turbine Efficiency ◽  
The Cost ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Lower Plant ◽  
Plant Power ◽  
Dry Cooling

As the power industry is deregulated, the cost of power plays a major role in obtaining long-term Power Purchase agreements. More and more plants, now, are developed with Dry Cooling System for condensing steam from the steam turbine of combined cycle plants or coal-fired plants. However, Dry Cooling has become synonymous with lower plant output. This paper presents solutions to dispel that myth. 1. Options available for control of the air-cooled system, their initial cost and the impact on minimizing internal power consumption and maximizing plant power output. 2. The air-cooled condenser operates normally at high turbine exhaust pressures during high ambient temperatures. The high backpressure results in lower turbine efficiency and lower plant output. Various options available are presented to combat this deficiency to maximize power output.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document