Gender Comparisons between Unilateral and Bilateral Landings

2010 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 444-453 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joshua T. Weinhandl ◽  
Mukta Joshi ◽  
Kristian M. O’Connor
Keyword(s):  
Gender Differences ◽  
Energy Absorption ◽  
Injury Risk ◽  
Sagittal Plane ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Knee Kinematics ◽  
Injury Rate ◽  
Drop Height ◽  
Recreational Athletes ◽  
Kinetics Of

The increased number of women participating in sports has led to a higher knee injury rate in women compared with men. Among these injuries, those occurring to the ACL are commonly observed during landing maneuvers. The purpose of this study was to determine gender differences in landing strategies during unilateral and bilateral landings. Sixteen male and 17 female recreational athletes were recruited to perform unilateral and bilateral landings from a raised platform, scaled to match their individual jumping abilities. Three-dimensional kinematics and kinetics of the dominant leg were calculated during the landing phase and reported as initial ground contact angle, ranges of motion (ROM) and peak moments. Lower extremity energy absorption was also calculated for the duration of the landing phase. Results showed that gender differences were only observed in sagittal plane hip and knee ROM, potentially due to the use of a relative drop height versus the commonly used absolute drop height. Unilateral landings were characterized by significant differences in hip and knee kinematics that have been linked to increased injury risk and would best be classified as “stiff” landings. The ankle musculature was used more for impact absorption during unilateral landing, which required increased joint extension at touchdown and may increase injury risk during an unbalanced landing. In addition, there was only an 11% increase in total energy absorption during unilateral landings, suggesting that there was a substantial amount of passive energy transfer during unilateral landings.

Sagittal plane kinematics and kinetics of the pastern joint during the stance phase of the trot

2002 ◽  
Vol 15 (01) ◽  
pp. 15-17 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. H. Singleton ◽  
J. L. Lanovaz ◽  
Marta Prades ◽  
Hilary M. Clayton
Keyword(s):  
Energy Absorption ◽  
Stance Phase ◽  
Sagittal Plane ◽  
Joint Moments ◽  
Maximal Extension ◽  
Peak Energy ◽  
Force Data ◽  
Kinetics Of ◽  
Kinematics And Kinetics ◽  
Palmar Aspect

SummaryThe objectives were to measure sagittal plane kinematics and kinetics of the forelimb pastern joint during the stance phase at the trot. Sagittal plane video (200 Hz) and force (1,000 Hz) recordings were analyzed from four trials of six sound horses trotting in hand. Kinematic and force data were used to calculate net joint moments and joint powers. The pastern joint showed maximal flexion (155.3 ± 11.0°) at 34% stance and maximal extension (190.2 ± 3.8°) at 93% stance. Energy was absorbed on the palmar aspect throughout stance, with peak energy absorption occurring in the second half of the stance. It was concluded that the primary function of the pastern joint was to act as an energy damper.

Ankle Dorsiflexion Displacement During Landing is Associated With Initial Contact Kinematics but not Joint Displacement

2015 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. 205-210 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca L. Begalle ◽  
Meghan C. Walsh ◽  
Melanie L. McGrath ◽  
Michelle C. Boling ◽  
J. Troy Blackburn ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Injury Risk ◽  
Sagittal Plane ◽  
Plantar Flexion ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Contact Angles ◽  
Ankle Dorsiflexion ◽  
Lower Extremity Injury ◽  
Initial Contact ◽  
Joint Displacement ◽  
Jump Landings

The ankle, knee, and hip joints work together in the sagittal plane to absorb landing forces. Reduced sagittal plane motion at the ankle may alter landing strategies at the knee and hip, potentially increasing injury risk; however, no studies have examined the kinematic relationships between the joints during jump landings. Healthy adults (N = 30; 15 male, 15 female) performed jump landings onto a force plate while three-dimensional kinematic data were collected. Joint displacement values were calculated during the loading phase as the difference between peak and initial contact angles. No relationship existed between ankle dorsiflexion displacement during landing and three-dimensional knee and hip displacements. However, less ankle dorsiflexion displacement was associated with landing at initial ground contact with larger hip flexion, hip internal rotation, knee flexion, knee varus, and smaller plantar flexion angles. Findings of the current study suggest that restrictions in ankle motion during landing may contribute to contacting the ground in a more flexed position but continuing through little additional motion to absorb the landing. Transverse plane hip and frontal plane knee positioning may also occur, which are known to increase the risk of lower extremity injury.

Lower Extremity Biomechanical Demands During Saut de Chat Leaps

2016 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. 211-217 ◽  
Author(s):  
Danielle N Jarvis ◽  
Kornelia Kulig
Keyword(s):  
Lower Extremity ◽  
Sagittal Plane ◽  
Reaction Force ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Vertical Force ◽  
Dance Training ◽  
Chronic Injuries ◽  
Analysis System ◽  
Kinetics Of ◽  
Kinematics And Kinetics

In dance, high demands are placed on the lower extremity joints during jumping tasks. The purpose of this study was to compare biomechanical demands placed on the lower extremity joints during the takeoff and landing phases of saut de chat leaps. METHODS: Thirty healthy, experienced dancers with 20.8±4.9 yrs of dance training performed 5 saut de chat leaps. A three-dimensional motion analysis system and force plates were used to collect kinematic and kinetic data. Ground reaction force (GRF) peaks and impulse and sagittal plane kinematics and kinetics of the hip, knee, ankle, and metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joints were calculated for the takeoff and landing phases of each leap. RESULTS: Saut de chat takeoffs demonstrated greater braking GRF impulse (p<0.001), while landings demonstrated greater peak vertical GRF (p<0.001). During takeoff, greater kinetic demands were placed on the MTP (p<0.001) and ankle (p<0.001) joints, while during landing greater kinetic demands were placed on the hip (p=0.037) joint. CONCLUSIONS: Both the takeoff and landing phases of saut de chat leaps place significant demands on a dancer’s body. Takeoff involves greater demands on the more distal joints and requires more braking forces, while the landing phase involves greater demands on the more proximal joints of the lower extremity and requires the dancer to absorb more vertical force. These demands, combined with extensive repetition of movements during training, may contribute to the high number of chronic injuries seen in dance.

scholarly journals Lower Extremity Energy Absorption and Biomechanics During Landing, Part I: Sagittal-Plane Energy Absorption Analyses

2013 ◽  
Vol 48 (6) ◽  
pp. 748-756 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marc F. Norcross ◽  
Michael D. Lewek ◽  
Darin A. Padua ◽  
Sandra J. Shultz ◽  
Paul S. Weinhold ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Energy Absorption ◽  
Injury Risk ◽  
Sagittal Plane ◽  
Frontal Plane ◽  
Acl Injury ◽  
Knee Extension ◽  
Landing Biomechanics ◽  
Anterior Tibial ◽  
Acl Injury Risk ◽  
Risk Potential

Context: Eccentric muscle actions of the lower extremity absorb kinetic energy during landing. Greater total sagittal-plane energy absorption (EA) during the initial impact phase (INI) of landing has been associated with landing biomechanics considered high risk for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury. We do not know whether groups with different INI EA magnitudes exhibit meaningful differences in ACL-related landing biomechanics and whether INI EA might be useful to identify ACL injury-risk potential. Objective: To compare biomechanical factors associated with noncontact ACL injury among sagittal-plane INI EA groups and to determine whether an association exists between sex and sagittal-plane INI EA group assignment to evaluate the face validity of using sagittal-plane INI EA to identify ACL injury risk. Design: Descriptive laboratory study. Setting: Research laboratory. Patients or Other Participants: A total of 82 (41 men, 41 women; age = 21.0 ± 2.4 years, height = 1.74 ± 0.10 m, mass = 70.3 ± 16.1 kg) healthy, physically active individuals volunteered. Intervention(s): We assessed landing biomechanics using an electromagnetic motion-capture system and force plate during a double-legged jump-landing task. Main Outcome Measure(s): Total INI EA was used to group participants into high, moderate, and low tertiles. Sagittal- and frontal-plane knee kinematics; peak vertical and posterior ground reaction forces (GRFs); anterior tibial shear force; and internal hip extension, knee extension, and knee varus moments were identified and compared across groups using 1-way analyses of variance. We used a χ2 analysis to compare male and female representation in the high and low groups. Results: The high group exhibited greater knee-extension moment and posterior GRFs than both the moderate (P &lt; .05) and low (P &lt; .05) groups and greater anterior tibial shear force than the low group (P &lt; .05). No other group differences were noted. Women were not represented more than men in the high group (χ2 = 1.20, P = .27). Conclusions: Greater sagittal-plane INI EA likely indicates greater ACL loading, but it does not appear to influence frontal-plane biomechanics related to ACL injury. Women were not more likely than men to demonstrate greater INI EA, suggesting that quantification of sagittal-plane INI EA alone is not sufficient to infer ACL injury-risk potential.

scholarly journals Sex Differences in Frontal and Transverse Plane Hip and Knee Kinematics During the Modified Star Excursion Balance Test

2017 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Brad W. Willis ◽  
Swithin Razu ◽  
Kelli Baggett ◽  
Amirhossein Jahandar ◽  
Aaron D. Gray ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sex Differences ◽  
Injury Risk ◽  
Sagittal Plane ◽  
Knee Kinematics ◽  
Predictive Ability ◽  
Neuromuscular Control ◽  
Transverse Plane ◽  
Lower Extremity Injury ◽  
Balance Test ◽  
Star Excursion Balance Test

AbstractPurpose. The modified Star Excursion Balance Test (mSEBT) assesses dynamic neuromuscular control, with predictive ability regarding lower extremity injury risk. Previous kinematic mSEBT analyses are limited to sex differences between injured or fatigued populations or non-fatigued groups in the sagittal plane only. We hypothesize that sex differences exist in the frontal and transverse plane kinematics of the hip and knee in healthy, non-fatigued subjects during the mSEBT. Methods. The descriptive laboratory study involved 38 healthy subjects: 20 males (aged 24.8 ± 2.7 years) and 18 females (24.1 ± 3.7 years). Peak kinematics, obtained by a VICON

scholarly journals Contribution of Lower Extremity Joints on Energy Absorption during Soft Landing

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (10) ◽  
pp. 5130
Author(s):  
Akihiro Tamura ◽  
Kiyokazu Akasaka ◽  
Takahiro Otsudo
Keyword(s):  
Lower Extremity ◽  
Energy Absorption ◽  
Sagittal Plane ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Mechanical Work ◽  
Knee Extensors ◽  
Soft Landing ◽  
Lower Extremity Injuries ◽  
Negative Effect ◽  
Extremity Injuries

Soft landing after jumping is associated with the prevention of lower extremity injuries during sports activities in terms of the energy absorption mechanisms. In this study, the contribution of lower extremity joints during soft landing was investigated. Subjects comprised 20 healthy females. Kinetics and kinematics data were obtained during drop vertical jumps using a three-dimensional motion analysis system. Negative mechanical work values in the lower extremity joints were calculated during landing. A multiple regression analysis was performed to determine which lower extremity joints contributed more in achieving soft landing. The means of mechanical work of the hip, knee, and ankle in the sagittal plane were −0.30 ± 0.17, −0.62 ± 0.31, and −1.03 ± 0.22 J/kg, respectively. Results showed that negative mechanical work in the hip and knee is effective in achieving soft landing. These findings indicate that energy absorption in the hip and knee joints might be an important factor in achieving soft landing, whereas that in the ankle has a negative effect. Therefore, when improving soft landing techniques, we should consider energy absorption in the hip and knee via eccentric activation of the hip and knee extensors during landing.

scholarly journals Knee Kinematics During Landing: Is It Really a Predictor of Acute Noncontact Knee Injuries in Athletes? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (12) ◽  
pp. 232596712096695
Author(s):  
Natalia Romero-Franco ◽  
María del Carmen Ortego-Mate ◽  
Jesús Molina-Mula
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Sagittal Plane ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Knee Injuries ◽  
Knee Kinematics ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Biomechanical Evaluation ◽  
Kinetics Of ◽  
Kinematics And Kinetics

Background: Although knee kinematics during landing tasks has traditionally been considered to predict noncontact knee injuries, the predictive association between noncontact knee injuries and kinematic and kinetic variables remains unclear. Purpose: To systematically review the association between kinematic and kinetic variables from biomechanical evaluation during landing tasks and subsequent acute noncontact knee injuries in athletes. Study Design: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 2. Methods: Databases used for searches were MEDLINE, LILACS, IBECS, CINAHL, SPORTDiscus, SCIELO, IME, ScienceDirect, and Cochrane from database inception to May 2020. Manual reference checks, articles published online ahead of print, and citation tracking were also considered. Eligibility criteria included prospective studies evaluating frontal and sagittal plane kinematics and kinetics of landing tasks and their association with subsequent acute noncontact knee injuries in athletes. Results: A total of 13 studies met the eligibility criteria, capturing 333 acute noncontact knee injuries in 8689 participants. A meta-analysis revealed no significant effects for any kinematic and kinetic variable with regard to subsequent noncontact knee injuries. Conclusion: No kinetic or kinematic variables from landing tasks had a significant association with acute noncontact knee injuries. Therefore, the role and application of the landing assessment for predicting acute noncontact knee injuries are limited and unclear, particularly given the heterogeneity and risk of bias of studies to date.

scholarly journals A Novel Pseudomonas geniculata AGE Family Epimerase/Isomerase and Its Application in d-Mannose Synthesis

Foods ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (12) ◽  
pp. 1809
Author(s):  
Zhanzhi Liu ◽  
Ying Li ◽  
Jing Wu ◽  
Sheng Chen
Keyword(s):  
3D Structure ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Optimal Temperature ◽  
Reaction Conditions ◽  
Enzymatic Production ◽  
Physiological Properties ◽  
Potential Applications ◽  
Kinetics Of ◽  
Optimal Reaction ◽  
Gene Age

d-mannose has exhibited excellent physiological properties in the food, pharmaceutical, and feed industries. Therefore, emerging attention has been applied to enzymatic production of d-mannose due to its advantage over chemical synthesis. The gene age of N-acetyl-d-glucosamine 2-epimerase family epimerase/isomerase (AGEase) derived from Pseudomonas geniculata was amplified, and the recombinant P. geniculata AGEase was characterized. The optimal temperature and pH of P. geniculata AGEase were 60 °C and 7.5, respectively. The Km, kcat, and kcat/Km of P. geniculata AGEase for d-mannose were 49.2 ± 8.5 mM, 476.3 ± 4.0 s−1, and 9.7 ± 0.5 s−1·mM−1, respectively. The recombinant P. geniculata AGEase was classified into the YihS enzyme subfamily in the AGE enzyme family by analyzing its substrate specificity and active center of the three-dimensional (3D) structure. Further studies on the kinetics of different substrates showed that the P. geniculata AGEase belongs to the d-mannose isomerase of the YihS enzyme. The P. geniculata AGEase catalyzed the synthesis of d-mannose with d-fructose as a substrate, and the conversion rate was as high as 39.3% with the d-mannose yield of 78.6 g·L−1 under optimal reaction conditions of 200 g·L−1d-fructose and 2.5 U·mL−1P. geniculata AGEase. This novel P. geniculata AGEase has potential applications in the industrial production of d-mannose.

Numerical and experimental investigation for enhancing the energy absorption capacity of the novel three-dimensional printed sandwich structures

2021 ◽  
pp. 146442072199749
Author(s):  
H Geramizadeh ◽  
S Dariushi ◽  
S Jedari Salami
Keyword(s):  
Energy Absorption ◽  
Sandwich Structures ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Absorption Capacity ◽  
The Novel ◽  
Energy Absorption Capacity ◽  
Fused Deposition ◽  
Honeycomb Sandwich ◽  
Out Of Plane ◽  
Vertical Walls

The current study focuses on designing the optimal three-dimensional printed sandwich structures. The main goal is to improve the energy absorption capacity of the out-of-plane honeycomb sandwich beam. The novel Beta VI and Alpha VI were designed in order to achieve this aim. In the Beta VI, the connecting curves (splines) were used instead of the four diagonal walls, while the two vertical walls remained unchanged. The Alpha VI is a step forward on the Beta VI, which was promoted by filleting all angles among the vertical walls, created arcs, and face sheets. The two offered sandwich structures have not hitherto been provided in the literature. All models were designed and simulated by the CATIA and ABAQUS, respectively. The three-dimensional printer fabricated the samples by fused deposition modeling technique. The material properties were determined under tensile, compression, and three-point bending tests. The results are carried out by two methods based on experimental tests and finite element analyses that confirmed each other. The achievements provide novel insights into the determination of the adequate number of unit cells and demonstrate the energy absorption capacity of the Beta VI and Alpha VI are 23.7% and 53.9%, respectively, higher than the out-of-plane honeycomb sandwich structures.

INTRA-SESSION RELIABILITY AND REPEATABILITY OF KNEE KINEMATICS IN SUBJECTS WITH ACL DEFICIENCY DURING STAIR ASCENT

2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (06) ◽  
pp. 1750092
Author(s):  
MARYAM HAJIZADEH ◽  
ALIREZA HASHEMI OSKOUEI ◽  
FARZAN GHALICHI ◽  
GISELA SOLE
Keyword(s):  
Knee Joint ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Force Plate ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Knee Kinematics ◽  
Compensatory Mechanisms ◽  
Joint Rotation ◽  
Stair Ascent ◽  
Acl Deficient

Analysis of knee kinematics and ground reaction forces (GRFs) is widely used to determine compensatory mechanisms of people with anterior cruciate ligament deficiency (ACLD). However, the practicality of the measurements is subject to their reliability during different trials. This study aims to determine the reliability and repeatability of knee joint rotations and GRFs in people with ACLD during stair ascent. Eight participants with unilateral ACL-deficient knees performed five trials of stair ascent with each leg. The movements were captured by VICON motion analysis system, and GRF components were recorded using force plate. Three-dimensional tibiofemoral joint rotations were calculated. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), standard error of measurement (SEM) and coefficient of multiple correlation (CMC) were calculated ACL-deficient legs showed lower absolute reliability during swing ([Formula: see text]–6.4) than stance phase ([Formula: see text]–2.2) for knee joint rotations. Moderate to high average measure ICCs (0.59–0.98), relative reliability, were achieved for injured and uninjured sides. The results also demonstrated high repeatability for the knee joint rotation ([Formula: see text]–0.97) and GRF ([Formula: see text]–0.99). The outcomes of this study confirmed the consistency and repeatability of the knee joint rotations and GRFs in ACL-deficient subjects. Additionally, ACL-deficient legs exhibited similar levels of reliability and repeatability compared to contralateral legs.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document