FLIPPING OR FLOPPING IN A GENERAL EDUCATION EARTH SCIENCE CLASS

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
David H. Voorhees ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 44 (2) ◽  
pp. 197-201 ◽  
Author(s):  
Curt Daniel Peterson ◽  
Linda Lee Anderson ◽  
William David Michtom

1950 ◽  
Vol 50 (3) ◽  
pp. 221-221
Author(s):  
Julius Sumner Miller

Author(s):  
Mark Ballora ◽  
Christopher Roman ◽  
Robert Pockalny ◽  
Karen Wishner

This paper describes preliminary investigations into how sonifications of scientific graphs are perceived by undergraduate students in an introductory course in oceanography at the University of Rhode Island. The goal is to gather data that can assist in gauging students’ levels of engagement with sonification as a component of science education. The results, while preliminary, show promise that sonified graphs improve understanding, especially when they are presented in combination with visual graphs.


1990 ◽  
Vol 105 ◽  
pp. 57-61
Author(s):  
S.B. Yorka

For many of us in the United States, the majority of our students are in descriptive astronomy classes. And since these classes typically satisfy general education or core curriculum requirements that must be completed by all students, the students can range from those genuinely interested in astronomy to those who are taking the class because “it sounded less boring” than other options available. Whichever end of that spectrum the students occupy, many of them approach astronomy with quite a bit of anxiety because it is a science class. In student lore, a science class is a class that is by definition more difficult — perhaps verging on the impossible — than other classes, one that discusses totally foreign things in an arcane language and, above all, is a class that has no connection with anything else in the curriculum, except maybe another science class.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document