scholarly journals Updated consensus statement on biological agents for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis and other immune mediated inflammatory diseases (May 2003)

2003 ◽  
Vol 62 (90002) ◽  
pp. 2ii-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
D E Furst
2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 871.2-871
Author(s):  
F. Araujo ◽  
N. Gonçalves ◽  
A. F. Mourão

Background:The outcomes of the infection by the SARS-CoV-2 in patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases were largely unknown during the early days of the COVID-19 pandemic. It was hypothesized that these patients were at higher risk of morbidity and mortality due to their inherent immune dysfunction and immunosuppressive therapy. Several rheumatology societies issued recommendations urging patients not to stop their anti-rheumatic treatments.Objectives:To assess treatment compliance of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) during the first wave of the SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19 pandemic in Portugal.Methods:The web-based survey COVIDRA (COVID in RA) was developed to assess the impact of the first wave mandatory confinement in patients with RA focusing on 5 domains: RA symptoms, attitudes towards medication, employment status, physical exercise and mental health. The questionnaire was sent to RA patients through e-mail and social media of the Portuguese Society of Rheumatology and two patient associations; and it was filled locally at two rheumatology centers in Lisbon. Recruitment took place during June and July 2020. Descriptive statistics were generated by the survey software and were afterwards transported and evaluated using appropriate biostatistics software.Results:We obtained 441 valid questionnaires. Most respondents were female (88.4%), caucasian (93.6%), with a mean age of 58 (+/-13) years. The majority (57.6%) had longstanding disease (>10 years) and were treated with csDMARDs (63.2%) and/or bDMARDs/tsDMARDS (23,7%). Only 14% (N=61) discontinued or reduced the dosage or frequency of their RA treatment. Most of these changes were previously planned by the attending physician (27.9%). Only 11 patients (18%) discontinued their immunosuppressive medication out of fear of becoming infected with SARS-CoV-2 (corresponding to 2.5% of total responders). Another 11 patients did so because they had no prescription, couldn’t go to the community/hospital pharmacy or couldn’t afford the medication. Although these numbers preclude any statistical analysis, when compared to patients who persisted on their treatment, those discontinuing due to fear of contagion were younger (56.4 vs 58.5 years), all female (100 vs 86.8%), with long-lasting disease (≥ 11 years) (90.9% vs 57.5%), more frequently treated with bDMARDs (36.4 vs 23.1%) and presenting more symptoms of depression (54.5 vs 49.7%).Conclusion:Most RA patients complied with their treatment during the first wave of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic in Portugal. Only a minority changed their immunosuppressive treatment due to fear of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Very similar rates of immunosuppressive discontinuation due to fear of contagion were reported by other authors (such as Schmeiser et al, Pineda-sic et al and Fragoulis et al).Disclosure of Interests:Filipe Araujo Speakers bureau: Pfizer, Biogen, Novartis, Menarini, Consultant of: MSD, Nuno Gonçalves: None declared, Ana Filipa Mourão: None declared.


2005 ◽  
Vol 54 (2) ◽  
pp. 191-202 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tsutomu Takeuchi ◽  
Kouichi Amano ◽  
Hideto Kameda ◽  
Toru Abe

2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 248-258 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fernando Magro ◽  
Rosa Coelho ◽  
Armando Peixoto

Immune-mediated inflammatory diseases share several pathogenic pathways and this pushes sometimes to extrapolate from one disease or indication to others. A biosimilar can be defined as a biotherapeutic product which is similar in terms of quality, safety, and efficacy to an already licensed reference biotherapeutic product. We review the substrate for extrapolation, the current approval process for biosimilars and the pioneering studies on biosimilars performed in rheumatoid arthritis patients. A biosimilar has the same amino acid sequence as its innovator product. However, post-translational modifications can occur and the current analytical techniques do not allow the final structure. To test the efficacy in one indication, a homogeneous population should be chosen and immunogenicity features are essential in switching and interchangeability. CT-P13 (Remsima™; Inflectra™) is a biosimilar of reference infliximab (Remicade®). It meets most of the requirements for extrapolation. Nevertheless, in inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) we need more studies to confirm the postulates of extrapolation from rheumatoid arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis to IBD. Furthermore, an effective pharmacovigilance schedule is mandatory to look for immunogenicity and side effects.


2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S625-S625
Author(s):  
D WARD ◽  
S Gørtz ◽  
N Nyboe Andersen ◽  
J Kirchgesner ◽  
T Jess

Abstract Background Tumour necrosis factor (TNF) has a central role in the pathophysiology of immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs) including rheumatoid arthritis, psoriasis, hidradenitis suppurativa, and inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). However, there have been case reports of patients receiving an anti-TNF therapy for one IMID subsequently developing a second IMID. We conducted a nationwide cohort study investigating the risk of incident IMID following anti-TNF exposure in patients with IBD in Denmark. Methods We followed patients with IBD from 1 January 2005 or date of IBD diagnosis (whichever occurred last) to an outcome event including incident diagnosis of hidradenitis suppurativa, arthropathic psoriasis, other forms of psoriasis, or rheumatoid arthritis; or emigration, death or 31 December 2018 (whichever occurred first). Patients were defined as exposed after a 3-month lag period from first anti-TNF infusion throughout follow-up, analogous to an intention-to-treat design. The lag period was censored from analyses to avoid including incipient IMIDs, unlikely to be caused by newly initiated anti-TNF treatment. We excluded patients initiating anti-TNF or with an outcome diagnosis before either 1 January 2005 or IBD diagnosis. We used Cox regression models with age as the underlying timescale, and sex, type of IBD (Crohn’s disease or ulcerative colitis), and calendar period of IBD diagnosis (in 5 year groups) as strata to estimate hazard ratios for each outcome, comparing anti-TNF users and non-users. Results Incidence rates (and 95% confidence intervals [CI]) as events per 100 000 person-years among anti-TNF users and non-users were, respectively, 138 (109–173) and 25.6 (22.0–29.7) for hidradenitis suppurativa, 26.3 (15.6–44.4) and 7.81 (5.95–10.2) for arthropathic psoriasis, 1177 (1085–1277) and 204 (121–189) for other forms of psoriasis, and 152 (121–189) and 95.6 (88.5–103) for rheumatoid arthritis. Hazard ratios (and 95% C.I.) were increased for hidradenitis suppurativa 2.91 (2.15–3.94), arthropathic psoriasis 2.62 (1.40–4.93), other forms of psoriasis 4.76 (4.27–5.31), and rheumatoid arthritis 2.35 (1.83–3.01). Conclusion The results indicate that patients with IBD receiving anti-TNF have an increased risk of IMIDs. An almost 5-fold increase in the risk of psoriasis is consistent with previous reports of psoriasiform skin lesions related to anti-TNF use. However, as more severe IBD is likely to be associated with both initiating anti-TNF and the incidence of other inflammatory diseases, the results are subject to confounding by indication. Thus, these results should be considered preliminary, and we plan to further address confounding by using propensity score methods.


2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. e001220
Author(s):  
Jianhua Wu ◽  
Sarah L Mackie ◽  
Mar Pujades-Rodriguez

IntroductionIn immune-mediated inflammatory diseases, there is a lack of -estimates of glucocorticoid dose–response diabetes risk that consider changes in prescribed dose over time and disease activity.Research design and methodsPopulation-based longitudinal analysis of electronic health records from the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink, linked to hospital admissions and the mortality registry (1998–2017). We included 100 722 adult patients without diabetes history, diagnosed with giant cell arteritis or polymyalgia rheumatica (n=32 593), inflammatory bowel disease (n=29 272), rheumatoid arthritis (n=28 365), vasculitis (n=6082), or systemic lupus erythematosus (n=4410). We estimated risks and HRs of type 2 diabetes associated with time-variant daily and total cumulative prednisolone-equivalent glucocorticoid dose using Cox regression methods.ResultsAverage patient age was 58.6 years, 65 469 (65.0%) were women and 8858 (22.6%) had a body mass index (BMI) ≥30 kg/m2. Overall, 8137 (8.1%) people developed type 2 diabetes after a median follow-up of 4.9 years. At 1 year, the cumulative risk of diabetes increased from 0.9% during periods of non-use to 5.0% when the daily prednisolone-equivalent dose was ≥25.0 mg. We found strong dose-dependent associations for all immune-mediated diseases, BMI levels and underlying disease duration, even after controlling for periods of active systemic inflammation. Adjusted HR for a <5.0 mg daily dose versus non-use was 1.90, 95% CI 1.44 to 2.50; range 1.70 for rheumatoid arthritis to 2.93 for inflammatory bowel disease.ConclusionsWe report dose-dependent risks of type 2 diabetes associated with glucocorticoid use for six common immune-mediated inflammatory diseases. These results underline the need for regular diabetic risk assessment and testing during glucocorticoid therapy in these patients.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document