scholarly journals Methods for the health technology assessment of complex interventions: a protocol for a scoping review

BMJ Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (11) ◽  
pp. e039263
Author(s):  
Abdolvahab Baghbanian ◽  
Tracy Merlin ◽  
Drew Carter ◽  
Shuhong Wang
Keyword(s):  
Health Technology Assessment ◽  
Scoping Review ◽  
Technology Assessment ◽  
Grey Literature ◽  
Relevant Literature ◽  
Secondary Analysis ◽  
Evaluation Criteria ◽  
Complex Interventions ◽  
Health Technology ◽  
Developed Countries

IntroductionIn healthcare policy and economic literature, research on the health technology assessment (HTA) of complex interventions (CIs) is becoming increasingly important. In many developed countries, HTA guides decision-making to help achieve greater value for money when funding health care. However, research has yet to identify the forms of evidence and evaluation criteria that should be used in the HTA of CIs. Previous research has established that the HTA of CIs requires multiple factors to be evaluated but there is no agreement on which factors ought always to be considered. There is equally little agreement on which forms of evidence ought to be collected or synthesised and how. We plan to perform a systematic scoping review in order to identify the range of evaluation criteria and types of evidence currently used in the HTA of CIs.Method and analysisThis protocol was developed to guide the methodological framework for the conduct of a scoping review on health technology assessment (HTA) of complex interventions (CIs), using the Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines and the six-stage framework proposed by Arksey and O’Malley, in addition to more recent innovations in scoping review methodology. A grey literature search will supplement the primary searches of seven electronic databases for studies available in English between January 2000 and August 2020. Two reviewers will independently screen all search results for inclusion and data will be extracted using a customised data extraction or charting form. Any dispute will be resolved by consensus or through arbitration by a third author. The mnemonic Population, Concept and Context will be adopted to establish criteria for selecting relevant literature, and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: Extension for Scoping Review will be used for reporting the results. Several explanatory-descriptive methods will be used for analysing the extracted data including frequency and trend analyses as well as reflexive thematic coding and analysis.Mapping evidence on the HTA of CIs will allow us to gain a better understanding of both established and emerging practices, including the information types, requirements, values and parameters that are incorporated in the HTA of CIs. We also expect the findings of the scoping review to help identify research gaps that will guide future studies. As healthcare becomes more complex in its delivery, it is timely to determine how these complex interventions should be assessed so that policy decisions can be made about whether implementation and public funding is warranted.Ethics and DisseminationThis scoping review will involve secondary analysis of already collected data, and thus, does not require ethics approval. The research findings will be submitted to peer-reviewed journals for publication and will also be disseminated at conferences and seminars.

scholarly journals Health technology assessment of biosimilars worldwide: a scoping review

2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruna de Oliveira Ascef ◽  
Ana Carolina de Freitas Lopes ◽  
Patrícia Coelho de Soárez
Keyword(s):  
Health Technology Assessment ◽  
Scoping Review ◽  
Technology Assessment ◽  
Health Technology

scholarly journals Health technology assessment in Malaysia

2009 ◽  
Vol 25 (S1) ◽  
pp. 224-230 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sadasivan Sivalal
Keyword(s):  
Health Technology Assessment ◽  
Technology Assessment ◽  
Warning System ◽  
Health Technology ◽  
Healthcare Services ◽  
Developed Countries ◽  
Policy Formulation ◽  
Full Potential ◽  
Ministry Of Health ◽  
Guidelines Development

Objectives: Malaysia, as a rapidly developing country, has been facing tremendous pressures in its attempts to maximize scarce resources. Despite this problem, Malaysia has made great strides in developing its health services, and has successfully provided good access to the population to healthcare services, reduced the incidence of many communicable diseases, and improved life expectancies and other global indices of health care, some of which are comparable to that of developed countries.Methods: The Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Unit was set up in Malaysia in August 1995 in the Ministry of Health Malaysia and has since grown tremendously in size and resources. To date, forty-three in-depth assessments have been carried out, and the recommendations of these assessments were subsequently implemented. In addition, approximately 140 rapid assessment reports were produced in response to requests from policy and decision makers. HTA has been able to provide input into formulation of national and Ministry of Health Malaysia policies, and provide a basis for clinical practice guidelines development, input into purchasing decisions, regulation of drugs, as well as advertisements related to health.Results: A major challenge is sustainability of the program, to be able to have trained personnel competent to take on the demanding tasks of assessments and the sustained efforts that are required. In addition, there need to be constant efforts to create awareness of the utility of HTA so that its services are used and its full potential realized. The scope of services may also need to be expanded to include an early warning system.Conclusions: Malaysia has successfully implemented a health technology program that has had major impact on policy formulation and decision making at various levels. Challenges may be faced in sustaining and developing the program further.

PP08 Evaluation Of The Brazilian Health Technology Assessment Network

2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (S1) ◽  
pp. 38-38
Author(s):  
Cecília Menezes Farinasso ◽  
Dalila Fernandes Gomes ◽  
Betânia Ferreira Leite ◽  
Roberta Borges Silva ◽  
Daniela Fortunato Rêgo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Technology Assessment ◽  
Technology Assessment ◽  
Scientific Evidence ◽  
Evaluation Criteria ◽  
Evaluation Process ◽  
Health Technology ◽  
Evaluation Methodology ◽  
Final Report ◽  
Data Collection And Analysis ◽  
Network Identification

IntroductionThe Brazilian Network for Health Technology Assessment (REBRATS) is a network of collaborating centers and teaching and research institutions, focused on the generation and synthesis of scientific evidence in the field of health technology assessment. Currently, the network is composed of 119 member institutions and mobilizes approximately 1,094 researchers and 4,998 relations. The objective of this study was to evaluate the member institutions of REBRATS.MethodsThe evaluation process was developed in seven stages, including the identification of the objectives of the Network; identification of evaluation criteria; selection of performance indicators for each criterion; identification of the measures appropriate to each indicator; data collection and analysis; classification of the institutions and production of the final report.ResultsThe evaluation of the member institutions of REBRATS mapped the capacity of these institutions to produce health technology assessment activities. The evaluation also provided information on the advances and challenges of health technology assessment in the country. In the long term, the initiative will contribute to the strengthening of the evaluation of health technology in Brazil, since the weaknesses of these institutions in the development of activities were mapped.ConclusionsThe production of this study will contribute to the dissemination of the evaluation methodology at the national and international level. This study is one of the few initiatives that exist in the world on the evaluation of networks and will contribute to the strengthening of the evaluation of health technology in Brazil.

OP109 The Need For Building Pharmacists’ Health Technology Assessment Capacity; The Nigerian Scenario

2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (S1) ◽  
pp. 26-26
Author(s):  
Otuto Amarauche Chukwu ◽  
Chizaram Chukwu
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Health Technology Assessment ◽  
Technology Assessment ◽  
Health Technology ◽  
Developed Countries ◽  
Sub Saharan Africa ◽  
Health Coverage ◽  
Healthcare Decision ◽  
Healthcare Decision Making ◽  
Sub Saharan

IntroductionThe role of Health technology assessment (HTA) as a systematic approach in the evaluation of health interventions and technologies is becoming increasingly important as the quest for attaining universal health coverage globally continues to increase. Some developed countries in Europe and the Americas now apply HTA extensively in healthcare policy decisions, however, developing regions and countries like sub-Saharan Africa and Nigeria respectively, seem not to be making significant progress in this area. Given that evidence suggests that Nigeria and indeed several countries in sub-Saharan Africa are performing poorly on most healthcare indices as the region continues to be ravaged by predictable and avoidable epidemics and disease outbreaks, the need to build HTA capacity has never been more paramount.MethodsA review of HTA capability in Nigeria was done. Pharmacists in Nigeria's Capital were randomly sampled. Semi-structured questionnaires were administered. Descriptive statistics were used in data analysis. P values less than 0.05 were considered to be significant.ResultsIn Nigeria, there is no institution tasked with undertaking HTA and there seems to be limited knowledge, capacity and awareness on the issue. Pharmacists, being the most accessible healthcare professionals according to evidence, are a key group that could play an active role in HTA and its implementation in developing countries like Nigeria. However, out of 322 pharmacists randomly sampled, 93 percent were not aware of HTA and its application in healthcare decision-making.ConclusionsThere is no paucity of healthcare programs and plans in Nigeria but they seem to fail due to lack of evidence-based assessment, decision-making and implementation. Hence, there is an increasing need to raise awareness on the importance of HTA in healthcare decision-making; strengthen HTA capacity by developing and sustaining institutional capacity and adequate human resource for HTA; and creating regional annexes of HTA organizations in Africa.

scholarly journals Social values for health technology assessment in Canada: a scoping review of hepatitis C screening, diagnosis and treatment

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Caroline O’Keefe-Markman ◽  
Kristina Dawn Lea ◽  
Christopher McCabe ◽  
Elaine Hyshka ◽  
Tania Bubela
Keyword(s):  
Hepatitis C ◽  
Health Technology Assessment ◽  
Scoping Review ◽  
Technology Assessment ◽  
Social Values ◽  
Health Technology ◽  
Diagnosis And Treatment

scholarly journals From Health Technology Assessment to Health Technology Sustainability

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (12) ◽  
pp. 4748 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesca Iandolo ◽  
Pietro Vito ◽  
Irene Fulco ◽  
Francesca Loia
Keyword(s):  
Health Technology Assessment ◽  
Technology Assessment ◽  
Systems Approach ◽  
Relevant Literature ◽  
Health Technology ◽  
General Reference ◽  
Viable Systems ◽  
Reference Framework ◽  
Political Sustainability ◽  
Interpretative Framework

This paper aims to propose a methodological lens to the assessment of technological innovations in healthcare based on the principles of social, economic, and political sustainability. Starting from the consideration of a lack of a unified interpretative framework of health technology assessment, using a content analysis of the relevant literature on the topic, we identified both the scientific perspectives adopted by the scholars and the most widely discussed topics. Consequently, the less explored scientific areas were framed, and, therefore, those more susceptible to further investigation came to light. The result is an overall picture which highlights the absence of unified and generally accepted approaches to evaluation, together with the lack of awareness on the fact that the multiplicity of methods adopted is essentially connected to the multiplicity of innovations, for each of which a method (or a set of methods) of preferable evaluation can be prefigured. Based on these observations, we propose a general reference framework for evaluation, based on the Viable Systems Approach (vSa), and a schematic outline of the connections between the complexity of innovations and the evaluation methodologies.

scholarly journals THE VULNERABLE ASPECTS OF APPLICATION OF “HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT”

2015 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 197-198 ◽  
Author(s):  
Reza Dehnavieh ◽  
Somayeh Noori Hekmat ◽  
Sara Ghasemi ◽  
Nadia Mirshekari
Keyword(s):  
Health Technology Assessment ◽  
Technology Assessment ◽  
Health Technology ◽  
Developed Countries ◽  
Economic Outcomes ◽  
The Other ◽  
Ethical Aspects ◽  
Health Technologies ◽  
Other Hand ◽  
The World

Many countries in the world have tried to examine the possible methods for import and logical use of health technologies to manage their budgets on one hand and to prevent the entry of uncertain, inefficient, and insecure technologies on the other hand (1). The “health technology assessment” (HTA) is one of the dominant methods in most developed countries (2). HTA is a multidisciplinary field which studies the medical, social, and ethical aspects, as well as economic outcomes of production, diffusion, and application of health technologies (3).

COMPREHENSIVE ASSESSMENT OF COMPLEX TECHNOLOGIES: INTEGRATING VARIOUS ASPECTS IN HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT

2017 ◽  
Vol 33 (5) ◽  
pp. 570-576 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristin Bakke Lysdahl ◽  
Kati Mozygemba ◽  
Jacob Burns ◽  
Jan Benedikt Brönneke ◽  
James B. Chilcott ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Technology Assessment ◽  
Technology Assessment ◽  
Stakeholder Involvement ◽  
Complex Interventions ◽  
Health Technology ◽  
Legal Aspects ◽  
Added Value ◽  
Health Technologies ◽  
Stakeholder Perspectives ◽  
Wide Range

Objectives: Despite recent development of health technology assessment (HTA) methods, there are still methodological gaps for the assessment of complex health technologies. The INTEGRATE-HTA guidance for effectiveness, economic, ethical, socio-cultural, and legal aspects, deals with challenges when assessing complex technologies, such as heterogeneous study designs, multiple stakeholder perspectives, and unpredictable outcomes. The objective of this article is to outline this guidance and describe the added value of integrating these assessment aspects.Methods: Different methods were used to develop the various parts of the guidance, but all draw on existing, published knowledge and were supported by stakeholder involvement. The guidance was modified after application in a case study and in response to feedback from internal and external reviewers.Results: The guidance consists of five parts, addressing five core aspects of HTA, all presenting stepwise approaches based on the assessment of complexity, context, and stakeholder involvement. The guidance on effectiveness, health economics and ethics aspects focus on helping users choose appropriate, or further develop, existing methods. The recommendations are based on existing methods’ applicability for dealing with problems arising with complex interventions. The guidance offers new frameworks to identify socio-cultural and legal issues, along with overviews of relevant methods and sources.Conclusions: The INTEGRATE-HTA guidance outlines a wide range of methods and facilitates appropriate choices among them. The guidance enables understanding of how complexity matters for HTA and brings together assessments from disciplines, such as epidemiology, economics, ethics, law, and social theory. This indicates relevance for a broad range of technologies.

Innovative medical devices and hospital decision making: a study comparing the views of hospital pharmacists and physicians

2016 ◽  
Vol 40 (3) ◽  
pp. 257 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mathilde Billaux ◽  
Isabelle Borget ◽  
Patrice Prognon ◽  
Judith Pineau ◽  
Nicolas Martelli
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Health Technology Assessment ◽  
Medical Devices ◽  
Technology Assessment ◽  
Evaluation Criteria ◽  
Health Technology ◽  
Local Health ◽  
University Hospitals ◽  
Hospital Pharmacists ◽  
Current Practices

Objectives Many university hospitals have developed local health technology assessment processes to guide informed decisions about new medical devices. However, little is known about stakeholders’ perceptions and assessment of innovative devices. Herein, we investigated the perceptions regarding innovative medical devices of their chief users (physicians and surgeons), as well as those of hospital pharmacists, because they are responsible for the purchase and management of sterile medical devices. We noted the evaluation criteria used to assess and select new medical devices and suggestions for improving local health technology assessment processes indicated by the interviewees. Methods We randomly selected 18 physicians and surgeons (nine each) and 18 hospital pharmacists from 18 French university hospitals. Semistructured interviews were conducted between October 2012 and August 2013. Responses were coded separately by two researchers. Results Physicians and surgeons frequently described innovative medical devices as ‘new’, ‘safe’ and ‘effective’, whereas hospital pharmacists focused more on economic considerations and considered real innovative devices to be those for which no equivalent could be found on the market. No significant difference in evaluation criteria was found between these groups of professionals. Finally, hospital pharmacists considered the management of conflicts of interests in local health technology assessment processes to be an issue, whereas physicians and surgeons did not. Conclusions The present study highlights differences in perceptions related to professional affiliation. The findings suggest several ways in which current practices for local health technology assessment in French university hospitals could be improved and studied. What is known about the topic? Hospitals are faced with ever-growing demands for innovative and costly medical devices. To help hospital management deal with technology acquisition issues, hospital-based health technology assessment has been developed to support decisions. However, little is known about the different perceptions of innovative medical devices among practitioners and how different perceptions may affect decision making. What does this paper add? This paper compares and understands the perceptions of two groups of health professionals concerning innovative devices in the university hospital environment. What are the implications for practitioners? Such a comparison of viewpoints could facilitate improvements in current practices and decision-making processes in local health technology assessment for these medical products.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document