Systematic review of current natural language processing methods and applications in cardiology

Heart ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. heartjnl-2021-319769
Author(s):  
Meghan Reading Turchioe ◽  
Alexander Volodarskiy ◽  
Jyotishman Pathak ◽  
Drew N Wright ◽  
James Enlou Tcheng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Natural Language Processing ◽  
Natural Language ◽  
Language Processing ◽  
Clinical Care ◽  
Real World Data ◽  
Clinical Text ◽  
Clinical Notes ◽  
Artery Disease ◽  
Automated Methods

Natural language processing (NLP) is a set of automated methods to organise and evaluate the information contained in unstructured clinical notes, which are a rich source of real-world data from clinical care that may be used to improve outcomes and understanding of disease in cardiology. The purpose of this systematic review is to provide an understanding of NLP, review how it has been used to date within cardiology and illustrate the opportunities that this approach provides for both research and clinical care. We systematically searched six scholarly databases (ACM Digital Library, Arxiv, Embase, IEEE Explore, PubMed and Scopus) for studies published in 2015–2020 describing the development or application of NLP methods for clinical text focused on cardiac disease. Studies not published in English, lacking a description of NLP methods, non-cardiac focused and duplicates were excluded. Two independent reviewers extracted general study information, clinical details and NLP details and appraised quality using a checklist of quality indicators for NLP studies. We identified 37 studies developing and applying NLP in heart failure, imaging, coronary artery disease, electrophysiology, general cardiology and valvular heart disease. Most studies used NLP to identify patients with a specific diagnosis and extract disease severity using rule-based NLP methods. Some used NLP algorithms to predict clinical outcomes. A major limitation is the inability to aggregate findings across studies due to vastly different NLP methods, evaluation and reporting. This review reveals numerous opportunities for future NLP work in cardiology with more diverse patient samples, cardiac diseases, datasets, methods and applications.

scholarly journals The 2019 n2c2/OHNLP Track on Clinical Semantic Textual Similarity: Overview (Preprint)

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yanshan Wang ◽  
Sunyang Fu ◽  
Feichen Shen ◽  
Sam Henry ◽  
Ozlem Uzuner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Natural Language Processing ◽  
Natural Language ◽  
Language Processing ◽  
State Of The Art ◽  
Shared Task ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Clinical Text ◽  
Clinical Notes ◽  
Clinical Domain ◽  
Semantic Textual Similarity

BACKGROUND Semantic textual similarity is a common task in the general English domain to assess the degree to which the underlying semantics of 2 text segments are equivalent to each other. Clinical Semantic Textual Similarity (ClinicalSTS) is the semantic textual similarity task in the clinical domain that attempts to measure the degree of semantic equivalence between 2 snippets of clinical text. Due to the frequent use of templates in the Electronic Health Record system, a large amount of redundant text exists in clinical notes, making ClinicalSTS crucial for the secondary use of clinical text in downstream clinical natural language processing applications, such as clinical text summarization, clinical semantics extraction, and clinical information retrieval. OBJECTIVE Our objective was to release ClinicalSTS data sets and to motivate natural language processing and biomedical informatics communities to tackle semantic text similarity tasks in the clinical domain. METHODS We organized the first BioCreative/OHNLP ClinicalSTS shared task in 2018 by making available a real-world ClinicalSTS data set. We continued the shared task in 2019 in collaboration with National NLP Clinical Challenges (n2c2) and the Open Health Natural Language Processing (OHNLP) consortium and organized the 2019 n2c2/OHNLP ClinicalSTS track. We released a larger ClinicalSTS data set comprising 1642 clinical sentence pairs, including 1068 pairs from the 2018 shared task and 1006 new pairs from 2 electronic health record systems, GE and Epic. We released 80% (1642/2054) of the data to participating teams to develop and fine-tune the semantic textual similarity systems and used the remaining 20% (412/2054) as blind testing to evaluate their systems. The workshop was held in conjunction with the American Medical Informatics Association 2019 Annual Symposium. RESULTS Of the 78 international teams that signed on to the n2c2/OHNLP ClinicalSTS shared task, 33 produced a total of 87 valid system submissions. The top 3 systems were generated by IBM Research, the National Center for Biotechnology Information, and the University of Florida, with Pearson correlations of <i>r</i>=.9010, <i>r</i>=.8967, and <i>r</i>=.8864, respectively. Most top-performing systems used state-of-the-art neural language models, such as BERT and XLNet, and state-of-the-art training schemas in deep learning, such as pretraining and fine-tuning schema, and multitask learning. Overall, the participating systems performed better on the Epic sentence pairs than on the GE sentence pairs, despite a much larger portion of the training data being GE sentence pairs. CONCLUSIONS The 2019 n2c2/OHNLP ClinicalSTS shared task focused on computing semantic similarity for clinical text sentences generated from clinical notes in the real world. It attracted a large number of international teams. The ClinicalSTS shared task could continue to serve as a venue for researchers in natural language processing and medical informatics communities to develop and improve semantic textual similarity techniques for clinical text.

Using Natural Language Processing to Measure and Improve Quality of Diabetes Care: A Systematic Review

2021 ◽  
pp. 193229682110008
Author(s):  
Alexander Turchin ◽  
Luisa F. Florez Builes
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Natural Language Processing ◽  
Natural Language ◽  
Language Processing ◽  
Real World ◽  
Diabetes Care ◽  
Large Fraction ◽  
Real World Data ◽  
Quality Of Diabetes Care

Background: Real-world evidence research plays an increasingly important role in diabetes care. However, a large fraction of real-world data are “locked” in narrative format. Natural language processing (NLP) technology offers a solution for analysis of narrative electronic data. Methods: We conducted a systematic review of studies of NLP technology focused on diabetes. Articles published prior to June 2020 were included. Results: We included 38 studies in the analysis. The majority (24; 63.2%) described only development of NLP tools; the remainder used NLP tools to conduct clinical research. A large fraction (17; 44.7%) of studies focused on identification of patients with diabetes; the rest covered a broad range of subjects that included hypoglycemia, lifestyle counseling, diabetic kidney disease, insulin therapy and others. The mean F1 score for all studies where it was available was 0.882. It tended to be lower (0.817) in studies of more linguistically complex concepts. Seven studies reported findings with potential implications for improving delivery of diabetes care. Conclusion: Research in NLP technology to study diabetes is growing quickly, although challenges (e.g. in analysis of more linguistically complex concepts) remain. Its potential to deliver evidence on treatment and improving quality of diabetes care is demonstrated by a number of studies. Further growth in this area would be aided by deeper collaboration between developers and end-users of natural language processing tools as well as by broader sharing of the tools themselves and related resources.

scholarly journals Natural language processing for abstraction of cancer treatment toxicities: accuracy versus human experts

JAMIA Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julian C Hong ◽  
Andrew T Fairchild ◽  
Jarred P Tanksley ◽  
Manisha Palta ◽  
Jessica D Tenenbaum
Keyword(s):  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Natural Language Processing ◽  
Natural Language ◽  
Language Processing ◽  
Text Analysis ◽  
High Accuracy ◽  
Radiation Dermatitis ◽  
Clinical Text ◽  
Clinical Notes ◽  
Oncology Research

Abstract Objectives Expert abstraction of acute toxicities is critical in oncology research but is labor-intensive and variable. We assessed the accuracy of a natural language processing (NLP) pipeline to extract symptoms from clinical notes compared to physicians. Materials and Methods Two independent reviewers identified present and negated National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0 symptoms from 100 randomly selected notes for on-treatment visits during radiation therapy with adjudication by a third reviewer. A NLP pipeline based on Apache clinical Text Analysis Knowledge Extraction System was developed and used to extract CTCAE terms. Accuracy was assessed by precision, recall, and F1. Results The NLP pipeline demonstrated high accuracy for common physician-abstracted symptoms, such as radiation dermatitis (F1 0.88), fatigue (0.85), and nausea (0.88). NLP had poor sensitivity for negated symptoms. Conclusion NLP accurately detects a subset of documented present CTCAE symptoms, though is limited for negated symptoms. It may facilitate strategies to more consistently identify toxicities during cancer therapy.

scholarly journals Psychiatric stressor recognition from clinical notes to reveal association with suicide

2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 1846-1862 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yaoyun Zhang ◽  
Olivia R Zhang ◽  
Rui Li ◽  
Aaron Flores ◽  
Salih Selek ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Natural Language Processing ◽  
Natural Language ◽  
Language Processing ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Suicidal Behaviors ◽  
Statistical Association ◽  
Clinical Text ◽  
Clinical Notes ◽  
Electronic Health ◽  
F Measure

Suicide takes the lives of nearly a million people each year and it is a tremendous economic burden globally. One important type of suicide risk factor is psychiatric stress. Prior studies mainly use survey data to investigate the association between suicide and stressors. Very few studies have investigated stressor data in electronic health records, mostly due to the data being recorded in narrative text. This study takes the initiative to automatically extract and classify psychiatric stressors from clinical text using natural language processing–based methods. Suicidal behaviors were also identified by keywords. Then, a statistical association analysis between suicide ideations/attempts and stressors extracted from a clinical corpus is conducted. Experimental results show that our natural language processing method could recognize stressor entities with an F-measure of 89.01 percent. Mentions of suicidal behaviors were identified with an F-measure of 97.3 percent. The top three significant stressors associated with suicide are health, pressure, and death, which are similar to previous studies. This study demonstrates the feasibility of using natural language processing approaches to unlock information from psychiatric notes in electronic health record, to facilitate large-scale studies about associations between suicide and psychiatric stressors.

scholarly journals The 2019 n2c2/OHNLP Track on Clinical Semantic Textual Similarity: Overview

10.2196/23375 ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (11) ◽  
pp. e23375 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yanshan Wang ◽  
Sunyang Fu ◽  
Feichen Shen ◽  
Sam Henry ◽  
Ozlem Uzuner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Natural Language Processing ◽  
Natural Language ◽  
Language Processing ◽  
State Of The Art ◽  
Shared Task ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Clinical Text ◽  
Clinical Notes ◽  
Clinical Domain ◽  
Semantic Textual Similarity

Background Semantic textual similarity is a common task in the general English domain to assess the degree to which the underlying semantics of 2 text segments are equivalent to each other. Clinical Semantic Textual Similarity (ClinicalSTS) is the semantic textual similarity task in the clinical domain that attempts to measure the degree of semantic equivalence between 2 snippets of clinical text. Due to the frequent use of templates in the Electronic Health Record system, a large amount of redundant text exists in clinical notes, making ClinicalSTS crucial for the secondary use of clinical text in downstream clinical natural language processing applications, such as clinical text summarization, clinical semantics extraction, and clinical information retrieval. Objective Our objective was to release ClinicalSTS data sets and to motivate natural language processing and biomedical informatics communities to tackle semantic text similarity tasks in the clinical domain. Methods We organized the first BioCreative/OHNLP ClinicalSTS shared task in 2018 by making available a real-world ClinicalSTS data set. We continued the shared task in 2019 in collaboration with National NLP Clinical Challenges (n2c2) and the Open Health Natural Language Processing (OHNLP) consortium and organized the 2019 n2c2/OHNLP ClinicalSTS track. We released a larger ClinicalSTS data set comprising 1642 clinical sentence pairs, including 1068 pairs from the 2018 shared task and 1006 new pairs from 2 electronic health record systems, GE and Epic. We released 80% (1642/2054) of the data to participating teams to develop and fine-tune the semantic textual similarity systems and used the remaining 20% (412/2054) as blind testing to evaluate their systems. The workshop was held in conjunction with the American Medical Informatics Association 2019 Annual Symposium. Results Of the 78 international teams that signed on to the n2c2/OHNLP ClinicalSTS shared task, 33 produced a total of 87 valid system submissions. The top 3 systems were generated by IBM Research, the National Center for Biotechnology Information, and the University of Florida, with Pearson correlations of r=.9010, r=.8967, and r=.8864, respectively. Most top-performing systems used state-of-the-art neural language models, such as BERT and XLNet, and state-of-the-art training schemas in deep learning, such as pretraining and fine-tuning schema, and multitask learning. Overall, the participating systems performed better on the Epic sentence pairs than on the GE sentence pairs, despite a much larger portion of the training data being GE sentence pairs. Conclusions The 2019 n2c2/OHNLP ClinicalSTS shared task focused on computing semantic similarity for clinical text sentences generated from clinical notes in the real world. It attracted a large number of international teams. The ClinicalSTS shared task could continue to serve as a venue for researchers in natural language processing and medical informatics communities to develop and improve semantic textual similarity techniques for clinical text.

scholarly journals Natural Language Processing of Clinical Notes on Chronic Diseases: Systematic Review

10.2196/12239 ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. e12239 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seyedmostafa Sheikhalishahi ◽  
Riccardo Miotto ◽  
Joel T Dudley ◽  
Alberto Lavelli ◽  
Fabio Rinaldi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Natural Language Processing ◽  
Natural Language ◽  
Chronic Diseases ◽  
Language Processing ◽  
Clinical Notes

scholarly journals Interactive Exploration of Longitudinal Cancer Patient Histories Extracted From Clinical Text

2020 ◽  
pp. 412-420 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhou Yuan ◽  
Sean Finan ◽  
Jeremy Warner ◽  
Guergana Savova ◽  
Harry Hochheiser
Keyword(s):  
Natural Language Processing ◽  
Natural Language ◽  
Language Processing ◽  
Data Model ◽  
Qualitative Inquiry ◽  
Clinical Text ◽  
Clinical Notes ◽  
Patients With Cancer ◽  
Interactive Tools ◽  
User Tasks

PURPOSE Retrospective cancer research requires identification of patients matching both categorical and temporal inclusion criteria, often on the basis of factors exclusively available in clinical notes. Although natural language processing approaches for inferring higher-level concepts have shown promise for bringing structure to clinical texts, interpreting results is often challenging, involving the need to move between abstracted representations and constituent text elements. Our goal was to build interactive visual tools to support the process of interpreting rich representations of histories of patients with cancer. METHODS Qualitative inquiry into user tasks and goals, a structured data model, and an innovative natural language processing pipeline were used to guide design. RESULTS The resulting information visualization tool provides cohort- and patient-level views with linked interactions between components. CONCLUSION Interactive tools hold promise for facilitating the interpretation of patient summaries and identification of cohorts for retrospective research.

scholarly journals A deep database of medical abbreviations and acronyms for natural language processing

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisa Grossman Liu ◽  
Raymond H. Grossman ◽  
Elliot G. Mitchell ◽  
Chunhua Weng ◽  
Karthik Natarajan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Natural Language Processing ◽  
Natural Language ◽  
Language Processing ◽  
American English ◽  
Substantial Improvement ◽  
Future Application ◽  
Multiple Sources ◽  
High Coverage ◽  
Clinical Text ◽  
Automated Quality Control

AbstractThe recognition, disambiguation, and expansion of medical abbreviations and acronyms is of upmost importance to prevent medically-dangerous misinterpretation in natural language processing. To support recognition, disambiguation, and expansion, we present the Medical Abbreviation and Acronym Meta-Inventory, a deep database of medical abbreviations. A systematic harmonization of eight source inventories across multiple healthcare specialties and settings identified 104,057 abbreviations with 170,426 corresponding senses. Automated cross-mapping of synonymous records using state-of-the-art machine learning reduced redundancy, which simplifies future application. Additional features include semi-automated quality control to remove errors. The Meta-Inventory demonstrated high completeness or coverage of abbreviations and senses in new clinical text, a substantial improvement over the next largest repository (6–14% increase in abbreviation coverage; 28–52% increase in sense coverage). To our knowledge, the Meta-Inventory is the most complete compilation of medical abbreviations and acronyms in American English to-date. The multiple sources and high coverage support application in varied specialties and settings. This allows for cross-institutional natural language processing, which previous inventories did not support. The Meta-Inventory is available at https://bit.ly/github-clinical-abbreviations.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document