Proton and fluorine magnetic resonance studies of some benzoyl fluoride derivatives. Sensitivity of the fluorine shifts to intramolecular van der Waals interactions and steric effects

1977 ◽  
Vol 55 (22) ◽  
pp. 3936-3941 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ted Schaefer ◽  
Kirk Marat ◽  
Kalvin Chum ◽  
Alexander F. Janzen

The syntheses and the analyses of the high resolution proton and fluorine magnetic resonance spectra of the 3-fluoro-4-methyl-, 2-fluoro-5-chloro-, 2-fluoro-6-chloro-, 2,6-difluoro-, and of the pentafluorobenzoyl fluorides are reported. The spin–spin coupling constants over five bonds between the sidechain fluorine-19 and the ring protons are sensitive to intrinsic substituent perturbations. Their use in the deduction of conformational preferences is much more problematical than is the use of the corresponding proton–proton couplings in benzaldehyde derivatives. The 2-fluoro-6-chloro compound is nonplanar, as indicated by a finite magnitude of the long-range proton–fluorine coupling over six bonds. The nonplanarity is also indicated by a comparison of the through-space fluorine–fluorine coupling to those in the other compounds. The chemical shift of the sidechain fluorine moves to low field by over 35 ppm as the size of the two ortho substituents increases. The individual shifts are discussed in terms of intramolecular van der Waals interactions and of out-of-plane twisting of the COF group.

1979 ◽  
Vol 57 (14) ◽  
pp. 1877-1880 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ted Schaefer ◽  
Harold M. Hutton ◽  
Salman R. Salman

The spin–spin coupling between the proton and the fluorine nuclei, 2J, in fluoroform varies by 1% in a range of solvents. It is argued that 2J decreases algebraically as the van der Waals solute–solvent interactions increase in magnitude. Such a decrease is also observed for coupling constants which likely contain a substantial positive orbital contribution. If the van der Waals interactions perturb the spin–orbital term in J, then 2J in fluoroform may well contain orbital contributions, as recently calculated for 2J in methyl fluoride. In that event, the large discrepancies between observed 2J(H,F) values and those calculated by semiempirical theories of the contact term may be partially attributed to the neglect of orbital terms.


1996 ◽  
Vol 74 (8) ◽  
pp. 1524-1525 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ted Schaefer ◽  
Guy M. Bernard ◽  
Frank E. Hruska

An excellent linear correlation (r = 0.9999) exists between the spin–spin coupling constants 1J(1H,13C), in benzene dissolved in four solvents (R. Laatikainen et al. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 117, 11006 (1995)) and Ando's solvation dielectric function, ε/(ε – 1). The solvents are cyclohexane, carbon disulfide, pyridine, and acetone. 1J(1H,13C)for gaseous benzene is predicted to be 156.99(2) Hz at 300 K. Key words: spin–spin coupling constants, 1J(1H,13C) for benzene in the vapor phase; spin–spin coupling constants, solvent dielectric constant dependence of 1J(1H,13C) in benzene; benzene, estimate of 1J(1H,13C) in the vapor; nuclear magnetic resonance, estimate of 1J(1H,13C) in gaseous benzene.


1969 ◽  
Vol 47 (9) ◽  
pp. 1507-1514 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Schaefer ◽  
S. S. Danyluk ◽  
C. L. Bell

The signs of all proton–proton and proton–fluorine spin–spin coupling constants in 2-fluoro-3-methylpyridine have been determined by double and triple resonance experiments. The signs of the longrange coupling constants, JH,CH3 and JF,CH3 are the same as in fluorotoluene derivatives. Their magnitudes are consistent with the assumption that the nitrogen atom primarily polarizes the σ bonds in the molecule, leaving the π contribution to the long-range coupling relatively unaffected.


1977 ◽  
Vol 55 (3) ◽  
pp. 557-561 ◽  
Author(s):  
William J. E. Parr ◽  
Ted Schaefer

The long-range spin–spin coupling constants between protons bonded to silicon and ring protons in C6H5SiH3, C6H5SiH2Cl, C6H5SiH2CH3, C6H5SiHCl2, and C6H5SiH(CH3)2 are determined from the proton magnetic resonance spectra of benzene solutions. A hindered rotor treatment of the barrier to internal rotation about the C—Si bond, in conjunction with the coupling constants over six bonds, allows the deduction of the low-energy conformations for C6H5SiH(CH3)2 and for C6H5SiHCl2, as well as of barriers of 1.0 ± 0.2 kcal/mol. The approach becomes less reliable for C6H5SiH2CH3 and for C6H5SiH2Cl and, particularly for the latter compound, the derived barrier is very likely an upper limit only. Ab initio molecular orbital calculations of the conformational energies are reported for C6H5SiH3, C6H5SiH2Cl, and for C6H5SiHCl2.


1974 ◽  
Vol 52 (9) ◽  
pp. 1714-1720 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter W. Clark ◽  
John L. S. Curtis ◽  
Philip E. Garrou ◽  
George E. Hartwell

The phosphines PPhn(CH2CH2CH=CH2)3−n, n = 2–0, PPhn(CH2CH2CH2CH=CH2)3−n, n = 1 or 2, and PPh2CH2CH = CH2 have been synthesized and studied by 1H and 31P magnetic resonance. The n.m.r. spectra of PPh2(OCH2CH=CH2), its oxide, O=PPh2(OCH2CH=CH2), and its Arbuzov rearrangement product, O=PPh2(CH2CH=CH2), have been investigated by 31P decoupling of the proton spectrum, selective proton decoupling of the 31P spectrum, and comparison with computer-simulated spectra to determine the spin–spin coupling constants. The n.m.r. spectra of the related oxides O=PPh2CH2CH2CH=CH2, O=P(CH2CH2CH=CH2)3, and O=P(OCH2CH=CH2)3 are also assigned. The data indicate that 3JPH > 2JPH for alkenylphosphines, 2JPH is larger for phosphine oxides than for phosphines, and 3JPH is little changed in comparing phosphorus(III) with phosphorus(V) compounds.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document