Presurgical Evaluation of the Motor Hand Area with Functional MR Imaging in Patients with Tumors and Dysplastic Lesions

Radiology ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 210 (2) ◽  
pp. 529-538 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric Achten ◽  
Graeme D. Jackson ◽  
Julie A. Cameron ◽  
David F. Abbott ◽  
Damien L. Stella ◽  
...  
2007 ◽  
Vol 37 (10) ◽  
pp. 964-974 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chandrasekharan Kesavadas ◽  
Bejoy Thomas ◽  
Sreedharan Sujesh ◽  
Radhakrishnan Ashalata ◽  
Mathew Abraham ◽  
...  

1996 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. E2
Author(s):  
Tarek Ahmed Yousry ◽  
Urs Dieter Schmid ◽  
Dorothea Schmidt ◽  
Thomas Hagen ◽  
Andre Jassoy ◽  
...  

The authors evaluated the anatomical location of the central sulcus (CS) in 24 cerebral hemispheres (eight in which tumors were located centrally, 16 in controls) using: 1) classic anatomical landmarks seen on magnetic resonance (MR) imaging (24 hemispheres); 2) functional MR imaging (24 hemispheres); and 3) intraoperative electrical stimulation mapping (eight hemispheres). On MR imaging the CS was identified with certainty in 79% of hemispheres (four of eight in patients, 15 of 16 in controls). Functional MR imaging identified a parenchymal “motor hand area” in only 83% (20 of 24 hemispheres; five of eight in patients, 15 of 16 in controls); this area was located in the precentral gyrus in 16 (80%) of 20, additionally in the postcentral gyrus in 10 (50%) of 20, and exclusively in the postcentral gyrus in four (20%) of 20. In contrast, functional MR imaging detected one to three sulcal veins presumably draining blood from the adjacent motor hand area in 100% (24 of 24) of the hemispheres studied, and anatomical MR imaging and intraoperative mapping localized these veins in the CS. It is concluded that sulcal veins lying deep within the CS: 1) drain activated blood from the adjacent pre- or postcentral cortex during performance of a motor hand task; 2) can be identified easily with functional MR imaging; and 3) are an anatomical landmark for noninvasive indentification of the CS, and thus the sensorimotor strip. The detection of these veins provides a more consistent landmark than the detection of parenchymal motor areas by functional MR imaging; this technique may be used when classic anatomical landmarks fail to identify the sensorimotor strip.


1996 ◽  
Vol 85 (4) ◽  
pp. 608-617 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tarek Ahmed Yousry ◽  
Urs Dieter Schmid ◽  
Dorothea Schmidt ◽  
Thomas Hagen ◽  
Andre Jassoy ◽  
...  

✓ The authors evaluated the anatomical location of the central sulcus (CS) in 24 cerebral hemispheres (eight in which tumors were located centrally, 16 in controls) using: 1) classic anatomical landmarks seen on magnetic resonance (MR) imaging (24 hemispheres); 2) functional MR imaging (24 hemispheres); and 3) intraoperative electrical stimulation mapping (eight hemispheres). On MR imaging the CS was identified with certainty in 79% of hemispheres (four of eight in patients, 15 of 16 in controls). Functional MR imaging identified a parenchymal “motor hand area” in only 83% (20 of 24 hemispheres; five of eight in patients, 15 of 16 in controls); this area was located in the precentral gyrus in 16 (80%) of 20, additionally in the postcentral gyrus in 10 (50%) of 20, and exclusively in the postcentral gyrus in four (20%) of 20. In contrast, functional MR imaging detected one to three sulcal veins presumably draining blood from the adjacent motor hand area in 100% (24 of 24) of the hemispheres studied, and anatomical MR imaging and intraoperative mapping localized these veins in the CS. It is concluded that sulcal veins lying deep within the CS: 1) drain activated blood from the adjacent pre- or postcentral cortex during performance of a motor hand task; 2) can be identified easily with functional MR imaging; and 3) are an anatomical landmark for noninvasive indentification of the CS and thus the sensorimotor strip. The detection of these veins provides a more consistent landmark than the detection of parenchymal motor areas by functional MR imaging; this technique may be used when classic anatomical landmarks fail to identify the sensorimotor strip.


Radiology ◽  
1995 ◽  
Vol 195 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-29 ◽  
Author(s):  
T A Yousry ◽  
U D Schmid ◽  
A G Jassoy ◽  
D Schmidt ◽  
W E Eisner ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 25 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. S402-S402
Author(s):  
Rong Wang ◽  
Zhonghang Zhao ◽  
David Rushforth ◽  
Tadeusz Foniok ◽  
Jaclyn I Wamsteeker ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sven Nebelung ◽  
Lisa Dötsch ◽  
Justus Schock ◽  
Christiane Kuhl ◽  
Daniel Truhn

2002 ◽  
Vol 46 (5) ◽  
pp. 425
Author(s):  
Ki Bong Yu ◽  
Myung Kwan Lim ◽  
Hyung Jin Kim ◽  
Jun Soo Byun ◽  
Young Kook Cho ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document