Visual-Vestibular Interaction Hypothesis for the Control of Orienting Gaze Shifts by Brain Stem Omnipause Neurons

2007 ◽  
Vol 97 (2) ◽  
pp. 1149-1162 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mario Prsa ◽  
Henrietta L. Galiana
Keyword(s):  
Brain Stem ◽  
Head Movements ◽  
Gaze Control ◽  
Gaze Shifts ◽  
Gaze Shift ◽  
Switching Mechanism ◽  
Interaction Hypothesis ◽  
Visual Vestibular Interaction ◽  
Motor Error ◽  
Gaze Position

Models of combined eye-head gaze shifts all aim to realistically simulate behaviorally observed movement dynamics. One of the most problematic features of such models is their inability to determine when a saccadic gaze shift should be initiated and when it should be ended. This is commonly referred to as the switching mechanism mediated by omni-directional pause neurons (OPNs) in the brain stem. Proposed switching strategies implemented in existing gaze control models all rely on a sensory error between instantaneous gaze position and the spatial target. Accordingly, gaze saccades are initiated after presentation of an eccentric visual target and subsequently terminated when an internal estimate of gaze position becomes nearly equal to that of the target. Based on behavioral observations, we demonstrate that such a switching mechanism is insufficient and is unable to explain certain types of movements. We propose an improved hypothesis for how the OPNs control gaze shifts based on a visual-vestibular interaction of signals known to be carried on anatomical projections to the OPN area. The approach is justified by the analysis of recorded gaze shifts interrupted by a head brake in animal subjects and is demonstrated by implementing the switching mechanism in an anatomically based gaze control model. Simulated performance reveals that a weighted sum of three signals: gaze motor error, head velocity, and eye velocity, hypothesized as inputs to OPNs, successfully reproduces diverse behaviorally observed eye-head movements that no other existing model can account for.

Brain Stem Omnipause Neurons and the Control of CombinedEye-Head Gaze Saccades in the Alert Cat

1998 ◽  
Vol 79 (6) ◽  
pp. 3060-3076 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Paré ◽  
Daniel Guitton
Keyword(s):  
Gaze Control ◽  
Error Signal ◽  
Gaze Shifts ◽  
Gaze Shift ◽  
The Gaze ◽  
Alert Cat ◽  
Motor Error ◽  
Omnipause Neurons ◽  
Gaze Saccades ◽  
Stimulation Of

Paré, Martin and Daniel Guitton. Brain stem omnipause neurons and the control of combined eye-head gaze saccades in the alert cat. J. Neurophysiol. 79: 3060–3076, 1998. When the head is unrestrained, rapid displacements of the visual axis—gaze shifts (eye-re-space)—are made by coordinated movements of the eyes (eye-re-head) and head (head-re-space). To address the problem of the neural control of gaze shifts, we studied and contrasted the discharges of omnipause neurons (OPNs) during a variety of combined eye-head gaze shifts and head-fixed eye saccades executed by alert cats. OPNs discharged tonically during intersaccadic intervals and at a reduced level during slow perisaccadic gaze movements sometimes accompanying saccades. Their activity ceased for the duration of the saccadic gaze shifts the animal executed, either by head-fixed eye saccades alone or by combined eye-head movements. This was true for all types of gaze shifts studied: active movements to visual targets; passive movements induced by whole-body rotation or by head rotation about stationary body; and electrically evoked movements by stimulation of the caudal part of the superior colliculus (SC), a central structure for gaze control. For combined eye-head gaze shifts, the OPN pause was therefore not correlated to the eye-in-head trajectory. For instance, in active gaze movements, the end of the pause was better correlated with the gaze end than with either the eye saccade end or the time of eye counterrotation. The hypothesis that cat OPNs participate in controlling gaze shifts is supported by these results, and also by the observation that the movements of both the eyes and the head were transiently interrupted by stimulation of OPNs during gaze shifts. However, we found that the OPN pause could be dissociated from the gaze-motor-error signal producing the gaze shift. First, OPNs resumed discharging when perturbation of head motion briefly interrupted a gaze shift before its intended amplitude was attained. Second, stimulation of caudal SC sites in head-free cat elicited large head-free gaze shifts consistent with the creation of a large gaze-motor-error signal. However, stimulation of the same sites in head-fixed cat produced small “goal-directed” eye saccades, and OPNs paused only for the duration of the latter; neither a pause nor an eye movement occurred when the same stimulation was applied with the eyes at the goal location. We conclude that OPNs can be controlled by neither a simple eye control system nor an absolute gaze control system. Our data cannot be accounted for by existing models describing the control of combined eye-head gaze shifts and therefore put new constraints on future models, which will have to incorporate all the various signals that act synergistically to control gaze shifts.

scholarly journals Frames of Reference for Gaze Saccades Evoked During Stimulation of Lateral Intraparietal Cortex

2007 ◽  
Vol 98 (2) ◽  
pp. 696-709 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. G. Constantin ◽  
H. Wang ◽  
J. C. Martinez-Trujillo ◽  
J. D. Crawford
Keyword(s):  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Saccadic Eye Movements ◽  
Head Movements ◽  
Gaze Shifts ◽  
Gaze Shift ◽  
Lateral Intraparietal Cortex ◽  
The Gaze ◽  
The Right ◽  
Gaze Position ◽  
Stimulation Of

Previous studies suggest that stimulation of lateral intraparietal cortex (LIP) evokes saccadic eye movements toward eye- or head-fixed goals, whereas most single-unit studies suggest that LIP uses an eye-fixed frame with eye-position modulations. The goal of our study was to determine the reference frame for gaze shifts evoked during LIP stimulation in head-unrestrained monkeys. Two macaques ( M1 and M2) were implanted with recording chambers over the right intraparietal sulcus and with search coils for recording three-dimensional eye and head movements. The LIP region was microstimulated using pulse trains of 300 Hz, 100–150 μA, and 200 ms. Eighty-five putative LIP sites in M1 and 194 putative sites in M2 were used in our quantitative analysis throughout this study. Average amplitude of the stimulation-evoked gaze shifts was 8.67° for M1 and 7.97° for M2 with very small head movements. When these gaze-shift trajectories were rotated into three coordinate frames (eye, head, and body), gaze endpoint distribution for all sites was most convergent to a common point when plotted in eye coordinates. Across all sites, the eye-centered model provided a significantly better fit compared with the head, body, or fixed-vector models (where the latter model signifies no modulation of the gaze trajectory as a function of initial gaze position). Moreover, the probability of evoking a gaze shift from any one particular position was modulated by the current gaze direction (independent of saccade direction). These results provide causal evidence that the motor commands from LIP encode gaze command in eye-fixed coordinates but are also subtly modulated by initial gaze position.

Action of the Brain Stem Saccade Generator During Horizontal Gaze Shifts. I. Discharge Patterns of Omnidirectional Pause Neurons

1999 ◽  
Vol 81 (3) ◽  
pp. 1284-1295 ◽  
Author(s):  
James O. Phillips ◽  
Leo Ling ◽  
Albert F. Fuchs
Keyword(s):  
Brain Stem ◽  
Eye Movement ◽  
Head Movement ◽  
Head Movements ◽  
Gaze Shifts ◽  
Gaze Shift ◽  
The Gaze ◽  
Horizontal Gaze ◽  
Discharge Patterns ◽  
The Brain

Action of the brain stem saccade generator during horizontal gaze shifts. I. Discharge patterns of omnidirectional pause neurons. Omnidirectional pause neurons (OPNs) pause for the duration of a saccade in all directions because they are part of the neural mechanism that controls saccade duration. In the natural situation, however, large saccades are accompanied by head movements to produce rapid gaze shifts. To determine whether OPNs are part of the mechanism that controls the whole gaze shift rather than the eye saccade alone, we monitored the activity of 44 OPNs that paused for rightward and leftward gaze shifts but otherwise discharged at relatively constant average rates. Pause duration was well correlated with the duration of either eye or gaze movement but poorly correlated with the duration of head movement. The time of pause onset was aligned tightly with the onset of either eye or gaze movement but only loosely aligned with the onset of head movement. These data suggest that the OPN pause does not encode the duration of head movement. Further, the end of the OPN pause was often better aligned with the end of the eye movement than with the end of the gaze movement for individual gaze shifts. For most gaze shifts, the eye component ended with an immediate counterrotation owing to the vestibuloocular reflex (VOR), and gaze ended at variable times thereafter. In those gaze shifts where eye counterrotation was delayed, the end of the pause also was delayed. Taken together, these data suggest that the end of the pause influences the onset of eye counterrotation, not the end of the gaze shift. We suggest that OPN neurons act to control only that portion of the gaze movement that is commanded by the eye burst generator. This command is expressed by driving the saccadic eye movement directly and also by suppressing VOR eye counterrotation. Because gaze end is less well correlated with pause end and often occurs well after counterrotation onset, we conclude that elements of the burst generator typically are not active till gaze end, and that gaze end is determined by another mechanism independent of the OPNs.

Rapid horizontal gaze movement in the monkey

1995 ◽  
Vol 73 (4) ◽  
pp. 1632-1652 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. O. Phillips ◽  
L. Ling ◽  
A. F. Fuchs ◽  
C. Siebold ◽  
J. J. Plorde
Keyword(s):  
Eye Movement ◽  
Head Movement ◽  
Vertical Axis ◽  
Head Position ◽  
Head Movements ◽  
Gaze Shifts ◽  
Gaze Shift ◽  
The Gaze ◽  
Small Correction ◽  
Horizontal Gaze

1. We studied horizontal eye and head movements in three monkeys that were trained to direct their gaze (eye position in space) toward jumping targets while their heads were both fixed and free to rotate about a vertical axis. We considered all gaze movements that traveled > or = 80% of the distance to the new visual target. 2. The relative contributions and metrics of eye and head movements to the gaze shift varied considerably from animal to animal and even within animals. Head movements could be initiated early or late and could be large or small. The eye movements of some monkeys showed a consistent decrease in velocity as the head accelerated, whereas others did not. Although all gaze shifts were hypometric, they were more hypometric in some monkeys than in others. Nevertheless, certain features of the gaze shift were identifiable in all monkeys. To identify those we analyzed gaze, eye in head position, and head position, and their velocities at three points in time during the gaze shift: 1) when the eye had completed its initial rotation toward the target, 2) when the initial gaze shift had landed, and 3) when the head movement was finished. 3. For small gaze shifts (< 20 degrees) the initial gaze movement consisted entirely of an eye movement because the head did not move. As gaze shifts became larger, the eye movement contribution saturated at approximately 30 degrees and the head movement contributed increasingly to the initial gaze movement. For the largest gaze shifts, the eye usually began counterrolling or remained stable in the orbit before gaze landed. During the interval between eye and gaze end, the head alone carried gaze to completion. Finally, when the head movement landed, it was almost aimed at the target and the eye had returned to within 10 +/- 7 degrees, mean +/- SD, of straight ahead. Between the end of the gaze shift and the end of the head movement, gaze remained stable in space or a small correction saccade occurred. 4. Gaze movements < 20 degrees landed accurately on target whether the head was fixed or free. For larger target movements, both head-free and head-fixed gaze shifts became increasingly hypometric. Head-free gaze shifts were more accurate, on average, but also more variable. This suggests that gaze is controlled in a different way with the head free. For target amplitudes < 60 degrees, head position was hypometric but the error was rather constant at approximately 10 degrees.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

scholarly journals Electrical Stimulation of the Frontal Eye Field in a Monkey Produces Combined Eye and Head Movements

2000 ◽  
Vol 84 (2) ◽  
pp. 1103-1106 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tyson A. Tu ◽  
E. Gregory Keating
Keyword(s):  
Electrical Stimulation ◽  
Eye Movements ◽  
Head Movements ◽  
Frontal Eye Field ◽  
Gaze Shifts ◽  
Gaze Shift ◽  
Eye Field ◽  
A Site ◽  
Head Rotations ◽  
Stimulation Of

The frontal eye field (FEF), an area in the primate frontal lobe, has long been considered important for the production of eye movements. Past studies have evoked saccade-like movements from the FEF using electrical stimulation in animals that were not allowed to move their heads. Using electrical stimulation in two monkeys that were free to move their heads, we have found that the FEF produces gaze shifts that are composed of both eye and head movements. Repeated stimulation at a site evoked gaze shifts of roughly constant amplitude. However, that gaze shift could be accomplished with varied amounts of head and eye movements, depending on their (head and eye) respective starting positions. This evidence suggests that the FEF controls visually orienting movements using both eye and head rotations rather than just shifting the eyes as previously thought.

scholarly journals Voluntary Control of Multisaccade Gaze Shifts During Movement Preparation and Execution

2010 ◽  
Vol 103 (5) ◽  
pp. 2400-2416 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arjun Ramakrishnan ◽  
Snehal Chokhandre ◽  
Aditya Murthy
Keyword(s):  
Race Model ◽  
Oculomotor System ◽  
Gaze Control ◽  
Inhibitory Process ◽  
Gaze Shifts ◽  
Motor Error ◽  
Average Latency ◽  
Corrective Response ◽  
Different Levels ◽  
Initial Target

Although the nature of gaze control regulating single saccades is relatively well documented, how such control is implemented to regulate multisaccade gaze shifts is not known. We used highly eccentric targets to elicit multisaccade gaze shifts and tested the ability of subjects to control the saccade sequence by presenting a second target on random trials. Their response allowed us to test the nature of control at many levels: before, during, and between saccades. Although the saccade sequence could be inhibited before it began, we observed clear signs of truncation of the first saccade, which confirmed that it could be inhibited in midflight as well. Using a race model that explains the control of single saccades, we estimated that it took about 100 ms to inhibit a planned saccade but took about 150 ms to inhibit a saccade during its execution. Although the time taken to inhibit was different, the high subject-wise correlation suggests a unitary inhibitory control acting at different levels in the oculomotor system. We also frequently observed responses that consisted of hypometric initial saccades, followed by secondary saccades to the initial target. Given the estimates of the inhibitory process provided by the model that also took into account the variances of the processes as well, the secondary saccades (average latency ∼215 ms) should have been inhibited. Failure to inhibit the secondary saccade suggests that the intersaccadic interval in a multisaccade response is a ballistic stage. Collectively, these data indicate that the oculomotor system can control a response until a very late stage in its execution. However, if the response consists of multiple movements then the preparation of the second movement becomes refractory to new visual input, either because it is part of a preprogrammed sequence or as a consequence of being a corrective response to a motor error.

scholarly journals Target modality determines eye-head coordination in nonhuman primates: implications for gaze control

2011 ◽  
Vol 106 (4) ◽  
pp. 2000-2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luis C. Populin ◽  
Abigail Z. Rajala
Keyword(s):  
Nonhuman Primates ◽  
Saccadic Eye Movements ◽  
Head Movements ◽  
Gaze Shifts ◽  
Gaze Shift ◽  
The Gaze ◽  
Midbrain Structure ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Visual Targets ◽  
Time Of Presentation

We have studied eye-head coordination in nonhuman primates with acoustic targets after finding that they are unable to make accurate saccadic eye movements to targets of this type with the head restrained. Three male macaque monkeys with experience in localizing sounds for rewards by pointing their gaze to the perceived location of sources served as subjects. Visual targets were used as controls. The experimental sessions were configured to minimize the chances that the subject would be able to predict the modality of the target as well as its location and time of presentation. The data show that eye and head movements are coordinated differently to generate gaze shifts to acoustic targets. Chiefly, the head invariably started to move before the eye and contributed more to the gaze shift. These differences were more striking for gaze shifts of <20–25° in amplitude, to which the head contributes very little or not at all when the target is visual. Thus acoustic and visual targets trigger gaze shifts with different eye-head coordination. This, coupled to the fact that anatomic evidence involves the superior colliculus as the link between auditory spatial processing and the motor system, suggests that separate signals are likely generated within this midbrain structure.

scholarly journals Matching the Oculomotor Drive During Head-Restrained and Head-Unrestrained Gaze Shifts in Monkey

2010 ◽  
Vol 104 (2) ◽  
pp. 811-828 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bernard P. Bechara ◽  
Neeraj J. Gandhi
Keyword(s):  
Mean Squared Error ◽  
Vestibular Nuclei ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Head Movements ◽  
Abducens Nucleus ◽  
Gaze Shifts ◽  
Gaze Shift ◽  
Head Velocity ◽  
Burst Neurons ◽  
Eye Velocity

High-frequency burst neurons in the pons provide the eye velocity command (equivalently, the primary oculomotor drive) to the abducens nucleus for generation of the horizontal component of both head-restrained (HR) and head-unrestrained (HU) gaze shifts. We sought to characterize how gaze and its eye-in-head component differ when an “identical” oculomotor drive is used to produce HR and HU movements. To address this objective, the activities of pontine burst neurons were recorded during horizontal HR and HU gaze shifts. The burst profile recorded on each HU trial was compared with the burst waveform of every HR trial obtained for the same neuron. The oculomotor drive was assumed to be comparable for the pair yielding the lowest root-mean-squared error. For matched pairs of HR and HU trials, the peak eye-in-head velocity was substantially smaller in the HU condition, and the reduction was usually greater than the peak head velocity of the HU trial. A time-varying attenuation index, defined as the difference in HR and HU eye velocity waveforms divided by head velocity [α = ( Ḣhr − Ėhu)/ Ḣ] was computed. The index was variable at the onset of the gaze shift, but it settled at values several times greater than 1. The index then decreased gradually during the movement and stabilized at 1 around the end of gaze shift. These results imply that substantial attenuation in eye velocity occurs, at least partially, downstream of the burst neurons. We speculate on the potential roles of burst-tonic neurons in the neural integrator and various cell types in the vestibular nuclei in mediating the attenuation in eye velocity in the presence of head movements.

scholarly journals Dissociation of Eye and Head Components of Gaze Shifts by Stimulation of the Omnipause Neuron Region

2007 ◽  
Vol 98 (1) ◽  
pp. 360-373 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neeraj J. Gandhi ◽  
David L. Sparks
Keyword(s):  
Head Movement ◽  
Displacement Vector ◽  
Movement Control ◽  
Head Movements ◽  
Gaze Shifts ◽  
Gaze Shift ◽  
The Gaze ◽  
Movement Component ◽  
Neck Motoneurons ◽  
Stimulation Of

Natural movements often include actions integrated across multiple effectors. Coordinated eye-head movements are driven by a command to shift the line of sight by a desired displacement vector. Yet because extraocular and neck motoneurons are separate entities, the gaze shift command must be separated into independent signals for eye and head movement control. We report that this separation occurs, at least partially, at or before the level of pontine omnipause neurons (OPNs). Stimulation of the OPNs prior to and during gaze shifts temporally decoupled the eye and head components by inhibiting gaze and eye saccades. In contrast, head movements were consistently initiated before gaze onset, and ongoing head movements continued along their trajectories, albeit with some characteristic modulations. After stimulation offset, a gaze shift composed of an eye saccade, and a reaccelerated head movement was produced to preserve gaze accuracy. We conclude that signals subject to OPN inhibition produce the eye-movement component of a coordinated eye-head gaze shift and are not the only signals involved in the generation of the head component of the gaze shift.

Contribution of Head Movement to Gaze Command Coding in Monkey Frontal Cortex and Superior Colliculus

2003 ◽  
Vol 90 (4) ◽  
pp. 2770-2776 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julio C. Martinez-Trujillo ◽  
Eliana M. Klier ◽  
Hongying Wang ◽  
J. Douglas Crawford
Keyword(s):  
Superior Colliculus ◽  
Neural Control ◽  
Significant Contribution ◽  
Head Movements ◽  
Vector Model ◽  
Gaze Control ◽  
Gaze Shift ◽  
Visual Model ◽  
The Gaze ◽  
Supplementary Eye Fields

Most of what we know about the neural control of gaze comes from experiments in head-fixed animals, but several “head-free” studies have suggested that fixing the head dramatically alters the apparent gaze command. We directly investigated this issue by quantitatively comparing head-fixed and head-free gaze trajectories evoked by electrically stimulating 52 sites in the superior colliculus (SC) of two monkeys and 23 sites in the supplementary eye fields (SEF) of two other monkeys. We found that head movements made a significant contribution to gaze shifts evoked from both neural structures. In the majority of the stimulated sites, average gaze amplitude was significantly larger and individual gaze trajectories were significantly less convergent in space with the head free to move. Our results are consistent with the hypothesis that head-fixed stimulation only reveals the oculomotor component of the gaze shift, not the true, planned goal of the movement. One implication of this finding is that when comparing stimulation data against popular gaze control models, freeing the head shifts the apparent coding of gaze away from a “spatial code” toward a simpler visual model in the SC and toward an eye-centered or fixed-vector model representation in the SEF.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document