scholarly journals Diagnostic Value of Subjective Memory Complaints Assessed with a Single Item in Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer’s Disease: Results of the DIAN Study

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christoph Laske ◽  
Hamid R. Sohrabi ◽  
Mateusz S. Jasielec ◽  
Stephan Müller ◽  
Niklas K. Koehler ◽  
...  

Objective. We examined the diagnostic value of subjective memory complaints (SMCs) assessed with a single item in a large cross-sectional cohort consisting of families with autosomal dominant Alzheimer’s disease (ADAD) participating in the Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Network (DIAN).Methods. The baseline sample of 183 mutation carriers (MCs) and 117 noncarriers (NCs) was divided according to Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) scale into preclinical (CDR 0; MCs:n=107; NCs:n=109), early symptomatic (CDR 0.5; MCs:n=48; NCs:n=8), and dementia stage (CDR ≥ 1; MCs:n=28; NCs:n=0). These groups were subdivided by the presence or absence of SMCs.Results. At CDR 0, SMCs were present in 12.1% of MCs and 9.2% of NCs(P=0.6). At CDR 0.5, SMCs were present in 66.7% of MCs and 62.5% of NCs(P=1.0). At CDR ≥ 1, SMCs were present in 96.4% of MCs. SMCs in MCs were significantly associated with CDR, logical memory scores, Geriatric Depression Scale, education, and estimated years to onset.Conclusions. The present study shows that SMCs assessed by a single-item scale have no diagnostic value to identify preclinical ADAD in asymptomatic individuals. These results demonstrate the need of further improvement of SMC measures that should be examined in large clinical trials.

2015 ◽  
Vol 11 (7S_Part_14) ◽  
pp. P660-P661
Author(s):  
Yakeel T. Quiroz ◽  
Rebecca Amariglio ◽  
Daniel C. Aguirre-Acevedo ◽  
Sandra Opoka ◽  
Brendan Pulsifer ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 92-97 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marieke van Oijen ◽  
Frank Jan de Jong ◽  
Albert Hofman ◽  
Peter J. Koudstaal ◽  
Monique M. B. Breteler

2015 ◽  
Vol 11 (7S_Part_12) ◽  
pp. P573-P574
Author(s):  
Christopher R. Nicholas ◽  
N. Maritza Dowling ◽  
Lindsay R. Clark ◽  
Annie M. Racine ◽  
Rebecca L. Koscik ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 308-314 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andria L. Norman ◽  
John L. Woodard ◽  
John E. Calamari ◽  
Evan Z. Gross ◽  
Noelle Pontarelli ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 439-452 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Miley-Akerstedt ◽  
Vesna Jelic ◽  
Kristina Marklund ◽  
Håkan Walles ◽  
Torbjörn Åkerstedt ◽  
...  

Background/Aims: Many patients presenting to a memory disorders clinic for subjective memory complaints do not show objective evidence of decline on neuropsychological data, have nonpathological biomarkers for Alzheimer’s disease, and do not develop a neurodegenerative disorder. Lifestyle variables, including subjective sleep problems and stress, are factors known to affect cognition. Little is known about how these factors contribute to patients’ subjective sense of memory decline. Understanding how lifestyle factors are associated with the subjective sense of failing memory that causes patients to seek a formal evaluation is important both for diagnostic workup purposes and for finding appropriate interventions and treatment for these persons, who are not likely in the early stages of a neurodegenerative disease. The current study investigated specific lifestyle variables, such as sleep and stress, to characterize those patients that are unlikely to deteriorate cognitively. Methods: Two hundred nine patients (mean age 58 years) from a university hospital memory disorders clinic were included. Results: Sleep problems and having much to do distinguished those with subjective, but not objective, memory complaints and non-pathological biomarkers for Alzheimer’s disease. Conclusions: Lifestyle factors including sleep and stress are useful in characterizing subjective memory complaints from objective problems. Inclusion of these variables could potentially improve health care utilization efficiency and guide interventions.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document