scholarly journals Changes in Pore Structure of Coal Caused by CS2 Treatment and Its Methane Adsorption Response

Geofluids ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Run Chen ◽  
Yong Qin ◽  
Pengfei Zhang ◽  
Youyang Wang
Keyword(s):  
Pore Structure ◽  
Adsorption Capacity ◽  
Gas Adsorption ◽  
Recovery Process ◽  
Micropore Volume ◽  
Methane Adsorption ◽  
Coal Bed ◽  
Methane Recovery ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Key Issues

The pore structure and gas adsorption are two key issues that affect the coal bed methane recovery process significantly. To change pore structure and gas adsorption, 5 coals with different ranks were treated by CS2 for 3 h using a Soxhlet extractor under ultrasonic oscillation conditions; the evolutions of pore structure and methane adsorption were examined using a high-pressure mercury intrusion porosimeter (MIP) with an AutoPore IV 9310 series mercury instrument. The results show that the cumulative pore volume and specific surface area (SSA) were increased after CS2 treatment, and the incremental micropore volume and SSA were increased and decreased before and after Ro,max=1.3%, respectively; the incremental big pore (greater than 10 nm in diameter) volumes were increased and SSA was decreased for all coals, and pore connectivity was improved. Methane adsorption capacity on coal before and after Ro,max=1.3% also was increased and decreased, respectively. There is a positive correlation between the changes in the micropore SSA and the Langmuir volume. It confirms that the changes in pore structure and methane adsorption capacity due to CS2 treatment are controlled by the rank, and the change in methane adsorption is impacted by the change of micropore SSA and suggests that the changes in pore structure are better for gas migration; the alteration in methane adsorption capacity is worse and better for methane recovery before and after Ro,max=1.3%. A conceptual mechanism of pore structure is proposed to explain methane adsorption capacity on CS2 treated coal around the Ro,max=1.3%.

scholarly journals Experimental Analysis of Pore Structure and Fractal Characteristics of Soft and Hard Coals With Same Coalification

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barkat Ullah ◽  
Yuanping Cheng ◽  
Liang Wang ◽  
Weihua Yang ◽  
Izhar Mithal Jiskani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pore Structure ◽  
Adsorption Capacity ◽  
Gas Adsorption ◽  
Hysteresis Loops ◽  
Control Measures ◽  
Practical Significance ◽  
Coal Bed ◽  
Hard Coal ◽  
Pore Surface ◽  
Soft Coal

Abstract Accurate and quantitative investigation of the physical structure and fractal geometry of coal has important theoretical and practical significance for coal bed methane and the prevention of dynamic disasters such as coal and gas outbursts. This study investigates the pore structure and fractural characteristics of soft and hard coals using nitrogen and carbon dioxide (N2/CO2) adsorption. Coal samples from Pingdingshan Mine in Henan province of China were collected and pulverized to the required size (0.2-0.25mm). N2/CO2 adsorption tests were performed to evaluate the pore size distribution (PSD), specific surface area (SSA), and pore volume (PV). The pore structure was characterized based on fractural theory. The results unveiled that the strength of coal has a significant influence on pore structure and fracture dimensions. The obvious N2-adsorption isotherms of the coals were verified as Type IV (A) and Type II. The shape of the hysteresis loops indicates the presence of slit-shaped pores. There are significant differences in SSA and PV between both coals. The soft coal showed larger SSA and PV than hard coal that shows consistency with adsorption capacity. The fractal dimensions of soft coal are respectively larger than that of hard coal. The greater the value of D1 (complexity of pore surface) of soft coal is, the larger the pore surface roughness and gas adsorption capacity is. The results enable us to conclude that the characterization of pores and fractures of soft and hard coals is different, tending to different adsorption/desorption characteristics and outburst sensitivity. In this regard, results provide a reference for formulating corresponding coal and gas outburst prevention and control measures.

scholarly journals Isothermal characteristics of methane adsorption and changes in the pore structure before and after methane adsorption with high-rank coal

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (5) ◽  
pp. 1409-1427 ◽  
Author(s):  
Teng Li ◽  
Caifang Wu ◽  
Ziwei Wang
Keyword(s):  
Pore Structure ◽  
Adsorption Capacity ◽  
Low Pressure ◽  
Methane Adsorption ◽  
High Rank ◽  
Excess Adsorption ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Test Pressure ◽  
Isothermal Measurement ◽  
Isothermal Characteristics

The pore structure is an essential factor that influences the isothermal characteristics of methane adsorption of coal, and the pore structure is altered after methane adsorption. In this study, a high-rank coal sample was investigated via methane adsorption isothermal measurement, and changes in the pore structure were studied using low-pressure N2 adsorption and low-pressure CO2 adsorption before and after the methane adsorption. The excess adsorption capacity exhibits a rapid increase at low pressure, reaching a maximum when the test pressure is approximately 8 MPa. Following that, the excess adsorption capacity of the high-rank coal tends to decrease. After the methane adsorption, the pore volume and specific surface area of the micro-, meso-, and macropores increase as compared to those before the methane adsorption, especially for micropores with apertures greater than 0.8 nm and mesopores with apertures below 10 nm. This is mainly caused by high pressure in the methane adsorption, indicating a pressure effect on the pore structure after the methane adsorption. After the methane adsorption, the ratio of pores with various sizes in the high-rank coal is enhanced, but the connectivity for meso- and macropores presents a slight decrease.

scholarly journals Influence of reservoir properties on the methane adsorption capacity and fractal features of coal and shale in the upper Permian coal measures of the South Sichuan coalfield, China

2019 ◽  
Vol 38 (1) ◽  
pp. 57-78 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuan Bao ◽  
Yiwen Ju ◽  
Zhongshan Yin ◽  
Jianlong Xiong ◽  
Guochang Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pore Structure ◽  
Adsorption Capacity ◽  
Gas Adsorption ◽  
Methane Adsorption ◽  
Structure Characterization ◽  
Upper Permian ◽  
Organic Carbon Content ◽  
Reservoir Properties ◽  
Fracture Width ◽  
Coal Measures

Pore structure plays an essential role in the reservoir heterogeneity and methane adsorption capacity. Significant progress has been made in the pore structure classification of porous materials (such as coal and shale). Considering the pore structure characterization of the coal measures and the measuring range of high-pressure mercury intrusion porosimetry and low-pressure N2/CO2 gas adsorption, an integrated classification for coal and shale is provided. They are micropore (<2 nm), mesopore (2–100 nm), macropore A (100 nm–1 µm), macropore B (1–10 µm), and micro-fracture (>10 µm). For coal and shale samples from Guxu mining area, the micropores and mesopores largely control the gas adsorption while micro-fractures and macropore B are significant for the storage and flow of free gas. The fractal dimensions calculated from limited N2 adsorption data are not suitable for the coal samples which are not developed in mesopore and macropore A; these samples are precisely corresponding to the N2 adsorption/desorption isotherms of group B (reversible isotherm). Furthermore, the main factors influencing the methane adsorption capacity of coal and shale in the coal measures are micropore frequency, micro-fracture width, clay mineral composition, and total organic carbon content.

scholarly journals Effect of Kerogen Thermal Maturity on Methane Adsorption Capacity: A Molecular Modeling Approach

Molecules ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 25 (16) ◽  
pp. 3764 ◽  
Author(s):  
Saad Alafnan ◽  
Theis Solling ◽  
Mohamed Mahmoud
Keyword(s):  
Molecular Modeling ◽  
Adsorption Capacity ◽  
Gas Adsorption ◽  
Material Balance ◽  
Methane Adsorption ◽  
Source Rocks ◽  
Thermal Maturity ◽  
Reserve Estimation ◽  
Adsorbed Gas ◽  
Key Factor

The presence of kerogen in source rocks gives rise to a plethora of potential gas storage mechanisms. Proper estimation of the gas reserve requires knowledge of the quantities of free and adsorbed gas in rock pores and kerogen. Traditional methods of reserve estimation such as the volumetric and material balance approaches are insufficient because they do not consider both the free and adsorbed gas compartments present in kerogens. Modified versions of these equations are based on adding terms to account for hydrocarbons stored in kerogen. None of the existing models considered the effect of kerogen maturing on methane gas adsorption. In this work, a molecular modeling was employed to explore how thermal maturity impacts gas adsorption in kerogen. Four different macromolecules of kerogen were included to mimic kerogens of different maturity levels; these were folded to more closely resemble the nanoporous kerogen structures of source rocks. These structures form the basis of the modeling necessary to assess the adsorption capacity as a function of the structure. The number of double bonds plus the number and type of heteroatoms (O, S, and N) were found to influence the final configuration of the kerogen structures, and hence their capacity to host methane molecules. The degree of aromaticity increased with the maturity level within the same kerogen type. The fraction of aromaticity gives rise to the polarity. We present an empirical mathematical relationship that makes possible the estimation of the adsorption capacity of kerogen based on the degree of polarity. Variations in kerogen adsorption capacity have significant implications on the reservoir scale. The general trend obtained from the molecular modeling was found to be consistent with experimental measurements done on actual kerogen samples. Shale samples with different kerogen content and with different maturity showed that shales with immature kerogen have small methane adsorption capacity compared to shales with mature kerogen. In this study, it is shown for the first time that the key factor to control natural gas adsorption is the kerogen maturity not the kerogen content.

scholarly journals Study on the Effect of Soft and Hard Coal Pore Structure on Gas Adsorption Characteristics

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Xun Zhao ◽  
Tao Feng ◽  
Ping Wang ◽  
Ze Liao
Keyword(s):  
Pore Structure ◽  
Adsorption Capacity ◽  
Residence Time ◽  
Coalbed Methane ◽  
Gas Adsorption ◽  
Nitrogen Adsorption ◽  
Hard Coal ◽  
Research Results ◽  
Adsorption Characteristics ◽  
Soft Coal

In order to grasp the effect of soft and hard coal pore structure on gas adsorption characteristics, based on fractal geometry theory, low-temperature nitrogen adsorption and constant temperature adsorption test methods are used to test the pore structure characteristics of soft coal and its influence on gas adsorption characteristics. We used box dimension algorithm to measure the fractal dimension and distribution of coal sample microstructure. The research results show that the initial nitrogen adsorption capacity of soft coal is greater than that of hard coal, and the adsorption hysteresis loop of soft coal is more obvious than that of hard coal. And the adsorption curve rises faster in the high relative pressure section. The specific surface area and pore volume of soft coal are larger than those of hard coal. The number of pores is much larger than that of hard coal. In particular, the superposition of the adsorption force field in the micropores and the diffusion in the mesopores enhance the adsorption potential of soft coal. Introducing the concept of adsorption residence time, it is concluded that more adsorption sites on the surface of soft coal make the adsorption and residence time of gas on the surface of soft coal longer. Fractal characteristics of the soft coal surface are more obvious. The saturated adsorption capacity of soft coal and the rate of reaching saturation adsorption are both greater than those of hard coal. The research results of this manuscript will provide a theoretical basis for in-depth analysis of the adsorption/desorption mechanism of coalbed methane in soft coal seams and the formulation of practical coalbed methane control measures.

scholarly journals Research on the Processes of Injecting CO2 into Coal Seams with CH4 Recovery Using Horizontal Wells

Energies ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 416 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jarosław Chećko ◽  
Tomasz Urych ◽  
Małgorzata Magdziarczyk ◽  
Adam Smolinski
Keyword(s):  
Carbon Dioxide ◽  
Coalbed Methane ◽  
Recovery Process ◽  
Coal Bed ◽  
Structural Parameter ◽  
Storage Site ◽  
Coal Seams ◽  
Methane Recovery ◽  
Enhanced Coalbed Methane Recovery ◽  
Research Activities

The paper presents a research study on modeling and computer simulation of injecting CO2 into the coal seams of the Upper Silesian Coal Basin, Poland connected with enhanced coal bed methane (ECBM) recovery. In the initial stage of the research activities, a structural parameter model was developed specifically with reference to the coal-bearing formations of the Upper Carboniferous for which basic parameters of coal quality and the distribution of methane content were estimated. In addition, a lithological model of the overall reservoir structure was developed and the reservoir parameters of the storage site were analyzed. In the next stage of the research, the static model was supplemented with detailed reservoir parameters as well as the thermodynamic properties of fluids and complex gases. The paper discusses a series of simulations of an enhanced coalbed methane recovery process with a simultaneous injection of carbon dioxide. The analyses were performed using the ECLIPSE software designed for simulating coal seam processes. The results of the simulations demonstrated that the total volume of CO2 injected to a designated seam in a coal mine during the period of one year equaled 1,954,213 sm3. The total amount of water obtained from the production wells during the whole period of the simulations (6.5 years) was 9867 sm3. At the same time, 15,558,906 sm3 of gas was recovered, out of which 14,445,424 sm3 was methane. The remaining 7% of the extracted gas was carbon dioxide as a result of reverse production of the previously injected CO2. However, taking into consideration the phenomena of coal matrix shrinking and swelling, the total amount of injected CO2 decreased to approximately 625,000 sm3.

Effect of nanometer pore structure on methane adsorption capacity in organic-rich shale

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (11) ◽  
pp. 1243-1250 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cheng Zhong ◽  
Qirong Qin ◽  
Cunhui Fan ◽  
Dongfeng Hu
Keyword(s):  
Pore Structure ◽  
Adsorption Capacity ◽  
Methane Adsorption

Interaction between Supercritical CO2 and Coal Petrography

2012 ◽  
Vol 616-618 ◽  
pp. 306-309 ◽  
Author(s):  
Run Chen
Keyword(s):  
Pore Structure ◽  
Supercritical Fluid ◽  
Gas Adsorption ◽  
Coal Bed ◽  
Coal Bed Methane ◽  
Organic Matters ◽  
Coal Swelling ◽  
Coal Petrography

CO2enhanced CBM recovery(CO2-ECBM) is an important way for reducing CO2emission into atmosphere and enhancing coal-bed methane (CBM) recovery. The interaction between supercritical CO2and coal petrography has been investigated since the 1990s. Advances in the interaction between supercritical CO2and coal petrography are reviewed in light of certain aspects, such as the competitive multi-component gas adsorption, sorption-induced coal swelling/shrinkage and the fluid-solid coupling between fluids(such as gas, liquid and supercritical fluid) and coal petrography. It is suggested that a comprehensive feasibility demonstration is necessary for a successful application of the technology for CO2-ECBM. At the same time, it also indicated that there are some questions must be discussed in future, such as the influences on pore structure, coal adsorptivity and permeability of the reaction of ScCO2-H2O and rock and small organic matters are extracted by supercritical CO2.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document